Acquired prosopagnosia without word recognition deficits

References

• Arguin, M., & Bub, D. (2005). Parallel processing blocked by letter similarity in letter by letter dyslexia: A replication. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(5), 589–602. doi: 10.1080/02643290442000202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Piepenbrock, R., & Van Rijn, H. (1993). The CELEX lexical data base on CD-ROM. Philadephia, PA: Linguistic Data Consortium.
   Google Scholar
• Barton, J. J., Hanif, H. M., Eklinder Bjornstorm, L., & Hills, C. (2014). The word-length effect in reading: A review. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 31(5–6), 378–412. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2014.895314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrmann, M., Moscovitch, M., & Winocur, G. (1994). Intact visual imagery and impaired visual perception in a patient with visual agnosia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 1068–1087.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrmann, M., & Plaut, D. C. (2013). Distributed circuits, not circumscribed centers, mediate visual recognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 210–219. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.03.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrmann, M., & Plaut, D. C. (2014). Bilateral hemispheric processing of words and faces: Evidence from word impairments in prosopagnosia and face impairments in pure alexia. Cerebral Cortex, 24(4), 1102–1118. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhs390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behrmann, M., Winocur, G., & Moscovitch, M. (1992). Dissociation between mental imagery and object recognition in a brain-damaged patient. Nature, 359, 636–637. doi: 10.1038/359636a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bub, D., Black, S., & Howell, J. (1989). Word recognition and orthographic context effects in a letter-by-letter reader. Brain and Language, 36, 357–376. doi: 10.1016/0093-934X(89)90073-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busigny, T., Joubert, S., Felician, O., Ceccaldi, M., & Rossion, B. (2010). Holistic perception of the individual face is specific and necessary: Evidence from an extensive case study of acquired prosopagnosia. Neuropsychologia, 48, 4057–4092. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.09.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M. (2002). Cognitive neuropsychology. Stevens’ handbook of experimental psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 139–174, 3rd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford, J. R., & Howell, D. C. (1998). Comparing an individual's test score against norms derived from small samples. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 12(4), 482–486. doi: 10.1076/clin.12.4.482.7241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das, A., Tadin, D., & Huxlin, K. (2014). Beyond blindsight: Properties of visual relearning in cortically blind fields. Journal of Neuroscience, 34(35), 11652–11664. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1076-14.2014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennett, H. W., McKone, E., Tavashmi, R., Hall, A., Pidcock, M., Edwards, M., & Duchaine, B. (2012). The Cambridge car memory test: A task matched in format to the Cambridge face memory test, with norms, reliability, sex differences, dissociations from face memory, and expertise effects. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 587–605. doi: 10.3758/s13428-011-0160-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchaine, B., & Nakayama, K. (2005). Dissociations of face and object recognition in developmental prosopagnosia. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(2), 249–261. doi: 10.1162/0898929053124857
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchaine, B., & Nakayama, K. (2006). The Cambridge Face Memory Test: Results for neurologically intact individuals and an investigation of its validity using inverted face stimuli and prosopagnosic patients. Neuropsychologia, 44, 576–585. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duchaine, B., Yovel, G., Butterworth, E., & Nakayama, K. (2006). Prosopagnosia as an impairment to face-specific mechanisms Elimination of the alternative hypotheses in a developmental case. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23(5), 714–747. doi: 10.1080/02643290500441296
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farah, M. (1991). Patterns of co-occurrence among the associative agnosias: Implications for visual object representation. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 8, 1–19. doi: 10.1080/02643299108253364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiset, D., Arguin, M., Bub, D., Humphreys, G. W., & Riddoch, M. J. (2005). How to make the word-length effect disappear in letter-by-letter dyslexia: Implications for an account of the disorder. Psychological Science, 16, 535–541. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01571.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox, C. J., Iaria, G., & Barton, J. J. (2009). Defining the face processing network: Optimization of the functional localizer in fMRI. Human Brain Mapping, 30, 1637–1651. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20630
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gauthier, I., Behrmann, M., & Tarr, M. (1999). Can face recognition really be dissociated from object recognition? Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11(4), 349–370. doi: 10.1162/089892999563472
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodglass, H., Kaplan, E., & Weintraub, S. (1983). Boston Naming Test. New York: Lea & Febiger.
   Google Scholar
• Hartshorne, J. K., & Germine, L. T. (2015). When does cognitive functioning peak? The asynchronous rise and fall of different cognitive abilities across the life span. Psychological Science, 26(4), 433–443.
   Google Scholar
• Hills, C. S., Pancaroglu, R., Duchaine, B., & Barton, J. J. (2015). Word and text processing in aquired prosopagnosia. Annals of Neurology, 78(2), 258–271.
   Google Scholar
• Konen, C. S., Behrmann, M., Nishimura, M., & Kastner, S. (2011). The functional neuroanatomy of object agnosia: A case study. Neuron. 71: 49–60. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.05.030
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marotta, J. J., McKeeff, T. J., & Behrmann, M. (2002). The effects of rotation and inversion on face processing in prosopagnosia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 19(1), 31–47. doi: 10.1080/02643290143000079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKone, E., Kanwisher, N., & Duchaine, B. (2007). Can generic expertise explain special processing for faces? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(1), 8–15. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKone, E., & Robbins, R. (2011). Are faces special? In A. J. Calder, G. Rhodes, M. H. Johnston & J. V. Haxby (Eds.), Handbook of face perception (pp. 149–176). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moscovitch, M., & Moscovitch, D. A. (2000). Super face-inversion effects for isolated internal or external features and for fractured faces. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 18, 201–219. doi: 10.1080/026432900380571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moscovitch, M., Winocur, G., & Behrmann, M. (1997). What is special about face recognition? Nineteen experiments on a person with visual object agnosia and dyslexia but normal face recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 555–604. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1997.9.5.555
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitcher, D., Dilks, D., Saxe, R., Triantafyllou, C. & Kanwisher, N. (2011). Differential selectivity for dynamic versus static information in face-selective cortical regions. Neuroimage, 56(15), 2356–2363. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.03.067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plaut, D. C. & Behrmann, M. (2013). Response to Susilo and Duchaine: Beyond neuropsychological dissociations in understanding face and word representations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(11), 546. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purcell, J. J., Shea, J., & Rapp, B. (2014). Beyond the visual word form area: The orthography-semantics interface in spelling and reading. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 31(5–6), 482–510. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2014.909399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rastle, K., Harrington, J., & Coltheart, M. (2002). 358,534 nonwords: The ARC Nonword Database. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 55, 1339–1362. doi: 10.1080/02724980244000099
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezlescu, C., Pitcher, D., Barton, J. J. S., & Duchaine, B. (2014). Normal acquisition of expertise with greebles in two cases of acquired prosopagnosia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(14), 5123–5128. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1317125111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rezlescu, C., Pitcher, D., & Duchaine, B. (2012). Acquired prosopagnosia with spared within-class object recognition but impaired recognition of basic-level objects. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 29, 325–347. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2012.749223
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riddoch, M. J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1993). Birmingham Object Recognition Battery. Hove: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Rossion, B., Caldara, R., Seghier, M., Schuller, A.-M., Lazeyras, F., & Mayer, E. (2003). A network of occipito-temporal face-sensitive areas besides the right middle fusiform gyrus is necessary for normal face processing. Brain, 126, 2381–2395. doi: 10.1093/brain/awg241
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shallice, T. (1988). From Neuropsychology to Mental Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sheldon, C. A., Abegg, M., Sekunova, A., & Barton, J. J. S. (2012). The word-length effect in acquired alexia, and real and virtual hemianopia. Neuropsychologia, 50, 841–851. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.01.020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snodgrass, S., & Vanderwart, M. A. (1980). A standardised set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 6, 174–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stadthagen-Gonzalez, H., & Davis, C. J. (2006). The Bristol norms for age of acquisition, imageability, and familiarity. Behavior Research Methods, 38(4), 598–605. doi: 10.3758/BF03193891
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susilo, T., & Duchaine, B. (2013). Dissociations between faces and words: Comment on Behrmann & Plaut. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(11), 545. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susilo, T., Yang, H., Potter, Z., Robbins, R., & Duchaine, B. (2015). Normal body perception despite the loss of right fusiform gyrus. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 27(3), 614–622. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00743
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susilo, T., Yovel, G., Barton, J. J. S., & Duchaine, B. (2013). Face perception is category-specific: Evidence from normal body perception in acquired prosopagnosia. Cognition, 129, 88–94. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.06.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsao, D. Y., Freiwald, W. A., Tootell, R. B. H., & Livingstone, M. S. L. (2006). A cortical region consisting entirely of face cells. Science, 311, 670–674. doi: 10.1126/science.1119983
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsapkini, K., & Rapp, B. (2010). The orthography-specific functions of the left fusiform gyrus: Evidence of modality and category specificity. Cortex., 46, 185–205. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.02.025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, H., Susilo, T., & Duchaine, B. (2014). The anterior temporal face area contains invariant representations of identity that can persist despite the loss of right FFA and OFA. Cerebral Cortex. Advance online publication. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhu289
   Google Scholar