3,995
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The dark side of artificial intelligence in services

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 149-172 | Received 07 Oct 2023, Accepted 10 Jan 2024, Published online: 30 Jan 2024

References

  • Akdim, K., Belanche, D., & Flavián, M. (2023). Attitudes toward service robots: Analyses of explicit and implicit attitudes based on anthropomorphism and construal level theory. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 35(8), 2816–2837. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-12-2020-1406
  • Ashfaq, M., Yun, J., Yu, S., & Loureiro, S. M. C. (2020, November). I, chatbot: Modeling the determinants of users’ satisfaction and continuance intention of AI-powered service agents. Telematics and Informatics, 54, 101473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101473
  • Bagozzi, R. P. (2020). Foundations of emotional research and its application. Korean Journal of Marketing, 35(4), 1–51. https://doi.org/10.15830/kjm.2020.35.4.1
  • Baker-Brunnbauer, J. (2021). TAII framework for trustworthy AI systems. ROBONOMICS: The Journal of the Automated Economy, 2, 17.
  • Belanche, D., Casaló, L. V., & Flavián, C. (2021a). Frontline robots in tourism and hospitality: Service enhancement or cost reduction? Electronic Markets, 31(3), 477–492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-020-00432-5
  • Belanche, D., Casaló, L. V., Flavián, C., & Pérez-Rueda, A. (2021b). The role of customers in the gig economy: How perceptions of working conditions and service quality influence the use and recommendation of food delivery services. Service Business, 15(1), 45–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-020-00432-7
  • Belanche, D., Casaló, L. V., Flavián, C., & Schepers, J. (2020a). Service robot implementation: A theoretical framework and research agenda. The Service Industries Journal, 40(3-4), 203–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2019.1672666
  • Belanche, D., Casaló, L. V., Flavián, C., & Schepers, J. (2020b). Robots or frontline employees? Exploring customers’ attributions of responsibility and stability after service failure or success. Journal of Service Management, 31(2), 267–289. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-05-2019-0156
  • Belk, R. (2021). Ethical issues in service robotics and artificial intelligence. The Service Industries Journal, 41(13-14), 860–876. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2020.1727892
  • Belk, R. (2022). Artificial emotions and love and sex doll service workers. Journal of Service Research, 25(4), 521–536. https://doi.org/10.1177/10946705211063692
  • Belk, R. (2023). Chatbots. In R. Llamas, & R. Belk (Eds.), Routledge handbook of digital consumption (pp. 124–135). Routledge.
  • Belk, R. W., Belanche, D., & Flavián, C. (2023). Key concepts in artificial intelligence and technologies 4.0 in services. Service Business, 17(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11628-023-00528-w
  • Bitner, M. J., Booms, B. H., & Tetreault, M. S. (1990). The service encounter: Diagnosing favorable and unfavorable incidents. Journal of Marketing, 54(1), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299005400105
  • Blut, M., Wang, C., Wünderlich, N. V., & Brock, C. (2021). Understanding anthropomorphism in service provision: A meta-analysis of physical robots, chatbots, and other AI. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 49(4), 632–658. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-020-00762-y
  • Bode, M., & Kristensen, D. (2015). The digital doppelgänger within: A study on self-tracking and the quantified self movement. In R. Canniford, & D. Bajde (Eds.), Assembling consumption: Assembling actors, networks, and markets (pp. 61–71). Routledge.
  • Bode, M., & Kristensen, D. (2023). From techno-utopianism to personal panopticon and beyond: A call for a revised self-tracking research agenda. In R. Llamas, & R. Belk (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of digital consumption (2nd ed, pp. 269–283). Routledge.
  • Brian, M. (2015). Microsoft’s Xiaoice AI becomes first live TV weather host. Engadget, Retrieved December 29, from https://www.engadget.com/2015-12-29-microsoft-xiaoice-ai-china-weather-host.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAA7zXHIJ0t-nmuFWZ0Wpw-g_K-4N0gAFcLK8lkN4WIqz-Y0-1B2ecJzE1m_zakhhKatwJTQvQvlBdpH3qHzf5bL4yp4jdBSlAuEhKOq21v-zx2VhycehXb6g7fLI0C6qfcGGqRRDLOUPWqjepztrD48CBJG1iPEK7ac5Gg9J63Km.
  • Brino, K. A. S., Derouin, A. L., & Silva, S. G. (2022, March–April). Problematic internet use in adolescents and implementation of a social media hygiene protocol. Journal of Pediatric Nursing, 63, 84–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedn.2021.10.011
  • Castillo, D., Canhoto, A. I., & Said, E. (2021). The dark side of AI-powered service interactions: Exploring the process of co-destruction from the customer perspective. The Service Industries Journal, 41(13-14), 900–925. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2020.1787993
  • Chen, M., Engelmann, S., & Grossklags, J. (2023). Social credit system and privacy. In S. Trepte, & P. Masur (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of privacy and social media (pp. 227–236). Routledge.
  • Coveri, A., Cozza, C., & Guarascio, D. (2022). Monopoly capital in the time of digital platforms: A radical approach to the Amazon case. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 46(6), 1341–1367. https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/beac044
  • Curry, A., & Rieser, Z. B. (2018). #MeToo: How conversational systems respond to sexual harassment, ACL Anthology, June, https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/W18-0802/.
  • Du, S., & Xie, C. (2021, May). Paradoxes of artificial intelligence in consumer markets: Ethical challenges and opportunities. Journal of Business Research, 129, 961–974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.08.024
  • DuFault, B., & Schouten, J. (2018). Self-quantification and the datapreneurial consumer identity. Consumption Markets & Culture, 23(3), 290–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253866.2018.1519489
  • Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Baabdullah, A. M., Koohang, A., Raghavan, V., Ahuja, M., Albanna, H., Albashrawi, M. A., Al-Busaidi, A. S., Balakrishnan, J., Barlete, Y., Basu, S., Bose, I., Brooks, L., Buhalis, D., … Wright, R. (2023, August). “So what if ChatGPT wrote it?” multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642
  • European Commission. (2018). Directorate-general for research and innovation, European group on ethics in science and new technologies, Statement on artificial intelligence, robotics and ‘autonomous’ systems. Retrieved April 14, 2023, from https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2777531856.
  • Eyssel, F., & Hegel, F. (2012). (S)he's got the look: Gender stereotyping of robots. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(9), 2213–2230. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00937.x
  • Flavián, C., & Casaló, L. V. (2021). Artificial intelligence in services: Current trends, benefits and challenges. The Service Industries Journal, 41(13-14), 853–859. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2021.1989177
  • Flavián, C., Pérez-Rueda, A., Belanche, D., & Casaló, L. V. (2022). Intention to use analytical artificial intelligence (AI) in services – The effect of technology readiness and awareness. Journal of Service Management, 33(2), 293–320. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-10-2020-0378
  • Floridi, L., & Sanders, J. W. (2004). On the morality of artificial agents. Minds and Machines, 14(3), 349–379. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MIND.0000035461.63578.9d
  • Future of Life Institute. (2023). Pause giant AI experiments: An open letter. https://futureoflife.org/open-letter/pause-giant-ai-experiments/.
  • Galliott, J., & Lotz, M.2015). Super soldiers: The ethical, legal, and social implications. Routledge.
  • Gambino, A., Fox, J., & Ratan, R. A. (2020). Building a stronger CASA: Extending the computers are social actors paradigm. Human-Machine Communication, 1, 71–86. https://doi.org/10.30658/hmc.1.5
  • Hernández-Orallo, J. (2017). The measure of all minds: Evaluating natural and artificial intelligence. Cambridge University Press.
  • Huang, M. H., & Rust, R. T. (2018). Artificial intelligence in service. Journal of Service Research, 21(2), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670517752459
  • Huang, M. H., & Rust, R. T. (2021). Engaged to a robot? The role of AI in service. Journal of Service Research, 24(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670520902266
  • Huang, M. H., & Rust, R. T. (2022). AI as customer. Journal of Service Management, 33(2), 210–220. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-11-2021-0425
  • Imperva. (2021). Bad bot report 2021: The pandemic of the internet. https://www.imperva.com/resources/resource-library/reports/bad-bot-report-report-ty?lang=EN&asset_id=4429.
  • Ivanov, S., & Webster, C. (2021). Automated decision-making: Hoteliers’ perceptions. Technology in Society, 33(11), 3926–3955.
  • Ivanov, S., & Webster, C. (2021). Willingness-to-pay for robot-delivered tourism and hospitality services – An exploratory study. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 33(11), 3926–3955. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-09-2020-1078
  • Jiang, H., Cheng, Y., Yang, J., & Gao, S. (2022, September). AI-powered chatbot communication with customers: Dialogic interactions, satisfaction, engagement, and customer behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 134, 107329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107329
  • Kipnis, E., McLeay, F., Grimes, A., de Saille, S., & Potter, S. (2022). Service robots in long-term care: A consumer-centric view. Journal of Service Research, 25(4), 667–685. https://doi.org/10.1177/10946705221110849
  • Lancaster, K. (2021). Non-consensual personified sexbots: An intrinsic wrong. Ethics and Information Technology, 23(4), 589–600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-021-09597-9
  • Li, B., Chen, Y., Liu, L., & Zheng, B. (2023). Users’ intention to adopt artificial intelligence-based chatbot: Meta-analysis. The Service Industries Journal, 1–23. in press.
  • Luo, X., Tong, S., Fang, Z., & Qu, Z. (2019). Frontiers: Machines vs. Humans: The impact of artificial intelligence chatbot disclosure on customer purchases. Marketing Science, 38(6), 937–947.
  • Makridis, C. A., & Mishra, S. (2022). Artificial intelligence as a service, economic growth, and well-being. Journal of Service Research, 25(4), 505–520. https://doi.org/10.1177/10946705221120218
  • Marinucci, L., Mazzuca, C., & Gangemi, A. (2023). Exposing implicit biases and stereotypes in human and artificial intelligence: State of the art and challenges with a focus on gender. AI & Society, 38(2), 747–761. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01474-3
  • Mehta, P., Jebarajakirthy, C., Maseeh, H. I., Anubha, A., Saha, R., & Dhanda, K. (2022). Artificial intelligence in marketing: A meta-analytic review. Psychology & Marketing, 39(11), 2013–2038. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21716
  • Mende, M., Scott, M. L., van Doorn, J., Grewal, D., & Shanks, I. (2019). Service robots rising: How humanoid robots influence service experiences and elicit compensatory consumer responses. Journal of Marketing Research, 56(4), 535–556. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022243718822827
  • Meskys, E., Kalpokiene, J., Jurcys, P., & Liaudanskas, A. (2020). Regulating deep fakes: Legal and ethical considerations. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 15(1), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpz167
  • Miller, S. (2015). Collective responsibility for the robopocolypse. In J. Galliott, & M. Lotz (Eds.), Super soldiers: The ethical, legal and social implications (pp. 153–166). Routledge.
  • Mori, M. (1970). The uncanny valley. Energy, 7(4), 33–35.
  • Müller, V. C. (2020). Ethics of artificial intelligence and robotics. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/ethics-ai/?utm_source=summari.
  • OECD. (2023). Transparency and explainability (Principle 1.3) https://oecd.ai/en/dashboards/ai-principles/P7.
  • Öhman, C., & Floridi, L. (2018). An ethical framework for the digital afterlife industry. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(5), 318–320. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0335-2
  • Osburg, V. S., Yoganathan, V., Kunz, W. H., & Tarba, S. (2022). Can (A) I give you a ride? Development and validation of the CRUISE framework for autonomous vehicle services. Journal of Service Research, 25(4), 630–648. https://doi.org/10.1177/10946705221118233
  • Pantano, E., & Gandini, A. (2017, December). Exploring the forms of sociality mediated by innovative technologies in retail settings. Computers in Human Behavior, 77, 367–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.036
  • Park, Y., & Lee, S. (2022, November). Gender differences in smartphone addiction and depression among Korean adolescents: Focusing on the internal mechanisms of attention deficit and self-control. Computers in Human Behavior, 136, 107400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107400
  • Publiese, J. (2015). On human and machine: When is a soldier not a soldier? In J. Galliott, & M. Lotz (Eds.), Super soldiers: The ethical, legal and social implications (pp. 25–36). Routledge.
  • Puntoni, S., Reczek, R. W., Giesler, M., & Botti, S. (2021). Consumers and artificial intelligence: An experiential perspective. Journal of Marketing, 85(1), 131–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242920953847
  • Raj, M., Berg, J., & Seamans, R. (2023). Artificial intelligence: The effect of AI Disclosure on evaluations of creative content. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.06217.
  • Reuters. (2023). ChatGPT sets record for fastest-growing user base – Analyst note. https://www.reuters.com/technology/chatgpt-sets-record-fastest-growing-user-base-analyst-note-2023-02-01/.
  • Schepers, J., Belanche, D., Casaló, L. V., & Flavián, C. (2022). How smart should a service robot be? Journal of Service Research, 25(4), 565–582. https://doi.org/10.1177/10946705221107704
  • Schüll, N. (2012). Addiction by design: Machine gambling in Las vegas. Princeton University Press.
  • Seo, S. (2022, April). When female (male) robot is talking to me: Effect of service robots’ gender and anthropomorphism on customer satisfaction. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 102, 103166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103166
  • Shank, D. B., & DeSanti, A. (2018, September). Attributions of morality and mind to artificial intelligence after real-world moral violations. Computers in Human Behavior, 86, 401–411. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2018.05.014
  • Shewan, D. (2020). “10 of the most innovative chatbots on the web,” February 26, Wordstream. https://www.wordstream.com/blog/ws/2017/10/04/chatbots.
  • Singer, P. (2009). Wired for war: The robotics revolution and conflict in the 21st century. Penguin.
  • Statista. (2023a). Distribution of detected cyber attacks worldwide in 2022, by type. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1382266/cyber-attacks-worldwide-by-type/.
  • Statista. (2023b). Cumulative number of monthly meta product users as of 2nd quarter 2023. https://www.statista.com/statistics/947869/facebook-product-mau/.
  • Statista. (2023c). Artificial intelligence (AI) market size worldwide in 2021 with a forecast until 2030. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1365145/artificial-intelligence-market-size/.
  • Strait, M. K., Floerke, V. A., Ju, W., Maddox, K., Remedios, J. D., Jung, M. F., & Urry, H. L. (2017). Understanding the uncanny: Both atypical features and category ambiguity provoke aversion toward humanlike robots. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(4), 1366, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01366
  • Stroessner, S. J., & Benitez, J. (2019). The social perception of humanoid and non-humanoid robots: Effects of gendered and machinelike features. International Journal of Social Robotics, 11(2), 305–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-018-0502-7
  • Stuart-Ulin, C. (2018). Microsoft’s politically correct chatbot is even worse than its racist one. Quartz. Retrieved July 31, from https://qz.com/1340990/microsofts-politically-correct-chat-bot-is-evenworse-than-its-racist-one/.
  • The Guardian. (2016). Tay, Microsoft's AI chatbot, gets a crash course in racism from Twitter. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/mar/24/tay-microsofts-ai-chatbot-gets-a-crash-course-in-racism-from-twitter?CMP=twt_a-technology_b-gdntech.
  • The Independent. (2023). 15 cybercrime statistics you ought to know. https://www.independent.co.uk/advisor/vpn/cybercrime-statistics.
  • Thompson, T. (2019). Posthuman folklore. University of Mississippi Press.
  • Tong, S., Jia, N., Luo, X., & Fang, Z. (2021). The Janus face of artificial intelligence feedback: Deployment versus disclosure effects on employee performance. Strategic Management Journal, 42(9), 1600–1631. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3322
  • Toosi, A., Bottino, A., Saboury, B., Siegel, E., & Rahmim, A. (2018). A brief history of AI: How to prevent another winter (A critical review). In M. Khosrow-Pour (Ed.), Advanced methodologies and technologies in artificial intelligence, co]mputer simulation, and human-computer interaction (pp. 449–469). IGI Global.
  • Turing, A. (1951). ‘Intelligent machinery, a heretical theory’, a lecture given to ‘51 Society’ at Manchester. https://turingarchive.kings.cam.ac.uk/publications-lectures-and-talks-amtb/amt-b-4.
  • Tussyadiah, I. P., & Park, S. (2018). Consumer evaluation of hotel service robots. In B. Stangl, & J. Pesonen (Eds.), Information and communication technologies in tourism 2018 (pp. 308–320). Springer.
  • Wang, S., Lilienfeld, S. O., & Rochat, P. (2015). The uncanny valley: Existence and explanations. Review of General Psychology, 19(4), 393–407. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000056
  • Washington Post. (2022a). He used AI to win a fine-arts competition. Was it cheating? https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/09/02/midjourney-artificial-intelligence-state-fair-colorado/.
  • Washington Post. (2022b). The Google engineer who thinks the company’s AI has come to life. https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2022/06/11/google-ai-lamda-blake-lemoine/.
  • Weber, P., Carl, K. V., & Hinz, O. (2023). Applications of explainable artificial intelligence in finance—A systematic review of finance, information systems, and computer science literature. Management Review Quarterly, 1–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11301-023-00320-0
  • Web Summit. (2017). Stephen Hawking at Web Summit 2017. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H41Zk1GrdRg.
  • Weiner, N. (1950). The human use of human beings: Cybernetics and society. Houghton Mifflin.
  • Weiner, N. (1964). God and Golem: A comment on certain points where cybernetics impinges on religion. MIT Press.
  • Yang, A. (2018). The war on normal people: The truth about America's disappearing jobs and why universal basic income is our future. Hachette UK.
  • Zuboff, S. (2019). The age of surveillance capitalism: The fight for a human future at the new frontier of power, Public Affairs.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.