Variations in observation frequency in a self-controlled learning environment do not modulate learning of a pirouette en dehors

References

• Andrieux, M., & Proteau, L. (2013). Observation learning of a motor task: Who and when? Experimental Brain Research, 229(1), 125–137.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Calmels, C., Hars, M., Jarry, G., & Stam, C. J. (2010). Non-linear EEG synchronization during observation: Effects of instructions and expertise. Psychophysiology, 47(5), 799–808.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, W. R., & Bandura, A. (1985). Role of timing of visual monitoring and motor rehearsal in observational learning of action patterns. Journal of Motor Behavior, 17(3), 269–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, W. R., & Bandura, A. (1987). Translating cognition into action: The role of visual guidance in observational learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 19(3), 385–398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, W. R., & Bandura, A. (1990). Representational guidance of action production in observational learning: A causal analysis. Journal of Motor Behavior, 22(1), 85–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, M. J., & Patterson, J. T. (2012). Self-controlled knowledge of results: Age-related differences in motor learning, strategies, and error detection. Human Movement Science, 31(6), 1459–1472.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, M. J., Rathwell, S., & Ste-Marie, D. (2016). Motor skill retention is modulated by strategy choice during self-controlled knowledge of results schedules. Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 4, 100–115.
   Google Scholar
• Carter, M. J., & Ste-Marie, D. M. (2017). An interpolated activity during the knowledge-of-results delay interval eliminates the learning advantages of self-controlled feedback schedules. Psychological Research, 81(2), 399–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, S., Tremblay, F., & Ste-Marie, D. (2003). Differential modulation of corticospinal excitability during observation, mental imagery and imitation of hand actions. Neuropsychologia, 42, 105–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fagundes, J., Chen, D. D., & Laguna, P. (2013). Self-control and frequency of model presentation: Effects on learning a ballet passé relevé. Human Movement Science, 32(4), 847–856.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, S., Pfeiffer, J., & Patterson, J. T. (2011). Self-control of feedback during motor learning: Accounting for the absolute amount of feedback using a yoked group with self-control over feedback. Journal of Motor Behavior, 43(2), 113–119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hird, J. S., Landers, D. M., Thomas, J. R., & Horan, J. J. (1991). Physical practice is superior to mental practice in enhancing cognitive and motor task performance. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 8, 281–293.
   Google Scholar
• Hodges, N. J., & Ste-Marie, D. M. (2013). Observation as an Instructional Method. In D. Farrow, J. Baker, & C. MacMahon (Eds.), Developing sport expertise: researchers and coaches put theory into practice (2nd ed., pp. 115–131). London: Taylor & Francis pusblishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kantak, S. S., & Winstein, C. J. (2012). Learning-performance distinction and memory processes for motor skills: A focused review and perspective. Behavioural Brain Research, 228(1), 219–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laguna, P. (1996). The effects of model demonstration strategies on motor skill acquisition and performance. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 30(2), 55–79.
   Google Scholar
• McCullagh, P., & Weiss, M. R. (2001). Modeling: Considerations for Motor Skill Performance and Psychological Responses. In R. N. Singer, H. A. Hausenblas, & C. M. Janelle (Eds.), Handbook of Sport Psychology (2nd ed., pp. 205–238). New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• McCullagh, P., Ste-Marie, D. M., & Law, B. (2013). Modeling: is what you see what you get? In J. Van Waalte & B. Brewer (Eds.), Exploring Sport and Exercise Psychology (3rd ed., pp. 139–162). Washington: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• McCullagh, P., & Meyer, K. N. (1997). Learning versus correct models: Influence of model type on the learning of a free-weight squat lift. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 68, 56–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, K. (1986). Constraints on the Development of Coordination. In M. G. Wade & H. T. A. Whiting (Eds.), Motor Development in Children: Aspects of Coordination and Control (pp. 341–361). Amsterdam: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ong, N., & Hodges, N. J. (2012). Mixing It Up a Little: How to Schedule Observational Practice. In N. J. Hodges & A. M. Williams (Eds.), Skill Acquisition in Sport (pp. 48–65). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Post, P. G., Aiken, C. A., Laughlin, D. D., & Fairbrother, J. T. (2016). Self-control over combined video feedback and modeling facilitates motor learning. Human Movement Science, 47, 49–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. A., & Bjork, R. A. (1992). New conceptualizations of practice: Common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training. Psychological Science, 3(4), 207–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidaway, B., & Hand, J. (1993). Relative frequency of modeling effects on the performance and retention of a motor skill. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 64(1), 122–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ste-Marie, D. M., Carter, M. J., & Yantha, Z. (in press). Self-Controlled Learning: Current Findings, Theoretical Perspectives, and Future Directions. In N. J. Hodges & A. M. Williams (Eds.), Skill acquisition in sport: research, theory, and practice (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ste-Marie, D. M., Law, B., Rymal, A. M.O. J., Hall, C., & McCullagh, P. (2012). Observation interventions for motor skill learning and performance: An applied model for the use of observation. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 5(2), 145–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ste-Marie, D. M., Vertes, K. A., Law, B., & Rymal, A. M. (2013). Learner-controlled self-observation is advantageous for motor skill acquisition. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Weeks, D., & Anderson, L. P. (2000). The interaction of observational learning with overt practice: Effects on motor skill learning. Acta Psychologica, 104(2), 259–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wrisberg, C., & Pein, R. (2002). Model presentation during skill acquisition. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 94, 792–794.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, W. F. W., & Magill, R. A. (2011). Allowing learners to choose: Self-controlledpractice schedules for learning multiple movement patterns. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 82(3), 449–457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2016). Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(5), 1382–1414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulf, G., Raupach, M., & Pfeiffer, F. (2005). Self-controlled observational practice enhances learning. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 76(1), 107–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar