The use of organising purposes in science instruction as a scaffolding mechanism to support progressions: a study of talk in two primary science classrooms

References

• Biesta, G. J., and N. C. Burbules. 2003. Pragmatism and Educational Research. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 1938/1997. Experience and Education. New York: Touchstone.
   Google Scholar
• Duschl, R. A. 2008. “Science Education in Three-Part Harmony: Balancing Conceptual, Epistemic, and Social Learning Goals.” Review of Research in Education 32: 268–291.10.3102/0091732X07309371
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duschl, R. A., S. Maeng, and A. Sezen. 2011. “Learning Progressions and Teaching Sequences: A Review and Analysis.” Studies in Science Education 47 (2): 123–182.10.1080/03057267.2011.604476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Boston, MA: Northeastern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hamza, K. M. 2013. “Distractions in the School Science Laboratory.” Research in Science Education 43: 1477–1499.10.1007/s11165-012-9316-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubber, P., R. Tytler, and F. Haslam. 2010. “Teaching and Learning about Force with a Representational Focus: Pedagogy and Teacher Change.” Research in Science Education 40: 5–28.10.1007/s11165-009-9154-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, A.-M., and P.-O. Wickman. 2011. Book Chapter. Leverkusen: Barbara Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, G. J., C. Chen, and T. Crawford. 1998. “Methodological Considerations for Studying Science-in-the-Making in Educational Settings.” Research in Science Education 28 (1): 23–49.10.1007/BF02461640
   Google Scholar
• KVA, Royal Swedish Academy of Science, & IVA, Royal Swedish Academy of Engineering Science. 2006. Fast eller flytande, handledning för lärare [Solid or Fluent, Tutorial for Teachers]. Eskilstuna: Bording. http://www.ntaskolutveckling.se/Teman/Fast-eller-flytande1/.
   Google Scholar
• Lave, J. 1996. “The Practice of Learning.” In Understanding Practice: Perspective on Activity and Context, edited by S. Chaiklin and J. Lave, 3–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. L. 1990. Talking Science: Language, Learning and Values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, I., and J. Mitchell. 2011. “Taking Metacognition a Step Further: Teachers Sharing Pedagogical Purposes.” In Navigating in Educational Contexts, edited by A. Lauriala, R. Rajala, H. Ruokamo, and O. Ylitapio-Mäntylä, 117–136. Rotterdam: Sense.10.1007/978-94-6091-522-2
   Google Scholar
• Mortimer, E. F., and P. H. Scott. 2003. Meaning Making in Secondary Science Classrooms. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2007. Taking Science to School: Learning and Teaching Science in Grade K-8. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Plummer, J. D. 2009. “Early Elementary Students’ Development of Astronomy Concepts in the Planetarium.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 46: 192–209.10.1002/tea.v46:2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plummer, J. D., and J. S. Krajcik. 2010. “Building a Learning Progression for Celestial Motion: Elementary Levels from an Earth-Based Perspective.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 47: 768–787.10.1002/tea.20355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prain, V., and B. Hand. 2005. “Language, Learning and Science Literacy.” In Elementary Science Teacher Education; International Perspectives on Contemporary Issues and Practice, edited by K. Appelton, 153–174. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Säljö, R., and K. Bergqvist. 1997. “Seeing the Light: Discourse and Practice in the Optics Lab.” In Discourse, Tools and Reasoning, edited by L. B. Resnick, R. Säljö, C. Pontecorvo, and B. Burge, 385–405. Berlin: Springer.10.1007/978-3-662-03362-3
   Google Scholar
• Schoultz, J., R. Säljö, and J. Wyndhamn. 2001. “Heavenly Talk: Discourse, Artifacts, and Children’s Understanding of Elementary Astronomy.” Human Development 44: 103–118.10.1159/000057050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwab, J. J. 1978. “The Nature of Scientific Knowledge as Related to Liberal Education.” In Science, Curriculum and Liberal Education, Selected Esseays, edited by I. Westbury and N. J. Wilkof (Red.), 68–104. London: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• The Swedish National Agency for Education. 2004. Nationella utvärderingen av grundskolan 2003. Sammanfattande huvudrapport [National Evaluation of Elementary School 2003. Summary Main Report. National Evaluation of Elementary School 2003. Summary Main Report]. Stockholm: The Swedish National Agency for Education. http://www.distans.hkr.se/ita101/Texter/nationella%20utvarderingen_2003_sammanfattning.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Tomkins, S. P., and S. D. Tunnicliffe. 2001. “Looking for Ideas: Observation, Interpretation and Hypothesis-Making by 12-Year-Old Pupils Undertaking Science Investigations.” International Journal of Science Education 23: 791–813.10.1080/09500690119322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind in Society. The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wickman, P.-O. 2012. Using Pragmatism to Develop Didactics in Sweden. Zeitschrift fűr Erziehungswissenschaft 15 (2): 483–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickman, P.-O., and F. Ligozat. 2011. Book Chapter. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Yore, L. D., G. L. Bisanz, and B. M. Hand. 2003. “Examining the Literacy Component of Science Literacy: 25 Years of Language Arts and Science Research.” International Journal of Science Education 25 (6): 689–725.10.1080/09500690305018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar