Effects of 6E-oriented STEM practical activities in cultivating middle school students’ attitudes toward technology and technological inquiry ability

References

• Abd-El-Khalick, F., S. Boujaoude, R. Duschl, N. G. Lederman, R. Mamlok-Naaman, A. Hofstein, M. Niaz, D. Tregust, and H.-L. Tuan. 2004. “Inquiry in Science Education: International Perspectives.” Science Education 88 (3): 397–419. doi:10.1002/sce.10118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avsec, S., and S. Kocijancic. 2014. “Effectiveness of Inquiry-Based Learning: How Do Middle School Students Learn to Maximise the Efficacy of a Water Turbine?” International Journal of Engineering Education 30 (6A): 1436–1449.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., and Cocking, R. R. 2000. How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bryman, A., and D. Cramer. 1997. Quantitative Data Analysis with SPSS for Windows: A Guide for Social Scientists. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, B. N. 2014. “The ITEEA 6E Learning by Design Model.” Technology and Engineering Teacher 73 (6): 14–17.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. W., J. A. Taylor, A. Gardner, P. V. Scotter, J. C. Powell, A. Westbrook, and N. Landes 2006. “The BSCS 5E Instructional Model: Origins and Effectiveness.” Accessed 1 December 2016. https://bscs.org/sites/default/files/_media/about/downloads/BSCS_5E_Full_Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chen, C. T., and H. C. She. 2015. “The Effectiveness of Scientific Inquiry With/Without Integration of Scientific Reasoning.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 20 (1–20). doi:10.1007/s10763-013-9508-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou, H. C. 2009. Quantitative Research and Statistical Analysis—Examples of the Chinese Version of SPSS Data Analysis. Taipei: Wunan.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, P. A. 1993. “Paradigm Shifts in Designed Instruction: From Behaviorism to Cognitivism to Constructivism.” Educational Technology 33 (5): 12–19.
   Google Scholar
• Duschl, R. A., H. A. Schweingruber, and A. W. Shouse. 2007. Taking Science to School: Learning and Teaching Science in Grades K‐8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fang, S. C., Y. S. Hsu, H. Y. Chang, W. H. Chang, H. K. Wu, and C. M. Chen. 2016. “Investigating the Effects of Structured and Guided Inquiry on Students’ Development of Conceptual Knowledge and Inquiry Abilities: A Case Study in Taiwan.” International Journal of Science Education 38 (12): 1945–1971. doi:10.1080/09500693.2016.1220688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flower, T. (2014). Growing the Engineering Education to Employment Pipeline: Reflections and Future Directions. In A. Bainbridge, Z. T. Qi, and G. S. Gupta (Eds.), Australasian Association for Engineering Education Conference (25th: 2014). Symposium conducted at the meeting of the Te Papa Tongarewa National Museum of Wellington, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Fraenkel, J. R., N. E. Wallen, and H. H. Hyun. 2015. How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Han, S., R. Capraro, and M. M. Capraro. 2015. “How Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Project-Based Learning (PBL) Affects High, Middle, and Low Achievers Differently: The Impact of Students Factors on Achievement.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 13 (5): 1089–1113. doi:10.1007/s10763-014-9526-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holmes, K., J. Gore, M. Smith, and A. Lloyd. 2017. “An Integrated Analysis of School Students’ Aspirations for STEM Careers: Which Student and School Factors are Most Predictive?.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 1–21. doi:10.1007/s10763-016-9793-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, K., G. M. Bodner, and L. Bryan. 2011. “Middle- and High-School Students’ Interest in Nanoscale Science and Engineering Topics and Phenomena.” Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research 1 (1): 30–39. doi:10.7771/2157-9288.1028.
   Google Scholar
• Ing, M., P. R. Aschbacher, and S. M. Tsai. 2014. “Gender Differences in the Consistency of Middle School Students’ Interest in Engineering and Science Careers.” Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research 4 (2): 1–10. doi:10.7771/2157-9288.1090.
   Google Scholar
• International Technology and Engineering Educators Association. 2009. The Overlooked STEM Imperatives. Reston, VA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, T. R., and J. G. Knowles. 2016. “A Conceptual Framework for Integrated STEM Education.” International Journal of STEM Education 33 (11): 1–11. doi:10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z.
   Google Scholar
• Kier, M. W., M. R. Blanchard, J. W. Osborne, and J. L. Albert. 2014. “The Development of the STEM Career Interest Survey (STEM-CIS).” Research in Science Education 44 (3): 461–481. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9389-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, H., M. C. Linn, K. Varma, and O. L. Liu. 2010. “How Do Technology‐Enhanced Inquiry Science Units Impact Classroom Learning?.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 47 (1): 71–90. doi:10.1002/tea.20304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Q. S. 2002. Psychology and Education Statistics. Taipei: Donghua.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, M. P. 2010. “Students’ Attitudes toward STEM: Development of an Instrument for High School STEM-based Programs.” Journal of Technology Studies 36 (1): 24–34. doi:10.21061/jots.v36i1.a.4.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S. B., R. S. Caffarella, and L. M. Baumgartner. 2007. Learning in Adulthood, a Comprehensive Guide. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley & Sons, .
   Google Scholar
• Metsärinne, M., and M. Kallio. 2016. “How are Students’ Attitudes Related to Learning Outcomes?.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 26 (3): 353–371. doi:10.1007/s10798-015-9317-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadelson, L., A. Seifert, A. Moll, and B. Coats. 2012. “i-STEM Summer Institute: An Integrated Approach to Teacher Professional Development in STEM.” Journal of STEM Education 13 (2): 69–83. http://scholarworks.boisestate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1092&context= cifs_facpubs
   Google Scholar
• Nehdi, M. 2002. “Crisis of Civil Engineering Education in Information Technology Age: Analysis and Prospects.” Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice 128 (3): 131–137. doi:10.1109/FIE.2001.963874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrina, S. 2000. “The Political Ecology of Design and Technology Education: An Inquiry into Methods.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 10 (3): 207–237. doi:10.1023/A:1008955016067.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purzer, S., M. Goldstein, R. Adams, C. Xie, and S. Nourian. 2015. “An Exploratory Study of Informed Engineering Design Behaviors Associated with Scientific Explanations.” International Journal of STEM Education 2 (9): 1–12. doi:10.1186/s40594-015-0019-7.
   Google Scholar
• Raat, J. H., and M. de Vries. 1985. What Do 13-Year Old Students Think about Technology? the Conception of and the Attitude Towards Technology of 13-Year Old Girls and Boys. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 262998). The Netherlands: Eindhoven University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Raju, P. K., and A. Clayson. 2010. “The Future of STEM Education: An Analysis of Two National Reports.” Journal of STEM Education 11 (5&6): 25–28.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, P. M., G. Sonnert, Z. Hazari, and R. Tai. 2012. “Stability and Volatility of STEM Career Interest in High School: A Gender Study.” Science Education 96 (3): 411–427. doi:10.1002/sce.21007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, M. 2009. “STEM, STEM Education, STEMmania.” The Technology Teacher 68 (4): 20–26.
   Google Scholar
• Shahat, M. A., A. Ohle, D. F. Treagust, and H. E. Fischer. 2013. “Design, Development and Validation of a Model of Problem Solving for Egyptian Science Classes.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 11 (5): 1157–1181. doi:10.1007/s10763-012-9367-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. 1988. “Cognitive Load during Problem Solving: Effects on Learning.” Cognitive Science 12: 257–285. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1202_4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Virtanen, S., E. Räikkönen, and P. Ikonen. 2015. “Gender-Based Motivational Differences in Technology Education.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 25 (2): 197–211. doi:10.1007/s10798-014-9278-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Mental Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, P. J., A. Jones, and C. Buntting. 2015. The Future of Technology Education. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, M. L. 2006. SPSS Statistical Applications Study and Practice: Questionnaire Analysis and Applied Statistics. Taipei: Zhicheng Digital Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, X. T., and G. H. Wang. 2007. “The Impact of Implementing Guided Inquiry Education on Elementary School Student Learning.” Journal of Science Education 15 (4): 439–459.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, K. C., S. C. Fan, and K. Y. Lin. 2015. “Enhancing Students’ Problem-Solving Skills through Context-Based Learning.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 13 (6): 1377–1401. doi:10.1007/s10763-014-9567-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, K. C., F. N. Han, Y. Y. Hsu, and K. Y. Lin. 2005. “The Development of a Science and Technology Attitude Scale for Middle School Students.” Kaohsiung Normal University Journal 19: 69–83.
   Google Scholar
• Yu, K. C., K. Y. Lin, F. N. Han, and I. Y. Hsu. 2012. “A Model of Junior High School Students’ Attitudes toward Technology.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 22 (4): 423–436. doi:10.1007/s10798-011-9154-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar