Investigating teachers’ and students’ experiences of quantum physics lessons: opportunities and challenges

References

• Akarsu, B. 2010. “Einstein’s Redundant Triumph “Quantum Physics”: An Extensive Study of Teaching/learning Quantum Mechanics in College.” Latin-American Journal of Physics Education 4 (2): 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Akkerman, S., W. Admiraal, M. Brekelmans, and H. Oost. 2008. “Auditing Quality of Research in Social Sciences.” Quality & Quantity 42 (2): 257–274. doi:10.1007/s11135-006-9044-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baily, C., and N.D. Finkelstein. 2015. “Teaching Quantum Interpretations: Revisiting the Goals and Practices of Introductory Quantum Physics Courses.” Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research 11 (2): 020124. doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.11.020124.
   Google Scholar
• Bobroff, J., and F. Bouquet. 2016. “A Project-based Course about Outreach in A Physics Curriculum.” European Journal of Physics 37 (4): 045704. doi:10.1063/PT.3.2124.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bøe, M. V., E.K. Henriksen, and C. Angell. 2018. “Actual versus Implied Physics Students: How Students from Traditional Physics Classrooms Related to an Innovative Approach to Quantum Physics.” Science Education 102 (4): 649–667. doi:10.1002/sce.21339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouchée, T., L. de Putter-Smits, M. Thurlings, and B. Pepin. under review. “Towards a Better Understanding of Conceptual Difficulties in Introductory Quantym Physics Courses.” Studies in Science Education.
   Google Scholar
• Bungum, B., E.K. Henriksen, C. Angell, C.W. Tellefsen, and M.V. Bøe. 2015. “ReleQuant: Improving Teaching and Learning in Quantum Physics through Educational Design Research.” Nordic Studies in Science Education 11 (2): 153–168. doi:10.5617/nordina.2043.
   Google Scholar
• Bungum, B., M.V. Bøe, and E.K. Henriksen. 2018. “Quantum Talk: How Small-group Discussions May Enhance Students’ Understanding in Quantum Physics.” Science Education 102 (4): 856–877. doi:10.1002/sce.21447.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Commissie Vernieuwing Natuurkundeonderwijs havo/vwo. 2010. Nieuwe Natuurkunde, Advies-examenprogramma’s Voor Havo En Vwo [Contemporary Physics, Recommended Exam Programs for Upper Secondary School] Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Nederlandse Natuurkunde Vereniging. Accessed 30 June 2021. Retrieved from www.slo.nl/publish/pages/4487/eindadvies_20natuurkunde.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Deslauriers, L., and C. Wieman. 2011. “Learning and Retention of Quantum Concepts with Different Teaching Methods.” Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research 7 (1): 010101. doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.7.010101.
   Google Scholar
• Dreyfus, B. W., J.R. Hoehn, A. Elby, N.D. Finkelstein, and A. Gupta. 2019. “Splits in Students’ Beliefs about Learning Classical and Quantum Physics.” International Journal of STEM Education 6 (1): 1–16. doi:10.1186/s40594-019-0187-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girwidz, R., L.-J. Thoms, H. Pol, V. López, M. Michelini, A. Stefanel, T. Greczyło, A. Müller, B. Gregorcic, and M. Hömöstrei. 2019. “Physics Teaching and Learning with Multimedia Applications: A Review of Teacher-oriented Literature in 34 Local Language Journals from 2006 to 2015.” International Journal of Science Education 41 (9): 1181–1206. doi:10.1080/09500693.2019.1597313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gong, Y., T. Yuksel, A. Magana, and L. Bryan. 2015. “Engineering and Physics Students’ Perceptions about Learning Quantum Mechanics via Computer Simulations.” In 2015 ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition Proceedings 26:1.Seattle, Washington: ASEE Conferences. doi: 10.18260/p.23952
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J., and H. Timperley. 2007. “The Power of Feedback.” Review of Educational Research 77 (1): 81–112. doi:10.3102/003465430298487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henriksen, E. K., B. Bungum, C. Angell, C.W. Tellefsen, T. Fragat, and M.V. Bøe. 2014. “Relativity, Quantum Physics and Philosophy in the Upper Secondary Curriculum: Challenges, Opportunities and Proposed Approaches.” Physics Education 49 (6): 678–684. doi:10.1088/0031-9120/49/6/678/meta.
   Google Scholar
• Henriksen, E. K., C. Angell, A.I. Vistnes, and B. Bungum. 2018. “What Is Light?: Students’ Reflections on the Wave-particle Duality of Light and the Nature of Physics.” Science & Education 27 (1–2): 81–111. doi:10.1007/s11191-018-9963-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, A. 2018. “Undergraduate Quantum Mechanics: Lost Opportunities for Engaging Motivated Students?” European Journal of Physics 39 (2): 025705. doi:10.1088/1361-6404/aa9b42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johansson, A., S. Andersson, M. Salminen-Karlsson, and M. Elmgren. 2018. ““Shut up and Calculate”: The Available Discursive Positions in Quantum Physics Courses.” Cultural Studies of Science Education 13 (1): 205–226. doi:10.1007/s11422-016-9742-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohnle, A., C. Baily, A. Campbell, N. Korolkova, and M.J. Paetkau. 2015. “Enhancing Student Learning of Two-level Quantum Systems with Interactive Simulations.” American Journal of Physics 83 (6): 560–566. doi:10.1119/1.4913786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krijtenburg-Lewerissa, K., H.J. Pol, A. Brinkman, and W.R. Van Joolingen. 2017. “Insights into Teaching Quantum Mechanics in Secondary and Lower Undergraduate Education.” Physical Review Physics Education Research 13 (1): 010109. doi:10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.010109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krijtenburg-Lewerissa, K., H.J. Pol, A. Brinkman, and W.R. Van Joolingen. 2018. “Key Topics for Quantum Mechanics at Secondary Schools: A Delphi Study into Expert Opinions.” International Journal of Science Education 41 (3): 349–366. doi:10.1080/09500693.2018.1550273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krijtenburg-Lewerissa, K., H.J. Pol, A. Brinkman, and W.R. Van Joolingen. 2020. “Secondary School Students’ Misunderstandings of Potential Wells and Tunneling.” Physical Review Physics Education Research 16 (1): 010132. doi:10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.16.010132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, T. 2006. “Different Countries, Same Science Classes: Students’ Experiences of School Science in Their Own Words.” International Journal of Science Education 28 (6): 591–613. doi:10.1080/09500690500339621.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKagan, S. B., K.K. Perkins, M. Dubson, C. Malley, S. Reid, R. LeMaster, and C.E. Wieman. 2008. “Developing and Researching PhET Simulations for Teaching Quantum Mechanics.” American Journal of Physics 76 (4): 406–417. doi:10.1119/1.2885199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., A.M. Huberman, and J. Saldana. 2014. Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Nieveen, N., and E. Folmer. 2013. “Formative Evaluation in Educational Design Research.” In Educational Design Research: An Introduction Part A, edited by, T. Plomp and N. Nieveen, 67-90. Enschede, the Netherlands, SLO.Retrieved from downloads.slo.nl/Documenten/educational-design-research-part-a.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ottevanger, W., E. Folmer, and M. Heijnen. 2018. Monitoring En Evaluatie Invoering Bètavernieuwing. Eindmeting Docenten En Leerlingen 2016-2017 [Monitoring and Evaluating the Introduction of the Science Renewal. Final Measurement Teachers and Students 2016-2017]. Enschede, the Netherlands: SLO. downloads.slo.nl/Repository/monitoring-en-evaluatie-invoering-betavernieuwing.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Paus, J. 2012. Handreiking Schoolexamen Natuurkunde Havo/vwo [Guide to Physics School Examination for Upper Secondary School]. Enschede, the Netherlands: SLO. www.slo.nl/downloads/handreiking-schoolexamen-natuurkunde-havo-vwo.pdf/
   Google Scholar
• Petri, J., and H. Niedderer. 1998. “A Learning Pathway in High-school Level Quantum Atomic Physics.” International Journal of Science Education 20 (9): 1075–1088. doi:10.1080/0950069980200905.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, L. V., J.T. van der Veen, A. Anjewierden, E. Van Den Berg, and T. De Jong. 2020. “Designing Inquiry-based Learning Environments for Quantum Physics Education in Secondary Schools.” Physics Education 55 (6): 065026. doi:10.1088/1361-6552/abb346.
   Google Scholar
• Savall-Alemany, F., J. Guisasola, S. Rosa Cintas, and J. Martínez-Torregrosa. 2019. “Problem-based Structure for a Teaching-learning Sequence to Overcome Students’ Difficulties When Learning about Atomic Spectra.” Physical Review Physics Education Research 15 (2): 020138. doi:10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siddiqui, S., and C. Singh. 2017. “How Diverse are Physics Instructors’ Attitudes and Approaches to Teaching Undergraduate Level Quantum Mechanics?” European Journal of Physics 38 (3): 035703. doi:10.1088/1361-6404/aa6131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stadermann, H. K. E., E. Van Den Berg, and M.J. Goedhart. 2019. “Analysis of Secondary School Quantum Physics Curricula of 15 Different Countries: Different Perspectives on a Challenging Topic.” Physical Review Physics Education Research 15 (1): 010130. doi:10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.010130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taber, K. S. 2005. “Learning Quanta: Barriers to Stimulating Transitions in Student Understanding of Orbital Ideas.” Science Education 89 (1): 94–116. doi:10.1002/sce.20038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timonen, V., G. Foley, and C. Conlon. 2018. “Challenges When Using Grounded Theory: A Pragmatic Introduction to Doing GT Research.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 17 (1): 1–9. doi:10.1177/1609406918758086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Akker, J. 2003. “Curriculum Perspectives: An Introduction.” In Curriculum Landscapes and Trends, edited by J. van den Akker, W. Kuiper, and U. Hameyer, 1–10. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Van den Akker, J. 2013. “Curricular Development Research as Specimen of Educational Design Research.” In Educational Design Research: An Introduction Part A, edited by, T. Plomp and N. Nieveen, 53–70. Enschede, the Netherlands, SLO. Retrieved from downloads.slo.nl/Documenten/educational-design-research-part-a.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. 2017. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar