Facilitatory and interfering effects of neighbourhood density on speech production: Evidence from aphasic errors

REFERENCES

• Alario, F.-X., & Ferrand, L. (1999). A set of 400 pictures standardized for French: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, visual complexity, image variability, and age of acquisition. Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31, 531–552. doi: 10.3758/BF03200732
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alario, F.-X., Ferrand, L., Laganaro, M., New, B., Frauenfelder, U., & Segui, J. (2004). Predictors of picture naming speed. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 140–155. doi: 10.3758/BF03195559
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Baayen, R. H. (2008). Analyzing linguistic data. A practical introduction to statistics using R. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baus, C., Costa, A., & Carreiras, M. (2008). Neighbourhood density and frequency effects in speech production: A case for interactivity. Language and Cognitive Processes, 23(6), 866–888. doi: 10.1080/01690960801962372
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belsley, D. A., Kuh, E., & Welsch, R. E. (1980). Regression diagnostics. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Best, W. M. (1996). When racquets are baskets but baskets are biscuits, where do words come from a single case study of formal paraphasic errors in aphasia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 13, 443–480. doi: 10.1080/026432996381971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan, K. Y., & Vitevitch, M. S. (2010). Network structure influences speech production. Cognitive Science, 34, 685–697. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01100.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Q., & Mirman, D. (2012). Competition and cooperation among similar representations: Toward a unified account of facilitative and inhibitory effects of lexical neighbors. Psychological Review, 119(4), 898. doi: 10.1037/a0030049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M., Davelaar, E., Jonasson, J. F., & Besner, D. (1977). Access to the internal lexicon. In S. Dornic (Ed.), Attention & performance VI (pp. 535–555). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cuetos, F., Aguado, G., Izura, C., & Ellis, A. (2002). Aphasic naming in Spanish: Predictors and errors. Brain and Language, 82, 344–365. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00038-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuetos, F., Monsalve, A., & Pérez, A. (2005). Determinants of lexical access in pure anomia. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 18, 383–399. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2005.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S. (1985). Positive feed-back in hierarchical connectionist models: Applications to language production. Cognitive Science, 9, 3–23. doi: 10.1207/s15516709cog0901_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S. (1988). The retrieval of phonological forms in production: Tests of predictions from a connectionist model. Journal of Memory and Language, 27, 124–142. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(88)90070-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S. (1990). Effects of frequency and vocabulary type on phonological speech errors. Language and Cognitive Processes, 5(4), 313–349. doi: 10.1080/01690969008407066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S., & Gordon, J. K. (2003). Neighbors in the lexicon: Friends or foes? In N. O. Schiller, & A. S. Meyer (Eds.), Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production: Differences and similarities (pp. 9–37). New York, Schiller State: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S., & Reich, P. A. (1981). Stages in sentence production: An analysis of speech error data. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 611–629. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(81)90202-4
   Google Scholar
• Del Viso, S., Igoa, J. M., & García-Albea, J. E. (1991). Autonomy of phonological encoding: Evidence from slips of the tongue in Spanish. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 20, 161–185. doi: 10.1007/BF01067213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fay, D., & Cutler, A. (1977). Malapropisms and the structure of the Mental Lexicon. Linguistic Inquiry, 8(3), 505–520.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagnon, D. A., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Dell, G., & Saffran, E. (1997). The origins of formal paraphasias in aphasics’ picture naming. Brain and Language, 59(3), 450–472. doi: 10.1006/brln.1997.1792
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldrick, M., Folk, J., & Rapp, B. (2010). Mrs. Malaprop's neighborhood: Using word errors to reveal neighborhood structure. Journal of Memory and Language, 62, 113–134. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2009.11.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, J. K. (2002). Phonological neighborhood effects in aphasic speech errors: Spontaneous and structured contexts. Brain and Language, 82, 113–145. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00001-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 434–446. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger, F. T. (2010). Redundancy and reduction: Speakers manage syntactic information density. Cognitive Psychology, 61, 23–62.
   Google Scholar
• Kittredge, A. K., Dell, G. S., Verkuilen, J., & Schwartz, M. F. (2008). Where is the effect of frequency in word production? Insights from aphasic picture-naming errors. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 25, 463–492. doi: 10.1080/02643290701674851
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laganaro, M., Di Pietro, M., & Schnider, A. (2003). Computerised treatment of anomia in chronic and acute aphasia: An exploratory study. Aphasiology, 17, 709–721. doi: 10.1080/02687030344000193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laganaro, M., Di Pietro, M., & Schnider, A. (2006). Computerised treatment of anomia in acute aphasia: Issue of treatment intensity and training size. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 16, 630–640. doi: 10.1080/09602010543000064
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laganaro, M., Morand, S., Schwitter, V., Zimmermann, C., & Schnider, A. (2008). Normalization and increase of abnormal ERP patterns accompany recovery from aphasia in the post-acute stage. Neuropsychologia, 46, 2265–2273. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.02.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leemann, B., Laganaro, M., Chetelat-Mabillard, D., & Schnider, A. (2011). Cross-over trial of adjunction of levodopa versus placebo to computerized therapy for anomia within 2 months after onset of aphasia. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 25, 43–47. doi: 10.1177/1545968310376938
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., Hao, M., Li, P., Shu, H., & Bishop, D. (2011). Timed picture naming norms for Mandarin Chinese. PLoS ONE, 6(1), e16505. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016505
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luce, P. A., & Pisoni, D. B. (1998). Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear and Hearing, 19, 1–36. doi: 10.1097/00003446-199802000-00001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McClelland, J. L., & Elman, J. L. (1986). The TRACE model of speech perception. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 1–86. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(86)90015-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middleton, E. L., & Schwartz, M. F. (2010). Density pervades: An analysis of phonological neighborhood density effects in aphasic speakers with different types of naming impairment. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 27(5), 401–427. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2011.570325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulatti, C., Reynolds, M., & Besner, D. (2006). Neighbourhood effects in visual word recognition: New findings and new challenges for computational models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 799–810. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.32.4.799
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New, B., Pallier, C., Brysbaert, M., & Ferrand, L. (2004). LEXIQUE2: A new French lexical database. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 516–524. doi: 10.3758/BF03195598
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Newman, R. S., & German, D. J. (2005). Life span effects of lexical factors on oral naming. Language and Speech, 48(2), 123–156. doi: 10.1177/00238309050480020101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickels, L. A., & Howard, D. (1995). Phonological errors in aphasic naming: Comprehension, monitoring and lexicality. Cortex, 31, 209–237. doi: 10.1016/S0010-9452(13)80360-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, D. (1994). Shortlist: A connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition, 52(3), 189–234. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90043-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. (2011). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, M., & Peter-Defare, E. (1998). Les lapsus: Ou comment notre fourche a langué. Paris: PUF.
   Google Scholar
• Sadat, J., Martin, C. D., Costa, A., & Alario, F. X. (2012). Phonological neighborhood in speech production revisited. Poster presented at the IX International Workshop on Language Production, New York, July 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Sadat, J., Martin, C. D., Costa, A., & Alario, F. X. (2013) Reconciling phonological neighborhood effects in speech production through single trial analysis. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Stemberger, J., & McWhinney, B. (1986). Form-oriented inflectional errors in language processing. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 329–354. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(86)90003-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stemberger, J. P. (2004). Neighborhood effects on error rates in speech production. Brain and Language, 90, 413–422. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00452-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. S. (1997). The neighborhood characteristics of malapropisms. Language and Speech, 40, 211–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. S. (2002). The influence of phonological similarity neighborhoods on speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 28, 735–747. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.28.4.735
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. S., Armbrüster, J., & Chu, S. (2004). Sublexical and lexical representations in speech production: Effects of phonotactic probability and onset density. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 514–529. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.30.2.514
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. S., & Sommers, M. (2003). The facilitative influence of phonological similarity and neighborhood frequency in speech production. Memory & Cognition, 31, 491–504. doi: 10.3758/BF03196091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. S., & Stamer, M. K. (2006). The curious case of competition in Spanish speech production. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, 760–770. doi: 10.1080/01690960500287196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitevitch, M. S., & Stamer, M. K. (2009). The influence of neighborhood density (and neighborhood frequency) in Spanish speech production: A follow-up report. (Spoken Language Laboratory Technical Report, no. 1), Lawrence, KS: Unviersity of Kansas.
   Google Scholar
• Yarkoni, T., Balota, D. A., & Yap, M. J. (2008). Moving beyond Coltheart's N: A new measure of orthographic similarity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 971–979. doi: 10.3758/PBR.15.5.971
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates, M., Locker, L., & Simpson, G. B. (2004). The influence of phonological neighborhood on visual word perception. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 11, 452–457. doi: 10.3758/BF03196594
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar