Research on performance assessment of students’ inquiry skills in China’s elementary schools: a video analysis of Beijing discovering science around us

References

• Abd-El-Khalick, F. 2004. “Inquiry in Science Education: International Perspectives.” SCIENCE EDUCATION 88 (3): 397–419. doi:10.1002/sce.10118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avi, Hofstein, Navon Oshrit, Kipnis, Rachel Mira, and Naaman Mamlok. 2005. “Developing Students’ Ability to Ask More and Better Questions Resulting from Inquiry-Type Chemistry Laboratories.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 42(7) :791–806. doi:10.1002/tea.20072 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, R. S., J. Clarke-Midura, and J. Ocumpaugh. 2016. “Towards General Models of Effective Science Inquiry in Virtual Performance Assessments.” JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING 32 (3): 267–280. doi:10.1111/jcal.12128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banet, E, and GE Ayuso. 2003. “Teaching of Biological Inheritance and Evolution of Living Beings in Secondary School.” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION 25 (3): 373–407. doi:10.1080/09500690210145716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beilstein, Shereen Oca, Michelle Perry, and Meg Schleppenbach Bates. 2017. “Prompting Meaningful Analysis from Pre-Service Teachers Using Elementary Mathematics Video Vignettes.” TEACHING AND TEACHER EDUCATION 63: 285–295. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2017.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, R. L., L. M. Blair, BAA Crawford, and N. G. Lederman. 2003. “Just Do It? Impact of a Science Apprenticeship Program on High School Students’ Understandings of the Nature of Science and Scientific Inquiry.” JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING 40 (5): 487–509. doi:10.1002/tea.10086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, Thorsten, Detlef Urhahne, Sascha Schanze, and Rolf Ploetzner. 2010. “Collaborative Inquiry Learning: Models, Tools, and Challenges.” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION 32 (3): 349–377. doi:10.1080/09500690802582241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanchard, Margaret R., Sherry A. Southerland, Jason W. Osborne, Victor D. Sampson, Leonard A. Annetta, and Ellen M. Granger. 2010. “Is Inquiry Possible in Light of Accountability?: A Quantitative Comparison of the Relative Effectiveness of Guided Inquiry and Verification Laboratory Instruction.” Science Education 94 (4): 577–616. doi:10.1002/sce.20390.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cetin P Seda. (2021). Effectiveness of Inquiry Based Laboratory Instruction on Developing Secondary Students’ Views on Scientific Inquiry. J. Chem. Educ., 98(3), 756–762. doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c01364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Rocha, CJT, and JMD Malheiro. 2019. “Metacognition and Inquiry Experimentation: The Construction of Dialogic Interactive Categories.” Educacao 44. doi:10.5902/1984644434409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz, Ana, Aragues. 2019. “Video-Analysis of an Inquiry Activity in Primary.” REIDOCREA-REVISTA EECTRONICA DE INVESTIGACION Y DOCENCIA CREATIVA 8: 309–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Dijk, Tessa H.S. Eysink, M. Alieke, H. S. Eysink Tessa, and Ton de Jong. 2016. “Ability-Related Differences in Performance of an Inquiry Task: The Added Value of Prompts.” LEARNING AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES 47: 145–155. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2016.01.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dogan, O. K. 2021. “Methodological? or Dialectical?: Reflections of Scientific Inquiry in Biology Textbooks.” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS EDUCATION 19 (8): 1563–1585. doi:10.1007/s10763-020-10120-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ebenezer, Jazlin, Osman Nafiz Kaya, and Devairakkam Luke Ebenezer. 2011. “Engaging Students in Environmental Research Projects: Perceptions of Fluency with Innovative Technologies and Levels of Scientific Inquiry Abilities.” JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING 48 (1): 94–116. doi:10.1002/tea.20387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eristya, Agustina Martha, and Nurfina Aznam. 2019. “Natural Science Learning with Modified Free Inquiry to Develop Students’ Creative Thinking Skills.” Journal of Physics Conference Series 1233: 012107. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012107.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, Richard. 2001.“Constructivism Examined . “Oxford Review of Education 27(1):, 23–35. doi:10.1080/03054980125310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furtak, Erin Marie, Tina Seidel, Heidi Iverson, and Derek C. Briggs. 2012. “Experimental and Quasi-Experimental Studies of Inquiry-Based Science Teaching: A Meta-Analysis.” REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH 82 (3): 300–329. doi:10.3102/0034654312457206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gobert, J. D., M. Sao Pedro, J. Raziuddin, and R. S. Baker. 2013. “From Log Files to Assessment Metrics: Measuring Students’ Science Inquiry Skills Using Educational Data Mining.” JOURNAL OF THE LEARNING SCIENCES 22 (4): 521–563. doi:10.1080/10508406.2013.837391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gyllenpalm, Jakob, Carl-Johan Rundgren, Judith Lederman, and Norman Lederman. 2021. “Views about Scientific Inquiry: A Study of Students’ Understanding of Scientific Inquiry in Grade 7 and 12 in Sweden.” SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH. doi:10.1080/00313831.2020.1869080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harlen, W. 1991. “Pupil Assessment in Science at the Primary Level.” Studies In Educational Evaluation 17 (2–3): 323–340. doi:10.1016/S0191-491X(05)80088-4.
   Google Scholar
• Hosbein, Kathryn N., Meghan A. Lower, and Joi P. Walker. 2021. “Tracking Student Argumentation Skills across General Chemistry through Argument-Driven Inquiry Using the Assessment of Scientific Argumentation in the Classroom Observation Protocol.” JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL EDUCATION 98 (6): 1875–1887. doi:10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c01225.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howie, S. 2004. “A National Assessment in Mathematics within an International Comparative Assessment.” PERSPECTIVES IN EDUCATION 22 (2): 149–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janouskova, S., L. P. Rathouska, V. Zak, and E. S. Urvalkova. 2021. “The Scientific Thinking and Reasoning Framework and Its Applicability to Manufacturing and Services Firms in Natural Sciences.” RESEARCH IN SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGICAL EDUCATION 1–22. doi:10.1080/02635143.2021.1928048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerome, Pine, Aschbacher Pamela, Roth Ellen, Jones, Cameron Melanie, and Mc Phee. 2014. “Fifth Graders’ Science Inquiry Abilities: A Comparative Study of Students in Hands on and Textbook Curricula.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 51 (8): 1021–1048. doi:10.1002/tea.21164.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Juanjuan, Chen, Minhong Wang, Chris Dede, and Tina A. Grotzer. 2021. “Analyzing Student Thinking Reflected in Self-Constructed Cognitive Maps and Its Influence on Inquiry Task Performance.” Instructional Science 49 , (3): 287–312.doi:10.1007/s11251-021-09543-8 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kremer, K., C. Specht, D. Urhahne, and J. Mayer. 2014. “The Relationship in Biology between the Nature of Science and Scientific Inquiry.” JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL EDUCATION 48 (1): 1–8. doi:10.1080/00219266.2013.788541.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruit, P. M., R. J. Oostdam, E. van den Berg, and J. A. Schuitema. 2018. “Assessing Students’ Ability in Performing Scientific Inquiry: Instruments for Measuring Science Skills in Primary Education.” RESEARCH IN SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGICAL EDUCATION 36 (4): 413–439. doi:10.1080/02635143.2017.1421530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruit, Patricia, Ron Oostdam, Ed van den Berg, and Jaap Schuitema. 2020. “Performance Assessment as a Diagnostic Tool for Science Teachers.” RESEARCH IN SCIENCE EDUCATION 50 (3): 1093–1117. doi:10.1007/s11165-018-9724-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo, C. Y., H. K. Wu, T. H. Jen, and Y. S. Hsu. 2015. “Development and Validation of a Multimedia-Based Assessment of Scientific Inquiry Abilities.” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION 37 (14): 2326–2357. doi:10.1080/09500693.2015.1078521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavoie, D. R. 1999. “Effects of Emphasizing Hypothetico-Predictive Reasoning within the Science Learning Cycle on High School Student‘s Process Skills and Conceptual Understandings in Biology.“ JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING 36 (10): 1127–1147 .doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199912)36:10<1127::AID-TEA5>3.0.CO;2-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederman, Judith, Norman Lederman, Selina Bartels, Juan Jimenez, Mark Akubo, Shereen Aly, Chengcheng Bao, et al. 2019. “An International Collaborative Investigation of Beginning Seventh Grade Students’ Understandings of Scientific Inquiry: Establishing a Baseline.” JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING 56 (4): 486–515. doi:10.1002/tea.21512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederman, N. G., J. S. Lederman, P. O. Wickman, and L. Lagernyqvist. 2010. “An International, Systematic Investigation of the Relative Effects of Inquiry and Direct Instruction: A Replication Study.“ Conference of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching. Baltimore.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education of the People’s Republic of China. 2011. Compulsory Primary Science Curriculum Standards. Beijing: Beijing Normal University Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 1996. National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/4962.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council (U.S.). Committee on a Conceptual Framework for New K-12 Science Education Standards, author. 2012.“A framework for K-12 science education : practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas .“Washington, D.C: The National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nowak, K. H., A. Nehring, R. Tiemann, and AUZ Belzen. 2013. “Assessing Students’ Abilities in Processes of Scientific Inquiry in Biology Using a Paper-and-Pencil Test.” JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL EDUCATION 47 (3): 182–188. doi:10.1080/00219266.2013.822747.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver, Mary, Andrew McConney, and Amanda Woods-McConney. 2021. “The Efficacy of Inquiry-Based Instruction in Science: A Comparative Analysis of Six Countries Using PISA 2015.” RESEARCH IN SCIENCE EDUCATION 51 (SUPPL 2): 595–616. doi:10.1007/s11165-019-09901-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pai-Hsing, Wu, Che-Yu Kuo, Wu Hsin-Kai, Tsung-Hau Jen, and Ying-Shao Hsu. 2018. “Learning Benefits of Secondary School Students’ Inquiry-Related Curiosity: A Cross-Grade Comparison of the Relationships among Learning Experiences, Curiosity, Engagement, and Inquiry Abilities.” SCIENCE EDUCATION 102 (5): 917–950. doi:10.1002/sce.21456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, D. 2005. “A Motivational View of Constructivist-Informed Teaching.” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION 27 (15): 1853–1881. doi:10.1080/09500690500339654.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedaste, Margus, Mario Mäeots, Leo A. Siiman, Ton de Jong, Siswa A.N. van Riesen, Ellen T. Kamp, Constantinos C. Manoli, Zacharias C. Zacharia, and Eleftheria Tsourlidaki. 2015. “Phases of Inquiry-Based Learning: Definitions and the Inquiry Cycle.” Educational Research Review 14 (February): 47–61. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003.
   Google Scholar
• Pedaste, M., and T. Sarapuu. “Developing an Effective Support System for Inquiry Learning in a Web-Based Environment.”
   Google Scholar
• Pedro, Michael A. Sao, Ryan S. J. D. Baker, Janice D. Gobert, Orlando Montalvo, and Adam Nakama. 2013. “Leveraging Machine-Learned Detectors of Systematic Inquiry Behavior to Estimate and Predict Transfer of Inquiry Skill.” USER MODELING AND USER-ADAPTED INTERACTION 23 (1): 1–39. doi:10.1007/s11257-011-9101-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedro, MAS, J. D. Gobert, and C. G. Betts. 2014. “Towards Scalable Assessment of Performance-Based Skills: Generalizing a Detector of Systematic Science Inquiry to a Simulation with a Complex Structure.” Edited by S. TrausanMatu, K. E. Boyer, M. Crosby, and K. Panourgia. INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEMS, ITS 2014 8474 (January). 12th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS) Honolulu, HI: 591–600.
   Google Scholar
• Penn, Mafor, and Umesh Ramnarain. 2021. “South African Grade 12 Science Students’ Understandings of Scientific Inquiry.” SCIENCE & EDUCATION. doi:10.1007/s11191-021-00259-2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Raes, Annelies, and Tammy Schellens. 2015. “Unraveling the Motivational Effects and Challenges of Web-Based Collaborative Inquiry Learning across Different Groups of Learners.” ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT 63 (3): 405–430. doi:10.1007/s11423-015-9381-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramnarain, Umesh. 2015. “Connecting the Hands-On to the Minds-On: A Video Case Analysis of South African Physical Sciences Lessons for Student Thinking.” EURASIA JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION 11 (5): 1151–1163. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2015.1391a.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roennebeck, Silke, Sascha Bernholt, and Mathias Ropohl. 2016. “Searching for A Common Ground - A Literature Review of Empirical Research on Scientific Inquiry Activities.” STUDIES IN SCIENCE EDUCATION 52 (2): 161–197. doi:10.1080/03057267.2016.1206351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadeh, Irit, and Michal Zion. 2009. “The Development of Dynamic Inquiry Performances within an Open Inquiry Setting: A Comparison to Guided Inquiry Setting.” JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING 46 (10): 1137–1160. doi:10.1002/tea.20310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandoval, W. A., and K. Morrison. 2003. “High School Students’ Ideas about Theories and Theory Change after a Biological Inquiry Unit.” JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING 40 (4): 369–392. doi:10.1002/tea.10081.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scalise, Kathleen, and Jody Clarke-Midura. 2018. “The Many Faces of Scientific Inquiry: Effectively Measuring What Students Do and Not Only What They Say.” JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING 55 (10): 1469–1496. doi:10.1002/tea.21464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schroeder, Carolyn M., Timothy P. Scott, Homer Tolson, Tse Yang Huang, and Yi Hsuan Lee. 2007. “A Meta-Analysis of National Research: Effects of Teaching Strategies on Student Achievement in Science in the United States.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 44 (10): 1436–1460. doi:10.1002/tea.20212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, L., I. Adler, N. Madjar, and M. Zion. 2021. “Rising to the Challenge: The Effect of Individual and Social Metacognitive Scaffolds on Students’ Expressions of Autonomy and Competence Throughout an Inquiry Process.” JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION AND TECHNOLOGY 30 (4): 582–593. doi:10.1007/s10956-021-09905-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Settlage, J., and L. Meadows. 2002. “Standards-Based Reform and Its Unintended Consequences: Implications for Science Education within America’s Urban Schools.” JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING 39 (2): 114–127. doi:10.1002/tea.10012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, M. U., and L. C. Scharmann. 1999. “Defining versus Describing the Nature of Science: A Pragmatic Analysis for Classroom Teachers and Science Educators.” Science Education 83 (4): 493–509. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199907)83:4<493::AID-SCE6>3.0.CO;2-U.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sole-Llussa, A., D. Aguilar, and M. Ibanez. 2020. “Video-Worked Examples to Support the Development of Elementary Students’ Science Process Skills: A Case Study in an Inquiry Activity on Electrical Circuits.” RESEARCH IN SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGICAL EDUCATION. doi:10.1080/02635143.2020.1786361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommer, K., P. Kring, C. G. Strippel, and K. Emmerich. 2021. “Teaching and Learning Scientific Inquiry - Step by Step.” CHEMKON. doi:10.1002/ckon.202000042.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Songer, NB, HS Lee, and R Kam. 2002. “Technology-Rich Inquiry Science in Urban Classrooms: What are the Barriers to Inquiry Pedagogy?” JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING 39 (2): 128–150. doi:10.1002/tea.10013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Songer, NB, HS Lee, and S McDonald. 2003. “Research Towards an Expanded Understanding of Inquiry Science beyond One Idealized Standard.” SCIENCE EDUCATION 87 (4): 490–516. doi:10.1002/sce.10085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spires, H. A., J. P. Rowe, B. W. Mott, and J. C. Lester. 2011. “Problem Solving and Game-Based Learning: Effects of Middle Grade Students’ Hypothesis Testing Strategies on Learning Outcomes.” Journal of Educational Computing Research 44 (4): 453–472. doi:10.2190/EC.44.4.e.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srirahayu, R. R. Yayuk, and Indyah Sulistyo Arty. 2019.“Development of Experiment Performance Assessment Instruments Using Guided Inquiry Learning Models to Assess Science Process Skills.“ INTERNATIONAL SEMINAR ON SCIENCE EDUCATION 1233 (January). 4th International Seminar on Science Education (ISSE). Yogyakarta, INDONESIA. edited byT. Herawan.10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012075.
   Google Scholar
• Stecher, B. M., and S. P. Klein. 1996.Edited by Brian M, Stecher, Stephen P, Klein. “ Performance Assessments in Science: Hands-On Tasks and Scoring Guides.“Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. .
   Google Scholar
• Stone, Elisa M., and E. Dolan. 2014. “Guiding Students to Develop an Understanding of Scientific Inquiry: A Science Skills Approach to Instruction and Assessment.” CBE-LIFE SCIENCES EDUCATION 13 (1): 90–101. doi:10.1187/cbe-12-11-0198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suparna, Sinha, Toni Kempler Rogat, Karlyn R. Adams-Wiggins, and Cindy E. Hmelo-Silver. 2015. “Collaborative Group Engagement in a Computer-Supported Inquiry Learning Environment.” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-SUPPORTED COLLABORATIVE LEARNING 10 (3): 273–307. doi:10.1007/s11412-015-9218-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teig, Nani, Ronny Scherer, and Marit Kjaernsli. 2020. “Identifying Patterns of Students’ Performance on Simulated Inquiry Tasks UsingPISA2015 Log-File Data.” JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING 57 (9): 1400–1429. doi:10.1002/tea.21657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Lei, Ronghui Zhang, David Clarke, and Weizhen Wang. 2014. “Enactment of Scientific Inquiry: Observation of Two Cases at Different Grade Levels in China Mainland.” JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION AND TECHNOLOGY 23 (2): 280–297. doi:10.1007/s10956-013-9486-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, B. Y., and J. R. Frederiksen. 1998. “Inquiry, Modeling, and Metacognition: Making Science Accessible to All Students.” COGNITION AND INSTRUCTION 16 (1): 3–118. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1601_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wild, Andrew. 2015. “Relationships between High School Chemistry Students’ Perceptions of a Constructivist Learning Environment and Their STEM Career Expectations.” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION 37 (14): 2284–2305. doi:10.1080/09500693.2015.1076951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, PH, and HK Wu. 2020. “Constructing a Model of Engagement in Scientific Inquiry: Investigating Relationships between Inquiry-Related Curiosity, Dimensions of Engagement, and Inquiry Abilities.” INSTRUCTIONAL SCIENCE 48 (1): 1. doi:10.1007/s11251-020-09503-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, P. H., H. K. Wu, and Y. S. Hsu. 2014. “Establishing the Criterion-Related, Construct, and Content Validities of a Simulation-Based Assessment of Inquiry Abilities.” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION 36 (10): 1630–1650. doi:10.1080/09500693.2013.871660.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang I, Park S, Shin J and Lim S. (2017). Exploring Korean Middle School Students’ View about Scientific Inquiry. EURASIA J MATH SCI T, 13(7). doi:10.12973/eurasia.2017.00765a.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zachos, P., T. L. Hick, WEJ Doane, and C. Sargent. 2000. “Setting Theoretical and Empirical Foundations for Assessing Scientific Inquiry and Discovery in Educational Programs.” JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING 37 (9): 938–962. doi:10.1002/1098-2736(200011)37:9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, W. X., Y. S. Hsu, C. Y. Wang, and Y. T. Ho. 2015. “Exploring the Impacts of Cognitive and Metacognitive Prompting on Students’ Scientific Inquiry Practices within an E-Learning Environment.” INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION 37 (3): 529–553. doi:10.1080/09500693.2014.996796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, Gaoxia, Wanli Xing, and Vitaliy Popov. 2019. “Uncovering the Sequential Patterns in Transformative and Non-Transformative Discourse during Collaborative Inquiry Learning.” The Internet and Higher Education 41: 51–61. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar