Exploring primary school teachers’ idea generation during the STEM instructional design process

References

• Aggarwal, V., E. H. Hwang, and Y. Tan. 2021. “Learning to Be Creative: A Mutually Exciting Spatiotemporal Point Process Model for Idea Generation in Open Innovation.” Information Systems Research 32 (4): 1214–1235. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2021.1020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alshamali, M. A., and W. M. Daher. 2016. “Scientific Reasoning and Its Relationship with Problem Solving: The Case of Upper Primary Science Teachers.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 14 (6): 1003–1019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9646-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baas, M., B. Nevicka, and F. S. Ten Velden. 2020. “When Paying Attention Pays Off: The Mindfulness Skill Act with Awareness Promotes Creative Idea Generation in Groups.” European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology 29 (4): 619–632. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432x.2020.1727889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banks, F., and D. Barlex. 2020. Teaching STEM in the Secondary School: Helping Teachers Meet the Challenge. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429317736.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, S., L. Lockyer, and S. Agostinho. 2018. “Towards Sustainable Technology-Enhanced Innovation in Higher Education: Advancing Learning Design by Understanding and Supporting Teacher Design Practice.” British Journal of Educational Technology 49 (6): 1014–1026. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, A. H., and T. D. Green. 2018. “Beyond Teaching Instructional Design Models: Exploring the Design Process to Advance Professional Development and Expertise.” Journal of Computing in Higher Education 30 (1): 176–186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-017-9164-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brücknerová, K., and P. Novotný. 2017. “Intergenerational Learning Among Teachers: Overt and Covert Forms of Continuing Professional Development.” Professional Development in Education 43 (3): 397–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2016.1194876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M. 2016. Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315757421.
   Google Scholar
• Calvera-Isabal, M., P. Santos, and D. Hernández-Leo. 2023. “Towards Citizen Science-Inspired Learning Activities: The Co-Design of an Exploration Tool for Teachers Following a Human-Centred Design Approach.” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2023.2201554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castaño, R., R. Poy, R. Tomsa, N. Flores, and C. Jenaro. 2015. “Pre-Service Teachers’ Performance from Teachers’ Perspective and Vice Versa: Behaviors, Attitudes and Other Associated Variables.” Teachers & Teaching 21 (7): 894–907. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2014.995487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, Z., Y. Long, and A. A. Koehler. 2022. “Supporting Problem Solving with Asynchronous Online Discussions: A Social Network Analysis.” Educational Technology Research & Development 70 (3): 737–763. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10110-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig, C. A., E. L. Petrun Sayers, S. Gilbertz, and I. Karabas. 2022. “The Development and Evaluation of Interdisciplinary STEM, Sustainability, and Management Curriculum.” The International Journal of Management Education 20 (2): 100652. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2022.100652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Chantal, P.-L., and H. Markovits. 2017. “The Capacity to Generate Alternative Ideas Is More Important Than Inhibition for Logical Reasoning in Preschool-Age Children.” Memory & Cognition 45 (2): 208–220. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0653-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Rooij, A. 2023. “Inner Speaking and Uncertainty During Idea Generation.” The Journal of Creative Behavior 57 (3): 376–396. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.584.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dökme, İ., and Z. K. Ünlü. 2023. “An Effective Intervention Using STEM Instruction for Improving Preservice Science Teachers’ Self-Efficacy.” Research in Science & Technological Education 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2023.2209847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, H. 2021. “Adapting During the Pandemic: A Case Study of Using the Rapid Prototyping Instructional System Design Model to Create Online Instructional Content.” The Journal of Academic Librarianship 47 (3): 102356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreamson, N., G. Thomas, A. L. Hong, and S. Y. Kim. 2018. “The Perceptual Gaps in Using a Learning Management System: Indigenous Cultural Perspectives.” Technology, Pedagogy & Education 27 (4): 431–444. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939x.2018.1490665.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrich, J. F., S. Woodcock, and C. West. 2020. “The Effect of Gender on Teaching Dispositions: A Rasch Measurement Approach.” International Journal of Educational Research 99:10510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.101510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekuri, E. E., J. M. Egbai, and C. I. Ita. 2011. “Teacher Factors and Perceived Assessment Practices Needs of Social Studies Teachers in Cross River State, Nigeria.” Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability 23 (4): 307–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-011-9129-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elwood, K., and M. E. Jordan. 2022. “Development of the Design Thinking and Instructional Lessons (DTAIL) Model: A Creative Approach for Teachers.” Educational Technology Research & Development 70 (5): 1781–1807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10140-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falloon, G. 2019. “Using Simulations to Teach Young Students Science Concepts: An Experiential Learning Theoretical Analysis.” Computers & Education 135:138–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonul, B., H. Işık, and S. Güneş. 2020. “A Multigroup Analysis of Family Climate and Volunteering: The Mediating Role of Parental Conversations in Emerging Adulthood.” Applied Developmental Science 26 (2): 317–328. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2020.1796666.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groenewoudt, A. C., G. Rooks, and P. J. R. van Gool. 2019. “When Problems Lead to Ideas: The Roles of Daily Vigor and Social Interactions.” Journal of Creative Behavior 53 (3): 286–297. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gurvich, C., and S. L. Rossell. 2015. “Dopamine and Cognitive Control: Sex-By-Genotype Interactions Influence the Capacity to Switch Attention.” Behavioural Brain Research 281:96–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2014.11.045.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., W. Black, B. J. Babin, and R. E. Anderson. 2019. Multivariate Data Analysis. 8th ed. Boston: Cengage.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. S., R. M. McGill, S. Puttick, and J. Maltby. 2022. “Resilience, Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM), and Anger: A Linguistic Inquiry into the Psychological Processes Associated with Resilience in Secondary School STEM Learning.” British Journal of Educational Psychology 92 (3): 1215–1238. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haroun, R. F., D. Ng, F. A. Abdelfattah, and M. S. Alsalouli. 2016. “Gender Difference in Teachers’ Mathematical Knowledge for Teaching in the Context of Single-Sex Classrooms.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 14 (2): 383–396. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9631-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henriksen, D., C. Richardson, and R. Mehta. 2017. “Design Thinking: A Creative Approach to Educational Problems of Practice.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 26:140–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Honey, M., G. Pearson, and H. Schweingruber. 2014. Stem Integration in K-12 Education: Status, Prospects, and an Agenda for Research. Washington: National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/18612.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, J.-C., M.-Y. Hwang, Y.-J. Chen, M.-Y. Chen, and L.-C. Liu. 2012. “Using Eight Trigrams (BaGua) Approach with Epistemological Practice to Vitalize Problem-Solving Processes: A Confirmatory Analysis of R&D Managers.” Thinking Skills and Creativity 7 (3): 187–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2012.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hong, J.-C., C.-R. Tsai, and K.-H. Tai. 2021. “Factors Affecting the Application of Scientific Knowledge in a STEAM Contest: The Correlates Between Collective Efficacy, Cohesiveness, and Prosociality.” Research in Science & Technological Education 41 (3): 1176–1196. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2021.1994383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, X., S. Erduran, K. Luo, P. Zhang, and M. Zheng. 2022. “Investigating In-Service Teachers’ STEM Literacy: The Role of Subject Background and Gender.” Research in Science & Technological Education 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2022.2153243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L.-t, and P. M. Bentler. 1999. “Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives.” Structural Equation Modeling 6 (1): 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubers, M. D., M. D. Endedijk, and K. Van Veen. 2020. “Effective Characteristics of Professional Development Programs for Science and Technology Education.” Professional Development in Education 48 (5): 827–846. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2020.1752289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchinson, A., and M. W. Tracey. 2015. “Design Ideas, Reflection, and Professional Identity: How Graduate Students Explore the Idea Generation Process.” Instructional Science 43 (5): 527–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-015-9354-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, C.-C., H.-C. Yeh, and N.-S. Chen. 2020. “Enhancing STEM Competence by Making Electronic Musical Pencil for Non-Engineering Students.” Computers & Education 150:103840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Illeris, K. 2007. How We Learn: Learning and Non-Learning in School and Beyond. 1st ed. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203939895.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson-Eilola, J., and S. A. Selber. 2020. “Strange Days: Creating Flexible Pedagogies for Technical Communication.” Journal of Business and Technical Communication 35 (1): 154–159. https://doi.org/10.1177/1050651920959189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kale, U., A. Roy, and J. Yuan. 2020. “To Design or to Integrate? Instructional Design versus Technology Integration in Developing Learning Interventions.” Educational Technology Research & Development 68 (5): 2473–2504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09771-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, Y., H. Rahrig, K. Eichel, H. F. Niles, T. Rocha, N. E. Lepp, J. Gold, and W. B. Britton. 2018. “Gender Differences in Response to a School-Based Mindfulness Training Intervention for Early Adolescents.” Journal of School Psychology 68:163–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2018.03.004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelley, T. R., and J. G. Knowles. 2016. “A Conceptual Framework for Integrated STEM Education.” International Journal of STEM Education 3 (1): 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0046-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. 2011. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 3rd ed. New York, NY: Guilford Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2010-18801-000.
   Google Scholar
• Lebuda, I., D. L. Zabelina, and M. Karwowski. 2016. “Mind Full of Ideas: A Meta-Analysis of the Mindfulness–Creativity Link.” Personality and Individual Differences 93:22–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2015.09.040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, M.-H., C.-Y. Hsu, and C.-Y. Chang. 2019. “Identifying Taiwanese Teachers’ Perceived Self-Efficacy for Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Knowledge.” The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher 28 (1): 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-018-0401-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leroy, A., M. Romero, and L. Cassone. 2021. “Interactivity and Materiality Matter in Creativity: Educational Robotics for the Assessment of Divergent Thinking.” Interactive Learning Environments 31 (4): 2194–2205. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1875005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, K.-Y., and P. J. Williams. 2016. “Taiwanese Preservice Teachers’ Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Teaching Intention.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 14 (6): 1021–1036. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9645-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, K.-Y., Y.-F. Yeh, Y.-S. Hsu, J.-Y. Wu, K.-L. Yang, and H.-K. Wu. 2023. “STEM Education Goals in the Twenty-First Century: Teachers’ Perceptions and Experiences.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 33 (2): 479–496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-022-09737-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lusnig, L., R. Radach, and M. J. Hofmann. 2022. “Meditation Affects Word Recognition of Meditation Novices.” Psychological Research 86 (3): 723–736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-021-01522-5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lv, B., J. Wang, Y. Zheng, X. Peng, and X. Ping. 2022. “Gender Differences in High School Students’ STEM Career Expectations: An Analysis Based on Multi-Group Structural Equation Model.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 59 (10): 1739–1764. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21772.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCallum, R. C., and S. Hong. 1997. “Power Analysis in Covariance Structure Modeling Using GFI and AGFI.” Multivariate Behavioral Research 32 (2): 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3202_5.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maran, T., M. Woznica, S. Moder, M. Furtner, E. Jehle, S. Hörner, and G. Hugger. 2021. “Overcoming Automaticity Through Meditation.” Mindfulness 12 (12): 2896–2907. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-021-01749-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, F., A. Ritzhaupt, S. Kumar, and K. Budhrani. 2019. “Award-Winning Faculty Online Teaching Practices: Course Design, Assessment and Evaluation, and Facilitation.” The Internet and Higher Education 42:34–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, J. K., and S. C. Yanchar. 2020. “Towards a View of Originary Theory in Instructional Design.” Educational Technology Research & Development 68 (2): 633–651. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09734-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyahara, M., T. Harada, S. Tanaka, H. Fukuhara, T. Kano, T. Ono, and N. Sadato. 2017. “Mindfulness Meditation for Future Early Childhood Teachers in Japan.” Teaching and Teacher Education 65:136–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.03.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, G. R., S. J. Ross, J. R. Morrison, and H. K. Kalman. 2019. Designing Effective Instruction. 8th ed. New Jersey: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Mulaik, S. A., L. R. James, J. Van Alstine, N. Bennett, S. Lind, and C. D. Stilwell. 1989. “Evaluation of Goodness-Of-Fit Indices for Structural Equation Models.” Psychological Bulletin 105 (3): 430–445. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.105.3.430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, B. C. N., A. Gerasimova, and S. M. Ritter. 2016. “Concentrative Meditation Influences Creativity by Increasing Cognitive Flexibility.” Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 10 (3): 278–286. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D., and T. McIntosh. 2017. “Creative Thinking Processes: The Past and the Future.” The Journal of Creative Behavior 51 (4): 317–322. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neufeld, P. G., and H. D. Delcore. 2018. “Situatedness and Variations in Student Adoption of Technology Practices: Towards a Critical Techno-Pedagogy.” Journal of Information Technology Education Research 17:1–38. https://doi.org/10.28945/3934.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, T. W. H., and L. Lucianetti. 2016. “Within-Individual Increases in Innovative Behavior and Creative, Persuasion, and Change Self-Efficacy Over Time: A Social–Cognitive Theory Perspective.” Journal of Applied Psychology 101 (1): 14–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nkambule, N. S., and C.-W. Tang. 2024. “Building a Case for Communities of Practice As Drivers of Innovative Teaching in English Medium Instruction Context.” Higher Education 87 (3): 721–740. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01032-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, E., D. Ifenthaler, and R. B. Clariana. 2022. “Adaptive or Adapted To: Sequence and Reflexive Thematic Analysis to Understand Learners’ Self‐Regulated Learning in an Adaptive Learning Analytics Dashboard.” British Journal of Educational Technology 54 (1): 98–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, D.-Y., M.-H. Park, and A. B. Bates. 2018. “Exploring Young Children’s Understanding About the Concept of Volume Through Engineering Design in a STEM Activity: A Case Study.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 16 (2): 275–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-016-9776-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radloff, J., and S. Guzey. 2016. “Investigating Preservice STEM Teacher Conceptions of STEM Education.” Journal of Science Education and Technology 25 (5): 759–774. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9633-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapanta, C., and L. Cantoni. 2014. “Being in the Users’ Shoes: Anticipating Experience While Designing Online Courses.” British Journal of Educational Technology 45 (5): 765–777. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reiser, R. A., and J. Dempsey. 2006. Trends and Issues in Instructional Design and Technology, 94–131. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River New Jersey: Pearson. https://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1210790.
   Google Scholar
• Riccardi, P., D. Zald, R. Li, S. Park, M. S. Ansari, B. Dawant, S. Anderson, et al. 2006. “Sex Differences in Amphetamine-Induced Displacement of [18F] Fallypride in Striatal and Extrastriatal Regions: A PET Study.” American Journal of Psychiatry 163 (9): 1639–1641. https://doi.org/10.1176/ajp.2006.163.9.1639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritz, J. M., and S.-C. Fan. 2015. “STEM and Technology Education: International State-Of-The-Art.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 25 (4): 429–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-014-9290-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryu, M., N. Mentzer, and N. Knobloch. 2019. “Preservice Teachers’ Experiences of STEM Integration: Challenges and Implications for Integrated STEM Teacher Preparation.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 29 (3): 493–512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-018-9440-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez, G. 2013. PLS Path Modeling with R. Berkeley, CA, USA: Trowchez Editions.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders, M. 2009. “STEM, STEM Education, STEMMania.” Retrieved From 68 (4): 20–26. https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/bitstream/10919/51616/1/STEMmania.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Shakeel, S. I., M. A. Al Mamun, and M. F. A. Haolader. 2023. “Instructional Design with ADDIE and Rapid Prototyping for Blended Learning: Validation and Its Acceptance in the Context of TVET Bangladesh.” Education and Information Technologies 28 (6): 7601–7630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11471-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soutschek, A., C. J. Burke, A. R. Beharelle, R. Schreiber, S. C. Weber, I. I. Karipidis, J. ten Velden, et al. 2017. “The Dopaminergic Reward System Underpins Gender Differences in Social Preferences.” Nature Human Behaviour 1 (11): 819–827. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0226-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spaan, W., R. Oostdam, J. Schuitema, and M. Pijls. 2022. “Analysing Teacher Behaviour in Synthesizing Hands-On and Minds-On During Practical Work.” Research in Science & Technological Education 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2022.2098265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, N., S. Tripathi, and I. Singhal. 2020. “Meditators Exercise Better Endogenous and Exogenous Control of Visual Awareness.” Mindfulness 11 (12): 2705–2714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-020-01496-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefaniak, J., J. Baaki, B. Hoard, and L. Stapleton. 2018. “The Influence of Perceived Constraints During Needs Assessment on Design Conjecture.” Journal of Computing in Higher Education 30 (1): 55–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9173-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stefaniak, J. E., and H. Hwang. 2021. “A Systematic Review of How Expertise Is Cultivated in Instructional Design Coursework.” Educational Technology Research & Development 69 (6): 3331–3366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10064-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibaut, L., H. Knipprath, W. Dehaene, and F. Depaepe. 2018. “The Influence of Teachers’ Attitudes and School Context on Instructional Practices in Integrated STEM Education.” Teaching and Teacher Education 71:190–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.12.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thibaut, L., H. Knipprath, W. Dehaene, and F. Depaepe. 2019. “Teachers’ Attitudes Toward Teaching Integrated STEM: The Impact of Personal Background Characteristics and School Context.” International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education 17 (5): 987–1007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-9898-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toker, S., and M. H. Baturay. 2022. “Developing Disposition to Critical Thinking and Problem-Solving Perception in Instructional Design Projects for Producing Digital Materials.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 32 (2): 1267–1292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09646-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai, F.-H., H.-S. Hsiao, K.-C. Yu, and K.-Y. Lin. 2022. “Development and Effectiveness Evaluation of a STEM-Based Game-Design Project for Preservice Primary Teacher Education.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 32 (5): 2403–2424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-021-09702-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Y. Chen, Y. Sun, K. Zhang, N. Wang, Y. Sun, X. Lin, J. Wang, and F. Luo. 2023. “Gender Differences in the Benefits of Meditation Training on Attentional Blink.” Current Psychology 42 (7): 5178–5187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01891-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, O. O. F., M. Coppolino, S. R. George, and M. L. Perreault. 2021. “Sex Differences in Dopamine Receptors and Relevance to Neuropsychiatric Disorders.” Brain Sciences 11 (9): 1199. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11091199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, B., X. Peng, and Y. Hu. 2021. “How to Foster Pre-Service Teachers’ STEM Learning Design Expertise Through Virtual Internship: A Design-Based Research.” Educational Technology Research & Development 69 (6): 3307–3329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10063-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, K.-L., Y.-H. Cheng, T.-Y. Wang, and J.-C. Chen. 2023. “Preservice Mathematics Teachers’ Reasoning About Their Instructional Design for Using Technology to Teach Mathematics.” Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education 51 (3): 248–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359866x.2023.2198116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, D., R. Gómez, N. Wright, M. Rittenbruch, and J. Davis. 2022. “A Design-Led Conceptual Framework for Developing School Integrated STEM Programs: The Australian Context.” International Journal of Technology and Design Education 32 (1): 383–411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09619-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar