Word form encoding is under attentional demand: evidence from dual-task interference in aphasia

References

• Alario, F. X., & Ferrand, L. (1999). A set of 400 pictures standardized for French: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, visual complexity, image variability, and age of acquisition. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 31, 531–552. doi: 10.3758/BF03200732
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alexander, M. P. (2006). Impairments of procedures for implementing complex language are due to disruption of frontal attention processes. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society: JINS, 12(2), 236–247. doi: 10.1017/S1355617706060309
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 390–412. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., Mächler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(1). doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bézy, C., Renard, A., & Pariente, J. (2016). GRÉMOTs: Batterie d’évaluation des troubles du langage. Louvain-la-Neuve: De Boeck.
   Google Scholar
• Bonin, P., Peerman, R., Malardier, N., Méot, A. C., & Chalard, M. (2003). A new set of 299 pictures for psycholinguistic studies: French norms for name agreement, image agreement, conceptual familiarity, visual complexity, image variability, age of acquisition, and naming latencies. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 35, 158–167. doi: 10.3758/BF03195507
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Colombo, F., & Assal, G. (1992). Adaptation française du test de dénomination de Boston. Versions abrégées. Boston Naming Test: French-Language Adaptation and Short Forms European Review of Applied Psychology, 42, 67–73. BNT Boston Naming test, diverses éditions.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, A. E., & Meyer, A. S. (2008). Capacity demands of phoneme selection in word production: New evidence from dual-task experiments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 34(4), 886.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Partz, M. P., Bilocq, V., De Wilde, V., Seron, X., & Pillon, A. (2001). Lexis. Tests pour le diagnostic des troubles lexicaux chez le patient aphasique. Marseille: Solal.
   Google Scholar
• Dolivo, C., & Assal, G. (1985). Tests neuropsychologiques rapides pour la recherche d’une détérioration intellectuelle. Psychologie Médicale, 17(14), 2093–2096.
   Google Scholar
• Fargier, R., & Laganaro, M. (2016). Neurophysiological modulations of non-verbal and verbal dual-tasks interference during word planning. PLoS ONE, 11(12), e0168358. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168358
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, V. S., & Pashler, H. (2002). Central bottleneck influences on the processing stages of word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 28(6), 1187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrod, S., & Pickering, M. J. (2007). Automaticity of language production in monologue and dialogue. In A. Meyer, L. Wheeldon, & A. Krott (Eds.), Automaticity and control in language processing (pp. 1–21). Hove: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hartsuiker, R. J., & Kolk, H. H. (2001). Error monitoring in speech production: A computational test of the perceptual loop theory. Cognitive Psychology, 42(2), 113–157. doi: 10.1006/cogp.2000.0744
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hula, W. D., & McNeil, M. R. (2008). Models of attention and dual-task performance as explanatory constructs in aphasia. Seminars in Speech and Language, 29(3), 169–187. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1082882
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hunting-Pompon, R., Kendall, D., & Bacon Moore, A. (2011). Examining attention and cognitive processing in participants with self-reported mild anomia. Aphasiology, 25(6–7), 800–812. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2010.542562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indefrey, P. (2011). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components: A critical update. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 255. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Indefrey, P., & Levelt, W. J. (2004). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition, 92(1), 101–144. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2002.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger, T. F. (2008). Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 434–446. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. (1973). Attention and effort (Vol. 1063). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kemper, S., Herman, R. E., & Nartowicz, J. (2005). Different effects of dual task demands on the speech of young and older adults. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 12(4), 340–358. doi: 10.1080/138255890968466
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kubose, T. T., Bock, K., Dell, G. S., Garnsey, S. M., Kramer, A. F., & Mayhugh, J. (2006). The effects of speech production and speech comprehension on simulated driving performance. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20(1), 43–63. doi: 10.1002/acp.1164
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laganaro, M., Morand, S. & Schnider, A. (2009). Time course of evoked-potential changes in different forms of anomia in aphasia. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(8), 1499–1510. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeil, M. R., Matthews, C. T., Hula, W. D., Doyle, P. J., & Fossett, T. R. (2006). Effects of visual-manual tracking under dual-task conditions on auditory language comprehension and story retelling in persons with aphasia. Aphasiology, 20(02–04), 167–174. doi: 10.1080/02687030500472660
   Google Scholar
• McNeil, M. R., Odell, K., & Tseng, C. H. (1991). Toward the integration of resource allocation into a general theory of aphasia. Clinical Aphasiology, 21, 21–39.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, L. L. (2000). The effects of varying attentional demands on the word retrieval skills of adults with aphasia, right hemisphere brain damage, or no brain damage. Brain and Language, 72(1), 40–72. doi: 10.1006/brln.1999.2281
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, L. L. (2012). Attention and other cognitive deficits in aphasia: Presence and relation to language and communication measures. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 21(2), 51–64. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2012/11-0067)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, L. L., Holland, A. L., & Beeson, P. M. (1997a). Auditory processing in individuals with mild aphasia: A study of resource allocation. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40(4), 792–808. doi: 10.1044/jslhr.4004.792
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, L. L., Holland, A. L., & Beeson, P. M. (1997b). Grammaticality judgments of mildly aphasic individuals under dual-task conditions. Aphasiology, 11(10), 993–1016. doi: 10.1080/02687039708249423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nespoulous, J. L., Lecours, A. R., Lafond, D., Lemay, A., Puel, M., Joannette, Y., … Rascol, A. (1992). Protocole Montréal-Toulouse d'examen linguistique de l'aphasie (MT86). Isbergues: L'Ortho-Edition.
   Google Scholar
• New, B., Pallier, C., Brysbaert, M., & Ferrand, L. (2004). Lexique 2: A new French lexical database. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(3), 516–524. doi: 10.3758/BF03195598
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nozari, N., Freund, M., Breining, B., Rapp, B., & Gordon, B. (2016). Cognitive control during selection and repair in word production. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(7), 886–903. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2016.1157194
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nozari, N., & Hepner, C. R. (2018). To select or to wait? The importance of criterion setting in debates of competitive lexical selection. Cognitive Neuropsychology. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2018.1476335
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97–113. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Protopapas, A. (2007). Checkvocal: A program to facilitate checking the accuracy and response time of vocal responses from DMDX. Behavior Research Methods, 39(4), 859–862. doi: 10.3758/BF03192979
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Python, G., Bischof, S., Probst, M., & Laganaro, M. (2012). Elaboration et normalisation d’un Test Informatisé de Compréhension Syntaxique en français. Revue de Neuropsychologie, 4(3), 206–215. doi: 10.3917/rne.043.0206
   Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A. (2008). Attention, gaze shifting, and dual-task interference from phonological encoding in spoken word planning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34(6), 1580–1598.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A., & Piai, V. (2011). Attention demands of spoken word planning: A review. Frontiers in Psychology, 2(307), 1–14.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tombu, M., & Jolicoeur, P. (2003). A central capacity sharing model of dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29(1), 3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tseng, C. H., McNeil, M. R., & Milenkovic, P. (1993). An investigation of attention allocation deficits in aphasia. Brain and Language, 45(2), 276–296. doi: 10.1006/brln.1993.1046
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar