References
- Aichert, I., Späth, M., & Ziegler, W. (2016). The role of metrical information in apraxia of speech. Perceptual and acoustic analyses of word stress. Neuropsychologia, 82, 171–178. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.01.009
- Aichert, I., & Ziegler, W. (2013). Word position effects in apraxia of speech: Group data and individual variation. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 20, 7–11.
- Buchwald, A., Rapp, B., & Stone, M. (2007). Insertion of discrete phonological units: An articulatory and acoustic investigation of aphasic speech. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22(6), 910–948. doi: 10.1080/01690960701273532
- Clements, G. N., & Keyser, S. J. (1983). CV phonology. A generative theory of the syllable. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
- Croot, K. (2002). Diagnosis of AOS: Definition and criteria. Seminars in Speech and Language, 23(4), 267–280. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-35800
- Féry, C. (1998). German word stress in optimality theory. Journal of Comparative German Linguistics, 2, 101–142. doi: 10.1023/A:1009883701003
- Galuzzi, C., Bureca, I., Guariglia, C., & Romani, C. (2015). Phonological simplifications, apraxia of speech and the interaction between phonological and phonetic processing. Neuropsychologia, 71, 64–83. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.03.007
- Goldrick, M., & Daland, R. (2009). Linking speech errors and phonological grammars: Insights from harmonic grammar networks. Phonology, 26, 147–185. doi: 10.1017/S0952675709001742
- Goldstein, L., Pouplier, M., Chen, L., Saltzman, E., & Byrd, D. (2007). Dynamic action units slip in speech production errors. Cognition, 103, 386–412. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.05.010
- Miozzo, M., & Buchwald, A. (2013). On the nature of sonority in spoken word production: Evidence from neuropsychology. Cognition, 128(3), 287–301. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.04.006
- Romani, C., & Calabrese, A. (1998). Syllabic constraints in the phonological errors of an aphasic patient. Brain and Language, 64(1), 83–121. doi: 10.1006/brln.1998.1958
- Romani, C., & Galuzzi, C. (2005). Effects of syllabic complexity in predicting accuracy of repetition and direction of errors in patients with articulatory and phonological difficulties. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(7), 817–850. doi: 10.1080/02643290442000365
- Romani, C., Galuzzi, C., Guariglia, C., & Goslin, J. (2018). Comparing phoneme frequency, age of acquisition and loss in aphasia: Implications for phonological universals. Cognitive Neuropsychology. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2017.1369942
- Schoor, A., Aichert, I., & Ziegler, W. (2012). A motor learning perspective on phonetic syllable kinships: How training effects transfer from learned to new syllables in severe apraxia of speech. Aphasiology, 26(7), 880–894. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2012.660458
- Staiger, A., & Ziegler, W. (2008). Syllable frequency and syllable structure in the spontaneous speech production of patients with apraxia of speech. Aphasiology, 22, 1201–1215. doi: 10.1080/02687030701820584
- Tilsen, S. (2016). Selection and coordination: The articulatory basis for the emergence of phonological structure. Journal of Phonetics, 55, 53–77. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2015.11.005
- Ziegler, W. (2009). Modelling the architecture of phonetic plans: Evidence from apraxia of speech. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24, 631–661. doi: 10.1080/01690960802327989
- Ziegler, W., & Aichert, I. (2015). How much is a word? Predicting ease of articulation planning from apraxic speech error patterns. Cortex, 69, 24–39. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.04.001
- Ziegler, W., Aichert, I., & Staiger, A. (2017). When words don’t come easily: A latent trait analysis of impaired speech motor planning in patients with apraxia of speech. Journal of Phonetics, 64, 145–155. doi: 10.1016/j.wocn.2016.10.002