Students’ argumentation in the contexts of science, religious education, and interdisciplinary science-religious education scenarios

References

• Aydeniz, M., A. Pabuccu, P. S. Cetin, and E. Kaya. 2012. “Impact of Argumentation on College Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Properties and Behaviors of Gases.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 10 (6): 1303–1324. 10.1007/s10763-012-9336-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basel, N., U. Harms, H. Prechtl, T. Weiß, and M. Rothgangel. 2014. “Students’ Arguments on the Science and Religion Issue: The Example of Evolutionary Theory and Genesis.” Journal of Biological Education 48 (4): 179–187. 10.1080/00219266.2013.849286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berland, L. K., and B. J. Reiser. 2009. “Making Sense of Argumentation and Explanation.” Science Education 93 (1): 26–55. 10.1002/sce.20286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billingsley, B., M. Nassaji, S. Fraser, and F. Lawson. 2018. “A Framework for Teaching Epistemic Insight in Schools.” Research in Science Education 48: 1115–1131. 10.1007/s11165-018-9788-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, J., N. Fancourt, and L. Guilfoyle. 2020. “Argumentation in religious education in England: an analysis of locally agreed syllabuses.” British Journal of Religious Education:1–14. 10.1080/01416200.2020.1734916
   Google Scholar
• Crujeiras-Pérez, B., and M. P. Jimenez-Aleixandre. 2019. “Interdisciplinarity and Argumentation in Chemistry Education.” In Argumentation in Chemistry Education: Research, Policy and Practice, edited by S. Erduran, 32–61. London: Royal Society of Chemistry.
   Google Scholar
• Dawson, Vaille, and Katherine Carson. 2017. “Using Climate Change Scenarios to Assess High School Students’ Argumentation Skills.” Research in Science & Technological Education 35 (1): 1–16. doi:10.1080/02635143.2016.1174932.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson, Vaille, and Katherine Carson. 2020. “Introducing Argumentation about Climate Change Socioscientific Issues in a Disadvantaged School.” Research in Science Education 50 (3): 863–883. 10.1007/s11165-018-9715-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duschl, R. A., and J. Osborne. 2002. “Supporting and Promoting Argumentation Discourse in Science Education.” Studies in Science Education 38 (1): 39–72. 10.1080/03057260208560187.
   Google Scholar
• Erduran, S., S. Simon, and J. Osborne. 2004. “TAPping Into Argumentation: Developments in the Application of Toulmin's Argument Pattern for Studying Science Discourse.” Science Education 88 (6): 915–933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erduran, S. 2008. “Methodological Foundations in the Study of Argumentation in Science Classrooms.” In Argumentation in Science Education, edited by S. Erduran and M. P. Jimenez-Aleixandre, 47–69. Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Erduran, S., L. Guilfoyle, W. Park, J. Chan and N. Fancourt. 2019. “Argumentation and Interdisciplinarity: Reflections from the Oxford Argumentation in Religion and Science Project.” Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research1 (8). 10.1186/s43031-019-0006-9.
   Google Scholar
• Erduran, S. 2020. “Argumentation in Science and Religion: Match And/or Mismatch When Applied in Teaching and Learning?” Journal for Education for Teaching 46 (1): 129–131. 10.1080/02607476.2019.1708624.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erduran, S., L. Guilfoyle, and W. Park. 2020. “Science and Religious Education Teachers’ Views of Argumentation and Its Teaching.” Research in Science Education. 10.1007/s11165-020-09966-2
   Google Scholar
• Erduran, S., L. Guilfoyle, and W. Park. 2021. “An investigation into secondary teachers’ views of argumentation in science and religious education.” Journal of Beliefs & Values 42 (2): 190–204. 10.1080/13617672.2020.1805925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erduran, S., Y. Ozdem, and J-Y. Park. 2015. “Research Trends on Argumentation in Science Education: A Journal Content Analysis from 1998-2014.” International Journal of STEM Education 2 (5). doi:10.1186/s40594-015-0020-1.
   Google Scholar
• Erduran, S., and Z.R. Dagher. 2014. “Regaining Focus in Irish Junior Cycle Science: Potential New Directions for Curriculum and Assessment on Nature of Science.” Irish Educational Studies 33 (4): 335–350. doi:10.1080/03323315.2014.984386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Union. 2006. “Recommendation of the European Parliament on Key Competences for Lifelong Learning.” Official Journal of the European Union, 3012-2006, L 394/10-L 394/18. Accessed 10 August 2020. https://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:394:0010:0018:en:PDF
   Google Scholar
• Freathy, R., J. Doney, G. Freathy, K. Walshe, and G. Teece. 2017. “Pedagogical Bricoleurs and Bricolage Researchers: The Case of Religious Education.” British Journal of Educational Studies 65 (4): 425–443. doi:10.1080/00071005.2017.1343454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, S., S. McKinney, K. Lowden, M. Smith, and P. Beaumont. 2014. “Collaboration between Science and Religious Education Teachers in Scottish Secondary Schools.” Journal of Beliefs and Values 35 (1): 90–107. doi:10.1080/13617672.2014.884846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F., and K. Krippendorff. 2007. “Answering the Call for a Standard Reliability Measure for Coding Data.” Communication Methods and Measures 1 (1): 77–89. doi:10.1080/19312450709336664.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. B., K. L. McNeill, M. González‐Howard, K. Close, and M. Evans. 2018. “Key Challenges and Future Directions for Educational Research on Scientific Argumentation.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 55 (1): 5–18. doi:10.1002/tea.21412.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hitzhusen, G., and M. Tucker. 2013. “The Potential of Religion for Earth Stewardship.” Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 11 (7): 368–376. doi:10.1890/120322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horwell, C., and F. McDonald. 2020. “Coronavirus: Why You Need to Wear a Face Mask in France, but Not in the UK.” Accessed 25 February 2020. https://theconversation.com/coronavirus-why-you-need-to-wear-a-face-mask-in-france-but-not-in-the-uk-137856
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. 2015. Signposts - Policy and Practice for Teaching about Religions and Non-religious World Views in Intercultural Education. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Jawoniyi, O. 2015. “Religious Education, Critical Thinking, Rational Autonomy, and the Child’s Right to an Open Future.” Religion and Education 42 (1): 34–53. doi:10.1080/15507394.2013.859960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, P. 2016. “Argumentation in Democratic Education: The Crucial Role of Values.” Theory into Practice 55 (4): 279–286. doi:10.1080/00405841.2016.1208066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khishfe, R. 2014. “Explicit Nature of Science and Argumentation Instruction in the Context of Socioscientific Issues: An Effect on Student Learning and Transfer.” International Journal of Science Education 36 (6): 974–1016. doi:10.1080/09500693.2013.832004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, D., and W. Moore. 2015. “Argumentation as Core Curriculum.” Learning: Research and Practice 1 (1): 66–78. doi:10.1080/23735082.2015.994254.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, H.-S., O.L. Liu, A. Pallant, K.C. Roohr, S. Pryputniewicz, and Z.E. Buck. 2014. “Assessment of Uncertainty-Infused Scientific Argumentation.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 51 (5): 581–605. doi:10.1002/tea.21147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levinson, R. 2010. “Science Education and Democratic Participation: An Uneasy Congruence?” Studies in Science Education 46 (1): 69–119. doi:10.1080/03057260903562433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, Feng., and Carol K. K. Chan. 2018. “Promoting Elementary Students’ Epistemology of Science Through Computer-Supported Knowledge-Building Discourse and Epistemic Reflection.” International Journal of Science Education 40 (6): 668–687. doi:10.1080/09500693.2018.1435923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeill, K. L. 2009. “Teachers’ Use of Curriculum to Support Students in Writing Scientific Arguments to Explain Phenomena.” Science Education 93 (2): 233–268. doi:10.1002/sce.20294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monte-Sano, C. 2016. “Argumentation in History Classrooms: A Key Path to Understanding the Discipline and Preparing Citizens.” Theory Into Practice 55 (4): 311–319. doi:10.1080/00405841.2016.1208068.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, E. M., and C. S. C. Asterhan. 2016. “The Psychology of Far Transfer from Classroom Argumentation.” In The Psychology of Argument: Cognitive Approaches to Argumentation and Persuasion, edited by Laura Bonelli, Fabio Paglieri and Silvia Felletti, 407–423. London: College Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. F., J. B. Henderson, A. MacPherson, E. Szu, A. Wild, and S.-Y. Yao. 2016. “The Development and Validation of a Learning Progression for Argumentation in Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 53 (6): 821–846. doi:10.1002/tea.21316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J.F., S. Erduran, and S. Simon. 2004. “Enhancing the Quality of Argumentation in School Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 41 (10): 994–1020. doi:10.1002/tea.20035.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pabuccu, A., and S. Erduran. 2017. “Beyond Rote Learning in Organic Chemistry: The Infusion and Impact of Argumentation in Tertiary Education.” International Journal of Science Education 39 (9): 1154–1172. doi:10.1080/09500693.2017.1319988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapanta, C., M. Garcia-Mila, and S. Gilabert. 2013. “What Is Meant by Argumentative Competence? an Integrative Review of Methods of Analysis and Assessment in Education.” Review of Educational Research 83 (4): 483–520. doi:10.3102/0034654313487606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Mora, F., D. Cebrián-Robles, and Á. Blanco-López. 2021. “An Assessment Using Rubrics and the Rasch Model of 14/15-Year-Old Students’ Difficulties in Arguing about Bottled Water Consumption.” Research in Science Education. doi:10.1007/s11165-020-09985-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D. 2004. “Informal Reasoning regarding Socio-Scientific Issues: A Critical Review of the Literature.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 41 (4): 513–536. doi:10.1002/tea.20009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D. 2006. “Promoting Discourse and Argumentation in Science Teacher Education.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 17: 323–346. doi:10.1007/s10972-006-9025-4.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D. 2011. Socio-Scientific Issues in the Classroom: Teaching, Learning and Research. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Sadler, T. D., and D. L. Zeidler. 2005. “Patterns of Informal Reasoning in the Context of Socioscientific Decision Making.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 42 (1): 112–138. doi:10.1002/tea.20042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, V., and D. Clarke. 2008. “Assessment of the Ways Students Generate Arguments in Science Education: Current Perspectives and Recommendations for Future Directions.” Science Education 92 (3): 447–472. doi:10.1002/()1098-237X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, B. B., Y. Neuman, J. Gil, and M. Ilya. 2003. “Construction of Collective and Individual Knowledge in Argumentation Activity.” Journal of the Learning Sciences 12 (2): 219–256. doi:10.1207/S15327809JLS1202_3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, S., S. Erduran, and J. Osborne. 2006. “Learning to Teach Argumentation: Research and Development in the Science Classroom.” International Journal of Science Education 28 (2–3): 235–260. doi:10.1080/09500690500336957.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. 1958. The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Venville, G. J., and V. M. Dawson. 2010. “The Impact of a Classroom Intervention on Grade 10 Students’ Argumentation Skills, Informal Reasoning, and Conceptual Understanding of Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 47 (8): 952–977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiß, T. 2016. Fachspezifische und fachübergreifende Argumentationen am Beispiel von Schöpfung und Evolution. [Specialist and multidisciplinary Arguments Using the Example of Creation and Evolution]. Gottingen: VandA.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, C.R. 2011. “Argumentation across the Curriculum.” Written Communication 28 (2): 193–219. doi:10.1177/0741088311399236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zohar, A. 1996. “Transfer and Retention of Reasoning Skills Taught in Biological Contexts.” Research in Science and Technological Education 14: 205–209. doi:10.1080/0263514960140207.
   Google Scholar