The effect of integrating lab experiments in electronic circuits into mathematic studies – a case study

References

• Anderson, Kelly M. 2007. “Tips for Teaching: Differentiating Instruction to Include All Students.” Preventing School Failure 51 (3): 49–54.
   Google Scholar
• Angell, Carl, Oystein Guttersrud, Ellen K. Henriksen, and Anders Isnes 2004. “Physics: Frightful, but Fun. Pupils' and Teachers' Views of Physics and Physics Teaching.” Science Education 88 (5): 683–706. doi:10.1002/sce.10141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, Louise, Osborne Jonathan, and DeWitt Jennifer. 2012. Ten Science Facts and Fictions: The Case for Early Education about STEM Careers. London: King’s College London, the ASPIRES Project. http://www.kcl.ac.uk/sspp/departments/education/research/aspires/10FactsandFictionsfinalversion.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Barak, Miri, Judson Harward, George Kocur, and Steven Lerman. 2007. “Transforming an Introductory Programming Course: From Lectures to Active Learning via Wireless Laptops.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 16 (4): 325–336.10.1007/s10956-007-9055-5
   Google Scholar
• Berlin, Donna F., and Arthur L. White. 1995. “Using Technology in Assessing Integrated Science and Mathematics Learning.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 4 (1): 47–56.10.1007/BF02211581
   Google Scholar
• Bernhard, Jonte. 2010. “Insightful Learning in the Laboratory: Some Experiences from 10 Years of Designing and Using Conceptual Labs.” European Journal of Engineering Education 35 (3): 271–287.10.1080/03043791003739759
   Google Scholar
• Bronson, Richard, and Gabriel B. Costa. 2006. Differential Equations, Schaum’s Outline Series. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, Donald T., and Julian C. Stanley. 1963. Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Designs for Research. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Carstensen, Anna-Kari, and Jonte Bernhard. 2009. “Student Learning in an Electric Circuit Theory Course: Critical Aspects and Task Design.” European Journal of Engineering Education 34 (4): 393–408.10.1080/03043790902990315
   Google Scholar
• Ciptowiyono, Iswanti. (2015, June 29 – July 2). Engineering Students’ Difficulties in Learning Complex Numbers. 43rd Annual SEFI Conference, Orleans, France. http://www.sefi.be/conference-2015/CHAP%203.%20Mathematics%20and%20Engineering%20Education/56274-%20I.%20CIPTOWIYONO.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Felder, Richard M., and Linda K. Silverman. 1988. “Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education.” Journal of Engineering Education 78 (7): 674–681. http://www4.ncsu.edu/unity/lockers/users/f/felder/public/Papers/LS-1988.pdf.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flateby, Teresa L.. 2014. A Guide for Writing and Improving Achievement Tests. Tampa, FL: Univ. of South Florida. http://www.usf.edu/provost/documents/assessment/resources-guideforwritingandimprovingachievementtests.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, Genevieve M. 2009. “Instructionism and Constructivism: Reconciling Two Very Good Ideas.” International Journal of Special Education 24 (3): 90–98. ERIC No. ED490726.
   Google Scholar
• Kaput, James J. 2000. “Teaching and Learning a New Algebra with Understanding.” National Center for Improving Student Learning and Achievements in Mathematics and Science: 1–35. ERIC No. ED 441 662.
   Google Scholar
• Leonard Gelfand Center for Service Learning and Outreach at Carnegie Mellon University and The Intermediate Unit 1 Center for STEM Education 2008. STEM Education in Southwestern Pennsylvania, Report of a Project to Identify the Missing Components. http://www.cmu.edu/gelfand/documents/stem-survey-report-cmu-iu1.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, Holi M. 2008. “Meeting the Needs of All Students through Differentiated Instruction: Helping Every Child Reach and Exceed Standards.” The Clearing House 81 (4): 161–164.10.3200/TCHS.81.4.161-164
   Google Scholar
• Ling-shin, Han. 1994. Complex Numbers and Geometry. Washington D.C.: Mathematical Association of America.
   Google Scholar
• Lo, Mun L. 2012. Variation Theory and the Improvement of Teacing and Learning. https://gupea.ub.gu.se/bitstream/2077/29645/5/gupea_2077_29645_5.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Papert, Seymour. 1980. Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Papert, Seymour. 1993. The Children’s Machine: Rethinking School in the Age of Computer. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Plants, H. L., R. K. Dean, J. T. Sears, and W. S. Venable. 1980. “A Taxonomy of Problem Solving Activities and Its Implication for Teaching” In The Teaching of Elementary Problem Solving in Engineering and Related Fields, edited by James L. Lubkin, 21–34. Washington D.C.: American Society for Engineering Education. ERIC No. ED 243714.
   Google Scholar
• Rawlins, John C. 2000. Basic AC Circuits. 2nd ed. Boston: Newnes.
   Google Scholar
• Rock, Marica L., Madeleine Gregg, Edwin Ellis, and Robert A. Gable. 2008. “REACH: A Framework for Differentiating Classroom Instruction.” Preventing School Failure 52 (2): 31–47.10.3200/PSFL.52.2.31-47
   Google Scholar
• Sabag, N., and E. Raz. 2014. “Analysis of Electrical and Electronics Students’ Obstacles in Studying Physics–Work in progress.” World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education 12 (4): 655–660.
   Google Scholar
• Sabag, N., and E. Trotskovsky. 2013. “Using Lab Experiments in Electric Circuits to Promote Achievements in Mathematics.” EDUCON(March 13–15): 123–129. doi:10.1109/EduCon.2013.6530096.
   Google Scholar
• Satterly, David. 1984. “Differential Aptitude Test, in Levy Philip and Goldstein Harvey” In Tests in Education. A Book of Critical Reviews, 508–516. London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Solomon, Gavriel, and David Perkins. 1996. “Learning in Wonderland: What Do Computers Really Offer Education?” In Technology and the Future of Education NSSE Yearbook, edited by S. Kerr, 111–130. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stroud, Kenneth A. 2007. “Part 2, Program 1 and 2.” In Engineering Mathematics. 6th ed., edited by Dexter J. Booth, 437–494. New York: Industrial Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tanner, Kimberly, and Deborah Allen. 2004. “Approaches to Biology Teaching and Learning: Learning Styles and the Problem of Instructional Selection – Engaging All Students in Science Courses.” Cell Biology a Journal of Life Science Education 3 (4): 197–201.10.1187/cbe.04-07-0050
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Technion. 2016. The Undergraduate Catalog 2014–2015, 102–107. http://webee.technion.ac.il/uploads/file/Undergraduate/Catalog_2014_15.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Trotskovsky, E., S. Waks, N. Sabag, and O. Hazzan. 2013. “Students’ Misunderstandings and Misconceptions in Engineering Thinking.” International Journal of Engineering Education 29 (1): 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waks, Shlomo. 1995. Curriculum Design from an Art Towards a Science. Hamburg: Tempus Publications.
   Google Scholar
• The White House – Office of the Press Secretary. 2012. President Obama Announces Plans for a New, National Corps to Recognize and Reward Leading Educators in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math. https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/07/17/president-obama-announces-plans-new-national-corps-recognize-and-reward-.
   Google Scholar