Using metacognitive strategies in teaching to facilitate understanding of light concepts among year 9 students

References

• Asan, A. 2007. “Concept Mapping in Science Class: A Case Study of Fifth Grade Students.” Educational Technology & Society 10 (1): 186–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azevedo, R. 2009. “Theoretical, Conceptual, Methodological, and Instructional Issues in Research on Metacognition and Self-Regulated Learning: A Discussion.” Metacognition and Learning 4 (1): 87–95.10.1007/s11409-009-9035-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cartwright-Hatton, S., A. Mather, V. Illingworth, J. Brocki, R. Harrington, and A. Wells. 2002. “Development and Preliminary Validation of Meta-Cognitions Questionnaire - Adolescent Version.” Anxiety Disorders 18 (2004): 411–422.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., L. Manion, and K. Morrison. 2011. Research Methods in Education. 7th ed. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cook-Sather, A. 2011. “Layered Learning: Student Consultants Deepening Classroom and Life Lessons.” Educational Action Research 19 (1): 41–57.10.1080/09650792.2011.547680
   Google Scholar
• Dutke, S., J. Barenberg, and C. Leopold. 2010. “Learning from Text: Knowing the Test Format Enhanced Metacognitive Monitoring.” Metacognition and Learning 5 (2): 195–206.10.1007/s11409-010-9057-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, J. A., L.-J. Costa, and K. Dellinger. 2011. “Analysis of Self-Regulated Learning Processing Using Statistical Models for Count Data.” Metacognition and Learning 6: 275–301.10.1007/s11409-011-9078-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hacker, D. J., J. Dunlosky, and A. C. Graser. 1998. Metacognition in Educational Theory and Practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Hartman, H. J. 2001. Metacognition in Learning and Instruction: Theory, Research and Practice. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/978-94-017-2243-8
   Google Scholar
• Huff, J. D., and J. L. Nietfeld. 2009. “Using Strategy Instruction and Confidence Judgements to Improve Metacognitive Monitoring.” Metacognition and Learning 4 (2): 161–176.10.1007/s11409-009-9042-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolencik, P. L., and S. A. Hillwig. 2011. Encouraging Metacognition: Supporting Learners through Metacognitive Teaching Strategies. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ku, K. Y. L., and I. T. Ho. 2010. “Metacognitive Strategies That Enhance Critical Thinking.” Metacognition and Learning 5: 251–267.10.1007/s11409-010-9060-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larkin, S. 2006. “Collaborative Group Work and Individual Development of Metacognition in the Early Years.” Research in Science Education 36: 7–27.10.1007/s11165-006-8147-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leutwyler, B. 2009. “Metacognitive Learning Strategies: Differential Development Patterns in High School.” Metacognition and Learning 4: 111–123.10.1007/s11409-009-9037-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magno, C. 2010. “The Role of Metacognitive Skills in Developing Critical Thinking.” Metacognition and Learning 5: 137–156.10.1007/s11409-010-9054-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLoughlin, C., A. Taji. 2005. Teaching in the Sciences: Learner-Centred Approaches. Binghamton, NY: The Haworth Press Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Phelps, R., A. Ellis, and S. Hase. 2001. “The Role of Metacognitive and Reflective Learning Processes in Developing Capable Computer Users.” Paper presented at the 18th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education. ( ASCILITE), Melbourne, Australia, December.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. 2000. “Multiple Goals, Multiple Pathways: The Role of Goal Orientation in Learning and Achievement.” Journal of Educational Psychology 92 (3): 544–555.10.1037/0022-0663.92.3.544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., and E. V. de Groot. 1990. “Motivational and Self-Regulated Learning Components of Classroom Academic Performance.” Journal of Educational Psychology 82 (1): 33–40.10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchhart, R., T. Turner, and L. Hadar. 2009. “Uncovering Students’ Thinking about Thinking Using Concept Maps.” Metacognition and Learning 4 (2): 145–159.10.1007/s11409-009-9040-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saab, N., W. R. Van Joolingen, and B. Van Hout-Wolters. 2011. “Support of the Collaborative Inquiry Learning Process: Influence of Support on Task and Team Regulation.” Metacognition and Learning 7: 7–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schellings, G. 2011. “Applying Learning Strategy Questionnaires: Problems and Possibilities.” Metacognition and Learning 6: 91–109.10.1007/s11409-011-9069-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schraw, G. 2009. “A Conceptual Analysis of Five Measures of Metacognitive Monitoring.” Metacognition and Learning 4 (1): 33–45.10.1007/s11409-008-9031-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schraw, G., K. J. Crippen, and K. Hartley. 2006. “Promoting Self-Regulation in Science Education: Metacognition as Part of a Broader Perspective on Learning.” Research in Science Education 36: 111–139.10.1007/s11165-005-3917-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, G. P. 2003. “Conceptualisation, Development and Validation of an Instrument for Investigating the Metacognitive Orientation of Science Classroom Learning Environments: The Metacognitive Orientation Learning Environment Scale-Science (MOLES-S).” Learning Environments Research 6: 175–197.10.1023/A:1024943103341
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, G. P. 2006. “An Investigation of the Metacognitive Orientation of Confucian-Heritage Culture and Non-Confucian-Heritage Culture Science Classroom Learning Environments in Hong Kong.” Research in Science Education 36: 85–109.10.1007/s11165-005-3915-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanides, J., Y. Yin, M. Tomita, and M. A. Ruiz-Primo. 2005. “Using Concept Maps in the Science Classroom.” Science Scope 28 (8): 27–29.
   Google Scholar
• Veenman, M. V. J. 2011. “Alternative Assessment of Strategy Use with Self-Report Instruments: A Discussion.” Metacognition and Learning 6: 205–211.10.1007/s11409-011-9080-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veenman, M. V. J. 2012. “Metacognition in Science Education: Definitions, Constituents, and Their Intricate Relation with Cognition.” In Metacognition in Science Education: Trends in Current Research, edited by A. Zohar and Y. J. Dori, 21–36. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-2132-6
   Google Scholar
• Veenman, M. V. J., and M. A. Spaans. 2005. “Relation between Intellectual and Metacognitive Skills: Age and Task Differences.” Learning and Individual Differences 15 (2): 159–176.10.1016/j.lindif.2004.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veenman, M. V. J., P. Wilhelm, and J. J. Beishuizen. 2004. “The Relation between Intellectual and Metacognitive Skills from a Developmental Perspective.” Learning and Instruction 14 (1): 89–109.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2003.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, N. S., and H. Bai. 2010. “The Relationships and Impact of Teachers’ Metacognitive Knowledge and Pedagogical Understandings of Metacognition.” Metacognition and Learning 5: 269–288.10.1007/s11409-010-9062-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., and D. H. Schunk. 2001. Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement: Theoretical Perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Zohar, A., and A. B. David. 2009. “Paving a Clear Path in a Thick Forest: A Conceptual Analysis of a Metacognitive Component.” Metacognition and Learning 4: 177–195.10.1007/s11409-009-9044-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar