The importance of supporting technological knowledge in post-primary education: a cohort study

References

• Alavi, M., and D. Leidner. 2001. “Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues.” MIS Quarterly 25 (1): 107–136.10.2307/3250961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. 1983. The Architect of Cognition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Aristotle. 2000. Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by R. Crisp. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Black, P., and G. Harrison. 1985. In Place of Confusion: Technology and Science in the School Curriculum. London: Nuffield-Chelsea Curriculum Trust and the National Centre for School Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, H. 2010. Tacit and Explicit Knowledge. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226113821.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Davies, D., and M. Rogers. 2000. “Pre-Service Primary Teachers’ Planning for Science and Technology Activities: Influences and Constraints.” Research in Science & Technological Education 18 (2): 215–225.10.1080/713694980
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education. 2013. National Curriculum in England: Design and Technology Programmes of Study. London: Department for Education.
   Google Scholar
• DES. 1999a. Leaving Certificate Chemistry Syllabus. Dublin: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• DES. 1999b. Leaving Certificate Physics Syllabus. Dublin: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• DES. 2001. Leaving Certificate Biology Syllabus. Dublin: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• DES. 2007a. Leaving Certificate Design and Communication Graphics Syllabus. Dublin: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• DES. 2007b. Leaving Certificate Technology Syllabus. Dublin: The Stationery Office.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, A. 2004. “Asking the Right Question About Pain: Narrative and Phronesis.” Literature and Medicine 23 (2): 209–225.10.1353/lm.2005.0003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagel, C. 2004. “Technology Profile: An Assessment Strategy for Technological Literacy.” The Journal of Technology Studies 30 (4): 38–44.
   Google Scholar
• Gettier, E. 1963. “Is Justified True Belief Knowledge?” Analysis 23 (6): 121–123.10.1093/analys/23.6.121
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, K. 2008. “Technology and Technological Knowledge: A Challenge for School Curricula.” Teachers and Teaching 14 (1): 3–15.10.1080/13540600701837582
   Google Scholar
• Gorman, M. 2002. “Types of Knowledge and Their Roles in Technology Transfer.” The Journal of Technology Transfer 27 (3): 219–231.10.1023/A:1015672119590
   Google Scholar
• Hetherington, S. 2011. How to Know. West Sussex: Wiley & Sons.10.1002/9781118083178
   Google Scholar
• Huang, S. L., and C. W. Yang. 2009. “Designing a Semantic Bliki System to Support Different Types of Knowledge and Adaptive Learning.” Computers and Education 53 (3): 701–712.10.1016/j.compedu.2009.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, G. 2001. Aristotle on Ethics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hulleman, C., and J. Harackiewicz. 2009. “Promoting Interest and Performance in High School Science Classes.” Science 326 (5958): 1410–1412.10.1126/science.1177067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jong, T., and M. Ferguson-Hessler. 1996. “Types and Qualities of Knowledge.” Educational Psychologist 31 (2): 105–113.10.1207/s15326985ep3102_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kimbell, R. 1994. “Progression in Learning and the Assessment of Children’s Attainments in Technology.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 4 (1): 65–83.10.1007/BF01197584
   Google Scholar
• Kimbell, R. 2011. “Wrong … but Right Enough.” Design and Technology Education: An International Journal 16 (2): 6–7.
   Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P., J. Sweller, and R. Clark. 2006. “Why Minimal Guidance during Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching.” Educational Psychologist 41 (2): 75–86.10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lally, V., M. Sharples, F. Tracy, N. Bertram, and S. Masters. 2012. “Researching the Ethical Dimensions of Mobile, Ubiquitous and Immersive Technology Enhanced Learning (MUITEL): A Thematic Review and Dialogue.” Interactive Learning Environments 20 (3): 217–238.10.1080/10494820.2011.607829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard, D., and S. Sensiper. 1998. “The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Group Innovation.” California Management Review 40 (3): 112–132.10.2307/41165946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liou, P. Y. 2015. “Developing an Instrument for Assessing Students’ Concepts of the Nature of Technology.” Research in Science and Technological Education 33 (2): 162–181.10.1080/02635143.2014.996542
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, R., and N. Houghton. 2002. “The Educational Value in Making.” In Issues in Design and Technology Teaching, edited by Su Sayers, Jim Morley and Bob Barnes, 43–66. London: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. 2002. “Rote versus Meaningful Learning.” Theory into Practice 41 (4): 226–232.10.1207/s15430421tip4104_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormick, R. 1997. “Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 7 (1–2): 141–159.10.1023/A:1008819912213
   Google Scholar
• McCormick, R. 2004. “Issues of Learning and Knowledge in Technology Education.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 14 (1): 21–44.10.1023/B:ITDE.0000007359.81781.7c
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millo, Y., and C. Schinckus. 2016. “A Nuanced Perspective on Episteme and Techne in Finance.” International Review of Financial Analysis 46 (1): 124–130.10.1016/j.irfa.2016.04.001
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. 2017. Technology in the New Zealand Curriculum. New Zealand: Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, E. 1998. “The Nature of Technology for Design.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 8 (1): 67–87.10.1023/A:1008827820764
   Google Scholar
• Norström, P. 2014. “Technological Knowledge and Technology Education.” PhD diss., KTH Royal Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Norström, P. 2015. “Knowing How, Knowing That, Knowing Technology.” Philosophy & Technology 28 (4): 553–565.10.1007/s13347-014-0178-3
   Google Scholar
• O’Donnell, D., and L. B. Henriksen. 2002. “Philosophical Foundations for a Critical Evaluation of the Social Impact of ICT.” Journal of Information Technology 17 (2): 89–99.10.1080/02683960210145968
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pirttimaa, M. J. Husu, and Jukka Husu. 2017. “Uncovering Procedural Knowledge in Craft, Design, and Technology Education: A Case of Hands-on Activities in Electronics.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 27 (2): 215–231.10.1007/s10798-015-9345-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. 1969. Knowing and Being: Essays. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rasinen, A. 2003. “An Analysis of the Technology Education Curriculum of Six Countries.” Journal of Technology Education 15 (1): 31–47.
   Google Scholar
• Rauscher, W. 2011. “The Technological Knowledge Used by Technology Education Students in Capability Tasks.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 21 (3): 291–305.10.1007/s10798-010-9120-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riggs, A. 1995. “Gender in Technology Education.” In Teaching Technology, edited by F. Banks, 217–226. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ryle, G. 1949. The Concept of the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scottish, C. C. C. 1996. Technology Education in Scottish Schools: A Statement of Position. Dundee: Scottish Consultative Council of the Curriculum.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, K. 2002. “Education and Technological Capability Building in the Gulf.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 12 (1): 77–91.10.1023/A:1013002828605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley, J., and T. Willlamson. 2001. “Knowing How.” Journal of Philosophy 98 (8): 411–444.10.2307/2678403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• State Examination Commission. 2018. “State Examinations Statistics.” Accessed April 2, 2018. https://www.examinations.ie/statistics/
   Google Scholar
• STEM Education Review Group. 2016. A Report on Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Education: Analysis and Recommendations. Dublin: The STEM Education Review Group.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, J. 2004. “Developing Technological Knowledge.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 14 (1): 5–19.10.1023/B:ITDE.0000007361.62177.07
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tairab, H. 2001. “How Do Pre-Service and in-Service Science Teachers View the Nature of Science and Technology?” Research in Science & Technological Education 19 (2): 235–250.10.1080/02635140120087759
   Google Scholar
• de Vries, M. 2016. Teaching about Technology. Switzerland: Springer.10.1007/978-3-319-32945-1
   Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D. 2008. “Comments on Bulterman-Bos: What Should Education Research Do, and How Should It Do It?” Educational Researcher 37 (7): 432–438.10.3102/0013189X08325678
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, P. J., J. Iglesias, and M. Barak. 2008. “Problem Based Learning: Application to Technology Education in Three Countries.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 18 (4): 319–335.10.1007/s10798-007-9028-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, A., and P. J. Williams. 1997. “Problem‐Based Learning: An Appropriate Methodology for Technology Education.” Research in Science & Technological Education 15 (1): 91–103.10.1080/0263514970150107
   Google Scholar