637
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Sports Performance

An expert’s mind in action: Assessing attentional focus, workload and performance in a dynamic, naturalistic environment

, , &
Pages 2318-2330 | Accepted 10 May 2019, Published online: 23 Jun 2019

References

  • Abdollahipour, R., Wulf, G., Psotta, R., & Palomo Nieto, M. (2015). Performance of gymnastics skill benefits from an external focus of attention. Journal of Sports Sciences, 33(17), 1807–1813.
  • Andy, C., Wong, T. W., & Masters, R. S. (2017). Examining motor learning in older adults using analogy instruction. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 28, 78–84.
  • Becker, K. A., Fairbrother, J. T., & Couvillion, K. F. (2018). The effects of attentional focus in the preparation and execution of a standing long jump. Psychological Research, 1–7. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29616337
  • Beilock, S. L., & Carr, T. H. (2004). From novice to expert performance: Attention, memory, and the control of complex sensorimotor skills. In A. M. Williams, N. J. Hodges, M. A. Scott, & M. L. J. Court (Eds.), Skill acquisition in sport: Research, theory and practice (pp. 309–328). New York: Routledge.
  • Beilock, S. L., & Carr, T. H. (2001). On the fragility of skilled performance: What governs choking under pressure? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130, 701–725. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.130.4.701
  • Beilock, S. L., Carr, T. H., MacMahon, C., & Starkes, J. L. (2002). When paying attention becomes counterproductive: Impact of divided versus skill-focused attention on novice and experienced performance of sensorimotor skills. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8(1), 6.
  • Beilock, S. L., & Gray, R. (2012). From attentional control to attentional spillover: A skill-level investigation of attention, movement, and performance outcomes. Human Movement Science, 31(6), 1473–1499.
  • Berger, R. (2015). Now I see it, now I don’t: Researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 15(2), 219–234.
  • Bernier, M., Codron, R., Thienot, E., & Fournier, J. F. (2011). The attentional focus of expert golfers in training and competition: A naturalistic investigation. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 23(3), 326–341.
  • Bernier, M., Trottier, C., Thienot, E., & Fournier, J. (2016). An investigation of attentional foci and their temporal patterns: A naturalistic study in expert figure skaters. The Sport Psychologist, 30(3), 256–266.
  • Brownstein, M. (2014). Rationalizing flow: Agency in skilled unreflective action. Philosophical Studies, 168(2), 545–568.
  • Christensen, W., Sutton, J., & McIlwain, D. J. (2016). Cognition in skilled action: Meshed control and the varieties of skill experience. Mind & Language, 31(1), 37–66.
  • Collins, D., Carson, H. J., & Toner, J. (2016). Letter to the editor concerning the article “Performance of gymnastics skill benefits from an external focus of attention” by.
  • Collins, D., Morriss, C., & Trower, J. (1999). Getting it back: A case study of skill recovery in an elite athlete. The Sport Psychologist, 13(3), 288–298.
  • Creswell, J. (2006). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Denscombe, M. (2008). Communities of practice: A research paradigm for the mixed methods approach. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(3), 270–283.
  • Denzin, N. K. (2010). Moments, mixed methods, and paradigm dialogs. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 419–427.
  • Di Nucci, E. (2013). Mindlessness. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  • Diekfuss, J. A., Ward, P., & Raisbeck, L. D. (2017). Attention, workload, and performance: A dual-task simulated shooting study. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 15(4), 423–437.
  • Drake, P. (2010). Grasping at methodological understanding: A cautionary tale from insider research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 33(1), 85–99.
  • Dreyfus, H., & Dreyfus, S. (1986). Mind over machine: The power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. New York: Free Press.
  • Dreyfus, H. L., Drey-fus, S. E., & Zadeh, L. A. (1987). Mind over machine: The power of human intuition and expertise in the era of the computer. IEEE Expert, 2(2), 110–111.
  • Dwyer, S., & Buckle, J. (2009). The space between: On being an insider-outsider in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(1), 54–63. doi:10.1177/160940690900800105
  • Ericsson, K. A. (2006). The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance. The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance, 38, 685–705.
  • Fairbrother, J. T., Post, P. G., & Whalen, S. J. (2016). Self-reported responses to player profile questions show consistency with the use of complex attentional strategies by expert horseshoe pitchers. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1028. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01028
  • Fitts, P. M., & Posner, M. I. (1967). Human performance (Vol. 5, pp. 7–16). Belmont, CA: Brooks. Cole.
  • Ford, P., Hodges, N. J., & Williams, A. M. (2005). Online attentional-focus manipulations in a soccer-dribbling task: Implications for the proceduralization of motor skills. Journal of Motor Behavior, 37(5), 386–394.
  • Giacobbi, P., Foore, B., & Weinberg, R. S. (2004). Broken clubs and expletives: The sources of stress and coping responses of skilled and moderately skilled golfers. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 16(2), 166–182.
  • Gomes, F. R. F., Bastos, F. H., Meira, C. D. M., Jr, Neiva, J. F. D. O., & Tani, G. (2017). Effects of distinct practice conditions on the learning of the o soto gari throwing technique of judo. Journal of Sports Sciences, 35(6), 572–578.
  • Gray, R. (2004). Attending to the execution of a complex sensorimotor skill: Expertise differences, choking, and slumps. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 10(1), 42.
  • Greenwald, A. G. (1970). Sensory feedback mechanisms in performance control: With special reference to the ideo-motor mechanism. Psychological Review, 77(2), 73.
  • Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1989). Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  • Hadi, M. A., & Closs, S. J. (2016). Ensuring rigour and trustworthiness of qualitative research in clinical pharmacy. International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 38(3), 641–646.
  • Hart, S. G., & Staveland, L. E. (1988). Development of NASA-TLX (task load index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In P. A. Hancock & N. Meshkati (Eds.), Human mental workload, 139−183. Oxford, UK: North-Holland.
  • Hesse-Biber, S. (2010). Qualitative approaches to mixed methods practice. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(6), 455–468.
  • Horsburgh, D. (2003). Evaluation of qualitative research. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 12(2), 307–312.
  • Hutchinson, J. C., & Tenenbaum, G. (2007). Attention focus during physical effort: The mediating role of task intensity. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 8(2), 233–245.
  • Imamura, R., Iteya, M., Hreljac, A., & Escamilla, R. (2007). A kinematic comparison of the judo throw Harai-goshi during competitive and non-competitive conditions. Journal of Sports Science & Medicine, 6(CSSI–2), 15.
  • Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14–26.
  • Kal, E., Van der Kamp, J., & Houdijk, H. (2013). External attentional focus enhances movement automatization: A comprehensive test of the constrained action hypothesis. Human Movement Science, 32(4), 527–539.
  • Kanuha, V. K. (2000). “Being” native versus “going native”: Conducting social work research as an insider. Social Work, 45(5), 439–447.
  • Koshida, S., Ishii, T., Matsuda, T., & Hashimoto, T. (2017). Kinematics of judo breakfall for osoto-gari: Considerations for head injury prevention. Journal of Sports Sciences, 35(11), 1059–1065.
  • Leavitt, J. (1979). Cognitive demands of skating and stickhandling in ice hockey. Canadian Journal of Applied Sport Sciences. Journal Canadien Des Sciences Appliquees Au Sport, 4(1), 46.
  • Liao, C.-M., & Masters, R. S. (2001). Analogy learning: A means to implicit motor learning. Journal of Sports Sciences, 19(5), 307–319.
  • Lincoln, Y. S. (2010). “What a long, strange trip it’s been … ”: Twenty-five years of qualitative and new paradigm research. Qualitative Inquiry, 16(1), 3–9.
  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
  • Lincoln, Y. S., Lynham, S. A., & Guba, E. G. (2011). Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences, revisited. The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, 4, 97–128.
  • Martinent, G., Ledos, S., Ferrand, C., Campo, M., & Nicolas, M. (2015). Athletes’ regulation of emotions experienced during competition: A naturalistic video-assisted study. Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology, 4(3), 188.
  • Maurer, H., & Munzert, J. (2013). Influence of attentional focus on skilled motor performance: Performance decrement under unfamiliar focus conditions. Human Movement Science, 32(4), 730–740.
  • Maxcy, S. J. (2003). Pragmatic threads in mixed methods research in the social sciences: The search formultiple modes of inquiry and the end of the philosophy of formalism. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 51–89). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Maxwell, J. P., Masters, R., & Eves, F. (2000). From novice to no know-how: A longitudinal study of implicit motor learning. Journal of Sports Sciences, 18(2), 111–120.
  • Montero, B. (2010). Does bodily awareness interfere with highly skilled movement? Inquiry, 53(2), 105–122.
  • Montero, B. G. (2016). Thought in action: Expertise and the conscious mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Morse, J. M. (2015). Critical analysis of strategies for determining rigor in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Health Research, 25(9), 1212–1222.
  • Mullen, R., Faull, A., Jones, E. S., & Kingston, K. (2015). Evidence for the effectiveness of holistic process goals for learning and performance under pressure. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 17, 40–44.
  • Mullen, R., & Hardy, L. (2010). Conscious processing and the process goal paradox. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 32(3), 275–297.
  • Nyberg, G. (2015). Developing a ‘somatic velocimeter’: The practical knowledge of free skiers. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 7(4), 488–503.
  • Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Leech, N. L. (2005). On becoming a pragmatic researcher: The importance of combining quantitative and qualitative research methodologies. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(5), 375–387.
  • Oudejans, R. R., Koedijker, J. M., & Beek, P. J. (2007). An outside view on Wulf’s external focus: Three recommendations. E-Journal Bewegung Und Training, 1, 41–42.
  • Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE Publications, inc.
  • Perrin, P., Deviterne, D., Hugel, F., & Perrot, C. (2002). Judo, better than dance, develops sensorimotor adaptabilities involved in balance control. Gait & Posture, 15(2), 187–194.
  • Raisbeck, L. D., & Diekfuss, J. A. (2015). Fine and gross motor skills: The effects on skill-focused dual-tasks. Human Movement Science, 43, 146–154.
  • Raisbeck, L. D., & Diekfuss, J. A. (2017). Verbal cues and attentional focus: A simulated target-shooting experiment. Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 5(1), 148–159.
  • Raisbeck, L. D., Diekfuss, J. A., Wyatt, W., & Shea, J. B. (2015). Motor imagery, physical practice, and memory: The effects on performance and workload. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 121(3), 691–705.
  • Rallis, S. F., & Rossman, G. B. (2003). Mixed methods in evaluation contexts: A pragmatic framework. In Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 491–512). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Ravn, S., & Christensen, M. K. (2014). Listening to the body? How phenomenological insights can be used to explore a golfer’s experience of the physicality of her body. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 6(4), 462–477.
  • Scanlan, T. K. (2011). Personal turning points on the road from laboratory experimentalist to mixed methodologist. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 3(3), 313–323.
  • Schücker, L., & Parrington, L. (2018). Thinking about your running movement makes you less efficient: Attentional focus effects on running economy and kinematics. Journal of Sports Sciences, 37(6), 638–646.
  • Smith, B., & Sparkes, A. C. (2012). Making sense of words and stories in qualitative research: Strategies for consideration.
  • Sutton, J. (2007). Batting, habit and memory: The embodied mind and the nature of skill. Sport in Society, 10(5), 763–786.
  • Sutton, J., McIlwain, D., Christensen, W., & Geeves, A. (2011). Applying intelligence to the reflexes: Embodied skills and habits between Dreyfus and Descartes. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology, 42(1), 78–103.
  • Tashakkori, A., & Creswell, J. W. (2007). Exploring the nature of research questions in mixed methods research.
  • Toner, J., Montero, B. G., & Moran, A. (2015). Considering the role of cognitive control in expert performance. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 14(4), 1127–1144.
  • Uphill, M. A., & Jones, M. V. (2007). Antecedents of emotions in elite athletes: A cognitive motivational relational theory perspective. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 78(2), 79–89.
  • Von Cranach, M., & Kalbermatten, U. (1982). Ordinary interactive action: Theory, methods and some empirical findings. In M. Von Cranach, and R. Harre (Eds.), The analysis of action (pp. 115–160). London: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ward, P., Fiore, S. M., Feltovich, P. J., Hoffman, R. R., DiBello, L., & Andrews, D. H. (2013). Accelerated expertise: Training for high proficiency in a complex world. New York: Psychology Press.
  • Wulf, G. (2013). Attentional focus and motor learning: A review of 15 years. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 6, 77–104. doi:10.1080/1750984X.2012.723728
  • Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2016). Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: The optimal theory of motor learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23, 1382–1414. doi:10.3758/s13423-015-0999-9
  • Wulf, G., McNevin, N., & Shea, C. H. (2001). The automaticity of complex motor skill learning as a function of attentional focus. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 54(4), 1143–1154.
  • Wulf, G., & Su, J. (2007). An external focus of attention enhances golf shot accuracy in beginners and experts. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 78(4), 384–389.
  • Wulf, G., McConnel, N., Gärtner, M., & Schwarz, A. (2002). Enhancing the learning of sport skills through external-focus feedback. Journal of Motor Behavior, 34(2), 171–182.
  • Yeh, T. T., Cinelli, M. E., Lyons, J., & Lee, T. D. (2016). Using a manipulation check to uncover age-related difference in focus of attention instruction during a balance task. Experimental Aging Research, 42(3), 307–313.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.