Raising test scores vs. teaching higher order thinking (HOT): senior science teachers’ views on how several concurrent policies affect classroom practices

References

• Anderson, K. J. 2012. “Science Education and Test-Based Accountability: Reviewing Their Relationship and Exploring Implications for Future Policy.” Science Education 96 (1): 104–129.10.1002/sce.v96.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, B. S. 1956. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Handbook 1: Cognitive Domain. New York: Longmans.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, M. M. 2015. “Why Ask Why?” Journal of Chemical Education 92 (8): 1273–1279.10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. 2010. The Flat World and Education: How America’s Commitment to Equity Will Determine Our Future. New York: Teachers’ College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elmore, R. C. 2004. School Reform from the inside out: Policy, Practice, and Performance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Educational Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gamoran, A. 2007. “School Accountability, American Style: Dilemmas of High-Stakes Testing.” Revue Suisse Des Science De L’ Education 29 (1): 79–94.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, C., R. Hipkins, and A. Zohar. 2012. “Positioning Thinking Within National Curriculum and Assessment Systems: Perspectives from Israel, New Zealand and Northern Ireland.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 7: 134–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, R. A., and C. J. Moore. 2000. “Educational Reform through High Stakes Testing – Don’t Go There.” Science Educator 9 (1): 7–13.
   Google Scholar
• Israeli MOE. 2009. “Goals of the MOE 2009–2012.” Accessed October 2016. http://cms.education.gov.il/EducationCMS/Units/Hofesh/DeenVeHeshbon/2008/2008/MatarotYeadim.htm
   Google Scholar
• Israeli MOE. 2010. “The MOE Work Plan for 2010.” Accessed October 2016. http://www.pmo.gov.il/IsraelGov/YearPlans/Pages/plans2010.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Israeli MOE. 2011. “Book of Working Plans for 2011.” Accessed October 2016. http://www.pmo.gov.il/BranchesAndUnits/direcgeneral/Documents/yearplan_education.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Israeli MOE, Science and technology administration. 2012. “Policy Paper: Explicit Teaching of Scientific Inquiry Skills.” Accessed October 2016. http://www.motnet.proj.ac.il/Apps/WW/Page.aspx?ws=5dd54bfd-f1b8-4c5d-834a-1ddecb1c789b&page=b37cd78e-a8c2-4103-9526-5f053defe42d&fol=58d79897-4e63-4655-b8ab-34ffe8c9db6c&code=58d79897-4e63-4655-b8ab-34ffe8c9db6c
   Google Scholar
• Kersaint, G., K. M. Borman, R. Lee, and T. L. Boydston. 2001. “Balancing the Contradictions between Accountability and Systemic Reform.” Journal of School Leadership 11 (3): 217–240.
   Google Scholar
• Koretz, D. 2008. Measuring up: What Educational Testing Really Tells Us. Massachusetts, CA: Harvard Educational Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krathwohl, D. R. 2002. “A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy: An Overview.” Theory into Practice 41: 212–218.10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leighton, J. P. 2011. “A Cognitive Model for the Assessment of Higher Order Thinking.” In Assessment of Higher Order Thinking Skills, edited by G. Schraw and D. R. Robinson, 151–181. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Maerten-Rivera, J., N. Myers, O. Lee, and R. Penfield. 2010. “Student and School Predictors of High-Stakes Assessment in Science.” Science Education 94: 937–962.10.1002/sce.v94:6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansell, W. 2007. Education by Numbers: The Tyranny of Testing. London: Politico’s Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, R. W., and C. J. Harris. 2006. “No Child Left behind and Science Education: Opportunities, Challenges, and Risks.” The Elementary School Journal 106 (5): 467–478.10.1086/505441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar, R., and J. Osborne. 1998. Beyond 2000; Science Education for the Future. London: King’s College.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2012. A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington, DC: Committee on a Conceptual Framework for New K-12 Science Education Standards, Board on Science Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education.
   Google Scholar
• Nichols, S. L., and D. C. Berliner. 2007. Collateral Damage: How High-Stake Testing Corrupts America’s Schools. Imprint Cambridge, Mass: Harvard Educational Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nir, A., A. Nir, A. Ben-David, A. Ben-David, R. Bogler, and A. Zohar. 2016. “School Autonomy and 21st Century Skills in the Israeli Educational System: Discrepancies Between the Declarative and Operational Levels.” International Journal of Educational Management 30 (7): 1231–1246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oakes, J. 1985. Keeping Track: How Schools Structure Inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2012). “The PISA 2015 Assessment Framework: Key Competencies in Reading, Mathematics and Science.” http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/pisa2015draftframeworks.htm.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2016. PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Science, Reading, Mathematic and Financial Literacy. Paris: PISA, OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264255425-en.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., and J. Dillon. 2008. Science Education in Europe: Critical Reflections. vol. 13. London: The Nuffield Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Qualifications and Curriculum Authority. 2005. “Science for Public Understanding.” Accessed July 2005. http://www.qca.org.uk/index.html
   Google Scholar
• RAMA (National Authority for Testing and Evaluation). 2017. “Demonstration Tests in Science and Technology.” Accessed May 2017. http://cms.education.gov.il/EducationCMS/Units/Rama/MivchaneyMadafLamore02/MadaVeTechnoligiaKitaHet/
   Google Scholar
• Raudenbush, S. W., B. Rowan, and Y. F. Cheong. 1993. “Higher Order Instructional Goals in Secondary Schools: Class, Teacher, and School Influences.” American Educational Research Journal 30 (3): 523–553.10.3102/00028312030003523
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnick, L. 1987. Education and Learning to Think. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Resnick, L. 2010. “Nested Learning Systems for the Thinking Curriculum.” Educational Researcher 39: 183–197.10.3102/0013189X10364671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savin-Baden, M., and C. Howell-Major. 2013. Qualitative Research: the Essential Guide to Theory and Practice. UK: Oxon.
   Google Scholar
• Schraw, G., M. T. McCrudden, S. Lehman, and B. Hoffman. 2011. “An Overview of Thinking Skills.” In Assessment of Higher Order Thinking Skills, edited by G. Schraw and D. R. Robinson, 1–18. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Shaver, A., P. Cuevas, O. Lee, and M. Avalos. 2006. “Teachers’ Perceptions of Policy Influences on Science Instruction with Culturally and Linguistically Diverse Elementary Students.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 44 (5): 725–746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Supovitz, J. 2009. “Can High Stakes Testing Leverage Educational Improvement? Prospects from the Last Decade of Testing and Accountability Reform.” Journal of Educational Change 10: 211–227.10.1007/s10833-009-9105-2
   Google Scholar
• Talanquer, V., M. Bolger, and D. Tomanek. 2015. “Exploring Prospective Teachers’ Assessment Practices: Noticing and Interpreting Student Understanding in the Assessment of Written Work.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 52 (5): 585–609.10.1002/tea.21209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warburton, E., and B. Torff. 2005. “The Effect of Perceived Learner Advantages on Teachers' Beliefs about Critical-Thinking Activities.” Journal of Teacher Education 56 (1): 24–33.10.1177/0022487104272056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zohar, A. 2013. It’s Not All About Test Scores: Reviving Pedagogical Discourse. Bnei Brak: Poalim - Hakibutz Hameuchad.
   Google Scholar
• Zohar, A. 2004. Higher Order Thinking in Science Classrooms: Students’ Learning and Teacher’ Professional Development. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zohar, A., and Y. J. Dori. 2003. “Higher Order Thinking Skills and Low Achieving Students: Are they Mutually Exclusive?” The Journal of the Learning Sciences 12: 145–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zohar, A., E. Vaaknin, and A. Degani. 2001. “Teachers’ Beliefs About Low Achieving Students and Higher Order Thinking.” Teaching and Teachers’ Education 17: 469–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar