Designing technology-enhanced science experiments in elementary teacher preparation: the role of learning communities

References

• Bell, R. L., J. L. Maeng, and I. C. Binns. 2013. “Learning in Context: Technology Integration in a Teacher Preparation Program Informed by Situated Learning Theory.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 50 (3): 348–379. doi:10.1002/tea.21075.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, J., S. Hogarth, F. Lubben, B. Campbell, and A. Robinson. 2010. “Talking Science: The Research Evidence on the Use of Small Group Discussions in Science Teaching.” International Journal of Science Education 32 (1): 69–95. doi:10.1080/09500690802713507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. P., M. G. Everett, and J. C. Johnson. 2018. Analyzing Social Networks. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, S., W. H. Chang, C. H. Lai, and C. Y. Tsai. 2014. “A Comparison of students’ Approaches to Inquiry, Conceptual Learning, and Attitudes in Simulation‐based and Microcomputer‐based Laboratories.” Science Education 98 (5): 905–935. doi:10.1002/sce.21126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Couso, D. 2016. “Participatory Approaches to Curriculum Design from a Design Research Perspective.” In Iterative Design of Teaching-Learning Sequences, edited by D. Psillos and P. Kariotoglou, 47–71. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly-Hermosillo, D. F., L. F. Gerard, and M. C. Linn. 2020. “Impact of Graph Technologies in K-12 Science and Mathematics Education.” Computers & Education 146: 103748. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103748.
   Google Scholar
• Duit, R., Gropengießer, H, Kattmann, U., Komorek, M., Parchmann, I. 2012. The Model of Educational Reconstruction – a Framework for Improving Teaching and Learning Science. In Science Education Research and Practice in Europe. Cultural Perpectives in Science Education, edited by D. Jorde, J. Dillon. 5th ed. Rotterdam: SensePublishers.
   Google Scholar
• Duit, R., and M. Tesch. 2010. On the Role of the Experiment in Science Teaching and Learning–Visions and the Reality of Instructional Practice. M. Kalogiannakis, D. Stavrou, and P. Michaelidis, edited by Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Hands-on Science. 25-31 July 2010, Rethymno-Crete, 17–30.
   Google Scholar
• Elster, D. 2010. “Learning Communities in Teacher Education: The Impact of E‐competence.” International Journal of Science Education 32 (16): 2185–2216. doi:10.1080/09500690903418550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. 2021. Proposal for a Council Recommendation on Blended Learning for High Quality and Inclusive Primary and Secondary Education. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52021DC0455&from=EN
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. 2015. Social Linguistics and Literacies: Ideology in Discourses. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gess-Newsome, J. 2015. “A Model of Teacher Professional Knowledge and Skill Including PCK: Results of the Thinking from the PCK Summit.” In Re-Examining Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Science Education, edited by A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, and J. Loughran, 28–42. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Iliaki, G., A. Velentzas, E. Michailidi, and D. Stavrou. 2019. “Exploring the Music: A Teaching-Learning Sequence About Sound in Authentic Settings.” Research in Science & Technological Education 37 (2): 218–238. doi:10.1080/02635143.2018.1526170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. G., G. E. Gardner, L. Robertson, and S. Robert. 2013. “Science Professional Learning Communities: Beyond a Singular View of Teacher Professional Development.” International Journal of Science Education 35 (10): 1756–1774. doi:10.1080/09500693.2013.791957.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kafyulilo, A. C., P. Fisser, and J. Voogt. 2015. “Supporting Teachers Learning Through the Collaborative Design of Technology-Enhanced Science Lessons.” Journal of Science Teacher Education 26 (8): 673–694. doi:10.1007/s10972-015-9444-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kittleson, J. M., and S. A. Southerland. 2004. “The Role of Discourse in Group Knowledge Construction: A Case Study of Engineering Students.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 41 (3): 267–293. doi:10.1002/tea.20003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lämsä, J., R. Hämäläinen, P. Koskinen, and J. Viiri. 2018. “Visualising the Temporal Aspects of Collaborative Inquiry-Based Learning Processes in Technology-Enhanced Physics Learning.” International Journal of Science Education 40 (14): 1697–1717. doi:10.1080/09500693.2018.1506594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavonen, J., K. Juuti, and V. Meisalo. 2003. “Designing a User‐friendly Microcomputer‐based Laboratory Package Through the Factor Analysis of Teacher Evaluations.” International Journal of Science Education 25 (12): 1471–1487. doi:10.1080/0950069032000072755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehesvuori, S., M. Hähkiöniemi, J. Viiri, P. Nieminen, K. Jokiranta, and J. Hiltunen. 2019. “Teacher Orchestration of Classroom Interaction in Science: Exploring Dialogic and Authoritative Passages in Whole-Class Discussions.” International Journal of Science Education 41 (17): 2557–2578. doi:10.1080/09500693.2019.1689586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathabathe, K. C., and M. Potgieter. 2017. “Manifestations of Metacognitive Activity During the Collaborative Planning of Chemistry Practical Investigations.” International Journal of Science Education 39 (11): 1465–1484. doi:10.1080/09500693.2017.1336808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. 2014. Qualitative Content Analysis: Theoretical Foundation, Basic Procedures and Software Solution. Klagenfurt.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, P. 2019. Considering Contextual Knowledge: The TPACK Diagram Gets an Upgrade.
   Google Scholar
• Mishra, P., and M. J. Koehler. 2006. “Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge: A Framework for Teacher Knowledge.” Teachers College Record 108 (6): 1017. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse, J. M. 2010. “Procedures and Practice of Mixed Method Design: Maintaining Control, Rigor, and Complexity.“ In Sage Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioural Research, edited by A. Tashakkori, C. Teddlie, 339–353. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolaou, C. T., I. Nicolaidou, Z. Zacharia, and C. P. Constantinou. 2007. “Enhancing Fourth graders’ Ability to Interpret Graphical Representations Through the Use of Microcomputer-Based Labs Implemented Within an Inquiry-Based Activity Sequence.” Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching 26 (1): 75–99.
   Google Scholar
• Nipyrakis, A., and D. Stavrou. 2022. “Integration of ICT in Science Education Laboratories by Primary Student Teachers.” In STEM, Robotics, Mobile Apps in Early Childhood and Primary Education, edited by S. Papadakis and M. Kalogiannakis, 55–78. Singapore: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Odom, A. L., J. M. Marszalek, E. R. Stoddard, and J. M. Wrobel. 2011. “Computers and Traditional Teaching Practices: Factors Influencing Middle Level students’ Science Achievement and Attitudes About Science.” International Journal of Science Education 33 (17): 2351–2374. doi:10.1080/09500693.2010.543437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oshima, J., R. Oshima, I. Murayama, S. Inagaki, M. Takenaka, H. Nakayama, and E. Yamaguchi. 2004. “Design Experiments in Japanese Elementary Science Education with Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Hypothesis Testing and Collaborative Construction.” International Journal of Science Education 26 (10): 1199–1221. doi:10.1080/0950069032000138824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prestridge, S. 2017. “Examining the Shaping of teachers’ Pedagogical Orientation for the Use of Technology.” Technology, Pedagogy and Education 26 (4): 1–15. doi:10.1080/1475939X.2016.1258369.
   Google Scholar
• Psillos, D., and P. Kariotoglou. 2016. “Theoretical Issues Related to Designing and Developing Teaching-Learning Sequences.” In Iterative Design of Teaching-Learning Sequences, edited by D. Psillos and P. Kariotoglou, 11–34. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rane, L. V. 2018. “Microcomputer Based Laboratory–An Effective Instructional Tool: A Review.” IJRAR-International Journal of Research and Analytical Reviews (IJRAR) 5 (1): 530–538.
   Google Scholar
• Sgouros, G., and D. Stavrou. 2019. “Teachers’ Professional Development in Nanoscience and Nanotechnology in the Context of a Community of Learners.” International Journal of Science Education 41 (15): 2070–2093. doi:10.1080/09500693.2019.1659521.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, L. S. 1986. “Those Who Understand: Knowledge Growth in Teaching.” Educational Researcher 15 (2): 4–14. doi:10.3102/0013189X015002004.
   Google Scholar
• Slutsky, R., and A. Allen. 2005. “A Time for Change: Implementation of a Community of Learners Model.” The Teacher Educator 40 (4): 278–298. doi:10.1080/08878730509555366.
   Google Scholar
• Sokoloff, D. R., P. W. Laws, and R. K. Thornton. 2007. RealTime Physics: Active Learning Labs Transforming the Introductory Laboratory. European Journal of Physics 28 (3): S83. 10.1088/0143-0807/28/3/S08
   Google Scholar
• Stammes, H., I. Henze, E. Barendsen, and M. de Vries. 2020. “Bringing Design Practices to Chemistry Classrooms: Studying teachers’ Pedagogical Ideas in the Context of a Professional Learning Community.” International Journal of Science Education 42 (4): 526–546. doi:10.1080/09500693.2020.1717015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strømme, T. A., and A. Furberg. 2015. “Exploring Teacher Intervention in the Intersection of Digital Resources, Peer Collaboration, and Instructional Design.” Science Education 99 (5): 837–862. doi:10.1002/sce.21181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, J. J., S. Hagenah, S. McDonald, and C. Barchenger. 2019. “Toward a Practice‐based Theory for How Professional Learning Communities Engage in the Improvement of Tools and Practices for Scientific Modeling.” Science Education 103 (6): 1423–1455. doi:10.1002/sce.21547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, E. M., and U. Kattmann. 2007. “A Research Model for the Study of Science teachers’ PCK and Improving Teacher Education.” Teaching and Teacher Education 23 (6): 885–897. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2006.05.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Riesen, S. A., H. Gijlers, A. Anjewierden, and T. de Jong. 2018. “The Influence of Prior Knowledge on Experiment Design Guidance in a Science Inquiry Context.” International Journal of Science Education 40 (11): 1327–1344. doi:10.1080/09500693.2018.1477263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vossen, T. E., I. Henze, R. C. A. Rippe, J. H. Van Driel, and M. J. De Vries. 2018. “Attitudes of Secondary School Students Towards Doing Research and Design Activities.” International Journal of Science Education 40 (13): 1629–1652. doi:10.1080/09500693.2018.1494395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waight, N., and F. Abd‐el‐khalick. 2007. “The Impact of Technology on the Enactment of “Inquiry” in a Technology Enthusiast’s Sixth Grade Science Classroom.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 44 (1): 154–182. doi:10.1002/tea.20158.
   Google Scholar
• Waight, N., and F. Abd-El-Khalick. 2012. “Nature of Technology: Implications for Design, Development, and Enactment of Technological Tools in School Science Classrooms.” International Journal of Science Education 34 (18): 2875–2905. doi:10.1080/09500693.2012.698763.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, C., T. Fang, and Y. Gu. 2020. “Learning Performance and Behavioral Patterns of Online Collaborative Learning: Impact of Cognitive Load and Affordances of Different Multimedia.” Computers & Education 143: 103683. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warr, M., P. Mishra, and B. Scragg. 2019, March. Beyond TPACK: Expanding Technology and Teacher Education to Systems and Culture. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, 2558–2562. Las Vegas: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
   Google Scholar
• Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yeh, Y. F., K. K. H. Chan, and Y. S. Hsu. 2021. “Toward a Framework That Connects Individual TPACK and Collective TPACK: A Systematic Review of TPACK Studies Investigating Teacher Collaborative Discourse in the Learning by Design Process.” Computers & Education 171: 104238. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar