Investigating the effects of explicit instructional approaches on students’ understanding of scientific models and modeling

References

• Baek, H., C. V. Schwarz, J. Chen, H. Hokayem, and L. Zhan. 2011. “Engaging Elementary Students in Scientific Modeling: The MoDeLS fifth-grade Approach and Findings.” In Models and Modeling, edited by M. Khine and I. Saleh, 195–220. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Baumfalk, B., D. Bhattacharya, T. Vo, C. Forbes, L. Zangori, and C. Schwarz. 2018. “Impact of Model‐based Science Curriculum and Instruction on Elementary Students’ Explanations for the Hydrosphere.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 56 (5): 570–597. doi:10.1002/tea.21514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, R. L., J. J. Matkins, and B. Gansneder. 2011. “Impacts of Contextual and Explicit Instruction of Preservice Elementary Teachers’ Understanding of the Nature of Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 48 (4): 414–436. doi:10.1002/tea.20402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgin, S. R., and T. D. Sadler. 2016. “Learning Nature of Science Concepts through A Research Apprenticeship Program: A Comparative Study of Three Approaches.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 53 (1): 31–59. doi:10.1002/tea.21296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, T., P. S. Oh, M. Maughn, N. Kiriazis, and R. Zuwallack. 2015. “A Review of Modeling Pedagogies: Pedagogical Functions, Discursive Acts, and Technology in Modeling Instruction.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education 11 (1): 159–176. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2015.1314a.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, T., P. S. Oh, and D. Neilson. 2012. “Discursive Modes and Their Pedagogical Functions in model-based Inquiry (MBI) Classrooms.” International Journal of Science Education 34 (15): 2393–2419. doi:10.1080/09500693.2012.704552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, M.-F., and J.-L. Lin. 2015. “Investigating the Relationship between Students’views of Scientific Models and Their Development of Models.” International Journal of Science Education 37 (15): 2453–2475. doi:10.1080/09500693.2015.1082671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, M.-F., J.-L. Lin, S.-Y. Lin, and C.-H. Cheng. 2017. “Scaffolding Middle School and High School Students’ Modeling Processes.” Journal of Baltic Science Education 16 (2): 207–217. doi:10.33225/jbse/17.16.207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed. New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203771587.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. 2007. “Data Analysis and Representation.” In Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches, edited by J. Creswell, 179–212. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Eymur, G. 2019. “The Influence of the Explicit Nature of Science Instruction Embedded in the Argument-Driven Inquiry Method in Chemistry Laboratories on High School Students’ Conceptions about the Nature of Science.” Chemistry Education Research and Practice 20 (1): 17–29. doi:10.1039/C8RP00135A.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forbes, C. T., L. Zangori, and C. V. Schwarz. 2015. “Empirical Validation of Integrated Learning Performances for Hydrologic Phenomena: 3rd‐grade Students’ Model‐driven Explanation‐construction.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 52 (7): 895–921. doi:10.1002/tea.21226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gobert, J. D., and A. Pallant. 2004. “Fostering Students’ Epistemologies of Models via Authentic model-based Tasks.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 13 (1): 7–22. doi:10.1023/B:JOST.0000019635.70068.6f.
   Google Scholar
• Gogolin, S., and D. Krüger. 2018. “Students’ Understanding of the Nature and Purpose of Models.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 55 (9): 1313–1338. doi:10.1002/tea.21453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, R., and A. Rogan-Klyve. 2018. “Talking Modeling: Examining Secondary Science Teachers’ modeling-related Talk during a model-based Inquiry Unit.” International Journal of Science Education 40 (11): 1345–1366. doi:10.1080/09500693.2018.1479547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grosslight, L., C. Unger, E. Jay, and C. L. Smith. 1991. “Understanding Models and Their Use in Science: Conceptions of Middle and High School Students and Experts.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 28 (9): 799–822. doi:10.1002/tea.3660280907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harrison, A. G., and D. F. Treagust. 1998. “Modeling in Science Lessons: Are There Better Ways to Learn with Models?” School Science and Mathematics 98 (8): 420–429. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.1998.tb17434.x.
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, S., M.-C. P. J. Knippels, and W. R. van Joolingen. 2019. “Assessing Students’ Understanding of Models of Biological Processes: A Revised Framework.” International Journal of Science Education 41 (8): 981–994. doi:10.1080/09500693.2019.1582821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khishfe, R., and F. Abd-El-Khalick. 2002. “Influence of Explicit and Reflective versus Implicit inquiry-oriented Instruction on Sixth Graders’ Views of Nature of Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39 (7): 551–578. doi:10.1002/tea.10036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. W.-Y. 2018. “Identifying the Item Hierarchy and Charting the Progression across Grade Levels: Surveying Taiwanese Students’ Understanding of Scientific Models and Modeling.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 16 (8): 1409–1430. doi:10.1007/s10763-017-9854-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S. W.-Y., H.-Y. Chang, and H. K. Wu. 2017. “Students’ Views of Scientific Models and Modeling: Do Representational Characteristics of Models and Students’ Educational Levels Matter?” Research in Science Education 47 (2): 305–328. doi:10.1007/s11165-015-9502-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, X. 2006. “Effects of Combined hands-on Laboratory and Computer Modeling on Student Learning of Gas Laws: A quasi-experimental Study.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 15 (1): 89–100. doi:10.1007/s10956-006-0359-7.
   Google Scholar
• Louca, T. L., and Z. C. Zacharia. 2012. “Modeling-based Learning in Science Education: Cognitive, Metacognitive, Social, Meterial and Epistemological Contributions.” Educational Review 64 (4): 471–492. doi:10.1080/00131911.2011.628748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louca, T., Z.C. Zacharia, and C.P. Constantinou. 2011. “In Quest of Productive modeling-based Learning Discourse in Elementary School Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 48 (8): 919–951. doi:10.1002/tea.20435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathesius, S., and M. Krell. 2019. “Assessing Modeling Competence with Questionnaires.“ In Towards a competence-based View on Models and Modeling in Science Education, edited byUpmeier Zu Belzen, Anette, Krüger, Drik, van Driel, Jan, 117–129. Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-30255-9_7.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education. 2014. Curriculum Guidelines of 12-year Basic Education General Guidelines. Taipei, Taiwan: Ministry ofEducation.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Council. 2012. A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolaou, C. T., and C. P. Constantinou. 2014. “Assessment of the Modeling Competence: A Systematic Review and Synthesis of Empirical Research.” Educational Research Review 13: 52–73. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2014.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowell, L. S., J. M. Norris, D. E. White, and N. J. Moules. 2017. “Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria.” International Journal of Qualitative Methods 16 (1): 1–13. doi:10.1177/1609406917733847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, S.-K. 2013. “The Relationship between Students’ Perception of the Scientifi Models and Their Alternative Conceptions of the Lunar Phases.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education 9 (3): 285–298. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2013.936a.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. T. 2011. “Eta Squared and Partial Eta Squared as Measures of Effect Size in Educational Research.” Educational Research Review 6 (2): 135–147. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2010.12.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, C. V., and B. Y. White. 2005. “Metamodeling Knowledge: Developing Students’ Understanding of Scientific Modeling.” Cognition and Instruction 23 (2): 165–205. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci2302_1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, J., J. Lei, H-Y. Chang, and B. Namdar. 2013. “Technology-Enhanced, Modeling-Based Instruction (TMBI) in Science Education.“ In Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, edited bySpector, J., Merrill, M., Elen, J., Bishop, M., 529–540. New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_41.
   Google Scholar
• Sins, P. H. M., E. R. Savelsbergh, W. R. van Joolingen, and B. H. A. M. van Hout-Wolters. 2009. “The Relation between Students’epistemological Understanding of Computer Models and Their Cognitive Processing on a Modeling Task.” International Journal of Science Education 31 (9): 1205–1229. doi:10.1080/09500690802192181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soulios, I., and D. Psillos. 2016. “Enhancing Student Teachers’ Epistemological Beliefs about Models and Conceptual Understanding through a model-based Inquiry Process.” International Journal of Science Education 38 (7): 1212–1233. doi:10.1080/09500693.2016.1186304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treagust, D. F., G. Chittleborough, and T. L. Mamiala. 2002. “Students’ Understanding of the Role of Scientific Models in Learning Science.” International Journal of Science Education 24 (4): 357–368. doi:10.1080/09500690110066485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, S., X. Liu, and Y. Jia. 2014. “Using Rasch Measurement to Validate the Instrument of Students’ Understanding of Models in Science (SUMS).” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 12 (5): 1067–1082. doi:10.1007/s10763-013-9459-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, B. Y., and J. R. Frederiksen. 1998. “Inquiry, Modeling, and Metacognition: Making Science Accessible to All Students.” Cognition and Instruction 16 (1): 3–118. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci1601_2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar