Effectiveness of simulation, hands-on and a combined strategy in enhancing conceptual understanding on electric circuit: a comparative study

References

• Angell, C., O. Guttersrud, E. K. Henriksen, and A. Isnes. 2004. “Physics: Frightful, but Fun. Pupil’s and Teacher’s Views of Physics and Physics Teaching.” Science Education 88 (5): 1–24. doi:10.1002/sce.10141.
   Google Scholar
• Areepattamannil, S. 2012. “Effects of Inquiry-Based Science Instruction on Science Achievement and Interest in Science: Evidence from Qatar.” The Journal of Educational Research 105 (2): 134–146. doi:10.1080/00220671.2010.533717.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayrak, B., and U. Kanli. 2007. “To Compare the Effects of Computer Based Learning and Laboratory Based Learning on students’ Achievement Regarding Electric Circuits.” The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology 6 (1): 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., and V. Clarke. 2017. “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
   Google Scholar
• Bulunuz, M. 2012. “Motivational Qualities of Hands-On Activities for Turkish Preservice Kindergarten Teachers.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 8 (2): 73–82. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2012.821a.
   Google Scholar
• Calik, M. 2013. “Effect of Technology-Embedded Scientific Enquiry on Senior Science Student teachers’ Self-Efficacy.” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 9 (3): 223–231. doi:10.12973/eurasia.2013.931a.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmichael, A., J. J. Chini, N. S. Rebello, and S. Puntambekar. 2010. “Comparing Student Learning in Mechanics Using Simulations and Hands-On Activities.” AIP Conference Proceedings 1289 (89).
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J.W. 2014. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed methods approaches. 5th ed. California: SAGE Publications Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W., and J. D. Creswell. 2018. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Croker, S., and H. Buchanan. 2011. “Scientific Reasoning in a Real-World Context. The Effect of Prior Belief and Outcome on Children’s Hypothesis-Testing Strategy.” The British Journal of Developmental Psychology 29 (3): 409–424. doi:10.1348/026151010X496906.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorrio, B., J. Blanco-Garcia, and M. Costa. 2011. “Hands-On Physics Experiment for the Classroom.” Selected Papers on Hands-On Science II: 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Finkelstein, N. D., W. K. Adams, C. J. Keller, P. B. Kohl, K. K. Perkins, N. S. Podolefsky and R. LeMaster. 2005. “When Learning About the Real World is Better Done by Virtuality: A Study of Substituting Computer Simulations for Laboratory Equipment.” Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research 1 (1). doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.1.010103.
   Google Scholar
• Flannery, M. C. 2001. “Hands-On: In Many Different Ways.” The American Biology Teacher 63 (4): 282–286. doi:10.2307/4451100.
   Google Scholar
• Gerstner, S., and F. X. Bogner. 2010. “Cognitive Achievement and Motivation in Hands-On and Teacher-Centered Science Class: Does an Additional Hands-On Consolidation Phase (Concept Mapping) Optimize Cognitive Learning at Work Stations?” International Journal of Science Education 32 (7): 849–870. doi:10.1080/09500690902803604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, S. E., N. Marcum-Dietrich, and R. Becker-Klein. 2014. “Model My Watershed: Connecting Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Watersheds to Real-World Decision Making.” Journal of Geoscience Education 62 (1): 61–73. doi:10.5408/12-395.1.
   Google Scholar
• Gulcicek, C., and B. Gunes. 2004. “Materializing the Concepts During Science Instruction: Modeling Strategy, Computer Simulations and Analogies.” Science and Education 29 (134): 36–48.
   Google Scholar
• Hmelo-Silver, C. E. 2004. “Problem-Based Learning: What and How Do Students Learn?” Educational Psychology Review 16 (3): 235–266. doi:10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huppert, J., S. Michal-Lomask, and R. Lazarowitz. 2002. “Computer Simulations in the High School: Students’ Cognitive Stages, Science Process Skills and Academic Achievement in Microbiology.” International Journal of Science Education 24 (8): 803–821. doi:10.1080/09500690110049150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hursen, C., and G. Asiksoy. 2015. “World Journal of Educational Technology.” World 7 (1): 87–98. doi:10.18844/wjet.v7i1.26.
   Google Scholar
• Hussain, M., and M. Akhtar. 2013. “Impact of Hands-On Activities on students’ Achievement in Science. An Experimental Evidence from Pakistan.” Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research 16 (5): 626–632.
   Google Scholar
• Jaakkola, T., and S. Nurmi. 2008. “Fostering Elementary School students’ Understanding of Simple Electricity by Combining Simulation and Laboratory Activities.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 24 (4): 271–283. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00259.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaakkola, T., S. Nurmi, and K. Veermans. 2010. “A Comparison of students’ Conceptual Understanding of Electricity in Simulations Only and Simulation-Laboratory Contexts.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 48 (1): 71–93. doi:10.1002/tea.20386.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, C., R. Ramanau, S. Cross, and G. Healing. 2010. “Net Generations or Digital Natives: Is There a Distinct New Generation Entering University?” Computers & Education 54 (3): 722–732. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.09.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karamustafaoglu, O. 2012. “How Computer Assisted Teaching in Physics Can Enhance Student Learning.” Educational Research and Reviews 7 (13): 297.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, X. 2006. “Effects on Combined Hands-On Laboratory and Computer Modeling on Student Learning of Gas Laws: A Quasi-Experimental Study.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 15 (1): 89–100. doi:10.1007/s10956-006-0359-7.
   Google Scholar
• Manunure, K., A. Delserieys, and J. Castera. 2019. “The Effects of Combining Simulations and Laboratory Experiments on Zimbabwean students’ Conceptual Understanding of Electric Circuits.” Research in Science and Technology Education 38 (3): 289–307. doi:10.1080/02635143.2019.1629407.
   Google Scholar
• Panjaitan, R.L, Irawati, R, Sujana, A, Hanifah, N, Djuanda, D. 2018. Item validity vs item discrimination index: A redundancy?. Journal of Physics: 2–6. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012101.
   Google Scholar
• PhET. 2002. “Free Online Physics, Chemistry, Biology, Earth Science and Math Simulations.” https://phet.colorado.edu/.
   Google Scholar
• Ramasundarm, V., S. Grunwald, A. Mangeot, N. B. Comerford, and C. M. Bliss. 2005. “Development of Envronment Virtual Field Laboratory.” Computers & Education 45: 21–34. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2004.03.002.
   Google Scholar
• Ratompomalala, H., and E. Bruillard. 2011. “ICT and Pre-Service Teacher Training in Physics and Chemistry: A Survey in France.” In The Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Rytting, M. C. 2016. Comparing Simulation and Hands-On Labs in Helping High School Students Learn Physics Concepts. Provo, UT: School of Technology; Brigham Young University.
   Google Scholar
• Rytting, M., G. A. Wright, S. L. Shumway, and J. Jensen. 2019. “Comparison of Simulation and Hands-On Labs in Helping High School Students Learn Physics Concepts.” International Journal of Education 11 (1): 1–11. doi:10.5296/ije.v11i1.14017.
   Google Scholar
• Sarabando, C., J. P. Cravino, and A. A. Soares. 2016. “Improving Students; Understanding of the Concepts of Mass and Weight with Computer Simulations.” Journal of Baltic Science Education 15 (1): 109–126. doi:10.33225/jbse/16.15.109.
   Google Scholar
• Scheckler, R. K. 2003. “Virtual Labs: A Substitute for Traditional Labs?” The International Journal of Developmental Biology 47 (2–3): 231–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stohr-Hunt, P. M. 2006. “An Analysis of Frequency of Hands-On Experience and Science Achievement.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 33 (1): 101–109. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2736(199601)33:1<101:AID-TEA6>3.0.CO;2-Z.
   Google Scholar
• Taher, M., and A. Khan. 2015. “Comparison of Simulations-Based and Hands-On Teaching Methodologies on students’ Learning in an Engineering Technology.” Qscience Proceedings, 58. doi: 10.5339/qproc.2015.elc2014.
   Google Scholar
• Tamang, M. 2004. “Strategies for Teaching Physics.” RABSEL, the CERD Educational Journal IV: 36–43.
   Google Scholar
• Tambaya, I. S. 2015. “Impacts of Hands-On Learning Activities on Academic Achievement of Senior Secondary Biology Students in Zaria, Kaduna State.” Journal of Science, Technology, Mathematics, and Education (JOSTMED) 11 (1): 261–267.
   Google Scholar
• Toth, E. E., B. L. Morrow, and L. R. Ludvico. 2008. “Designing Blended Inquiry Learning in a Laboratory Context: A Study of Incorporating Hands-On and Virtual Laboratories.”
   Google Scholar
• Unal, S. 2008. “Changing students’ Misconceptions of Floating and Sinking Using Hands-On Activities.” Journal of Baltic Science Education 7 (3): 134–136.
   Google Scholar
• Wangdi, D., and S. Tshomo. 2019. “Using a Learning Cycle Model to Improve Grade ten Student’s Conceptions of Simple Electric Circuits.” Research Journal of Recent Rciences 8 (4): 31–39.
   Google Scholar
• Yehya, F. M., A. M. Barbar, and S. Abou-Rjeili. 2019. “Learning with Simulations: Influence of a Computer Simulation with Hands-On Activities on students’ Learning of the Physics capacitors’ Concepts.” Research in Social Sciences and Technology (RESSAT) 4 (1): 1–19. doi:10.46303/ressat.04.01.1.
   Google Scholar
• Zacharia, Z. C. 2007. “Comparing and Combining Real and Virtual Experimentation: An Effort to Enhance Students’ Conceptual Understanding of Electric Circuit.” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 23 (2): 120–132. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00215.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zacharia, Z. C., G. Olympiou, and M. Papaevripidou. 2008. “Effects of Experimenting with Physical and Virtual Manipulatives on students’ Conceptual Understanding in Heat and Temperature.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching 45 (9): 1021–1035. doi:10.1002/tea.20260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. 2018. “Withholding Answers During Hands-On Scientific Investigation? Comparing Effects on Developing students’ Scientific Knowledge, Reasoning and Application.” International Journal of Science Education 40 (4): 459–469. doi:10.1080/09500693.2018.1429692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar