Does computation technology matter in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) projects?

References

• American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). 1993. Benchmarks for Science Literacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bers, M. U. 2018. Coding as a Playground: Programming and Computational Thinking in the Early Childhood Classroom. New York and London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, G. A. 2009. “Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method.” Qualitative Research Journal 9 (2): 27–40. doi:10.3316/QRJ0902027.
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. W. 2013. The Case for STEM Education: Challenges and Opportunities. Arlington: NSTA press.
   Google Scholar
• Castro, S. 2015. “Meeting the ‘T’in STEM through Computer Science and Coding.” PhD diss., California State University.
   Google Scholar
• Chin, C. 2003. “Facilitating Science Investigations: Some Suggestions for the Teacher.” Teaching and Learning 24 (2): 141–151.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham, I. 2017. The Wisdom of Strategic Learning: The Self Managed Learning Solution. England: Gower.
   Google Scholar
• Czekman, B., and J. Kiss. 2018. “Coding without (Age) Limits? Experiences with BBC Micro: Bit in Primary School.” HERJ Hungarian Educational Research Journal 8 (4): 112–115. doi:10.14413/HERJ/8/4/10.
   Google Scholar
• Department for Education. 2013. “The National Curriculum in England: Key Stages 1 and 2 Framework Document.” Department for Education. https://www.gov.uk/government/collections/national-curriculum
   Google Scholar
• Education Bureau. 2020. “Computational Thinking – Coding Education: Supplement to the Primary Curriculum.” https://www.edb.gov.hk/attachment/en/curriculum-development/renewal/CT/CT%20Supplement%20Eng%20_2020.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Eduxtra Innovating Education. 2018. “Why Coding? A Parent’s Guide.” The Xtracode Advantage: Premium Coding Classes for Kids and Teenagers. Target – 6–19 years old. https://www.eduxtra.com.ng/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Why-Coding-for-Parents.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Eguchi, A. 2014. “Robotics as a Learning Tool for Educational Transformation.” In Proceeding of 4th international workshop teaching robotics, teaching with robotics & 5th international conference robotics in education. Padova (Italy), 27–34, July.
   Google Scholar
• English, L. D. 2017. “Advancing Elementary and Middle School STEM Education.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 15 (1): 5–24. doi:10.1007/s10763-017-9802-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, B., S. Marginson, and R. Tytler. 2019. “An International View of STEM Education.” In STEM Education 2.0, edited by A. Sahin, 350–363. Netherlands: Brill. doi:10.1163/9789004405400_019.
   Google Scholar
• Goldsworthy, A., R. Watson, and V. Wood-Robinson. 1998. “Sometimes It’s Not Fair!” Primary Science Review 53: 15–17.
   Google Scholar
• Gott, R., and S. Duggan. 2003. Understanding and Using Scientific Evidence. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hamari, J., D. J. Shernoff, E. Rowe, B. Coller, J. Asbell-Clarke, and T. Edwards. 2016. “Challenging Games Help Students Learn: An Empirical Study on Engagement, Flow and Immersion in Game-based Learning.” Computers in Human Behaviour 54: 170–179. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.07.045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harlen, W. 2000. “Assessment in the Inquiry Classroom.” About Foundations 2: 87–119.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, W. K., and K. C. Ang. 2015. “Developing Computational Thinking through Coding.” Electronic Proceedings of the 20th Asian Technology Conference in Mathematics Leshan, 73–87, China. http://atcm.mathandtech.org/EP2015/invited/5.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Huberty, C. J., and M. D. Petoskey. 2000. “Multivariate Analysis of Variance and Covariance.” In Handbook of Applied Multivariate Statistics and Mathematical Modeling, edited by H. E. A. Tinsley, 183–208. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, J., and R. M. Thrupp. 2018. “What Is the Public Face of Coding in Australian Primary Schools?” ICICTE 2018 Proceedings. http://www.icicte.org/assets/8.1_hunt_thrupp.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jeong, H., N. B. Songer, and S. Y. Lee. 2007. “Evidentiary Competence: Sixth Graders Understanding for Gathering and Interpreting Evidence in Scientific Investigations.” Research in Science Education 37 (1): 75–97. doi:10.1007/s11165-006-9014-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanbul, S., and H. Uzunboylu. 2017. “Importance of Coding Education and Robotic Applications for Achieving 21st-Century Skills in North Cyprus.” International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learnin 12 (1). doi:10.3991/ijet.v12i01.6097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katehi, L., G. Pearson, and M. Feder. 2009. Engineering in the K-12 Education. Understanding the States and Improving the Prospects. Washington, DC: National Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, T. 2010. “Staking the Claim for the ‘T’ in STEM.” The Journal of Technology Studies 36 (1): 2–11. doi:10.21061/jots.v36i1.a.1.
   Google Scholar
• Kelley, T. R., and J. G. Knowles. 2016. “A Conceptual Framework for Integrated STEM Education.” International Journal of STEM Education 3 (1): 1–11. doi:10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. G., and J. S. Lederman. 2013. “Nature of Scientific Knowledge and Scientific Inquiry: Building Instructional Capacity through Professional Development.” In Second International Handbook of Science Education. Part One, edited by B. J. Fraser, 335–359. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, K., G. Sonnert, and P. Sadler. 2017. “The Influence of Students’ Participation in STEM Competitions on Their Interest in STEM Careers.” International Journal of Science Education 8 (2): 95–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Academy of Engineering and National Research Council (NAE&NRC). 2014. STEM Integration in K-12 Education: Status, Prospects, and an Agenda for Research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council (NRC). 2013. Next Generation Science Standards: For States, by States. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Priemer, B., K. Eilerts, A. Filler, N. Pinkwart, B. Rösken-Winter, R. Tiemann, and A. U. Zu Belzen. 2019. “A Framework to Foster Problem-solving in STEM and Computing Education.” Research in Science & Technological Education 38 (1): 105–130. doi:10.1080/02635143.2019.1600490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockland, R., D. S. Bloom, J. Carpinelli, L. Burr-Alexander, L. S. Hirsch, and H. Kimmel. 2010. “Advancing the ‘E’ in K-12 STEM Education.” Journal of Technology Studies 36 (1): 53–64.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, R. M., and A. Lumpe. 1996. “The Nature of Student Science Projects in Comparison to Educational Goals for Science.” Ohio Journal of Science 96 (4–5): 81–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahali, E. H. M., L. Halim, M. S. Rasul, K. Osman, and N. M. Arsad. 2019. “Students’ Interest Towards STEM: A Longitudinal Study.” Research in Science & Technological Education 37 (1): 71–89. doi:10.1080/02635143.2018.1489789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaughnessy, J. 2013. “Mathematics in a STEM Context.” Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School 18 (6): 324.
   Google Scholar
• So, W. M. W. 2003. “Learning science through investigations: An experience with Hong Kong primary school children”. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 1 (1): 175–200. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:IJMA.0000016852.19000.af
   Google Scholar
• So, W. M. W., Y. Zhan, C. F. S. Chow, and C. F. Leung. (2018). “Analysis of STEM Activities in Primary Students' Science Projects in an Informal Learning Environment”. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 16 (6): 1003–1023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9828–0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• So, W. M. W., Q. He, Y. Chen, and C. F. S. Chow. 2020. “School-STEM Professionals' Collaboration: A Case Study on Teachers’ Conceptions”, Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866X.2020.1774743
   Google Scholar
• So, W. M. W. 2013. “Connecting Mathematics and Science in Primary Science Inquiry.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11 (2): 385–406. doi:10.1007/s10763-012-9342-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stohlmann, M. 2018. “A Vision for Future Work to Focus on the ‘M’ in Integrated STEM.” School Science and Mathematics 118 (7): 310–319. doi:10.1111/ssm.12301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stohlmann, M., T. J. Moore, and G. H. Roehrig. 2012. “Considerations for Teaching Integrated STEM Education.” Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research 2 (1): 28–34. doi:10.5703/1288284314653.
   Google Scholar
• The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. 2015. “2015 Policy Address.” https://www.policyaddress.gov.hk/2015/eng/pdf/PA2015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. 2016. “2016 Policy Address.” https://www.policyaddress.gov.hk/2016/eng/p87.html
   Google Scholar
• The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. 2017. “2017 Policy Address.” https://www.policyaddress.gov.hk/jan2017/eng/p210.html
   Google Scholar
• Toulmin, C. N., and M. Groome. 2007. Building a Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math Agenda. Washington, DC: National Governors’ Association.
   Google Scholar
• Walan, S., and N. Gericke. 2019. “Factors from informal learning contributing to the children’s interest in STEM – experiences from the out-of-school activity called Children’s University.” Research in Science and Technological Education. doi:10.1080/02635143.2019.1667321.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, R., A. Goldsworthy, and V. Wood-Robinson. 1999. “What Is Not Fair with Investigations?” School Science Review 80 (292): 101–106.
   Google Scholar