Word repetition and retrieval practice effects in aphasia: Evidence for use-dependent learning in lexical access

References

• Baddeley, A., & Wilson, B. A. (1994). When implicit learning fails: Amnesia and the problem of error elimination. Neuropsychologia, 32(1), 53–68. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(94)90068-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Badecker, W., Miozzo, M., & Zanuttini, R. (1995). The two-stage model of lexical retrieval: Evidence from a case of anomia with selective preservation of grammatical gender. Cognition, 57(2), 193–216. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(95)00663-J
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeson, P. M., Holland, A. L., & Murray, L. L. (1997). Naming famous people: An examination of tip-of-the-tongue phenomena in aphasia and Alzheimer’s disease. Aphasiology, 11(4–5), 323–336. doi: 10.1080/02687039708248474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belke, E., Meyer, A. S., & Damian, M. F. (2005). Refractory effects in picture naming as assessed in a semantic blocking paradigm. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 58(4), 667–692. doi: 10.1080/02724980443000142
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bjork, R. A. (1994). Memory and metamemory considerations in the training of human beings. In J. Metcalfe, & A. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 185–205). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bjork, R. A. (1999). Assessing our own competence: Heuristics and illusions. In D. Gopher, & A. Koriat (Eds.), Attention and performance XVII: Cognitive regulation of performance: Interaction of theory and application (pp. 435–459). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, M. (2010). Semantic feature analysis treatment for aphasic word retrieval impairments: What’s in a name? Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 17(6), 411–422. doi: 10.1310/tsr1706-411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozeat, S., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Patterson, K., Garrard, P., & Hodges, J. R. (2000). Non-verbal semantic impairment in semantic dementia. Neuropsychologia, 38(9), 1207–1215. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(00)00034-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breining, B., Nozari, N., & Rapp, B. (2016). Does segmental overlap help or hurt? Evidence from blocked cyclic naming in spoken and written production. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(2), 500–506. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0900-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., & New, B. (2009). Moving beyond kučera and francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American english. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 41, 977–990. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.4.977
   Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A., & Hillis, A. E. (1990). Where do semantic errors come from? Cortex, 26(1), 95–122. doi: 10.1016/S0010-9452(13)80077-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, Q., Middleton, E., & Mirman, D. (in press). Words fail: Lesion-symptom mapping of errors of omission in post-stroke aphasia. Journal of Neuropsychology. doi:10.1111/jnp.12148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conroy, P., Sage, K., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2009). Errorless and errorful therapy for verb and noun naming in aphasia. Aphasiology, 23(11), 1311–1337. doi: 10.1080/02687030902756439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dabul, B. (2000). Apraxia battery for adults (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Damian, M. F., & Als, L. C. (2005). Long-lasting semantic context effects in the spoken production of object names. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 31(6), 1372–1384. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1372
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damian, M. F., Vigliocco, G., & Levelt, W. J. (2001). Effects of semantic context in the naming of pictures and words. Cognition, 81(3), B77–B86. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00135-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, G., Lawler, E., Harris, H., & Gordon, J. (2004). Models of errors of omission in aphasic naming. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21(2), 125–145. doi: 10.1080/02643290342000320
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S., Martin, N., & Schwartz, M. F. (2007). A case-series test of the interactive two-step model of lexical access: Predicting word repetition from picture naming?. Journal of Memory and Language, 56(4), 490–520. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.05.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Saffran, E. M., & Gagnon, D. A. (1997). Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. Psychological Review, 104(4), 801–838. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.104.4.801
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmonds, L. A., Mammino, K., & Ojeda, J. (2014). Effect of verb network strengthening treatment (VNeST) in persons with aphasia: Extension and replication of previous findings. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 23(2), S312–S329. doi: 10.1044/2014_AJSLP-13-0098
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. J., Wilson, B. A., Schuri, U., Andrade, J., Baddeley, A., Bruna, O., … Taussik, I. (2000). A comparison of “errorless” and “trial-and-error” learning methods for teaching individuals with acquired memory deficits. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 10(1), 67–101. doi: 10.1080/096020100389309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fillingham, J. K., Hodgson, C., Sage, K., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2003). The application of errorless learning to aphasic disorders: A review of theory and practice. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 13(3), 337–363. doi: 10.1080/09602010343000020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fillingham, J. K., Sage, K., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2005a). Treatment of anomia using errorless versus errorful learning: Are frontal executive skills and feedback important? International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 40(4), 505–523. doi: 10.1080/13682820500138572
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fillingham, J. K., Sage, K., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2005b). Further explorations and an overview of errorless and errorful therapy for aphasic word-finding difficulties: The number of naming attempts during therapy affects outcome. Aphasiology, 19(7), 597–614. doi: 10.1080/02687030544000272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fillingham, J. K., Sage, K., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2006). The treatment of anomia using errorless learning. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 16(2), 129–154. doi: 10.1080/09602010443000254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foygel, D., & Dell, G. S. (2000). Models of impaired lexical access in speech production. Journal of Memory and Language, 43(2), 182–216. doi: 10.1006/jmla.2000.2716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, R. B., Sullivan, K. L., Snider, S. F., Luta, G., & Jones, K. T. (2017). Leveraging the test effect to improve maintenance of the gains achieved through cognitive rehabilitation. Neuropsychology, 31(2), 220–228. doi: 10.1037/neu0000318
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gainotti, G., Miceli, G., Caltagirone, C., Silveri, M. C., & Masullo, C. (1981). The relationship between type of naming error and semantic-lexical discrimination in aphasic patients. Cortex, 17(3), 401–409. doi: 10.1016/S0010-9452(81)80028-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldrick, M., & Rapp, B. (2007). Lexical and post-lexical phonological representations in spoken production. Cognition, 102(2), 219–260. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.12.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodglass, H., Kaplan, E., Weintraub, S., & Ackerman, N. (1976). The “tip-of-the-tongue” phenomenon in aphasia. Cortex, 12(2), 145–153. doi: 10.1016/S0010-9452(76)80018-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanley, J. R., Dell, G., Kay, J., & Baron, R. (2004). Evidence for the involvement of a nonlexical route in the repetition of familiar words: A comparison of single and dual route models of auditory repetition. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21(2), 147–158. doi: 10.1080/02643290342000339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanley, J. R., Kay, J., & Edwards, M. (2002). Imageability effects, phonological errors, and the relationship between auditory repetition and picture naming: Implications for models of auditory repetition. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 19(3), 193–206. doi: 10.1080/02643290143000132
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillis, A. E., & Caramazza, A. (1991). Mechanisms for accessing lexical representations for output: Evidence from a category-specific semantic deficit. Brain and Language, 40(1), 106–144. doi: 10.1016/0093-934X(91)90119-L
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillis, A. E., Rapp, B., Romani, C., & Caramazza, A. (1990). Selective impairment of semantics in lexical processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 7(3), 191–243. doi: 10.1080/02643299008253442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, D., Nickels, L., Coltheart, M., & Cole-Virtue, J. (2006). Cumulative semantic inhibition in picture naming: Experimental and computational studies. Cognition, 100(3), 464–482. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2005.02.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, D., & Patterson, K. (1992). Pyramids and palm trees: A test of semantic access from pictures and words. Bury St. Edmunds, Suffolk: Thames Valley Test Company.
   Google Scholar
• Hsiao, E. Y., Schwartz, M. F., Schnur, T. T., & Dell, G. S. (2009). Temporal characteristics of semantic perseverations induced by blocked-cyclic picture naming. Brain and Language, 108(3), 133–144. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2008.11.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jang, Y., Wixted, J. T., Pecher, D., Zeelenberg, R., & Huber, D. E. (2012). Decomposing the interaction between retention interval and study/test practice: The role of retrievability. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(5), 962–975. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2011.638079
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefferies, E., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2006). Semantic impairment in stroke aphasia versus semantic dementia: A case-series comparison. Brain, 129(8), 2132–2147. doi: 10.1093/brain/awl153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jescheniak, J. D., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1994). Word frequency effects in speech production: Retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological form. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(4), 824–843. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.20.4.824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpicke, J. D., Lehman, M., & Aue, W. R. (2014). Retrieval-based learning: An episodic context account. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 61, 237–284. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-800283-4.00007-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L. (2007). Expanding retrieval practice promotes short-term retention, but equally spaced retrieval enhances long-term retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(4), 704–719. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.33.4.704
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kertesz, A. (2007). Western aphasia battery-revised. San Antonio, TX: PsychCorp.
   Google Scholar
• Kittredge, A. K., Dell, G. S., Verkuilen, J., & Schwartz, M. F. (2008). Where is the effect of frequency in word production? Insights from aphasic picture-naming errors. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 25(4), 463–492. doi: 10.1080/02643290701674851
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornell, N., Bjork, R. A., & Garcia, M. A. (2011). Why tests appear to prevent forgetting: A distribution-based bifurcation model. Journal of Memory and Language, 65(2), 85–97. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2011.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornell, N., Hays, M. J., & Bjork, R. A. (2009). Unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhance subsequent learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(4), 989–998. doi: 10.1037/a0015729
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroll, J. F., & Stewart, E. (1994). Category interference in translation and picture naming: Evidence for asymmetric connections between bilingual memory representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 33(2), 149–174. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1994.1008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(1), 1–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKissock, S., & Ward, J. (2007). Do errors matter? Errorless and errorful learning in anomic picture naming. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 17(3), 355–373. doi: 10.1080/09602010600892113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middleton, E. L., Chen, Q., & Verkuilen, J. (2015). Friends and foes in the lexicon: Homophone naming in aphasia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(1), 77–94. doi: 10.1037/a0037778
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middleton, E. L., & Schwartz, M. F. (2012). Errorless learning in cognitive rehabilitation: A critical review. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 22(2), 138–168. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2011.639619
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middleton, E. L., Schwartz, M. F., Rawson, K. A., & Garvey, K. (2015). Test-enhanced learning versus errorless learning in aphasia rehabilitation: Testing competing psychological principles. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(4), 1253–1261. doi: 10.1037/xlm0000091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Middleton, E. L., Schwartz, M. F., Rawson, K. A., Traut, H., & Verkuilen, J. (2016). Towards a theory of learning for naming rehabilitation: Retrieval practice and spacing effects. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 59(5), 1111–1122. doi: 10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0303
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nozari, N., & Dell, G. S. (2013). How damaged brains repeat words: A computational approach. Brain and Language, 126(3), 327–337. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2013.07.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nozari, N., Kittredge, A. K., Dell, G. S., & Schwartz, M. F. (2010). Naming and repetition in aphasia: Steps, routes, and frequency effects. Journal of Memory and Language, 63(4), 541–559. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2010.08.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppenheim, G. M., Dell, G. S., & Schwartz, M. F. (2010). The dark side of incremental learning: A model of cumulative semantic interference during lexical access in speech production. Cognition, 114(2), 227–252. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.09.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyc, M. A., & Rawson, K. A. (2009). Testing the retrieval effort hypothesis: Does greater difficulty correctly recalling information lead to higher levels of memory? Journal of Memory and Language, 60(4), 437–447. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2009.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, B., & Goldrick, M. (2000). Discreteness and interactivity in spoken word production. Psychological Review, 107(3), 460–499. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.107.3.460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawson, K. A., & Dunlosky, J. (2011). Optimizing schedules of retrieval practice for durable and efficient learning: How much is enough? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 140(3), 283–302. doi: 10.1037/a0023956
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rawson, K. A., & Dunlosky, J. (2013). Relearning attenuates the benefits and costs of spacing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(4), 1113–1129. doi: 10.1037/a0030498
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from http://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Richland, L. E., Kornell, N., & Kao, L. S. (2009). The pretesting effect: Do unsuccessful retrieval attempts enhance learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 15(3), 243–257. doi: 10.1037/a0016496
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roach, A., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Grewal, R. S., & Brecher, A. (1996). The Philadelphia naming test: Scoring and rationale. Clinical Aphasiology, 24, 121–133.
   Google Scholar
• Romani, C., & Galluzzi, C. (2005). Effects of syllabic complexity in predicting accuracy of repetition and direction of errors in patients with articulatory and phonological difficulties. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(7), 817–850. doi: 10.1080/02643290442000365
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romani, C., Galluzzi, C., & Olson, A. (2011). Phonological-lexical activation: A lexical component or an output buffer? Evidence from aphasic errors. Cortex, 47(2), 217–235. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.11.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowland, C. A. (2014). The effect of testing versus restudy on retention: A meta-analytic review of the testing effect. Psychological Bulletin, 140(6), 1432–1463. doi: 10.1037/a0037559
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowland, C. A., & DeLosh, E. L. (2015). Mnemonic benefits of retrieval practice at short retention intervals. Memory (Hove, England), 23(3), 403–419. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2014.889710
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schnur, T. T. (2014). The persistence of cumulative semantic interference during naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 75, 27–44. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2014.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuchard, J., & Middleton, E. L. (in press). The roles of retrieval practice versus errorless learning in strengthening lexical access in aphasia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, M., Dell, G., Martin, N., Gahl, S., & Sobel, P. (2006). A case-series test of the interactive two-step model of lexical access: Evidence from picture naming?. Journal of Memory and Language, 54(2), 228–264. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2005.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, M. F., Kimberg, D. Y., Walker, G. M., Faseyitan, O., Brecher, A., Dell, G. S., & Coslett, H. B. (2009). Anterior temporal involvement in semantic word retrieval: Voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping evidence from aphasia. Brain, 132(12), 3411–3427. doi: 10.1093/brain/awp284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shallice, T., Rumiati, R. I., & Zadini, A. (2000). The selective impairment of the phonological output buffer. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17(6), 517–546. doi: 10.1080/02643290050110638
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szekely, A., Jacobsen, T., D’Amico, S., Devescovi, A., Andonova, E., Herron, D., … Bates, E. (2004). A new on-line resource for psycholinguistic studies. Journal of Memory and Language, 51(2), 247–250. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2004.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughn, K. E., Dunlosky, J., & Rawson, K. A. (2016). Effects of successive relearning on recall: Does relearning override the effects of initial learning criterion? Memory & Cognition, 44(6), 897–909. doi: 10.3758/s13421-016-0606-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughn, K. E., & Rawson, K. A. (2012). When is guessing incorrectly better than studying for enhancing memory? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(5), 899–905. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0276-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, G. M., & Hickok, G. (2016). Bridging computational approaches to speech production: The semantic-lexical-auditory-motor model (SLAM). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(2), 339–352. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0903-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, B. A., & Evans, J. J. (1996). Error-free learning in the rehabilitation of people with memory impairments. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 11(2), 54–64. doi: 10.1097/00001199-199604000-00006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar