Factors affecting the application of scientific knowledge in a STEAM contest: the correlates between collective efficacy, cohesiveness, and prosociality

References

• Akgun, A. E., J. C. Byrne, G. S. Lynn, and H. Keskin. 2007. “Team Stressors, Management Support, and Project and Process Outcomes in New Product Development Projects.” Technovation 27 (10): 628–639. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2007.02.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akkerman, S., P. Van den Bossche, W. Admiraal, W. Gijselaers, M. Segers, R. J. Simons, and P. Kirschner. 2007. “Reconsidering Group Cognition: From Conceptual Confusion to a Boundary Area between Cognitive and Socio-cultural Perspectives?” Educational Research Review 2 (1): 39–43. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2007.02.001.
   Google Scholar
• Audia, P. G., E. A. Locke, and K. G. Smith. 2000. “The paradox of Success: An archival and a laboratory study of strategic persistence following radical environmental change.” Academy of management Journal 43 (5): 837–853.
   Google Scholar
• Bakeman, R., and R. Helmreich. 1975. “Cohesiveness and Performance: Covariation and Causality in an Undersea Environment.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 11 (5): 478–489. doi:10.1016/0022-1031(75)90050-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. 1997. “Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control.” American Journal of Health Promotion 12 (1): 8–10. doi:10.4278/0890-1171-12.1.8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beal, D. J., R. R. Cohen, M. J. Burke, and C. L. McLendon. 2003. “Cohesion and Performance in Groups: A Meta-analytic Clarification of Construct Relations.” Journal of Applied Psychology 88 (6): 989–1004. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.989.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bednar, R. L., and T. J. Kaul. 2021. “Experiential Group Research: Can the Canon Fire?” In Bergin and Garfield’s Handbook of Psychotherapy and Behavior Change, edited by Michael Lambert, Wolfgang Lutz, and Louis Castonguay, 7th ed., 631–663. Hoboken: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Belk, R. 2007. “Why Not Share Rather than Own?” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 611 (1): 126–140. doi:10.1177/0002716206298483.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belk, R. 2010. “Sharing.” Journal of Consumer Research 36 (5): 715–734. doi:10.1086/612649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belk, R. 2014. “You are what you can Access: Sharing and Collaborative Consumption Online.” Journal of Business Research 67 (8): 1595–1600. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benkler, Y. 2004. “Sharing Nicely: On Shareable Goods and the Emergence of Sharing as a Modality of Economic Production.” Yale Law Journal 114 (2): 273–358. doi:10.2307/4135731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, K., S. J. H. Biddle, and N. Ntoumanis. 2001. “Self-Efficacy and Causal Attribution in Female Golfers.” International Journal of Sport Psychology 32 (3): 243–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botsman, R., and R. Rogers. 2010. What’s Mine is Yours. Old Saybrook: Tantor Audio.
   Google Scholar
• Bratman, M. 1993. “Shared Intention.” Ethics 104 (1): 97–113. doi:10.1086/293577.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlo, G., and B. A. Randall. 2002. “The Development of a Measure of Prosocial Behaviors for Late Adolescents.” Journal of Youth and Adolescence 31: 31–44. doi:10.1023/A:1014033032440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlo, G., R. A. Fabes, D. Laible, and K. Kupanoff. 1999. “Early Adolescence and Prosocial/ Moral Behavior II: The Role of Social and Contextual Influences.” Journal of Early Adolescence 19: 133–147. doi:10.1177/0272431699019002001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cartwright, D. 1968. “The Nature of Group Cohesiveness.” In Group Dynamics, edited by Cartwright Dorwin and Zander Alvin. Harper and Row.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, A. and D. Clark. 1998. “The Extended Mind.” Analysis 58 (1): 7–19.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: Hillsdale.
   Google Scholar
• Cortes, B. R., and C. S. Dweck. 2014. “Rethinking Natural Altruism: Simple Reciprocal Interactions Trigger Children’s Benevolence.” PNAS Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111 (48): 17071–17074. doi:10.1073/pnas.1419408111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dion, K. L. 2000. “Group Cohesion: From Field of Forces to Multidimensional Construct.” Group Dynamics: Theory. Research and Practice 4 (1): 7–26. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.4.1.7.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, N., R. A. Fabes, and T. L. Spinrad. 2006. “Prosocial Development.” In Handbook of Child Psychology, edited by William Damon, 646–718. Wiley. doi:10.1002/9780470147658.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, N., T. L. Spinrad, and A. Knafo-Noam. 2015. “Prosocial Development.” In Handbook of Child Psychology and Developmental Science, Vol. 3: Socioemotional Processes, edited by Richard Lerner and Michael Lamb, 610–656. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Fabes, R. A., G. Carlo, K. Kupanoff, and D. Laible. 1999. “Early Adolescence and Prosocial/ Moral Behavior I: The Role of Individual Processes.” Journal of Early Adolescence 19 (1): 5–16. doi:10.1177/0272431699019001001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., and D. F. Larcker. 1981. “Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error: Algebra and Statistics.” Journal of Marketing Research 18 (3): 382–388. doi:10.2307/3150980.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuller, T. 2016. “The Extended Scientific Mind.” Cognitive Systems Research 40: 75–85. doi:10.1016/j.cogsys.2016.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Futamura, I., and Y. Shima. 2019. “Age-related Differences in Judgments of Reciprocal and Unilateral Prosocial Behaviors.” Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 180: 69–86. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2018.11.009.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, T. R., D. L. Feltz, and M. A. Chase. 1992. “Effects of Model Similarity on Self-efficacy and Muscular Endurance: A Second Look.” Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology 14 (3): 237–248. doi:10.1123/jsep.14.3.237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giere, R. 2002. “Scientific Cognition as Distributed Cognition.” In The Cognitive Basis of Science, edited by Peter Carruthers, Stephen Stich, and Michael Siegal, 285–299. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511613517.
   Google Scholar
• Giere, R., and B. Moffatt. 2003. “Distributed Cognition: Where the Cognitive and the Social Merge.” Social Studies of Science 33 (2): 301–310. doi:10.1177/03063127030332017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, M. 2003. “The Structure of the Social Atom: Joint Commitment and the Foundation of Human Social Behavior.” In Socializing Metaphysics, edited by Frederick Schmitt, 39–64. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, A. M., and J. W. Berry. 2011. “The Necessity of Others Is the Mother of Invention: Intrinsic and Prosocial Motivations, Perspective Taking, and Creativity.” Academy of Management Journal 54 (1): 73–96. doi:10.5465/amj.2011.59215085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greener, S. H. 2000. “Peer Assessment of Children’s Prosocial Behaviour.” Journal of Moral Education 29 (1): 47–60. doi:10.1080/030572400102925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, S. B., and N. J. Salkind. 2012. Using SPSS for Windows and Macintosh: Analyzing and understanding data (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education. doi: 10.1198/tas.2005.s139
   Google Scholar
• Gurven, M. 2006. “The Evolution of Contingent Cooperation.” Current Anthropology 47 (1): 185–192. doi:10.1086/499552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., M. Sarstedt, L. Hopkins, and V. G. Kuppelwieser. 2014. “Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM): An Emerging Tool in Business Research.” European Business Review 26 (2): 106–121. doi:10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128.
   Google Scholar
• Hakkarainen, V., T. M. Daw, and M. Tengö. 2020. “On the Other End of Research: Exploring Community-level Knowledge Exchanges in Small-scale Fisheries in Zanzibar.” Sustainability Science 15 (1): 281–295. doi:10.1007/s11625-019-00750-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastings, P. D., K. E. McShane, R. Parker, and F. Ladha. 2007. “Ready to make nice: Parental socialization of young sons’ and daughters’ prosocial behaviors with peers.” The Journal of Genetic Psychology 168 (2): 177–200.
   Google Scholar
• Henriksen, D., R. Mehta, and S. Mehta. 2019. “Design Thinking Gives STEAM to Teaching: A Framework that Breaks Disciplinary Boundaries.” In STEAM Education, edited by Myint Swe and KhineShaljan Areepattamannil. Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-04003-1_4.
   Google Scholar
• Heuzé, J. P., N. Raimbault, and P. Fontayne. 2006. “Relationships between Cohesion, Collective Efficacy and Performance in Professional Basketball Teams: An Examination of Mediating Effects.” Journal of Sports Sciences 24 (1): 59–68. doi:10.1080/02640410500127736.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, M. L. 2000. Empathy and Moral Development: Implications for Caring and Justice. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511805851.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, D., E. Suh, and C. Koo. 2011. “Developing strategies for overcoming barriers to knowledge sharing based on conversational knowledge management: A case study of a financial company.” Expert Systems with Applications 38 (12): 14417–14427. doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2011.04.072
   Google Scholar
• Hong, J. C., J. H. Ye, Y. J. Ho, and Y. J. Wang. 2020a. “STEM embedded in the Dujiangyan irrigation system: A descriptive-interpretive analysis to design STEM course.” Journal of Baltic Science Education 19 (5): 764–779. doi:10.33225/jbse/20.19.764
   Google Scholar
• Hong, J. C., M. Y. Hwang, C. R. Tsai, K. H. Tai, & Y. F. Wu. 2020b. “The effect of social dilemma on flow experience: Prosociality relevant to collective efficacy and goal achievement motivation.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 18 (2): 239–258. doi:10.1007/s10763-019-09958-3
   Google Scholar
• Hsu, J. S., T. P. Liang, S. P. J. Wu, G. Klein, and J. J. Jiang. 2011. “Promoting the Integration of Users and Developers to Achieve a Collective Mind through the Screening of Information System Projects.” International Journal of Project Management 29 (5): 514–524. doi:10.1016/j.ijproman.2010.06.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L. T., and P. M. Bentler. 1999. “Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives.” Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 6 (1): 1–55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, C. C. 2009. “Knowledge Sharing and Group Cohesiveness on Performance: An Empirical Study of Technology RandD Teams in Taiwan.” Technovation 29 (11): 786–797. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2009.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janis, I. L. 1982. Groupthink. 2nd ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, O., and N. W. van Yperen. 2004. “Employees’ Goal Orientation, the Quality of Leader-member Exchange and the Outcomes of Job Performance and Job Satisfaction.” Academy of Management Journal 47: 368–384. doi:10.5465/20159587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, H. J. A., W. G. Kim, H. M. Choi, and Y. Li. 2020. “How to Fuel Employees’ Prosocial Behavior in the Hotel Service Encounter.” International Journal of Hospitality Management 84: 102333. doi:10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.102333.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. I., H. Chung, M. Kim, and M. D. Svinicki. 2015. “Context-specific Achievement Goal Orientations in Cooperative Group Work.” Learning and Individual Differences 42: 117–125. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2015.08.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. 2005. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 2nd ed. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kratzer, J., R. T. A. J. Leenders, and J. M. L. Van Engelen. 2006. “Managing Creative Team Performance in Virtual Environments: An Empirical Study in 44 RandD Teams.” Technovation 26 (1): 42–49. doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2004.07.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger, N. K., and P. R. Dickson. 1995. “How Believing in Ourselves Increases Risk Taking: Perceived Self-efficacy and Opportunity Recognition.” Decision Sciences 25 (3): 385–400. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1994.tb00810.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• León, F., T. Szanto, and D. Zahavi. 2019. “Emotional Sharing and the Extended Mind.” Synthese 196: 4847–4867. doi:10.1007/s11229-017-1351-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malti, T., S. Sette, and S. P. Dys. 2016. “Social-emotional Responding: A Perspective from Developmental Psychology.” In Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences: An Interdisciplinary, Searchable, and Linkable Resource, 1–15. doi:10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0415.
   Google Scholar
• Malti, T., and S. P. Dys. 2018. “From Being Nice to Being Kind: Development of Prosocial Behaviors.” Current Opinion in Psychology 20: 45–49. doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.07.036.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathieu, J. E., T. L. Rapp, M. T. Maynard, and P. M. Mangos. 2010. “Interactive Effects of Team and Task Shared Mental Models as Related to Air Traffic Controllers’ Collective Efficacy and Effectiveness.” Human Performance 23 (1): 22–40. doi:10.1080/08959280903400150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McAuliffe, M. 2016. “The Potential Benefits of Divergent Thinking and Metacognitive Skills in STEAM Learning: A Discussion Paper.” International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change 2 (3): 71–82.
   Google Scholar
• Meier, S., and A. Stutzer. 2008. “Is Volunteering Rewarding in Itself? Economica.” London School of Economics and Political Science 75 (297): 39–59. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0335.2007.00597.x.
   Google Scholar
• Midlarsky, E., and E. Kahana. 2007. “Altruism, Well-being, and Mental Health in Late Life.” In Altruism and Health, edited by Stephen Post, 56–69. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195182910.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Mueller, J. S., S. Melwani, and J. Goncalo. 2011. “The Bias against Creativity: Why People Desire but Reject Creative Ideas.” Psychological Science 23 (1): 13–17. doi:10.1177/0956797611421018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullen, B., and C. Copper. 1994. “The Relation between Group Cohesiveness and Performance: An Integration.” Psychological Bulletin 115 (2): 210–227. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.115.2.210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piliavm, J. A., and H. W. Chamg. 1990. “Altruism; A Review of Theory and Research.” Annual Review of Sociology 16: 27–65. doi:10.1146/annurev.so.16.080190.000331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, D. J., J. M. Engelmann, E. Herrmann, and M. Tomasello. 2017. “The Impact of Choice on Young Children’s Prosocial Motivation.” Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 158: 112–121. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2017.01.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roos, D., and R. Hahn. 2019. “Understanding Collaborative Consumption: An Extension of the Theory of Planned Behavior with Value-based Personal Norms.” Journal of Business Ethics 158 (3): 679–697. doi:10.1007/s10551-017-3675-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruci, L., Z. M. van Allen, and J. M. Zelenski. 2018. “Pro-social Personality Traits, Helping Behavior, and Ego-depletion: Is Helping Really Easier for the Dispositionally Pro-social?” Personality and Individual Differences 120 (1): 32–39. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2017.08.013.
   Google Scholar
• Salmela, M., and M. Nagatsu. 2017. “How Does it Really Feel to Act Together? Shared Emotions and the Phenomenology of We-agency.” Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 16: 449–470. doi:10.1007/s11097-016-9465-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sampson, R. J. 2008. “Collective Efficacy Theory: Lessons Learned and Directions for Future Inquiry.” In Taking Stock: The Status of Criminological Theory, edited by Francis Cullen, John Paul Wright, and Kristie Blevins, 149–167. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, R. J., J. D. Morenoff, and F. Earls. 1999. “Beyond Social Capital: Spatial Dynamics of Collective Efficacy for Children.” American Sociological Review 64 (5): 633–660. doi:10.2307/2657367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searle, J. 1990. “Collective Intentions and Actions.” In Intentions in Communication, edited by Philip Cohen, Jerry Morgan, and Martha Pollack, 401–415. Cambridge: : MIT press.
   Google Scholar
• Shah, Z., J. Chu, U. Ghani, S. Qaisar, and Z. Hassan. 2020. “Media and Altruistic Behaviors: The Mediating Role of Fear of Victimization in Cultivation Theory Perspective.” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 42: 101336. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, M. E. 1976. Group dynamics: The psychology of small group behavior. New York: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Simonin, B. L. 1999. “Ambiguity and the Process of Knowledge Transfer in Strategic Alliances.” Strategic Management Journal 20 (7): 595–623. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199907)20:7<595::AID-SMJ47>3.0.CO;2-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solansky, S. T., and D. Stringer. 2019. “Collective Mind: A Study of Development and Team Performance.” Organization Development Journal 37 (3): 59–69. doi:10.2307/2393372.
   Google Scholar
• Stokes, J. P. 1983. “Components of Group Cohesion.” Small Group Research 14 (2): 163–173. doi:10.1177/104649648301400203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tasa, K., and G. Whyte. 2005. “Collective Efficacy and Vigilant Problem Solving in Group Decision Making: A Non-linear Model.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 96 (2): 119–129. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torkzadeh, G., X. Koufteros, and K. Pflughoeft. 2003. “Confirmatory Analysis of Computer Self-efficacy.” Structural Equation Modeling 10 (2): 263–275. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM1002_6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Kerkhoff, L., and L. Lebel. 2006. “Linking Knowledge and Action for Sustainable Development.” Annual Review of Environment and Resources 31: 445–477. doi:10.1146/annurev.energy.31.102405.170850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, S. L., and S. S. Lin. 2007. “The Effects of Group Composition of Self-efficacy and Collective Efficacy on Computer-supported Collaborative Learning.” Computers in Human Behavior 23 (5): 2256–2268. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2006.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, W. T., and Y. P. Hou. 2015. “Motivations of Employees’ Knowledge Sharing Behaviours: A Self-determination Perspective.” Information and Organization 25 (1): 1–26. doi:10.1016/j.infoandorg.2014.11.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whyte, G., A. M. Saks, and S. Hook. 1998. “When success breeds failure: The role of self-efficacy in escalating commitment to a losing course of action.” Journal of Organizational Behavior 18 (5): 415-432. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(199709)18:5<415::AID-JOB813>3.0.CO;2-G
   Google Scholar
• Wu, W. Y., A. A. Rivas, and Y. C. Chen. 2019. “The Role of Team Reflexivity as a Mediator between Project Management Skills, Task Familiarity, Procedural Justice, and Product Performance.” Journal of Management and Organization 25 (6): 876–895. doi:10.1017/jmo.2017.34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, J., L. Zhu, and A. M. Leslie. 2016. “Children’s Sharing Behavior in Minidictator Games: The Role of In-group Favoritism and Theory of Mind.” Child Development 87 (6): 1747–1757. doi:10.1111/cdev.12635.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zacarro, S. J., V. Blair, C. Peterson, and M. Zazanis. 1995. “Collective Efficacy.” In Self-efficacy, Adaptation, and Adjustment: Theory, Research, and Application, edited by James Maddux, 305–328. Plenum Press. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-6868-5.
   Google Scholar
• Zahn-Waxler, C., M. Radke-Yarrow, E. Wagner, and M. Chapman. 1992. “Development of Concern for Others.” Developmental Psychology 28 (1): 126–136. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.28.1.126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar