A conceptual model of motivations for consumer resale on C2C websites

References

• Abdul-Ghani, E., Hyde, K.F., & Marshall, R. (2011). Emic and etic interpretations of engagement with a consumer-to-consumer online auction site. Journal of Business Research, 64(10), 1060–1066. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2010.10.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, M.J., & Reynolds, K.E. (2003). Hedonic shopping motivation. Journal of Retailing, 79(2), 77–95. doi: 10.1016/S0022-4359(03)00007-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babin, B.J., Darden, W.R., & Griffin, M. (1994). Work and/or fun: Measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(4), 644–656. doi: 10.1086/209376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batra, R., & Ahtola, O.T. (1991). Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian sources of consumer attitudes. Marketing Letters, 2(2), 159–170. doi: 10.1007/BF00436035
   Google Scholar
• Belk, R.W. (1995). Collecting as luxury consumption: Effects on individuals and households. Journal of Economic Psychology, 16(3), 477–490. doi: 10.1016/0167-4870(95)98956-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belk, R.W., Sherry, J.F., & Wallendorf, M. (1988). A naturalistic inquiry into buyer and seller behavior at a swap meet. Journal of Consumer Research, 14(4), 449–470. doi: 10.1086/209128
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnett, M.S., & Lunsford, D.A. (1994). Conceptualizing guilt in the consumer decision making process. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 11(3), 33–43. doi: 10.1108/07363769410065454
   Google Scholar
• Childers, T.L., Carr, C.L., Peck, J., & Carson, S. (2001). Hedonic and utilitarian motivations for online retail shopping behavior. Journal of Retailing, 77(4), 511–535. doi: 10.1016/S0022-4359(01)00056-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu, H., & Liao, S. (2007). Exploring consumer resale behavior in C2C online auctions: Taxonomy and influences on consumer decisions. Academy of Marketing Science Review, 11(3), 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Chu, H., & Liao, S. (2008). Toward a conceptual model of consumer online resale behavior: An exploratory study in Taiwan. Journal of Internet Commerce, 7(2), 220–252. doi: 10.1080/15332860802067722
   Google Scholar
• Chu, H., & Liao, S. (2010). Buying while expecting to sell: The economic psychology of online resale. Journal of Business Research, 63(9–10), 1073–1078. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2009.03.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–337. doi: 10.2307/249008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day, E. (2004). Charity shops lose out as second-hand goods go to Internet auctions. The Telegraph. Retrieved August 15, 2010, from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1469435/Charity-shops-lose-out-as-second-hand-goods-go-to-internet-auctions.html
   Google Scholar
• Dykema, E.B. (1999). Consumers catch auction fever. Forrester Report. Retrieved December 4, 2009, from http://www.forrester.com/ER/Research/Report/Summary/0,1338,5667,FF.html
   Google Scholar
• eBay India website. (2007). eBay India website. Retrieved December 11, 2009, from http://pricebook.ebay.in/aboutpricebook.html
   Google Scholar
• eBay Marketplaces Fast Facts. (2007). eBay marketplaces fast facts. Retrieved March 5, 2010, from http://pages.ebay.com.sg/presscentre/Quarterly_FastFacts/eBay%20Marketplaces%20Fast%20Facts%20Q107.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Engel, J.F., Blackwell, R.D., & Miniard, P.W. (1986). Consumer behavior (5th ed.). New York, NY: Dryden Press.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, P. (1997). The scopic regimes of shopping. In P. Falk & C. Campbell (Eds.), The shopping experience, (pp. 177–185). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, J.L., Wallington, S.A., & Bless, E. (1967). Compliance without pressure: The effects of guilt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7(2), 117–124. doi: 10.1037/h0025009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghose, A., Telang, R., & Krishnan, R. (2005). Effect of electronic secondary markets on the supply chain. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(2), 91–120. doi: 10.1201/1078/45099.22.2.20050301/87282.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh, S. (1998). Marketing business sense of the Internet. Harvard Business Review, 76(2), 127–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregson, N., & Crewe, L. (2003). Second hand cultures, Oxford: Berg.
   Google Scholar
• Halstead, D., & Becherer, R.C. (2003). Internet auction sellers: Does size really matter?. Internet Research, 13(3), 183–194. doi: 10.1108/10662240310478204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, C., & Fennema, M.G. (1996). Mental depreciation and marginal decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68(2), 95–108. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1996.0092
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrmann, G.M. (1997). Gift or commodity: What changes hands in the US garage sale?. American Ethnologist, 24(4), 910–930. doi: 10.1525/ae.1997.24.4.910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrmann, G.M. (2006). Garage sales make good neighbors: Building community through neighborhood sales. Human Organization, 65(2), 181–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrmann, G.M., & Soiffer, S.M. (1984). For fun and profit: An analysis of the American garage sale. Urban Life, 12(4), 397–421.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschman, E.C., & Holbrook, M.B. (1982). Hedonic consumption: Emerging concepts, methods and propositions. Journal of Marketing, 46(3), 92–101. doi: 10.2307/1251707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holt, D.B. (1995). How consumers consume: A typology of consumption practices. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(1), 1–16. doi: 10.1086/209431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Industry & Technology Intelligence Service. (2006). Taiwan internet shopping survey. Retrieved June 17, 2009, from http://www.itis.org.tw/
   Google Scholar
• Jacoby, J., Berning, C.K., & Dietvorst, T.F. (1977). What about disposition?. Journal of Marketing, 41(2), 22–28. doi: 10.2307/1250630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y. (2005). The effects of buyer and product traits with seller reputation on price premiums in e-auction. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 46(1), 79–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korgaonkar, P.K., & Wolin, L.D. (1999). A multivariate analysis of Web usage. Journal of Advertising Research, 39(2), 53–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lastovicka, J., & Fernandez, K. (2007). Extending generalizations about the disposition of meaningful possessions to buyers with a shared self. In M.C. Lees, T. Davis & G. Gregory (Eds.), Asia-Pacific advances in consumer research, (pp. 105–107). Sydney: Association for Consumer Research.
   Google Scholar
• Mano, H., & Elliott, M.T. (1997). Smart shopping: The origins and consequences of price savings. In M. Brooks & D.J. MacInnis (Eds.), Advances in consumer research, (pp. 504–510). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mullen, B., & Johnson, C. (1990). The psychology of consumer behavior, New Jersey, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Paden, N., & Stell, R. (2005). Consumer product redistribution: Disposition decisions and channel options. Journal of Marketing Channels, 12(3), 105–123. doi: 10.1300/J049v12n03_06
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, E. (2006). Dealing in second-hand goods: Creating meaning and value. European Advances in Consumer Research, 7, 189–194.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Purohit, D. (1992). Exploring the relationship between the markets for new and used durable goods: The case of automobiles. Marketing Science, 11(2), 154–167. doi: 10.1287/mksc.11.2.154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiffman, L.G., & Kanuk, L.L. (1997). Consumer behavior (6th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Shipman, A. (2001). Privatized production, socialized consumption? Old producer power behind the new consumer sovereignty. Review of Social Economy, 59(2), 331–352. doi: 10.1080/00346760110053932
   Google Scholar
• Spiggle, S. (1994). Analysis and interpretation of qualitative data in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(3), 491–503. doi: 10.1086/209413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stern, B.B., & Stafford, M.R. (2006). Individual and social determinants of winning bids in online auctions. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 5(1), 43–55. doi: 10.1002/cb.47
   Google Scholar
• Tatzel, M. (2002). Money worlds and well-being: An integration of money dispositions, materialism and price-related behavior. Journal of Economic Psychology, 23(1), 103–126. doi: 10.1016/S0167-4870(01)00069-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thaler, R.H. (1985). Mental accounting and consumer choice. Marketing Science, 4(3), 199–244. doi: 10.1287/mksc.4.3.199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walley, M. J.C., & Fortin, D.R. (2005). Behavioral outcomes from online auctions: Reserve price, reserve disclosure, and initial bidding influences in the decision process. Journal of Business Research, 58(10), 1409–1418. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2003.10.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walters, C.G., & Blaise, J.B. (1989). Consumer behavior – a decision making approach, Cincinnati, OH: South-Western Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, K., Wang, T.G., & Tai, C.F. (2002). A study of online auction sites in Taiwan: product, auction rule, and trading type. International Journal of Information Management, 22(2), 127–142. doi: 10.1016/S0268-4012(01)00050-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiner, B. (1985). An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion. Psychological Review, 92(4), 548–573. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.92.4.548
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfinbarger, M., & Gilly, M. (2001). Shopping online for freedom, control, and fun. California Management Review, 43(2), 34–55. doi: 10.2307/41166074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yousafzai, S.Y., Pallister, J., & Foxall, G. (2009). Multi-dimensional role of trust in internet banking adoption. The Service Industries Journal, 29(4), 591–605. doi: 10.1080/02642060902719958
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar