Science teacher candidates’ perceptions about roles and nature of scientific models

References

• Akerson, V. L., F. Abd-El-Khalick, and N. G. Lederman. 2000. “Influence of a Reflective Explicit Activity-Based Approach on Elementary Teachers' Conceptions of Nature of Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 37 (4): 295–317.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aktan M. B. 2005.Investigation of Prospective Teachers’ Knowledge and Understanding of Models and Modeling and Their Attitudes towards the Use of Models in Science Education. ( Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Purdue University, Indiana, IN.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Balushi, S. M. 2011. “Students’ Evaluation of the Credibility of Scientific Models that represent Natural Entities and Phenomena.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 9: 571–601.10.1007/s10763-010-9209-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Association for the Advancement of Science [AAAS]. 2001. Atlas of Science Literacy. Washington, DC: AAAS and NSTA.
   Google Scholar
• Apaydin, Z., E. O. Cobanoglu, and O. Taskin. 2006. “Evrim Ogretimi Icin Model Onerisi: Soyagaci, Hat Modeli Ve El Modeli Olusturma [a Model Suggestion for Teaching Evolution: Developing Cladogram, Line Model and Hand Model].” Ondokuz Mayis Universitesi Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi 22: 95–108.
   Google Scholar
• Aslan, O., and M. F. Tasar. 2013. “How Do Science Teachers View and Teach the Nature of Science?” A Classroom Investigation. Education and Science 38 (167): 65–80.
   Google Scholar
• Berber, N. C., and H. Guzel. 2009. “Fen Ve Matematik Ogretmen Adaylarinin Modellerin Bilim Ve Fendeki Rolune Ve Amacina Iliskin Algilari [Preservice Science and Mathematics Teachers’ Perceptions about Roles and Goals of Models in Science].” Selcuk Universitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitusu Dergisi 21: 87–97.
   Google Scholar
• Bokulich, A. 2011. How Scientific Models Can Explain. Synthese 180: 33–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cartier, J. L., J. Stewart, and B. Zoellner. 2006. “Modeling & Inquiry in a High School Genetics Class.” The American Biology Teacher 68 (6): 334–340.10.1662/0002-7685(2006)68[334:MIIAHS]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chittleborough, G. D., D. F. Treagust, T. L. Mamiala, and M. Mocerino. 2005. “Students’ Perceptions of the Role of Models in the Process of Science and in the Process of Learning.” Research in Science and Technological Education 23 (2): 195–212.10.1080/02635140500266484
   Google Scholar
• Christofilis, T., and M. Kousathana. 2005, July. Models in Science Teaching. Paper presented at International History, Philosophy, Sociology and Science Teaching Conference, Leeds, England.
   Google Scholar
• Coll, R. K. 2006. “The Role of Models, Mental Models and Analogies in Chemistry Teaching.” In Metaphor and Analogy in Science Education, edited by P. J. Aubusson, A. G. Harrison and S. M. Ritchie, 65–77. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.10.1007/1-4020-3830-5
   Google Scholar
• Coll, R. K., B. France, and I. Taylor. 2005. “The Role of Models and Analogies in Science Education.” International Journal of Science Education 27 (2): 183–198.10.1080/0950069042000276712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, B. A., and M. J. Cullin. 2004. “Supporting Prospective Teachers’ Conceptions of Modeling in Science.” International Journal of Science Education 26 (11): 1379–1401.10.1080/09500690410001673775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullin, M., and B. A. Crawford. 2003. “Using Technology to Support Prospective Science Teachers in Learning and Teaching about Scientific Models.” Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education 2 (4): 409–426.
   Google Scholar
• Dogan, N., and F. Abd-El-Khalick. 2008. “Turkish Grade 10 Students’ and Science Teachers’ Conceptions of Nature of Science: A National Study.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 45 (10): 1083–1112.10.1002/tea.v45:10
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falcao, D., D. Colinvaux, S. Krapas, G. Querioz, F. Alves, S. Cazelli, M. E. Valente, and G. Gouvea. 2004. “A Model-Based Approach to Science Exhibition Evaluation: A Case Study in Brazilian Astronomy Museum.” International Journal of Science Education 26 (8): 951–978.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frigg, R. 2002. Models and Representation: Why Structures Are Not Enough. Measurement in Physics and Economics Project Discussion Paper Series. London, England: London School of Economics.
   Google Scholar
• Giere, R. N. 1988. Explaining Science: A Cognitive Approach. Chicago: Chicago University Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226292038.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Gilbert, S. W. 1991. “Model Building and a Definition of Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 28 (1): 73–79.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, J. K., C. Boulter, and M. Rutherford. 1998. “Models in Explanations, Part 1: Horses for Courses?” International Journal of Science Education 20 (1): 83–97.10.1080/0950069980200106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gobert, J. D., and B. C. Buckley. 2000. “Introduction to Model-Based Teaching and Learning in Science Education.” International Journal of Science Education 22 (9): 891–894.10.1080/095006900416839
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gobert, J. D., and J. Discenna. 1997, March. The Relationship between Students’ Epistemologies and Model-Based Reasoning. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Gobert, J. D., L. O’Dwyer, P. Horwitz, B. C. Buckley, S. Tal Levy, and U. Wilensky. 2010. “Examining the Relationship between Students’ Understanding of the Nature of Models and Conceptual Learning in Biology, Physics, and Chemistry.” International Journal of Science Education, (IFirst), 891–894.
   Google Scholar
• Godfrey-Smith, P. 2006. “The Strategy of Model-Based Science.” Biology and Philosophy 21: 725–740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosslight, L., C. Unger, E. Jay, and C. L. Smith. 1991. “Understanding Models and Their Use in Science: Conceptions of Middle and High School Students and Experts.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 28 (9): 799–822.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunes, B., C. Gulcicek, and N. Bagci. 2004. “Egitim Fakultelerindeki Fen Ve Matematik Ogretim Elemanlarinin Model Ve Modelleme Hakkindaki Goruslerinin Incelenmesi [Investigating Science and Mathematics Education Academic Staff’s Views of Models and Modeling].” Turk Fen Egitimi Dergisi 1 (1): 35–48.
   Google Scholar
• Halloun, I. 2007. “Mediated Modeling in Science Education.” Science and Education 16: 653–697.10.1007/s11191-006-9004-3
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, A. G. 2001. “How Do Teachers and Textbook Writers Model Scientific Ideas for Students?” Research in Science Education 31 (3): 401–435.10.1023/A:1013120312331
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, A. G., and D. F. Treagust. 1996. “Secondary Students’ Mental Models of Atoms and Molecules: Implications for Teaching Chemistry.” Science Education 80 (5): 509–534.10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199609)80:5<>1.0.CO;2-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, A. G., and D. F. Treagust. 1998. “Modeling in Science Lessons: Are There Better Ways to Learn with Models?” School Science and Mathematics 98 (8): 420–429.10.1111/ssm.1998.98.issue-8
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, A. G., and D. F. Treagust. 2000a. “Learning about Atoms, Molecules and Chemical Bonds: A Case Study of Multiple-Model Use in Grade 11 Chemistry.” Science Education 84: 352–381.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-237X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, A. G., and D. F. Treagust. 2000b. “A Typology of School Science Models.” International Journal of Science Education 22 (9): 1011–1026.10.1080/095006900416884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitt, A., O. White, and D. Hanson. 2005. “Popping the Kernel: Modeling the States of Matter.” Science Scope 28 (4): 39–41.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, T. 1995. “Secondary Mathematics Modeling: Issues and Challenges.” School Science and Mathematics 95: 351–358.10.1111/ssm.1995.95.issue-7
   Google Scholar
• Justi, R. S., and J. K. Gilbert. 2000. “History and Philosophy of Science through Models: Some Challenges in the Case of ‘the Atom’.” International Journal of Science Education 22 (9): 993–1009.10.1080/095006900416875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Justi, R. S., and J. K. Gilbert. 2002. “Modeling, Teachers’ Views on the Nature of Modeling, and Implications for the Education of Modelers.” International Journal of Science Education 24 (4): 369–387.10.1080/09500690110110142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Justi, R. S., and J. K. Gilbert. 2003. “Teachers’ Views on the Nature of Models.” International Journal of Science Education 25 (11): 1369–1386.10.1080/0950069032000070324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Justi, R. S., and J. van Driel. 2005a. “The Development of Science Teachers’ Knowledge on Models and Modeling: Promoting, Characterizing, and Understanding the Process.” International Journal of Science Education 27 (5): 549–573.10.1080/0950069042000323773
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Justi, R. S., and J. van Driel. 2005b. “A Case Study of the Development of a Beginning Chemistry Teacher’s Knowledge about Models and Modeling.” Research in Science Education 35: 197–219.10.1007/s11165-004-7583-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. G. 2007. “Nature of Science: Past, Present, and Future.” In Handbook of Research on Science Education, edited by S. K. Abell and N. G. Lederman, 831–879. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. G., F. Abd-El-Khalick, R. L. Bell, and R. S. Schwartz. 2002. “Views of Nature of Science Questionnaire: Toward Valid and Meaningful Assessment of Learners’ Conceptions of Nature of Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39 (6): 497–521.10.1002/(ISSN)1098-2736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mashhadi, A. 1999. “Enhancing Students’ Understanding of the Nature of Science.” Teaching and Learning 19 (2): 84–89.
   Google Scholar
• McComas, W. F. 1998. “The Principal Elements of the Nature of Science: Dispelling the Myths.” In The Nature of Science in Science Education, edited by W. F. McComas, 53–70. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B. 1998. Qualitative Research and Case Study Applications in Education. Rev ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of National Education [MoNE]. 2013. Elementary Science Education Course Program. Ankara, Turkey: Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 1996. National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petridou, E., D. Psillos, E. Hatzikraniotis, and J. Viiri. 2009. “Design and Development of a Microscopic Model for Polarization.” Physics Education 44 (6): 589–598.10.1088/0031-9120/44/6/003
   Google Scholar
• Roth, W. M., G. M. Bowen, and M. K. McGinn. 1999. “Differences in Graph-Related Practices between High School Biology Textbooks and Scientific Ecology Journals.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 36: 977–1019.10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199911)36:9<>1.0.CO;2-N
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, R. S., and B. Skjold. 2012. “Teaching about Scientific Models in a Science Content Course.” Educacion Quimica 23 (4): 451–457.
   Google Scholar
• Taber, K. S. 2008. “Towards a Curricular Model of the Nature of Science.” Science and Education 17: 179–218.10.1007/s11191-006-9056-4
   Google Scholar
• Treagust, D. F., G. Chittleborough, and T. L. Mamiala. 2002. “Students’ Understanding of the Role of Scientific Models in Learning Science.” International Journal of Science Education 24 (4): 357–368.10.1080/09500690110066485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treagust, D. F., G. Chittleborough, and T. L. Mamiala. 2004. “Students' Understanding of the Descriptive and Predictive Nature of Teaching Models in Organic Chemistry.” Research in Science Education 34: 1–20.10.1023/B:RISE.0000020885.41497.ed
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Valk, T., J. H. Van Driel, and W. De Vos. 2007. “Common Characteristics of Models in Present-Day Scientific Practice.” Research in Science Education 37: 469–488.10.1007/s11165-006-9036-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Driel, J. H., and N. Verloop. 1999. “Teachers’ Knowledge of Models and Modeling in Science.” International Journal of Science Education 21 (11): 1141–1153.10.1080/095006999290110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahbeh, N., and F. Abd-El-Khalick. 2014. “Revisiting the Translation of Nature of Science Understandings into Instructional Practice: Teachers' Nature of Science Pedagogical Content Knowledge.” International Journal of Science Education 36 (3): 425–466.10.1080/09500693.2013.786852
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yenilmez Turkoglu, A. 2013. “Investigating Pre-Service Science Teachers' Understandings and Use of Models.” Unpublished doctoral diss., Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2011. Qualitative Research from Start to Finish. New York: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar