4,053
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Scientist of the week: evaluating effects of a teacher-led STEM intervention to reduce stereotypical views of scientists in young children

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon

References

  • Archer, L., J. DeWitt, J. Osborne, J. Dillon, B. Willis, and B. Wong. 2013b. “Not girly, not sexy, not glamorous”: primary school girls’ and parents’ constructions of science aspirations1. Pedagogy, Culture and Society 21(1): 171–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2012
  • Archer, L., J. DeWitt, J. Osborne, J. Dillon, and B. Wong. 2013a. ASPIRES. Young people’s science and career aspirations, age 10 – 14. King’s College London Department of Education & Professional Studies. Accessed 13 January 2021. https://www.kcl.ac.uk/ecs/research/aspires/aspires-final-report-december-2013.pdf
  • Archer, L., J. Moote, B. Francis, J. DeWitt, and L. Yeomans. 2017. The “Exceptional” Physics Girl: A Sociological Analysis of Multimethod Data From Young Women Aged 10–16 to Explore Gendered Patterns of Post-16 Participation. American Educational Research Journal 54(1): 88–126. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831216678379
  • Archer, L., E. Dawson, J. DeWitt, A. Seakins, and B. Wong. 2015. “Science capital”: A conceptual, methodological, and empirical argument for extending bourdieusian notions of capital beyond the arts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21227
  • Avraamidou, L. 2013. “Superheroes and Supervillains: Reconstructing the Mad-scientist Stereotype in School Science.” Research in Science and Technological Education 31 (1): 90–115. doi:10.1080/02635143.2012.761605.
  • Betz, D. E., and D. Sekaquaptewa. 2012. “My Fair Physicist? Feminine Math and Science Role Models Demotivate Young Girls.” Social Psychological and Personality Science 3(6): 738–746. doi:10.1177/1948550612440735.
  • Bian, L., S. J. Leslie, and A. Cimpian. 2017. “Gender Stereotypes about Intellectual Ability Emerge Early and Influence Children’s Interests.” Science (New York, N.Y.) 355 (6323): 389–391. doi:10.1126/science.aah6524.
  • Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2006. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
  • Buck, G. A., D. Leslie-Pelecky, and S. K. Kirby. 2002. “Bringing Female Scientists into the Elementary Classroom: Confronting the Strength of Elementary Students’ Stereotypical Images of Scientists.” Journal of Elementary Science Education 14 (2): 1–9. doi:10.1007/bf03173844.
  • Cakmakci, G., O. Tosun, S. Turgut, S. Orenler, K. Sengul, and G. Top. 2011. “Promoting an Inclusive Image of Scientists among Students: Towards Research Evidence-based Practice.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 9 (3): 627–655. doi:10.1007/s10763-010-9217-4.
  • Catalyst. 2020. “Women in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM): Quick Take.” https://www.catalyst.org/research/women-in-science-technology-engineering-and-mathematics-stem/
  • Chambers, D. W. 1983. Stereotypic images of the scientist: The draw-a-scientist test. Science education 67(2): 255–265.
  • Christensen, R., G. Knezek, and T. Tyler-Wood. 2014. “Student Perceptions of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Content and Careers.” Computers in Human Behavior 34: 173–186. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.046.
  • Cleaves, A. 2005. “The Formation of Science Choices in Secondary School.” International Journal of Science Education 27 (4): 471–486. doi:10.1080/0950069042000323746.
  • Clemence, M., N. Gilby, J. Shah, J. Swiecicka, D. Warren, P. Smith, and J. D. Souza. 2013. “Wellcome Trust Monitor: Wave 2.” Wellcome Trust. Accessed 4 January 2021. https://wellcome.ac.uk/sites/default/files/monitor-wave2-full-wellcome-may13.pdf
  • Congressional Commission on the Advancement of Women and Minorities in Science, Engineering and Technology Development. 2020. “Land of Plenty Diversity as America’s Competitive Edge in Science, Engineering and Technology.” Accessed 5 January 2020. https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2000/cawmset0409/cawmset_0409.pdf
  • Davenport, C., O. Dele-Ajayi, I. Emembolu, R. Morton, A. Padwick, A. Portas, J. Sanderson, J. Shimwell, J. Stonehouse, R. Strachan, and L. Wake. 2020. A Theory of Change for Improving Children’s Perceptions, Aspirations and Uptake of STEM Careers. Research Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-09909–6
  • Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy. 2020. “Annual Report and Accounts 2014–2015.” Accessed 4 January 2021. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/922625/CCS0320287242-001_BEIS_Annual_Report-V11.pdf
  • Department for Business Innovation and Skills. 2014. “Annual Report and Accounts 2014–2015.” Accessed 4 January 2021. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/444895/BIS-15-421-BIS-Annual-Report-15-HI-RES.pdf
  • Department for Communities and Local Government. 2015. “The English Indices of Deprivation 2015”. Accessed 6 January 2021. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/465791/English_Indices_of_Deprivation_2015_-_Statistical_Release.pdf
  • Department for Education. 2017. “Careers Strategy: Making the Most of Everyone’s Skills and Talents”. Accessed 6 January 2021. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/664319/Careers_strategy.pdf
  • DeWitt, J., and L. Archer. 2017. Participation in informal science learning experiences: the rich get richer? International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement, 7(4), 356–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2017.1360531
  • DeWitt, J., and K. Bultitude. 2018. Space Science: the View from European School Students. Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9759–y
  • Emvalotis, A., and A. Koutsianou. 2018. “Greek Primary School Students’ Images of Scientists and Their Work: Has Anything Changed?” Research in Science and Technological Education 36 (1): 69–85. doi:10.1080/02635143.2017.1366899.
  • Finson, K. D. 2002. “Drawing a Scientist: What We Do and Do Not Know after Fifty Years of Drawings.” School Science and Mathematics 102 (7): 335–345. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2002.tb18217.x.
  • Finson, K. D., J. B. Beaver, and B. L. Cramond. 1995. Development and field test of a checklist for the Draw‐A‐Scientist Test. School science and mathematics 95(4): 195–205.
  • Fort, D. C., and H. L. Varney. 1989. How students see scientists: Mostly male, mostly white, and mostly benevolent. Science and Children 26(8): 8–13.
  • Greenfield, S., J. Peters, N. Lane, T. Rees, and G. Samuels. 2002. “SET Fair.” Accessed 10 January 2021. http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-files/Education/documents/2002/11/28/4408-DTI-Greenfield.pdf
  • Guides Girl. 2016. “2016 Girls’ Attitudes Survey.” Accessed 8 January 2021. www.girlguiding.org.uk/girlsattitudes
  • Hannover, B., and U. Kessels. 2004. “Self-to-prototype Matching as a Strategy for Making Academic Choices. Why High School Students Do Not like Math and Science.” Learning and Instruction 14 (1): 51–67. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2003.10.002.
  • Hatch, J. A. 2002. Doing Qualitative Research in Education Settings. Suny Press.
  • Hillman, S. J., K. H. Bloodsworth, C. E. Tilburg, S. I. Zeeman, and H. E. List. 2014. “K-12 Students’ Perceptions of Scientists: Finding a Valid Measurement and Exploring whether Exposure to Scientists Makes an Impact.” International Journal of Science Education 36 (15): 2580–2595. doi:10.1080/09500693.2014.908264.
  • House of Commons Science and Technology Committee. 2014. “Women in scientific careers Sixth Report of Session 2013-14 Report.” https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201314/cmselect/cmsctech/701/701.pdf
  • Huber, R. A., and G. M. Burton. 1995. What do students think scientists look like? School Science and Mathematics 95(7): 371–376.
  • Ipsos MORI. 2011. Public attitudes to science 2011.” London: Ipsos MORI Social Research Institute.
  • Jenkins, E. W., and R. G. Pell. 2006. “The Relevance of Science Education Project (ROSE) in England: A Summary of Findings.” Centre for Studies in Science and Mathematics Education, University of Leeds. Accessed 3 March 2021. https://www.roseproject.no/network/countries/uk-england/rose-report-eng.pdf
  • Keller, B. K., and S. C. Whiston. 2008. “The Role of Parental Influences on Young Adolescents’ Career Development.” Journal of Career Assessment 16 (2): 198–217. doi:10.1177/1069072707313206.
  • Kessels, U., M. Rau, and B. Hannover. 2006. “What Goes Well with Physics? Measuring and Altering the Image of Science.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 76 (4): 761–780. doi:10.1348/000709905X59961.
  • Koren, P., and V. Bar. 2009. “Science and It’s Images - Promise and Threat: From Classic Literature to Contemporary Students’ Images of Science and the Scientist.” Interchange 40 (2): 141–163. doi:10.1007/s10780-009-9088-1.
  • Langan, T. 2019. Biggleton. United Kingdom: BBC. www.bbc.co.uk/cbeebies/shows/biggleton
  • Leonardi, S., H. Lamb, J. Harrison, A. Stutz, R. Steer, P. Howe, and A. Corley. 2019. “Understanding the “State of the Nation” Report of UK Primary Science.” Wellcome Trust. https://wellcome.ac.uk/sites/default/files/understanding-state-of-the-nation-report-of-uk-primary-science-education.pdf
  • Lincoln, Y., and E. G. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic Enquiry. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
  • Long, Marilee, Jocelyn Steinke, Brooks Applegate, Maria Knight Lapinski, Marne J. Johnson, and Sayani Ghosh. 2010. “Portrayals of Male and Female Scientists in Television Programs Popular among Middle School-Age Children.” Science Communication 32 (3): 356–382. doi:10.1177/1075547009357779.
  • Losh, S. C., R. Wilke, and M. Pop. 2008. “Some Methodological Issues with “Draw a Scientist Tests” among Young Children.” International Journal of Science Education 30 (6): 773–792. doi:10.1080/09500690701250452.
  • Lucas, B., J. Hanson, and G. Claxton 2014. “Thinking like an Engineer - Implications for the Education System.” Royal Academy of Engineers. Accessed 11 January 2021. http://www.raeng.org.uk/thinkinglikeanengineer
  • MacDonald, A. 2014. “Not for People like Me?” Under-represented groups in science, technology and engineering, (November 2014), 1–32.
  • Mansour, N. 2015. “Science Teachers’ Views and Stereotypes of Religion, Scientists and Scientific Research: A Call for Scientist–science Teacher Partnerships to Promote Inquiry-based Learning.” International Journal of Science Education 37 (11): 1767–1794. doi:10.1080/09500693.2015.1049575.
  • Markus, H., and P. Nurius 1986. “Possible Selves”. psycnet.apa.org. Accessed 3 January 2021. https://psycnet.apa.org/journals/amp/41/9/954.html?uid=1987-01154-001
  • Matthews, B., and D. Davies. 1999. Changing Children's Images of Scientists: Can Teachers Make a Difference? School Science Review 80(293): 79–85.
  • McCarthy, D. 2015. “Teacher Candidates’ Perceptions of Scientists: Images and Attributes.” Educational Review 67 (4): 389–413. doi:10.1080/00131911.2014.974510.
  • Mead, M., and R. Metraux. 1957. Image of the scientist among high-school students. Science 126(3270): 384–390.
  • Miller, D. I., K. H Nolla, A. H. Eagly, and D. H. Uttal. 2018. “The Development of Children’s Gender-Science Stereotypes: A Meta-analysis of 5 Decades of U.S. Draw-A-Scientist Studies.” Child Development 89 (6): 1943–1955. doi:10.1111/cdev.13039.
  • Mills, L. A. 2014. “Possible Science Selves: Informal Learning and the Career Interest Development Process”. In 11th International Conference on Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age, CELDA 2014 (pp. 275–279). Portugal. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED557373
  • Morgan, R, and C. Kirby 2016. “The UK STEM Education Landscape.” Royal Academy of Engineering. Accessed 12 January 2021. https://www.raeng.org.uk/publications/reports/uk-stem-education-landscape
  • National Science Foundation. 2020. “The State of U.S. Science and Engineering 2020.” National Science Foundation. Accessed 19 August 2020, from https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20201/u-s-s-e-workforce
  • Newton, L. D., and D. P. Newton. 2011. “Primary Children’s Conceptions of Science and the Scientist: Is the Impact of a National Curriculum Breaking down the Stereotype?” International Journal of Science Education 20 (9): 1137–1149. doi:10.1080/0950069980200909.
  • Noonan, R. 2017. “STEM Jobs: 2017 Update (ESA Issue Brief #02-17).” US Department of Commerce. Accessed 8 January 2021. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED594354
  • Nowell, L. S., J. M. Norris, D. E. White, and N. J. Moules. 2017. “Thematic Analysis.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 16 (1): 160940691773384. doi:10.1177/1609406917733847.
  • Osborne, J., S. Simon, and S. Collins. 2003. “Attitudes Towards Science: A Review of the Literature and Its Implications.” International Journal of Science Education 25 (9): 1049–1079. doi:10.1080/0950069032000032199.
  • Oyserman, D., and S. Fryberg. 2006. “The Possible Selves of Diverse Adolescents: Content and Function across Gender, Race and National Origin.” In Possible Selves: Theory, Research and Applications, 17–40. Nova Science Publishers. https://bit.ly/308H6wk
  • Packard, B. W. L., and D. Nguyen. 2003. “Science Career-Related Possible Selves of Adolescent Girls: A Longitudinal Study.” Journal of Career Development 29 (4): 251–263. doi:10.1177/089484530302900403.
  • Painter, J., T.R. Tretter, M. G. Jones, and D. Kubasko. 2006. “Pulling Back the Curtain: Uncovering and Changing Students’ Perceptions of Scientists.” School Science and Mathematics 106 (4): 181–190. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2006.tb18074.x.
  • R Core Team. 2013. “R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing.” Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Accessed 16 January 2021. http://www.R-project.org/
  • Scherz, Z., and M. Oren. 2006. “How to Change Students’ Images of Science and Technology.” Science Education 90 (6): 965–985. doi:10.1002/sce.20159.
  • Schinske, J. N., H. Perkins, A. Snyder, M. Wyer, and P. Marsteller. 2016. “Scientist Spotlight Homework Assignments Shift Students’ Stereotypes of Scientists and Enhance Science Identity in a Diverse Introductory Science Class.” CBE Life Sciences Education 15 (3): 1–18. doi:10.1187/cbe.16-01-0002.
  • Schummer, J., and T. I. Spector. 2008. Popular images versus self-images of science. Science Images and Popular images of the Sciences 69–95.
  • Sharkawy, A. 2009. “Moving beyond the Lone Scientist: Helping 1st-grade Students Appreciate the Social Context of Scientific Work Using Stories about Scientists.” Journal of Elementary Science Education 21 (1): 67–78. doi:10.1007/bf03174716.
  • Sharkawy, A. 2012. “Exploring the Potential of Using Stories about Diverse Scientists and Reflective Activities to Enrich Primary Students’ Images of Scientists and Scientific Work.” Cultural Studies of Science Education 7 (2): 307–340. doi:10.1007/s11422-012-9386-2.
  • Steinke, J., M. K. Lapinski, M. Long, C. Van Der Maas, L. Ryan, and B. Applegate. 2009. “Seeing Oneself as a Scientist: Media Influences and Adolescent Girls’ Science Career-possible Selves.” Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 15 (4): 279–301. doi:10.1615/JWomenMinorScienEng.v15.i4.10.
  • Strachan, R., Peixoto, A., Emembolu, I., & Restivo, M. T. 2018. Women in engineering: Addressing the gender gap, exploring trust and our unconscious bias. IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON, 2018-April, 2088–2093. https://doi.org/10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363497
  • Tan, A. L., J. A. Jocz, and J. Zhai. 2017. “Spiderman and Science: How Students’ Perceptions of Scientists are Shaped by Popular Media.” Public Understanding of Science 26 (5): 520–530. doi:10.1177/0963662515615086.
  • Tan, E., A. Calabrese Barton, H. Kang, and T. O’Neill. 2013. “Desiring a Career in STEM-related Fields: How Middle School Girls Articulate and Negotiate Identities-in-practice in Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 50 (10): 1143–1179. doi:10.1002/tea.21123.
  • Varelas, M., J. M. Kane, and C. D. Wylie. 2011. “Young African American Children’s Representations of Self, Science, and School: Making Sense of Difference.” Science Education 95 (5): 824–851. doi:10.1002/sce.20447.
  • Vennix, J., P. Den Brok, and R. Taconis. 2018. “Do Outreach Activities in Secondary STEM Education Motivate Students and Improve Their Attitudes Towards STEM?” International Journal of Science Education 0693 (May): 1–21. doi:10.1080/09500693.2018.1473659.
  • WISE. 2018. “WISE 2018 Workforce Statistics.” Women in Science and Engineering. Accessed 6 January 2021. https://www.wisecampaign.org.uk/statistics/2018-workforce-statistics/
  • Woods-Townsend, K., A. Christodoulou, W. Rietdijk, J. Byrne, J. B. Griffiths, and M. M. Grace. 2016. “Meet the Scientist: The Value of Short Interactions between Scientists and Students.” International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement 6 (1): 89–113. doi:10.1080/21548455.2015.1016134.