From “some butter” to “a butter”: An investigation of mass and count representation and processing

REFERENCES

• Alario, F.-X., Ayora, P., Costa, A., & Melinger, A. (2008). Grammatical and nongrammatical contributions to closed-class word selection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 960–981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alario, F.-X., & Caramazza, A. (2002). The production of determiners: Evidence from French. Cognition, 82, 179–223. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00158-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alario, F.-X., Matos, R. E., & Segui, J. (2004). Gender congruency effects in picture naming. Acta Psychologica, 117, 185–204. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2004.06.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Burani, C., & Schreuder, R. (1996). Effects of semantic markedness in the processing of regular nominal singulars and plurals in Italian, chapter 3. In G. E. Booij & J. van Marle (Eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1996 (pp. 13–35). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Levelt, W. M. J., Schreuder, R., & Ernestus, M. (2008). Paradigmatic structure in speech production. Chicago Linguistics Society, 43, 1–29.
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Gulikers, L. (1995). The CELEX lexical database (CD-ROM). Philadelphia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pensylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & van Rijn, H. (1993). The CELEX lexical database (release 1) [CD-ROM]. Philadelphia: PA: Linguistic Data Consortium, University of Pensylvania.
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Schreuder, R., & Sproat, R. (1998). A non-interactive activation model for morphological segmentation. In F. van Eynde, D. Gibbon, & I. Shuurman (Eds.), Lexicon development for speech and language processing (pp. 267–293). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Cortese, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., Kessler, B., Loftis, B., … Treiman, R. (2007). The English lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 445–459. doi: 10.3758/BF03193014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, W., Schröder, A., & Herbert, R. (2006). An investigation of a relative impairment in naming non-living items: Theoretical and methodological implications. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 19, 96–123. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2005.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biedermann, B., Lorenz, A., Beyersmann, E., & Nickels, L. (2012). The influence of plural dominance in aphasic word production. Aphasiology, 26, 985–1004. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2012.660459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biedermann, B., Nickels, L. A., & Beyersmann, E. (2009). Organisation of ‘number’ information in the lexicon: Insights from aphasic plural errors. In Otsu, Y. (Ed.), The proceedings of the 10th Tokyo conference on psycholinguistics (pp. 27–42). Japan: Hituzi Syobo Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Biran, M., & Friedmann, N. (2012). The representation of lexical-syntactic information: Evidence from syntactic and lexical retrieval impairments in aphasia. Cortex, 48, 1103–1127. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2011.05.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, D. V. M. (2003b). Test for reception of grammar (version 2). London: Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Bock, K., Eberhard, K. M., & Cutting, C. (2004). Producing number agreement: How pronouns equal verbs., 51, 251–278.
   Google Scholar
• Bonin, P., Chalard, M., Méot, A., & Fayol, M. (2002). The determinants of spoken and written picture naming latencies. British Journal of Psychology, 93, 89–114. doi: 10.1348/000712602162463
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bordag, D., & Pechmann, T. (2008). Grammatical gender in speech production: Evidence from Czech. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 37, 69–85. doi: 10.1007/s10936-007-9060-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bordag, D., & Pechmann, T. (2009). Externality, internality, and (In) dispensability of grammatical features in speech production: Evidence from Czech declension and conjugation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 446–465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A. (1997). How many levels of processing are there in lexical access. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 14, 177–208. doi: 10.1080/026432997381664
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A., & Miozzo, M. (1998). More is not always better: A response to Roelofs, Meyer, & Levelt. Cognition, 69, 231–241. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00057-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M. (1981). The MRC psycholinguistic database. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Database, 33, 497–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, A., Kovacic, D., Fedorenko, E., & Caramazza, A. (2003). The gender congruency effect and the selection of freestanding and bound morphemes: Evidence from Croatian. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29, 1270–1282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, J. R., & Garthwaite, P. H. (2002). Investigation of the single case in neuropsychology: Confidence limits on the abnormality of test scores and test score differences. Neuropsychologia, 40, 1196–1208. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00224-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, J. R., & Garthwaite, P. H. (2005). Testing for suspected impairments and dissociations in single-case studies in neuropsychology: Evaluation of alternatives using Monte Carlo simulations and revised tests for dissociations. Neuropsychology, 19, 318–331. doi: 10.1037/0894-4105.19.3.318
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, J. R., & Howell, D. C. (1998). Comparing an individual's test score against norms derived from small samples. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 12, 482–486. doi: 10.1076/clin.12.4.482.7241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eberhard, K. M., Cutting, J. C., & Bock, K. (2005). Making syntax of sense: Number agreement in sentence production. Psychological Review, 112, 531–559. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.112.3.531
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrard, P., Carroll, E., Vinson, D., & Vigliocco, G. (2004). Dissociation of lexical syntax and semantics: Evidence from focal cortical degeneration. Neurocase, 10, 353–362. doi: 10.1080/13554790490892248
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gillon, B. S., Kehayia, E., & Taler, V. (1999). The mass/count distinction: Evidence from online psycholinguistic performance. Brain and Language, 68, 205–211. doi: 10.1006/brln.1999.2081
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, W. R., & Glaser, M. O. (1989). Context effects in Stroop-like word and picture processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 13–42. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.118.1.13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemera. (1997–2000). Photo-objects 50,000. Premium image collection. Hull, QC: Hemera Technologies.
   Google Scholar
• Herbert, R., & Best, W. (2010). The role of noun syntax in spoken word production: Evidence from aphasia. Cortex, 46, 329–342. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.03.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, D., & Patterson, K. E. (1992). Pyramids and palm trees. Bury, St. Edmunds, UK: Thames Valley Test Company.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson, T. (1999). Effects of grammatical gender on picture and word naming: Evidence from German. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28, 499–514. doi: 10.1023/A:1023268310519
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen, N., & Caramazza, A. (2003). The selection of closed-class words in noun phrase production: The case of Dutch determiners. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 635–652. doi: 10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00531-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jescheniak, J. D. (1999). Gender priming in picture naming. Modality and baseline effects. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28, 729–737. doi: 10.1023/A:1023229329967
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jescheniak, J. D., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1994). Word frequency effects in speech production: Retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological form. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 824–843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, E., Goodglass, H., & Weintraub, S. (1978). The Boston naming test. Boston: E. Kaplan and H. Goodglass.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, J., Lesser, R., & Coltheart, M. (1992). PALPA: Psycholinguistic assessments of language processing in aphasia. Hove, England: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, G. (1964). Semantic power measured through the interference of words with color-naming. American Journal of Psychology, 77, 576–588. doi: 10.2307/1420768
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Heij, W., Mak, P., Sander, J., & Willeboordse, E. (1998). The gender-congruency effect in picture-word tasks. Psychological Research, 61, 209–219. doi: 10.1007/s004260050026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamers, M. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Rabeling-Keus, I. M. (2010). Selective attention and response set in the Stroop task. Memory and Cognition, 38, 893–904. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.7.893
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22, 1–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luzzatti, C., Mondini, S., & Semenza, C. (2001). Lexical representation and processing of morphologically complex words: Evidence from the reading performance of an Italian agrammatic patient. Brain and Language, 79, 345–359. doi: 10.1006/brln.2001.2475
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miceli, G., Laudanna, A., & Burani, C. (1994). Batteria per l'analisi dei deficit afasici del linguaggio. Roma: Universita Cattolica.
   Google Scholar
• Middleton, E. L. (2008). Mass matters (Dissertation Abstracts International). 70(02), (UMI No. 3347451).
   Google Scholar
• Middleton, E. L., Wisniewski, E. J., Trindel, K. A., & Imai, M. (2004). Separating the chaff from the oats: Evidence for a conceptual distinction between count noun and mass noun aggregates. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 371–394. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2004.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mondini, S., Kehayia, E., Gillon, B., Arcara, G., & Jarema, G. (2009). Lexical access of mass and count nouns. How word recognition reaction times correlate with lexical and morpho-syntactic processing. Mental Lexicon, 4, 354–379. doi: 10.1075/ml.4.3.03mon
   Google Scholar
• Nickels, L., Biedermann, B., Fieder, N., & Schiller, N. O. (2014). The lexical syntactic representation of number. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, invited paper.
   Google Scholar
• Nickels, L., & Cole-Virtue, J. Picture naming stimuli with full psycholinguistic measures. Unpublished assessment materials.
   Google Scholar
• Nickels, L., & Cole-Virtue, J. (2004). Reading tasks from PALPA: How do controls perform on visual lexical decision, homophony, rhyme, and synonym judgments? Aphasiology, 18, 103–126. doi: 10.1080/02687030344000517-633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proctor, R. (1978). Sources of color-word interference in the Stroop color-naming task. Perception & Psychophysics, 23, 413–419. doi: 10.3758/BF03204145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quirk, R., & Greenbaum, S. (1974). A university grammar of English. London, UK: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Schiller, N. O., & Caramazza, A. (2002). The selection of grammatical features in word production: The case of plural nouns in German. Brain and Language, 81, 342–357. doi: 10.1006/brln.2001.2529
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiller, N. O., & Caramazza, A. (2003). Grammatical feature selection in noun phrase production: Evidence from German and Dutch. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 169–194. doi: 10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00508-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiller, N. O., & Caramazza, A. (2006). Grammatical gender selection and the representation of morphemes: The production of Dutch diminutives. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21, 945–973. doi: 10.1080/01690960600824344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiller, N. O., Münte, T. F., Horemans, I., & Jansma, B. M. (2003). The influence of semantic and phonological factors on syntactic decisions: An event-related brain potential study. Psychophysiology, 40, 869–877. doi: 10.1111/1469-8986.00105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schriefers, H. (1993). Syntactic processes in the production of noun phrases. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 841–850.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schriefers, H., Jescheniak, J. D., & Hantsch, A. (2002). Determiner selection in noun phrase production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 941–950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schriefers, H., Jescheniak, J. D., & Hantsch, A. (2005). Selection of gender-marked morphemes in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31, 159–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schriefers, H., & Teruel, E. (2000). Grammatical gender in noun phrase production: The gender interference effect in German. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1368–1377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semenza, C., Mondini, S., & Cappelletti, M. (1997). The grammatical properties of mass nouns: An aphasia case study. Neuropsychologia, 35, 669–675. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(96)00124-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Semenza, C., Mondini, S., & Marinelli, K. (2000). Count and mass nouns: Semantics and syntax in Aphasia and Alzheimer`s disease. Brain and Language, 74, 395–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, L. P., Zurif, E., Carey, S., & Grossman, M. (1989). Comprehension of lexical subcategory distinctions by aphasic patients: Proper/common and mass/count nouns. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 32, 481–488.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sonnenstuhl, I., & Huth, A. (2002). Processing and representation of German –n plurals: A dual mechanism approach. Brain and Language, 81, 276–290. doi: 10.1006/brln.2001.2524
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinhauer, K., Pancheva, R., Newman, A. J., Gennari, S., & Ullman, M. T. (2001). How the mass counts: An electrophysiological approach to the processing of lexical features. Cognitive Neuroscience and Neuropsychology, 12, 999–1005.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taler, V., & Jarema, G. (2007). Lexical access in younger and older adults: The case of the mass/count distinction. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 21–34. doi: 10.1037/cjep2007003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Berkum, J. J. A. (1997). Syntactic processes in speech production: The retrieval of grammatical gender. Cognition, 64, 115–152. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(97)00026-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigliocco, G., & Franck, J. (1999). When sex and syntax go hand in hand: Gender agreement in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 455–478. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1998.2624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigliocco, G., & Franck, J. (2001). When sex affects syntax: Contextual influences in sentence production. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 368–390. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2000.2774
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Martin, R. C., & Garrett, M. F. (1999). Is “count” and “mass” information available when the noun is not? An investigation of tip of the tongue states and anomia. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 534–558. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1998.2626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigliocco, G., & Zilli, T. (1999). Syntactic accuracy in sentence production: Gender disagreement in Italian language impaired and unimpaired speakers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28, 623–648. doi: 10.1023/A:1023268911312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wierzbicka, A. (1988). The semantics of grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Wisniewski, E. J., Lamb, C. A., & Middleton, E. L. (2003). On the conceptual basis for the count and mass noun distinction. Language and cognitive processes, 18, 583–624. doi: 10.1080/01690960344000044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worrall, L. E., Yiu, E. M-L., Hickson, L. M. H., & Barnett, H. M. (1995). Normative data for the Boston naming test for Australian elderly. Aphasiology, 9, 541–551. doi: 10.1080/02687039508248713
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar