Challenges in the use of treatment to investigate cognition

References

• Baddeley, A. D., Papagno, C., & Vallar, G. (1988). When long-term learning depends on short-term storage. Journal of Memory & Language, 27, 586–596. doi: 10.1016/0749-596X(88)90028-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banales, E., Kohnen, S., & McArthur, G. (2015). Can verbal working memory training improve reading? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 32, 104–132. doi:10.1080/02643294.2015.1014331
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeson, P. M. (2015). Primary and secondary analyses of single-subject data have complementary value. commentary in response to “optimising the design of intervention studies: Critiques and ways forward”. Aphasiology, 29(5), 598–604. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2014.987042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, W., Fedor, A., Hughes, L., Kapikian, A., Masterson, J., Roncoli, S., … Thomas, M. S. C. (2015). Intervening to alleviate word-finding difficulties in children: Case series data and a computational modelling foundation. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 32, 133–168. doi:10.1080/02643294.2014.1003204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brossart, D. F., Vannest, K., Davis, J., & Patience, M. (2014). Incorporating nonoverlap indices with visual analysis for quantifying intervention effectiveness in single-case experimental designs. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 24(3–4), 464–491. doi:10.1080/09602011.2013.868361
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butterworth, B., Campbell, R., & Howard, D. (1986). The uses of short-term memory: A case study. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 38A, 705–737. doi: 10.1080/14640748608401622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caplan, D., & Waters, G. S. (1999). Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 22, 77–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A. (1986). On drawing inferences about the structure of normal cognitive systems from the analysis of patterns of impaired performance: The case for single-patient studies. Brain & Cognition, 5, 41–66. doi: 10.1016/0278-2626(86)90061-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castles, A., Kohnen, S., Nickels, L., & Brock, J. (2014). Developmental disorders: What can be learned from cognitive neuropsychology? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society - B, 369(1634), 20130407. doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0407
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M., Bates, A., & Castles, A. (1994). Cognitive neuropsychology and rehabilitation. In G. W. Humphreys & M. J. Riddoch (Eds.), Cognitive neuropsychology and cognitive rehabilitation (pp. 17–37). London: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R., & Ziegler, J. (2001). DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, 204–256. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.108.1.204
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croot, K., Taylor, C., Abel, S., Jones, K., Krein, L., Hameister, I., … Nickels, L. (2015). Measuring gains in connected speech following treatment for word retrieval: A study with two participants with primary progressive aphasia. Aphasiology, in press. doi:10.1080/02687038.2014.975181
   Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S. (2004). Connectionism and cognitive neuropsychology: Comments on Harley's reflections. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21(1), 27–30. doi:10.1080/02643290342000168
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Saffran, E. M., & Gagnon, D. A. (1997). Lexical access in normal and aphasic speech. Psychological Review, 104, 801–838. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.104.4.801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer-Baum, S. (2015). How much better? The challenge of interpreting interactions in intervention studies. Aphasiology, 29(5), 609–614. doi:10.1080/02687038.2014.987050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2001). Are there orthographic impairments in phonological dyslexia? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 18, 71–92. doi: 10.1080/02643290125986
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegde, M. N. (2007). A methodological review of randomized clinical trials. Communicative Disorders Review, 1(1), 17–38.
   Google Scholar
• Hillis, A. E. (1993). The role of models of language processing in rehabilitation of language impairments. Aphasiology, 7, 5–26. doi: 10.1080/02687039308249497
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, D. (1986). Beyond randomized controlled trials - The case for effective case-studies of the effects of treatment in aphasia. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 21(1), 89–102. doi: 10.3109/13682828609018546
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Howard, D., Best, N., Nickels, L. (2015). Optimising the design of intervention studies: Critiques and ways forward. Aphasiology, 29(5), 526–562. doi:10.1080/02687038.2014.985884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, D., & Hatfield, F. M. (1987). Aphasia therapy; historical and contemporary issues. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, D., Hickin, J., Redmond, T., Clark, P., & Best, W. (2006). Re-visiting “semantic facilitation” of word retrieval for people with aphasia: Facilitation yes but semantic no. Cortex, 42, 946–962. doi: 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70439-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99, 122–149. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.99.1.122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1998). Is atypical development necessarily a window on the normal mind/brain? The case of Williams syndrome. Developmental Science, 1, 273–277. doi: 10.1111/1467-7687.00042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keane, C., & Kiran, S. (2015). The nature of facilitation and interference in the multilingual language system: Insights from treatment in a case of trilingual aphasia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 32, 169–194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laganaro, M. (2015). Optimizing the design of intervention studies: Should we test if people require treatment or which intervention has the best outcome? Aphasiology, 29(5), 605–608. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2014.986966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laine, M., & Martin, N. (2006). Anomia: Theoretical and clinical aspects. Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lambon Ralph, M. A., & Fillingham, J. K. (2007). The importance of memory and executive function in aphasia: Evidence from the treatment of anomia using errorless and errorful learning. In A. Meyer, L. R. Wheeldon, & A. Krott (Eds.), Automaticity and control in language processing. (pp. 193–216). Hove: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lane, J., & Gast, D. L. (2014). Visual analysis in single case experimental design studies: Brief review and guidelines. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 24, 445–463. doi:10.1080/09602011.2013.815636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999a). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 22, 1–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999b). Multiple perspectives on word production. Behavioural and Brain Sciences, 22, 61–75. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X99451775
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, N., Saffran, E. M., & Dell, G. S. (1996). Recovery in deep dysphasia: Evidence for a relationship between auditory–verbal STM capacity and lexical errors in repetition. Brain and Language, 52, 83–113. doi: 10.1006/brln.1996.0005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. C. (1987). Articulatory and phonological deficits in short-term memory and their relation to syntactic processing. Brain & Language, 32, 159–192. doi: 10.1016/0093-934X(87)90122-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matyas, T., & Greenwood, K. (1990). Visual analysis of single-case time series: Effects of variability, serial dependence, and magnitude of intervention effects. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 23(3), 341–351. doi: 10.1901/jaba.1990.23-341
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickels, L., Best, W., & Howard, D. (2015). Optimising the ingredients for evaluation of the effects of intervention. Aphasiology, 29(5), 619–643. doi:10.1080/02687038.2014.1000613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickels, L., Biedermann, B., Coltheart, M., Saunders, S., & Tree, J. (2008). Computational modelling of phonological dyslexia: How does the DRC model fare? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 25(2), 165–193. doi: 10.1080/02643290701514479
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickels, L., Kohnen, S., & Biedermann, B. (2010). An untapped resource: Treatment as a tool for revealing the nature of cognitive processes. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 27(7), 539–562. doi:10.1080/02643294.2011.609811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickels, L. A. (2002a). Improving word finding: Practice makes (closer to) perfect? Aphasiology, 16(10–11), 1047–1060. doi: 10.1080/02687040143000618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickels, L. A. (2002b). Therapy for naming disorders: Revisiting, revising, and reviewing. Aphasiology, 16(10–11), 935–979. doi: 10.1080/02687030244000563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickels, L. A., & Howard, D. (2000). When the words won't come: Relating impairments and models of spoken word production. In L. Wheeldon (Ed.), Aspects of language production (pp. 115–142). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Plaut, D., & Shallice, T. (1993). Deep dyslexia: A case study of connectionist neuropsychology. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 10, 377–500. doi: 10.1080/02643299308253469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plaut, D. C. (1996). Relearning after damage in connectionist networks: Toward a theory of rehabilitation. Brain and Language, 52, 25–82. doi: 10.1006/brln.1996.0004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plaut, D. C. (1999). Computational modeling of word reading, acquired dyslexia, and remediation. In R. M. Klein & P. A. McMullen (Eds.), Converging methods in reading and dyslexia (pp. 339–372). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rapp, B., & Goldrick, M. (2000). Discreteness and interactivity in spoken word production. Psychological Review, 107, 460–499. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.107.3.460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, B., & Kane, A. (2002). Remediation of deficits affecting different components of the spelling process. Aphasiology, 16, 439–454. doi: 10.1080/02687030244000301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riddoch, M. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (Eds.). (1994). Cognitive neuropsychology and cognitive rehabilitation. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A. (2004). Error biases in spoken word planning and monitoring by aphasic and nonaphasic speakers: Comment on Rapp and Goldrick (2000). Psychological Review, 111, 561–572. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.2.561
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986). Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Nature, 323(6088), 533–536. doi: 10.1038/323533a0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saffran, E. M., & Marin, O. S. M. (1975). Immediate memory for word lists and sentences in a patient with deficient auditory short-term memory. Brain & Language, 2, 420–433. doi: 10.1016/S0093-934X(75)80081-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schröder, A., Burchert, F., & Stadie, N. (2015) Training-induced improvement of non-canonical sentence production does not generalize to comprehension: Evidence for modality-specific processes. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 32, 195–220. doi:10.1080/02643294.2014.968535
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, M. F., Dell, G. S., Martin, N., Gahl, S., & Sobel, P. (2006). A case-series test of the interactive two-step model of lexical access: Evidence from picture naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 228–264. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2005.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith-Lock, K. (2015). Rule-based learning of regular past tense in children with specific language impairment. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 32, 221–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. K. (2006). Single subject controlled experiments in aphasia: The science and the state of the science. Journal of Communication Disorders, 39, 266–291. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2006.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. K. (2015). Establishing the effects of treatment for aphasia using single-subject-controlled experimental designs. Aphasiology, 29(5), 588–597. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2014.987043
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vallar, G., & Baddeley, A. D. (1984). Phonological short-term store, phonological processing and sentence comprehension: A neuropsychological case study. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 1, 121–141. doi: 10.1080/02643298408252018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willmes, K. (2015). The curse of serial dependency in single-case data-commentary on Howard, Best, & Nickels “Optimising the design of intervention studies: Critiques and ways forward”. Aphasiology, 29(5), 615–618. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2014.987048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar