The representation of laboratory activities in Indonesian physics textbooks: a content analysis

References

• Abd‐El‐Khalick, F., S. Boujaoude, R. Duschl, N. G. Lederman, R. Mamlok‐Naaman, A. Hofstein, D. Treagust, and H. L. Tuan. 2004. “Inquiry in Science Education: International Perspectives.” Science Education 88 (3): 397–419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrahams, I., and M. Saglam. 2010. “A Study of Teachers’ Views on Practical Work in Secondary Schools in England and Wales.” International Journal of Science Education 32 (6): 753–768.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abrahams, I., and R. Millar. 2008. “Does Practical Work Really Work? A Study of the Effectiveness of Practical Work as A Teaching and Learning Method in School Science.” International Journal of Science Education 30 (14): 1945–1969.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahtineva, A. 2005. “Textbook Analysis in the Service of Chemistry Teaching.” Universitas Scientiarum 10 (3): 25–33.
   Google Scholar
• Aldahmash, A. H., N. S. Mansour, S. M. Alshamrani, and S. Almohi. 2016. “An Analysis of Activities in Saudi Arabian Middle School Science Textbooks and Workbooks for the Inclusion of Essential Features of Inquiry.” Research in Science Education 46 (6): 879–900.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinson, J. R. 2015. “Learning Outcome Achievement in Non-traditional (Virtual and Remote) versus Traditional (Hands-on) Laboratories: A Review of the Empirical Research.” Computers & Education 87 (20): 218–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulunuz, M., O. S. Jarrett, and L. Martin-Hansen. 2012. “Level of Inquiry as Motivator in an Inquiry Methods Course for Pre-service Elementary Teachers.” School Science and Mathematics 112 (6): 330–339.
   Google Scholar
• Bunterm, T., K. Lee, J. Ng Lan Kong, S. Srikoon, P. Vangpoomyai, J. Rattanavongsa, and G Rachahoon. 2014. “Do Different Levels of Inquiry Lead to Different Learning Outcomes? A Comparison between Guided and Structured Inquiry.” International Journal of Science Education 36 (12): 1937–1959.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu, J. L., C. J. DeJaegher, and J. Chao. 2015. “The Effects of Augmented Virtual Science Laboratories on Middle School Students’ Understanding of Gas Properties.” Computers & Education 85 (6): 59–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, L., L. Manion, and K. Morrison. 2017. Research Methods in Education, pp. 31–30. 7th ed ed. London: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, F. L. 1988. “Content Analysis: Process and Application.” Clinical Nurse Specialist 2 (1): 53–57.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Correia, A. P., N. Koehler, A. Thompson, and G. Phye. 2019. “The Application of PhET Simulation to Teach Gas Behavior on the Submicroscopic Level: Secondary School Students’ Perceptions.” Research in Science & Technological Education 37 (2): 193–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiGiuseppe, M. 2014. “Representing Nature of Science in a Science Textbook: Exploring Author–editor–publisher Interactions.” International Journal of Science Education 36 (7): 1061–1082.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimopoulos, K., and C. Karamanidou. 2013. “Towards a More Epistemologically Valid Image of School Science: Revealing the Textuality of School Science Textbooks.” In Critical Analysis of Science Textbooks, edited by M. S. Khine, 61–77. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Doran, R. L. 1978. “Assessing the Outcomes of Science Laboratory Activities.” Science Education 62 (3): 401–409.
   Google Scholar
• Elgar, A. G. 2004. “Science Textbooks for Lower Secondary Schools in Brunei: Issues of Gender Equity.” International Journal of Science Education 26 (7): 875–894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herron, M.D. 1971. “The Nature of Scientific Inquiry.” School Review 79 (2): 141–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstein, A., and V. N. Lunetta. 2004. “The Laboratory in Science Education: Foundations for the Twenty‐first Century.” Science Education 88 (1): 28–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, J., M. Hwang, M. Liu, H. Ho, and Y. Chen. 2014. “Using a “Prediction–observation–explanation” Inquiry Model to Enhance Student Interest and Intention to Continue Science Learning Predicted by Their Internet Failure.” Computers & Education 72 (2): 110–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irez, S. 2009. “Nature of Science as Depicted in Turkish Biology Textbooks.” Science Education 93 (3): 422–447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ismail, A., A. Setiawan, A. Suhandi, and A. Rusli. 2019. “Profile of Physics Laboratory-based Higher Order Thinking Skills (Hots) in Indonesian High Schools.” Journal of Physics. Conference Series 1280 (5): 052053–052061.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang, F., and W. F. Mc Comas. 2015. “The Effects of Inquiry Teaching on Student Science Achievement and Attitudes: Evidence from Propensity Score Analysis of PISA Data.” International Journal of Science Education 37 (3): 554–576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamajaya, K., and W. Purnama. 2016a. Buku Siswa: Aktif Dan Kreatif Belajar Fisika-Kelas X (Active and Creative Physics-Grade X). Bandung: Grafindo.
   Google Scholar
• Kamajaya, K., and W. Purnama. 2016b. Buku Siswa: Aktif Dan Kreatif Belajar Fisika-Kelas XI (Active and Creative Physics-Grade XI). Bandung: Grafindo.
   Google Scholar
• Kamajaya, K., and W. Purnama. 2016c. Buku Siswa: Aktif Dan Kreatif Belajar Fisika-Kelas XII (Active and Creative Physics-Grade XII). Bandung: Grafindo.
   Google Scholar
• Khine, M. S. 2013. “Analysis of Science Textbooks for Instructional Effectiveness.” In Critical Analysis of Science Textbooks, edited by M. S. Khine, 303–310. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kluge, A. 2014. “Combining Laboratory Experiments with Digital Tools to Do Scientific Inquiry.” International Journal of Science Education 36 (13): 2157–2179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruit, P. M., R. J. Oostdam, E. Van Den Berg, and J. A. Schuitema. 2018. “Assessing Students’ Ability in Performing Scientific Inquiry: Instruments for Measuring Science Skills in Primary Education.” Research in Science & Technological Education 36 (4): 413–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X., Z. Tan, J. Shen, W. Hu, Y. Chen, and J. Wang. 2020. “Analysis of Five Junior High School Physics Textbooks Used in China for Representations of Nature of Science.” Research in Science Education 50 (3): 833–844.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., and D. F. Treagust. 2013. “Content Analysis of Diagrams in Secondary School Science Textbooks.” In Critical Analysis of Science Textbooks, edited by M. S. Khine, pp. 287–300. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lunetta, V. N. 1981. “Inquiry-related Tasks in High School Science Laboratory Handbooks.” Science Education 65 (5): 477–484.
   Google Scholar
• McComas, W. F., and A. I. Colburn. 1995. “Laboratory Learning: Addressing a Neglected Dimension of Science Teacher Education.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 6 (2): 120–123.
   Google Scholar
• MOEC (Ministry of Education and Culture). 2018. Materi Bimbingan Teknis Fasilitator Dan Instruktur Kurikulum 2013: Mata Pelajaran Fisika Sekolah Menengah Atas (Technical Guidance Materials for Facilitator and Instructor of Curriculum 2013: Physics Subject for Senior High School). Jakarta: Ministry of Education and Culture.
   Google Scholar
• Muspratt, S., and P. Freebody. 2013. “Understanding the Disciplines of Science: Analysing the Language of Science Textbooks.” In Critical Analysis of Science Textbooks, edited by M. S. Khine, 33–59. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Novak, J. D. 1988. “Learning Science and the Science of Learning.”Studies in Science Education 15: 77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Ogan-Bekiroglu, F. 2007. “To What Degree Do the Currently Used Physics Textbooks Meet the Expectations?” Journal of Science Teacher Education 18 (4): 599–628.
   Google Scholar
• Olympiou, G., and Z. C. Zacharia. 2012. “Blending Physical and Virtual Manipulatives: An Effort to Improve Students’ Conceptual Understanding through Science Laboratory Experimentation.” Science Education 96 (1): 21–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, D. 2005. “Differences between a Standards-based Curriculum and Traditional Textbooks in High School Earth Science.” Journal of Geoscience Education 53 (5): 540–547.
   Google Scholar
• Park, D. Y., and J. Lavonen. 2013. “An Analysis of Standards-based High School Physics Textbooks of Finland and the United States.” In Critical Analysis of Science Textbooks, edited by M. S. Khine, pp. 219–238. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Park, M., and Y. Sung. 2013. “Teachers’ Perceptions of the Recent Curriculum Reforms and Their Implementation: What Can We Learn from the Case of Korean Elementary Teachers?” Asia Pacific Journal of Education 33 (1): 15–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penney, K., S. P. Norris, L. M. Phillips, and G. Clark. 2003. “The Anatomy of Junior High School Science Textbooks: An Analysis of Textual Characteristics and a Comparison to Media Reports of Science.” Canadian Journal of Math, Science & Technology Education 3 (4): 415–436.
   Google Scholar
• Roychoudhury, A., and W. M. Roth. 1996. “Interactions in an Open‐inquiry Physics Laboratory.” International Journal of Science Education 18 (4): 423–445.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saariaho, E., K. Pyhältö, A. Toom, J. Pietarinen, and T. Soini. 2016. “Student Teachers’ Self-and Co-regulation of Learning during Teacher Education. Learning.” Research and Practice 2 (1): 44–63.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, W. L. 1992. “The Constructivist Perspective: Implications and Teaching Strategies for Science.” School Science and Mathematics 92 (3): 136–141.
   Google Scholar
• Schwab, J. J. 1962. “The Teaching of Science as Enquiry.” In The Teaching of Science, edited by J. J. Schwab and P. F. Brandwein, 1–103. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sesen, B. A., and L. Tarhan. 2013. “Inquiry-based Laboratory Activities in Electrochemistry: High School Students’ Achievements and Attitudes.” Research in Science Education 43 (1): 413–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiland, T. W. 1999. “Constructivism: The Implications for Laboratory Work.” Journal of Chemical Education 76 (1): 107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamir, P. 1989. “Training Teachers to Teach Effectively in the Laboratory.” Science Education 73 (1): 59–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamir, P., and M. Pilar-Garcia. 1992. “Characteristics of Laboratory Exercises Included in Science Textbooks in Catalonia (Spain).” International Journal of Science Education 14 (4): 381–392.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamir, P., and V. I. Lunetta. 1978. “An Analysis of Laboratory Activities in the Bscs Yellow Version.” The American Biology Teacher 40 (6): 353–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, X., J. E. Coffey, A. L. Elby, and M. Daniel. 2010. “The Scientific Method and Scientific Inquiry: Tensions in Teaching and Learning.” Science Education 94 (1): 29–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobin, K. 1984. “Avoiding Cookbook Science. Science Activities.” Classroom Projects and Curriculum Ideas 21 (2): 10–15.
   Google Scholar
• Tobin, K. 1986. “Secondary Science Laboratory Activities.” European Journal of Science Education 8 (2): 199–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tobin, K. G. 1990. “Research on Science Laboratory Activities: In Pursuit of Better Questions and Answers to Improve Learning.” School Science and Mathematics 90 (5): 403–418.
   Google Scholar
• Velentzas, A., and K. Halkia. 2018. “Scientific Explanations in Greek Upper Secondary Physics Textbooks.” International Journal of Science Education 40 (1): 90–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcox, B. R., and H. J. Lewandowski. 2017. “Developing Skills versus Reinforcing Concepts in Physics Labs: Insight from a Survey of Students’ Beliefs about Experimental Physics.” Physical Review Physics Education Research 13 (1): 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, J. 1999. “A Qualitative Analysis of Physics Textbooks for Scientific Literacy Themes.” Research in Science Education 29 (3): 385–399.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, W., and E. Liu. 2016. “Development and Validation of an Instrument for Evaluating Inquiry-based Tasks in Science Textbooks.” International Journal of Science Education 38 (18): 2688–2711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zohar, A., and D. Sela. 2003. “Her Physics, His Physics: Gender Issues in Israeli Advanced Placement Physics Classes.” International Journal of Science Education 25 (2): 245–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zohar, A., and V. Alboher Agmon. 2018. “Raising Test Scores Vs. Teaching Higher Order Thinking (HOT): Senior Science Teachers’ Views on How Several Concurrent Policies Affect Classroom Practices.” Research in Science & Technological Education 36 (2): 243–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar