Teaching aspects of the interrelationship between science and technology: explicit or implicit approach?

References

• Abd-El-Khalick, F. 2006. “Over and over Again: College Students’ Views of Nature of Science.” In Scientific Inquiry and Nature of Science: Implications for Teaching, Learning, and Teacher Education, edited by L. B. Flick and N. G. Lederman, 389–425. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Abd-El-Khalick, F., and N. Lederman. 2000. “Improving Science Teachers’ Conceptions of Nature of Science: A Critical Review of the Literature.” International Journal of Science Education 22 (7): 665–701. doi:10.1080/09500690050044044.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agassi, J. 1980. “Between Science and Technology.” Philosophy of Science 47 (1): 82–99. doi:10.1086/288911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akerson, V. L., and M. L. Volrich. 2006. “Teaching Nature of Science Explicitly in a First-grade Internship Setting.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 43 (4): 377–394. doi:10.1002/tea.20132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alters, B. J. 1997. “Whose Nature of Science?” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 34 (1): 39–55. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199701)34:1<39::AID-TEA4>3.0.CO;2-P.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arageorgis, A., and A. Baltas. 1989. “Demarcating Technology from Science: Problems and Problem Solving in Technology.” Journal for General Philosophy of Science 20: 212–229.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, R. L. 2008. Teaching the Nature of Science through Process Skills: Activities for Grades 3-8. Boston: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, R. L., J. J. Matkins, and B. M. Gansneder. 2011. “Impacts of Contextual and Explicit Instruction on Preservice Elementary Teachers’ Understandings of the Nature of Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 48 (4): 414–436. doi:10.1002/tea.20402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beveridge, W. I. B. 1961. The Art of Scientific Investigation. Rev. ed. London: Mercury.
   Google Scholar
• Böck, P. 2020. Getting It Right: R&D Methods for Science and Engineering. 2nd Edition. Amsterdam, Oxford and Cambridge: Elsevier. doi:10.1016/C2017-0-04427-0
   Google Scholar
• Bybee, R. W. 2011. “Scientific and Engineering Practices in K-12 Classrooms.” Science Teacher 78: 34–40.
   Google Scholar
• Clough, M. P. 2006. “Learners’ Responses to the Demands of Conceptual Change: Considerations for Effective Nature of Science Instruction.” Science & Education 15 (5): 463–494. doi:10.1007/s11191-005-4846-7.
   Google Scholar
• Clough, M. P. 2011. “The Story behind the Science: Bringing Science and Scientists to Life in Post-secondary Science Education.” Science & Education 20 (7–8): 701–717. doi:10.1007/s11191-010-9310-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clough, M. P., J. K. Olson, and D. S. Niederhauser. 2013. The Nature of Technology. Implications for Learning and Teaching. Rotterdam/Boston/Taipei: Sense Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Constantinou, C. P., R. Hadjilouka, and N. Papadouris. 2010. “Students’ Epistemological Awareness Concerning the Distinction between Science and Technology.” International Journal of Science Education 32 (2): 143–172. doi:10.1080/09500690903229296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Constantinou, C. P., M. Livitzis, R. Hadjilouca, A. Scholinaki, M. Papaevripidou, N. Papadouris, Y. Hadjidemetriou, I. Karmiotis, M. Michael, Y. Hadjikostis, A. Stylianou, M. Kyndini, M. Pouangare, and L. Fakiolas. 2010a. “Electromagnetic properties of materials: Teachers’ Guide.” Learning in Science Group, University of Cyprus. http://www.felab.edu.uowm.gr/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/CYPRUS_TEACHER-ENGLISH-ORIGINAL-2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Constantinou, C. P., M. Livitzis, R. Hadjilouca, A. Scholinaki, M. Papaevripidou, N. Papadouris, Y. Hadjidemetriou, I. Karmiotis, M. Michael, Y. Hadjikostis, A. Stylianou, M. Kyndini, M. Pouangare, and L. Fakiolas. 2010b. “Electromagnetic properties of materials: Teaching and learning activities.” Learning in Science Group, University of Cyprus. http://www.felab.edu.uowm.gr/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/CYPRUS_STUDENT-ENGLISH-ORIGINAL-2.pdf 
   Google Scholar
• Constantinou, C. P., M. Papaevripidou, M. Lividjis, A. Scholinaki, and R. Hadjilouca. 2010c. “Teaching and learning about electromagnetism in high school: addressing issues of relevance and epistemic practice.” In Physics Curriculum Design, Development and Validation, Selected Papers from the GIREP2008 International Conference, edited by C. P. Constantinou and N. Papadouris, 296–310. Accessed April 10 2021. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/259939930_Teaching_and_learning_about_electromagnetism_in_high_school_addressing_issues_of_relevance_and_epistemic_practice 
   Google Scholar
• Constantinou, C. P., O. E. Tsivitanidou, and E. Rybska. 2018. “What Is Inquiry-Based Science Teaching and Learning?” In Professional Development for Inquiry-Based Science Teaching and Learning, edited by O. E. Tsivitanidou, P. Gray, E. Rybska, L. Louca and C. P. Constantinou, 1–23. Springer International Publishing, Book Series: Contributions from Science Education Research, 5. Series Editor: Robin Millar. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-91406-0
   Google Scholar
• Custer, R. L. 1995. “Examining the Dimensions of Technology.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 5 (3): 219–244. doi:10.1007/BF00769905.
   Google Scholar
• Dagher, Z. R., and S. Erduran. 2016. “Reconceptualizing the Nature of Science for Science Education. Why Does It Matter?” Science & Education 25 (1–2): 147–164. doi:10.1007/s11191-015-9800-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Vries, M. J. 2009. “The Developing Field of Technology Education: An Introduction.” In International Handbook of Research and Development in Technology Education, edited by A. T. Jones and M. J. De Vries, 1–9. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• De Vries, M. J., and I. Mottier. 2006. International Handbook of Technology Education. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
   Google Scholar
• Duggan, S., and R. Gott. 1995. “The Place of Investigations in Practical Work in the UK National Curriculum for Science.” International Journal of Science Education 17 (2): 137–147. doi:10.1080/0950069950170201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner, P. L. 1993. “Textbook Representations of Science-technology Relationships.” Research in Science Education 23 (1): 85–94. doi:10.1007/BF02357048.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, P. L. 1994. “The Relationship between Technology and Science: Some Historical and Philosophical Reflections. Part I.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 4 (2): 123–153. doi:10.1007/BF01204544.
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, P. L. 1999. “The Representation of Science-technology Relationships in Canadian Physics Textbooks.” International Journal of Science Education 21 (3): 329–347. doi:10.1080/095006999290732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil-Perez, D., A. Vilches, I. Fernandez, A. Cachapuz, J. Praia, P. Valdes, and J. Salinas. 2005. “Technology as ‘Applied Science’.” Science & Education 14 (3–5): 309–320. doi:10.1007/s11191-004-7935-0.
   Google Scholar
• Gyllenpalm, J., and P. O. Wickman. 2011. ““Experiments” and the Inquiry Emphasis Conflation in Science Teacher Education.” Science Education 95 (5): 908–926. doi:10.1002/sce.20446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadjilouca, R., C. P. Constantinou, and N. Papadouris. 2011. “The rationale for a teaching innovation about the interrelationship between science and technology.” Science & Education20 (10): 981–1005. doi:10.1007/s11191-010-9332-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadjilouca, R. and C. P. Constantinou. 2019. “Teaching Aspects of the Inter-relationship between Science and Technology: A Research Report on the Design, Enactment and Evaluation of a Teaching Proposal.” Research in Science and Technological Education 37 (4): 446–470. doi:10.1080/02635143.2018.1554560.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Höttecke, D., and D. Allchin. 2020. “Reconceptualizing Nature‐of‐science Education in the Age of Social Media.” Science Education 104 (4): 641–666. doi:10.1002/sce.21575.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irzik, G., and R. Nola. 2014. “New Directions for Nature of Science Research.” In International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching, edited by M. Matthews, 999–1021. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Irzik, G., and R. Nola. 2011. “A Family Resemblance Approach to the Nature of Science for Science Education.” Science & Education 20 (7–8): 591–607. doi:10.1007/s11191-010-9293-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ITEA. 2007. Standards for Technological Literacy: Content for the Study of Technology. 3rd ed. Virginia: International Technology Education Association.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, A., and C. Buntting. 2015. “Technology Education and Science Education.” In Springer Encyclopedia in Science Education, edited by R. Gunstone, 1049–1053. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kang, J., J. Hense, A. Scheersoi, and T. Keinonen. 2019. “Gender Study on the Relationships between Science Interest and Future Career Perspectives.” International Journal of Science Education 41 (1): 80–101. doi:10.1080/09500693.2018.1534021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaya, S., S. Erduran, N. Birdthistle, and O. McCormack. 2018. “Looking at the Social Aspects of Nature of Science in Science Education through a New Lens.” Science & Education 27 (5–6): 457–478. doi:10.1007/s11191-018-9990-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khishfe, R., and F. Abd-El-Khalick. 2002. “Influence of Explicit and Reflective versus Implicit Inquiry-oriented Instruction on Sixth Graders’ Views of Nature of Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39 (7): 551–578. doi:10.1002/tea.10036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khishfe, R., and N. Lederman. 2006. “Teaching Nature of Science within a Controversial Topic: Integrated versus Non-integrated.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 43 (4): 395–418. doi:10.1002/tea.20137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S. Y., and K. E. Irving. 2010. “History of Science as an Instructional Context: Student Learning in Genetics and Nature of Science.” Science & Education 19 (2): 187–215. doi:10.1007/s11191-009-9191-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolstø, S. 2008. “Science Education for Democratic Citizenship through the Use of the History of Science.” Science & Education 17 (8–9): 977–997. doi:10.1007/s11191-007-9084-8.
   Google Scholar
• Kyza, E., C. P. Constantinou, and G. Spanoudis. 2011. “Sixth graders’ co-construction of explanations of a disturbance in an ecosystem: exploring relationships between grouping, reflective scaffolding and evidence-based explanations.” International Journal of Science Education 33 (18): 2489–2525. doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.550951
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederman, N., and F. Abd-El-Khalick. 2000. “Avoiding De-natured Science: Activities that Promote Understandings of the Nature of Science.” In The Nature of Science in Science Education, edited by W. F. McComas, 83–126. Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, N., F. Abd-El-Khalick, P. Bell, and R. Schwartz. 2002. “View of Nature of Science Questionnaire: Toward Valid and Meaningful Assessment of Learners’ Conceptions of Nature of Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39 (6): 497–521. doi:10.1002/tea.10034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. G. 1992. “Students’ and Teachers’ Conceptions of the Nature of Science: A Review of the Research.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 29 (4): 331–359. doi:10.1002/tea.3660290404.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. G. 2007. “Nature of Science: Past, Present, and Future.” In Handbook of Research on Science Education, edited by S. K. Abell and N. G. Lederman, 831–879. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, T. 2006. “Design and Inquiry: Bases for an Accommodation between Science and Technology Education in the Curriculum?” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 43 (3): 255–281. doi:10.1002/tea.20111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton, F., and S. Booth. 1997. Learning and Awareness. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Matthews, M. R. 2017. “Reconceptualizing the Nature of Science for Science Education.” Science & Education 53: 105–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McComas, W. 2008. “Seeking Historical Examples to Illustrate Key Aspects of the Nature of Science.” Science & Education 17 (2–3): 249–263. doi:10.1007/s11191-007-9081-y.
   Google Scholar
• McComas, W. F., and J. K. Olson. 2002. “The Nature of Science in International Science Education Standards Documents.” In The Nature of Science in Science Education: Rationales and Strategies, edited by W. F. McComas, 41–52. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• McComas, W. F., Ed. 2002. The Nature of Science in Science Education: Rationales and Strategies. Vol. 5. Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, D. M., E. D. Abrams, and J. Robb. 2001. “Examining Student Conceptions of the Nature of Science.” International Journal of Science Education 23 (8): 771–790. doi:10.1080/09500690010016030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2012. A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nouri, N., and W. F. McComas. 2019. “History of Science (HOS) as a Vehicle to Communicate Aspects of Nature of Science (NOS): Multiple Cases of HOS Instructors’ Perspectives regarding NOS.” Research in Science Education 1-17. doi:10.1007/s11165-019-09879-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 2006. Women in Scientific Careers: Unleashing the Potential. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264025387-en
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, A. W., V. L. Akerson, H. Colak, K. Pongsanon, and A. Genel. 2012. “The Implicit Communication of Nature of Science and Epistemology during Inquiry Discussion.” Science Education 96 (4): 652–684. doi:10.1002/sce.21005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J., S. Collins, M. Ratcliffe, R. Millar, and R. Duschl. 2003. “What ? Ideas-about-science? Should Be Taught in School Science? A Delphi Study of the Expert Community.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 40 (7): 692–720. doi:10.1002/tea.10105.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadouris, N. and C. P. Constantinou. 2011. A Philosophically Informed Teaching Proposal on the Topic of Energy for Students Aged 11–14. Science & Education 20 (10): 961–979. doi:10.1007/s11191-010-9305-4
   Google Scholar
• Papadouris, N. and C. P. Constantinou. 2014. “An Exploratory Investigation of 12-Year-Old Students' Ability to Appreciate Certain Aspects of the Nature of Science through a Specially Designed Approach in the Context of Energy.” International Journal of Science Education 36 (5): 755–782. doi:10.1080/09500693.2013.827816.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadouris, N., C. P. Constantinou, M. Papaevripidou, M. Livitzis, A. Scholinaki, and R. Hadjilouca. 2016. “Design, Development and Refinement of a Teaching-Learning Sequence on the Electromagnetic Properties of Materials.” In Iterative Design of Teaching-Learning Sequences:Introducing the Science of Materials in European Schools, edited by D. Psillos and P. Kariotoglou, 331–369. Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-7808-5
   Google Scholar
• Peters, E. E. 2012. “Developing Content Knowledge in Students through Explicit Teaching of the Nature of Science: Influences of Goal Setting and Self-monitoring.” Science & Education 21 (6): 881–898. doi:10.1007/s11191-009-9219-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pleasants, J., M. P. Clough, J. K. Olson, and G. Miller. 2019. “Fundamental Issues regarding the Nature of Technology. Implications for STEM Education.” Science & Education 28 (3–5): 561–597. doi:10.1007/s11191-019-00056-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raftopoulos, A., N. Kalyfommatou, and C. P. Constantinou. 2005. “The Properties and the Nature of Light: The Study of Newton’s Work and the Teaching of Optics.” Science & Education 14: 649–673. doi:10.1007/s11191-004-5609-6
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, G. 2002. SET for Success: The Supply of People with Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Skills. UK: HM Treasury.
   Google Scholar
• Rudge, D., and E. Howe. 2009. “An Explicit and Reflective Approach to the UsPapadourise of History to Promote Understanding of the Nature of Science.” Science & Education 18 (5): 561–580. doi:10.1007/s11191-007-9088-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. 2004. “Informal Reasoning regarding Socioscientific Issues: A Critical Review of Research.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 41 (5): 513–536. doi:10.1002/tea.20009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandoval, W. A. 2003. The Inquiry Paradox: Why Doing Science Doesn’t Necessarily Change Ideas about Science. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Computer-Based Learning in Science Conference: I. New Technologies and their Applications in Education, edited by Constantinou, C. P. and Z. C. Zacharia, 825–834. University of Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus. Accessed April 10 2021. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/38301617.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sandoval, W. A. 2005. “Understanding Students’ Practical Epistemologies and Their Influence on Learning through Inquiry.” Science Education 89 (4): 634–656. doi:10.1002/sce.20065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandoval, W. A., and K. Morrison. 2003. “High School Students’ Ideas about Theories and Theory Change after a Biological Inquiry Unit.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 40: 369–392. doi:10.1002/tea.10081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schickore, J. 2008. “Doing Science, Writing Science.” Philosophy of Science 75 (3): 323–343. doi:10.1086/592951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, R. S., N. G. Lederman, and B. A. Crawford. 2004. “Developing Views of Nature of Science in an Authentic Context: An Explicit Approach to Bridging the Gap between Nature of Science and Scientific Inquiry.” Science Education 88 (4): 610–645. doi:10.1002/sce.10128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. U., N. G. Lederman, R. L. Bell, W. F. McComas, and M. P. Clough. 1997. “How Great Is the Disagreement about the Nature of Science: A Response to Alters.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 34 (10): 1101–1103. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199712)34:10<1101::AID-TEA8>3.0.CO;2-V.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Straits, W. J., and S. E. Nichols. 2007. “Using Historical Nonfiction and Literature Circles to Develop Elementary Teachers’ Nature of Science Understanding.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 18 (6): 901–912. doi:10.1007/s10972-007-9070-7.
   Google Scholar
• Szumilewicz, I. 1977. “Incommensurability and the Rationality of the Development of Science.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 28 (4): 345–350. doi:10.1093/bjps/28.4.345.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taber, K. S. 2008. “Towards a Curricular Model of the Nature of Science.” Science & Education 17 (2–3): 179–218. doi:10.1007/s11191-006-9056-4.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, K. A., and D. L. Zeidler. 2003. “Students’ Understanding of the Nature of Science and Their Reasoning on Socioscientific Issues: A Web-based Learning Inquiry.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Yip, D. Y. 2006. “Using History to Promote Understanding of Nature of Science in Science Teachers.” Teaching Education 17 (2): 157–166. doi:10.1080/10476210600680382.
   Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L., K. A. Walker, W. A. Ackett, and M. L. Simmons. 2002. “Tangled up in Views: Beliefs in the Nature of Science and Responses to Socioscientific Dilemmas.” Science Education 86 (3): 343–367. doi:10.1002/sce.10025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeidler, D. L., T. D. Sadler, M. L. Simmons, and E. V. Howes. 2005. “Beyond STS: A Research-based Framework for Socioscientific Issues Education.” Science Education 89 (3): 357–377. doi:10.1002/sce.20048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar