Meeting Linnaeus: improving comprehension of biological classification and attitudes to plants using drama in primary science education

References

• Abed, O. H. 2016. “Drama-Based Science Teaching and Its Effect on Students’ Understanding of Scientific Concepts and Their Attitudes Towards Science Learning.” International Education Studies 9 (10): 163. doi:10.5539/ies.v9n10p163.
   Google Scholar
• Ainley, M., and J. Ainley. 2011. “Student Engagement with Science in Early Adolescence: The Contribution of Enjoyment to Students’ Continuing Interest in Learning about Science.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 36 (1): 4–12. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.08.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, C. 2004. “Learning in ‘As-If’ Worlds: Cognition in Drama in Education.” Theory into Practice 43 (4): 281–286. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4304_6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, L., J. DeWitt, J. Osborne, J. Dillon, B. Willis, and B. Wong. 2010. “Doing’ Science versus ’Being’ a Scientist: Examining 10/11‐Year‐Old Schoolchildren‘S Constructions of Science through the Lens of Identity.” Science Education 94 (4): 617–639. doi:10.1002/sce.v94:4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aubusson, P. J., and S. Fogwill. 2006. “Role Play as Analogical Modelling in Science.” In Metaphor and Analogy in Science Education, edited by Peter J. Aubusson, Allan G. Harrison, Stephen M. Ritchie, 93–104. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Auer, M. R. 2008. “Sensory Perception, Rationalism and Outdoor Environmental Education.” International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education 17 (1): 6–12. doi:10.2167/irgee225.0.
   Google Scholar
• Beery, T., and K. A. Jørgensen. 2018. “Children in Nature: Sensory Engagement and the Experience of Biodiversity.” Environmental Education Research 24 (1): 13–25. doi:10.1080/13504622.2016.1250149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, J. R. 2010. “Effects of Physical Activity on Children’s Executive Function: Contributions of Experimental Research on Aerobic Exercise.” Developmental Review 30 (4): 331–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowell, P., and B. S. Heap. 2013. Planning Process Drama: Enriching Teaching and Learning. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bowker, R. 2004. “Children‘S Perceptions of Plants following Their Visit to the Eden Project.” Research in Science & Technological Education 22 (2): 227–243. doi:10.1080/0263514042000290912.
   Google Scholar
• Braund, M., and M. Reiss. 2006. “Towards a More Authentic Science Curriculum: The Contribution of Out‐Of‐School Learning.” International Journal of Science Education 28 (12): 1373–1388. doi:10.1080/09500690500498419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cakici, Y., and E. Bayir. 2012. “Developing Children‘S Views of the Nature of Science through Role Play.” International Journal of Science Education 34 (7): 1075–1091. doi:10.1080/09500693.2011.647109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çìl, E. 2016. “Instructional Integration of Disciplines for Promoting Children’s Positive Attitudes Towards Plants.” Journal of Biological Education 50 (4): 366–383. doi:10.1080/00219266.2015.1117512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., L. Manion, and K. Morrison. 2007. Research Methods in Education. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• De Swert, K. 2012. “Calculating Inter-Coder Reliability in Media Content Analysis Using Krippendorff’s Alpha.” Center for Politics and Communication 1–15. http://www.polcomm.org/wp-content/uploads/ICR01022012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• DeWitt, J., L. Archer, J. Osborne, J. Dillon, B. Willis, and B. Wong. 2011. “High Aspirations but Low Progression: The Science Aspirations–Careers Paradox Amongst Minority Ethnic Students.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 9 (2): 243–271. doi:10.1007/s10763-010-9245-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeWitt, J., and M. Storksdieck. 2008. “A Short Review of School Field Trips: Key Findings from the past and Implications for the Future.” Visitor Studies 11 (2): 181–197. doi:10.1080/10645570802355562.
   Google Scholar
• Fančovičová, J., and P. Prokop. 2010. “Development and Initial Psychometric Assessment of the Plant Attitude Questionnaire.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 19 (5): 415–421. doi:10.1007/s10956-010-9207-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fančovičová, J., and P. Prokop. 2011. “Plants Have a Chance: Outdoor Educational Programmes Alter Students‘ Knowledge and Attitudes Towards Plants.” Environmental Education Research 17 (4): 537–551. doi:10.1080/13504622.2010.545874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garner, R. L. 2006. “Humor in Pedagogy: How Ha-Ha Can Lead to Aha!” College Teaching 54 (1): 177–180. doi:10.3200/CTCH.54.1.177-180.
   Google Scholar
• Glenberg, A. M., T. Gutierrez, J. R. Levin, S. Japuntich, and M. P. Kaschak. 2004. “Activity and Imagined Activity Can Enhance Young Children‘S Reading Comprehension.” Journal of Educational Psychology 96 (3): 424. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, L., C. Hume, and S. Tazzyman. 2016. “Five Degrees of Happiness: Effective Smiley Face Likert Scales for Evaluating with Children.” In Proceedings of The 15th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (pp. 311–321). Manchester, UK: ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F., and K. Krippendorff. 2007. “Answering the Call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data.” Communication Methods and Measures 1 (1): 77–89. doi:10.1080/19312450709336664.
   Google Scholar
• Heathcote, D., and P. Herbert. 1985. “A Drama of Learning: Mantle of the Expert.” Theory into Practice 24 (3): 173–180. doi:10.1080/00405848509543169.
   Google Scholar
• Herrington, J., and R. Oliver. 2000. “An Instructional Design Framework for Authentic Learning Environments.” Educational Technology Research and Development 48 (3): 23–48. doi:10.1007/BF02319856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hidi, S. 1990. “Interest and Its Contribution as a Mental Resource for Learning.” Review of Educational Research 60 (4): 549–571. doi:10.3102/00346543060004549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isen, A. M., and J. Reeve. 2005. “The Influence of Positive Affect on Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation: Facilitating Enjoyment of Play, Responsible Work Behavior, and Self-Control.” Motivation and Emotion 29 (4): 295–323. doi:10.1007/s11031-006-9019-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isen, A. M., K. A. Daubman, and G. P. Nowicki. 1987. “Positive Affect Facilitates Creative Problem Solving.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52 (6): 1122. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, A., and H. R. Leahy. 2005. “‘Seeing It for real…?’—Authenticity, Theatre and Learning in Museums.” Research in Drama Education 10 (3): 303–325. doi:10.1080/13569780500275956.
   Google Scholar
• Keller, J., and E. Burkman. 1993. “‘Motivation Principles.’ In Instructional Message Design:.” Principles from the Behavioral and Cognitive Sciences 2:: 3–49.
   Google Scholar
• Kerby, H. W., J. Cantor, M. Weiland, C. Babiarz, and A. W. Kerby. 2010. “Fusion Science Theater Presents the Amazing Chemical Circus: A New Model of Outreach that Uses Theater to Engage Children in Learning.” Journal of Chemical Education 87 (10): 1024–1030. doi:10.1021/ed100143j.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiefer, M., and N. M. Trumpp. 2012. “Embodiment Theory and Education: The Foundations of Cognition in Perception and Action.” Trends in Neuroscience and Education 1 (1): 15–20. doi:10.1016/j.tine.2012.07.002.
   Google Scholar
• Lohr, V. I., and C. H. Pearson-Mims. 2005. “Children‘S Active and Passive Interactions with Plants Influence Their Attitudes and Actions toward Trees and Gardening as Adults.” HortTechnology 15 (3): 472–476. doi:10.21273/HORTTECH.15.3.0472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGregor, D. 2014. “Chronicling Innovative Learning in Primary Classrooms: Conceptualizing a Theatrical Pedagogy to Successfully Engage Young Children Learning Science.” Pedagogies: An International Journal 9 (3): 216–232. doi:10.1080/1554480X.2014.899544.
   Google Scholar
• McSharry, G., and S. Jones. 2000. “Role-play in science teaching and learning”. School Science Review, 82: 73–82. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/b1cc/e48245b2b05e03887e169f2a14fff9f21391.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Müller-Wille, S., and I. Charmantier. 2012. “Natural History and Information Overload: The Case of Linnaeus.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 43 (1): 4–15. doi:10.1016/j.shpsc.2011.10.021.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Neelands, J., and T. Goode. 2015. Structuring Drama Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Negrete, A. 2002. “Science via Narratives: Communicating Science through Literary Forms.” Ludus vitalis 18: 197–204.
   Google Scholar
• Nyberg, E., and D. Sanders. 2014. “Drawing Attention to the ‘Green Side of Life’.” Journal of Biological Education 48 (3): 142–153. doi:10.1080/00219266.2013.849282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O‘Neill, C. 1985. “Imagined Worlds in Theatre and Drama.” Theory into Practice 24 (3): 158–165. doi:10.1080/00405848509543167.
   Google Scholar
• O’Toole, J., and J. Dunn. 2015. Pretending to Learn: Drama in the Primary and Middle Years. Brisbane: DramaWeb Publishing (online).
   Google Scholar
• Ødegaard, M. 2003. “Dramatic Science. A Critical Review of Drama in Science Education.” Studies in Science Education 39 (1): 75–101. doi:10.1080/03057260308560196.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., S. Simon, and S. Collins. 2003. “Attitudes Towards Science: A Review of the Literature and Its Implications.” International Journal of Science Education 25 (9): 1049–1079. doi:10.1080/0950069032000032199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peleg, R., and A. Baram-Tsabari. 2011. “Atom Surprise: Using Theatre in Primary Science Education.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 20 (5): 508–524. doi:10.1007/s10956-011-9299-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders, D. 2007. “Making Public the Private Life of Plants: The Contribution of Informal Learning Environments.” International Journal of Science Education 29 (10): 1209–1228. doi:10.1080/09500690600951549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saricayir, H. 2010. “Teaching Electrolysis of Water through Drama.” Journal of Baltic Science Education 9 (3): 179–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schussler, E. E., and L. A. Olzak. 2008. “It‘S Not Easy Being Green: Student Recall of Plant and Animal Images.” Journal of Biological Education 42 (3): 112–119. doi:10.1080/00219266.2008.9656123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, C. L., R. J. Harris, and A. R. Rothe. 2001. “Embodied Cognition through Improvisation Improves Memory for a Dramatic Monologue.” Discourse Processes 31 (3): 293–305. doi:10.1207/S15326950dp31-3_4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibley, B. A., and J. L. Etnier. 2003. “The Relationship between Physical Activity and Cognition in Children: A Meta-Analysis.” Pediatric Exercise Science 15 (3): 243–256. doi:10.1123/pes.15.3.243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sousa, D. A., and T. Pilecki. 2013. From STEM to STEAM: Using Brain-Compatible Strategies to Integrate the Arts. California: Corwin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stagg, B. C., and M. Donkin. 2013. “Teaching Botanical Identification to Adults: Experiences of the UK Participatory Science Project ‘Open Air Laboratories’.” Journal of Biological Education 47 (2): 104–110. doi:10.1080/00219266.2013.764341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stagg, B. C., and M. F. Verde. 2018. “Story of a Seed: Educational Theatre Improves Students’ Comprehension of Plant Reproduction and Attitudes to Plants in Primary Science Education.” Research in Science & Technological Education ( (published ahead-of-print 19/4/18)). doi:10.1080/02635143.2018.1455655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toonders, W., R. P. Verhoeff, and H. Zwart. 2016. “Performing the Future.” Science and Education 25 (7–8): 869–895. doi:10.1007/s11191-016-9853-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varela, F., E. R. Thompson, and E. Rosch. 1991. The Embodied Mind. Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Waite, S. 2010. “Losing Our Way? the Downward Path for Outdoor Learning for Children Aged 2–11 Years.” Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning 10 (2): 111–126. doi:10.1080/14729679.2010.531087.
   Google Scholar
• Wandersee, J. H., and E. E. Schussler. 2001. “Toward a Theory of Plant Blindness.” Plant Science Bulletin 47 (1): 2–9.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, C. D., and C. Andersen. 2004. “Snails are Science: Creating Context for Science Inquiry and Writing through Process Drama.” Youth Theatre Journal 18 (1): 68–86. doi:10.1080/08929092.2004.10012565.
   Google Scholar
• Yangin, S., S. Sidekli, and Y. Gokbulut. 2014. “Prospective Teachers’ Misconceptions about Classification of Plants and Changes in Their Misconceptions during Pre-Service Education.” Journal of Baltic Science Education 13 (1): 105–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar