Analysing task design and students’ responses to context-based problems through different analytical frameworks

References

• Adbo, Karina, and Keith S. Taber. 2013. “Developing Chemical Understanding in the Explanatory Vacuum: Swedish High School Students’ Use of an Anthropomorphic Conceptual Framework to Make Sense of Chemical Phenomena.” In Concepts of Matter in Science Education, edited by Georgios Tsaparlis and Hannah Sevian, 347–370. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Aikenhead, Glen S. 2006. Science Education for Everyday Life: Evidence-based Practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Lorin W., and David R. Krathwohl. 2001. A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Addison Wesley Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Andersson, Stig, Artur Sonesson, Ola Svahn, Aina Tullberg, and Lars Rydén. 2008. Gymnasiekemi B [Chemistry B for Upper Secondary School]. Stockholm: Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Avargil, Shirly, Orit Herscovitz, and Yehudit Judy Dori. 2012. “Teaching Thinking Skills in Context-based Learning: Teachers’ Challenges and Assessment Knowledge.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 21: 207–225.10.1007/s10956-011-9302-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, Judith, Cornelia Gräsel, Ilka Parchmann, and David Waddington. 2005. “Context-based and Conventional Approaches to Teaching Chemistry: Comparing Teachers’ Views.” International Journal of Science Education 27 (13): 1521–1547.10.1080/09500690500153808
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, Judith, Gillian Hampden-Thompson, and Fred Lubben. 2011. Schools That Make a Difference to Post-compulsory Uptake of Science: Final Report to the Astra Zeneca Science Teaching Trust. York: University of York, Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, Judith, and Sylvia Hogarth. 2009. “Would You Want to Talk to a Scientist at a Party? High School Students’ Attitude to School Science and to Science.” International Journal of Science Education 31 (14): 1975–1998.10.1080/09500690802425581
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, Judith, Fred Lubben, and Sylvia Hogarth. 2007. “Bringing Science to Life: A Synthesis of the Research Evidence on the Effects of Context-based and STS Approaches to Science Teaching.” Science & Education 91 (3): 347–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernholt, Sascha, Sabina Eggert, and Christoph Kulgemeyer. 2012. “Capturing the Diversity of Students’ Competences in Science Classrooms: Differences and Commonalities of Three Complementary Approaches.” In Making It Tangible – Learning Outcomes in Science Education, edited by Sascha Bernholt, Knut Neumann, and Peter Nentwig, 187–217. Münster: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Bernholt, Sascha, and Ilka Parchmann. 2011. “Assessing the Complexity of Students’ Knowledge in Chemistry.” Chemistry Education Research and Practice 12: 167–173.10.1039/c1rp90021h
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, John B., and Kevin F. Collis. 1982. Evaluating the Quality of Learning: The SOLO Taxonomy. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Black, Paul, Robert McCormock, Mary James, and David Pedder. 2006. “Learning How to Learn and Assessment for Learning: A Theoretical Inquiry.” Research Papers in Education 21 (2): 119–132.10.1080/02671520600615612
   Google Scholar
• Bodner, George M., and Dudley J. Herron. 2002. “Problem-solving in Chemistry.” In Chemical Education: Towards Research-based Practice, edited by John K Gilbert, Onno De Jong, Rosária Justi, David F. Treagust, and Jan H Van Driel, 235–266. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Broman, Karolina, and Ilka Parchmann. 2014. “Students’ Application of Chemical Concepts When Solving Chemistry Problems in Different Contexts.” Chemistry Education Research and Practice 15 (4): 516–529.10.1039/C4RP00051J
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cogill, Adelene, Frank Harriss, Dave Newton, Chris Otter, Gill Saville, Kay Stephenson, Dave Waistnidge, and Ashley Wheway. 2009. Salters Advanced Chemistry: Chemical Storylines A2. 3rd ed. Oxford: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, Louis, Lawrence Manion, and Keith Morrison. 2011. Research Methods in Education. 7th ed. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Commons, Michael Lamport, Edward James Trudeau, Sharon Anne Stein, Francis Asbury Richards, and Sharon R. Krause. 1998. “Hierarchical Complexity of Tasks Shows the Existence of Developmental Stages.” Developmental Review 18 (3): 237–278.10.1006/drev.1998.0467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, Elzbieta, Eugene Kennedy, and Saundra Y. McGuire. 2013. “Effect of Teaching Metacognitive Learning Strategies on Performance in General Chemistry Courses.” Journal of Chemical Education 90 (8): 961–967.10.1021/ed300686h
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denscombe, Martyn. 2010. The Good Research Guide for Small-scale Social Research Projects. 4th ed. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fechner, Sabine. 2009. Effects of Context-oriented Learning on Student Interest and Achievement in Chemistry Education. Berlin: Logos Verlag Berlin GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• Fensham, Peter J. 2009. “Real World Contexts in PISA Science: Implications for Context-based Science Education.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 46 (8): 884–896.10.1002/tea.v46:8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, Kurt W, and Thomas R. Bidell. 2006. “Dynamic Development of Action, Thought, and Emotion.” In Theoretical Models of Human Development, edited by Richard M. Lerner and William Damon, 313–399. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, John K. 2006. “On the Nature of ‘Context’ in Chemical Education.” International Journal of Science Education 28 (9): 957–976.10.1080/09500690600702470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, John K., Astrid M. W. Bulte, and Albert Pilot. 2011. “Concept Development and Transfer in Context-based Science Education.” International Journal of Science Education 33 (6): 817–837.10.1080/09500693.2010.493185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, John R. 1989. The Complete Problem Solver. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Henriksson, Anders. 2011. Syntes – Kemi 1 För Gymnasieskolan [Synthesis – Chemistry 1 for Upper Secondary School]. Malmö: Gleerups.
   Google Scholar
• de Jong, Onno. 2006. “Making Chemistry Meaningful. Conditions for Successful Context-based Teaching.” Educación Química 17: 215–221.
   Google Scholar
• de Jong, Onno. 2008. “Context-based Chemical Education: How to Improve It?” Chemical Education International 8 (1): 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• de Jong, Onno, and Keith S. Taber. 2007. “Teaching and Learning the Many Faces of Chemistry.” In Handbook of Research on Science Education, edited by Sandra K. Abell and Norman G. Lederman, 631–652. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• King, Donna. 2009. “Context-based Chemistry: Creating Opportunities for Fluid Transitions between Concepts and Context.” Teaching Science 55 (4): 13–20.
   Google Scholar
• King, Donna. 2012. “New Perspectives on Context-based Chemistry Education: Using a Dialectical Sociocultural Approach to View Teaching and Learning.” Studies in Science Education 48 (1): 51–87.10.1080/03057267.2012.655037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, Donna, and Stephen M. Ritchie. 2012. “Learning Science through Real-world Contexts.” In Second International Handbook of Science Education, edited by Barry J. Fraser, Kenneth G. Tobin, and Campbell J. McRobbie, 69–79. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7
   Google Scholar
• King, Donna, and Stephen M. Ritchie. 2013. “Academic Success in Context-based Chemistry: Demonstrating Fluid Transitions between Concepts and Context.” International Journal of Science Education 35 (7): 1159–1182.10.1080/09500693.2013.774508
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leou, Mary, Pamela Abder, Megan Riordan, and Uri Zoller. 2006. “Using ‘HOCS-centered Learning’ as a Pathway to Promote Science Teachers’ Metacognitive Development.” Research in Science Education 36: 69–84.10.1007/s11165-005-3916-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy Nahum, Tami, Rachel Mamlok-Naaman, Avi Hofstein, and Keith S. Taber. 2010. “Teaching and Learning the Concept of Chemical Bonding.” Studies in Science Education 46 (2): 179–207.10.1080/03057267.2010.504548
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton, Ference. 2006. “Sameness and Difference in Transfer.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 15 (4): 499–535.10.1207/s15327809jls1504_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakhleh, Mary B., and Richard C. Mitchell. 1993. “Concept Learning versus Problem Solving.” Journal of Chemical Education 70 (3): 190–192.10.1021/ed070p190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nentwig, Peter, Reinhard Demuth, Ilka Parchmann, Cornelia Gräsel, and Bernd Ralle. 2007. “Chemie Im Kontext: Situated Learning in Relevant Contexts While Systematically Developing Basic Chemical Concepts.” Journal of Chemical Education 84 (9): 1439–1444.10.1021/ed084p1439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nentwig, Peter, and David Waddington, eds. 2005. Making It Relevant: Context Based Learning of Science. Münster: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Ngu, Bing Hiong, and Alexander Seeshing Yeung. 2012. “Fostering Analogical Transfer: The Multiple Components Approach to Algebra Word Problem Solving in a Chemistry Context.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 37: 14–32.10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2010. PISA 2009 Results: Executive Summary. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/46619703.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2013. PISA 2012 Results in Focus: What 15-Year-olds Know and What They Can Do with What They Know. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results-overview.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, Jonathan, and Justin Dillon. 2008. Science Education in Europe: Critical Reflections. A Report to the Nuffield Foundation. London: King’s College.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, Jonathan, Shirley Simon, and Sue Collins. 2003. “Attitudes towards Science: A Review of the Literature and Its Implications.” International Journal of Science Education 25 (9): 1049–1079.10.1080/0950069032000032199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overton, Tina, and Jonathan Potter. 2008. “Solving Open-ended Problems, and the Influence of Cognitive Factors on Student Success.” Chemistry Education Research and Practice 9 (1): 65–69.10.1039/b801307c
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parchmann, Ilka, Karolina Broman, Maike Busker, and Julian Rudnik. 2015. “Context-based Learning on School and University Level.” In Chemistry Education: Best Practices, Innovative Strategies and New Technologies, edited by Javier Garcia-Martinez and Elena Serrano-Torregrosa, 259–278. Weinheim: Wiley-VCH.
   Google Scholar
• Pilot, Albert, and Astrid M. W. Bulte. 2006a. International Journal of Science Education Special Issue: Context-based Chemistry Education. Edited by John K. Gilbert, 953–1112. 9 vols. Vol. 28. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pilot, Albert, and Astrid M. W. Bulte. 2006b. “The Use of ‘Contexts’ as a Challenge for the Chemistry Curriculum: Its Successes and the Need for Further Development and Understanding.” International Journal of Science Education 28 (9): 1087–1112.10.1080/09500690600730737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilot, Albert, and Astrid M. W. Bulte. 2006c. “Why Do You ‘Need to Know’? Context-based Education.” International Journal of Science Education 28 (9): 953–956.10.1080/09500690600702462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramsden, Judith M. 1997. “How Does a Context-based Approach Influence Understanding of Key Chemical Ideas at 16?” International Journal of Science Education 19 (6): 697–710.10.1080/0950069970190606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risch, Björn. 2010. Teaching Chemistry around the World. Münster: Waxmann.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, Troy D. 2009. “Situated Learning in Science Education: Socio-scientific Issues as Contexts for Practice.” Studies in Science Education 45 (1): 1–42.10.1080/03057260802681839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salta, Katerina, and Chryssa Tzougraki. 2011. “Conceptual versus Algorithmic Problem-solving: Focusing on Problems Dealing with Conservation of Matter in Chemistry.” Research in Science Education 41: 587–609.10.1007/s11165-010-9181-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sasson Irit, and Yehudit J. Dori. 2012. “Transfer Skills and Their Case-based Assessment.” In Second International Handbook of Science Education, edited by Barry J. Fraser, Kenneth G. Tobin, and Campbell J. McRobbie, 691–709. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, A. Truman. 2006. “Contextualized Chemistry Education: The American Experience.” International Journal of Science Education 28 (9): 977–998.10.1080/09500690600702488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• She, Hsiao-Ching, Meng-Tzu Cheng, Ta-Wei Li, Chia-Yu Wang, Hsin-Tien Chiu, Pei-Zon Lee, Wen-Chi Chou, and Ming-Hua Chuang. 2012. “Web-based Undergraduate Chemistry Problem-solving: The Interplay of Task Performance, Domain Knowledge and Web-searching Strategies.” Computers & Education 59: 750–761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, David K. 2011. “From Crazy Chemists to Engaged Learners through Education.” Nature Chemistry 3 (9): 681–684.10.1038/nchem.1091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuckey, Marc, Avi Hofstein, Rachel Mamlok-Naaman, and Ingo Eilks. 2013. “The Meaning of ‘Relevance’ in Science Education and Its Implications for the Science Curriculum.” Studies in Science Education 49 (1): 1–34.10.1080/03057267.2013.802463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swedish National Agency for Education. 2000. Chemistry Syllabus for Upper Secondary School. Stockholm: The Swedish National Agency for Education.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish National Agency for Education. 2014. “Statistics and Analysis.” Accessed October 20. http://www.skolverket.se/statistik-och-utvardering
   Google Scholar
• Taasoobshirazi, Gita, and Martha Carr. 2008. “A Review and Critique of Context-based Physics Instruction and Assessment.” Educational Research Review 3 (2): 155–167.10.1016/j.edurev.2008.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taasoobshirazi, Gita, and Shawn M. Glynn. 2009. “College Students Solving Chemistry Problems: A Theoretical Model of Expertise.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 46 (10): 1070–1089.10.1002/tea.v46:10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tytler, Russell, and Jonathan Osborne. 2012. “Student Attitudes and Aspirations towards Science.” In Second International Handbook of Science Education, edited by Barry J. Fraser, Kenneth G. Tobin, and Campbell J. McRobbie, 597–625. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Ültay, Neslihan, and Muammer Calik. 2012. “A Thematic Review of Studies into the Effectiveness of Context-based Chemistry Curricula.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 21: 686–701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaino, Katrin, Jack Holbrook, and Miia Rannikmäe. 2012. “Stimulating Students’ Intrinsic Motivation for Learning Chemistry through the Use of Context-based Learning Modules.” Chemistry Education Research and Practice 13: 410–419.10.1039/c2rp20045g
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitelegg, Elizabeth, and Malcolm Parry. 1999. “Real-life Contexts for Learning Physics: Meanings, Issues and Practice.” Physics Education 34 (2): 68–72.10.1088/0031-9120/34/2/014
   Google Scholar
• Zoller, Uri, and Yehudit J. Dori. 2002. “Algorithmic, LOCS and HOCS (Chemistry) Exam Questions: Performance and Attitudes of College Students.” International Journal of Science Education 24 (2): 185–203.10.1080/09500690110049060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zoller Uri, and Tami Levy Nahum. 2012. “From Teaching to KNOW to Learning to THINK in Science Education.” In Second International Handbook of Science Education, edited by Barry J. Fraser, Kenneth G. Tobin, and Campbell J. McRobbie, 209–229. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Zoller, Uri, and Georgios Tsaparlis. 1997. “Higher and Lower-order Cognitive Skills: The Case of Chemistry.” Research in Science Education 27 (1): 117–130.10.1007/BF02463036
   Google Scholar