1,051
Views
28
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reviews

Situational systematicity: A role for schema in understanding the differences between abstract and concrete concepts

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 142-153 | Received 31 May 2019, Accepted 20 Dec 2019, Published online: 03 Jan 2020

References

  • Altmann, G. T. M., & Ekves, Z. (2019). Events as intersecting object histories: A new theory of event representation. Psychological Review. doi: 10.1037/rev0000154
  • Badre, D., & Wagner, A. D. (2005). Frontal lobe mechanisms that resolve proactive interference. Cerebral Cortex, 15(12), 2003–2012. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhi075
  • Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptions of perceptual symbols. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(04), 637–660. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X99532147
  • Barsalou, L. W. (2009). Simulation, situated conceptualization, and prediction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1521), 1281–1289. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0319
  • Barsalou, L. W., Dutriaux, L., & Scheepers, C. (2018). Moving beyond the distinction between concrete and abstract concepts. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1752), 20170144. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0144
  • Barsalou, L. W., Santos, A., Simmons, W. K., & Wilson, C. D. (2008). Language and simulation in conceptual processing. In Symbols, embodiment, and meaning (pp. 245–283).
  • Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering: An experimental and social study. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University.
  • Barwise, J., & Perry, J. (1991). Situations and attitudes. Noûs, 25(5), 743–770. doi: 10.2307/2215650
  • Binder, J. R., Conant, L. L., Humphries, C. J., Fernandino, L., Simons, S. B., Aguilar, M., & Desai, R. H. (2016). Toward a brain-based componential semantic representation. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 3294, 1–45. doi: 10.1080/02643294.2016.1147426
  • Binder, J. R., & Desai, R. H. (2011). The neurobiology of semantic memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(11), 527–536. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.10.001
  • Binder, J. R., Desai, R. H., Graves, W. W., & Conant, L. L. (2009). Where is the semantic system? A critical review and meta-analysis of 120 functional neuroimaging studies. Cerebral Cortex, 19(12), 2767–2796. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhp055
  • Binder, J. R., Westbury, C. F., McKiernan, K. A., Possing, E. T., & Medler, D. A. (2005). Distinct Brain Systems for Processing Concrete and Abstract Concepts. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(6), 905–917. doi: 10.1162/0898929054021102
  • Borghi, A. M., & Binkofski, F. (2014). Words as social tools: An embodied view on abstract concepts. New York, NY: Springer.
  • Borghi, A. M., Binkofski, F., Castelfranchi, C., Cimatti, F., Scorolli, C., Borghi, A. M., … Tummolini, L. (2017). The challenge of abstract concepts. Psychological Bulletin, 143(3), 263–292. doi: 10.1037/bul0000089
  • Brysbaert, M., Warriner, A. B., & Kuperman, V. (2014). Concreteness ratings for 40 thousand generally known English word lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 46(3), 904–911. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0403-5
  • Cohen, N. J., & Eichenbaum, H. (1993). Memory, amnesia, and the hippocampal system. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Davachi, L. (2006). Item, context and relational episodic encoding in humans. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 16(6), 693–700. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2006.10.012
  • Davis, C. P., Paz-Alonso, P. M., Altmann, G. T. M., & Yee, E. (2019). Abstract concepts and the suppression of arbitrary episodic context. In A. K. Goel, C. M. Seifert, & C. Freksa (Eds.), Proceedings of the 41st Annual Conference of the cognitive science Society (pp. 1592–1598). Montreal, QC: Cognitive Science Society.
  • Davis, C. P., & Yee, E. (2018). Features, labels, space, and time: Factors supporting taxonomic relationships in the anterior temporal lobe and thematic relationships in the angular gyrus. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2018.1479530
  • Desai, R. H., Reilly, M., & van Dam, W. (2018). The multifaceted abstract brain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1752), 20170122. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0122
  • Dove, G. (2016). Three symbol ungrounding problems: Abstract concepts and the future of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(4), 1109–1121. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0825-4
  • Dove, G. (2018). Language as a disruptive technology: Abstract concepts, embodiment and the flexible mind. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 373(1752), 20170135. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0135
  • Galbraith, R. C., & Underwood, B. J. (1973). Perceived frequency of concrete and abstract words. Memory & Cognition, 1(1), 56–60. doi: 10.3758/BF03198068
  • Geschwind, N. (1972). Language and the brain. Scientific American, 226(4), 76–83. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0472-76
  • Ghosh, V. E., & Gilboa, A. (2014). What is a memory schema? A historical perspective on current neuroscience literature. Neuropsychologia, 53, 104–114. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.11.010
  • Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton-Mifflin.
  • Gilboa, A., & Marlatte, H. (2017). Neurobiology of schemas and schema-mediated memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21(8), 618–631. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.04.013
  • Gilead, M., Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2019). Above and beyond the concrete: The diverse representational substrates of the predictive brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1–63. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X19002000
  • Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What memory is for. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20(1), 1–19. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X97000010
  • Gureckis, T., & Goldstone, R. L. (2010). Schema. In P. C. Hogan (Ed.), The Cambridge encyclopedia of language science (pp. 725–727). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hafri, A., Papafragou, A., & Trueswell, J. C. (2013). Getting the gist of events: Recognition of two-participant actions from brief displays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142(3), 880–905. doi: 10.1037/a0030045
  • Hoffman, P. (2016). The meaning of ‘life’ and other abstract words: Insights from neuropsychology. Journal of Neuropsychology, 10(2), 317–343. doi: 10.1111/jnp.12065
  • Hoffman, P., Binney, R. J., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2015). Differing contributions of inferior prefrontal and anterior temporal cortex to concrete and abstract conceptual knowledge. Cortex, 63, 250–266. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2014.09.001
  • Hoffman, P., Lambon Ralph, M. A., & Rogers, T. T. (2013). Semantic diversity: A measure of semantic ambiguity based on variability in the contextual usage of words. Behavior Research Methods, 45(3), 718–730. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0278-x
  • Hoffman, P., McClelland, J. L., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2018). Concepts, control and context: A connectionist account of normal and disordered semantic cognition. Psychological Review, 125(3), 293–328. doi: 10.1037/rev0000094
  • Lambon Ralph, M. A., Jefferies, E., Patterson, K., & Rogers, T. T. (2017). The neural and computational bases of semantic cognition. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 18(1), 42–55. doi: 10.1038/nrn.2016.150
  • McRae, K., Nedjadrasul, D., Pau, R., Lo, B. P. H., & King, L. (2018). Abstract concepts and pictures of real-world situations activate one another. Topics in Cognitive Science, 10, 518–532. doi: 10.1111/tops.12328
  • Murphy, G. (2002). The big book of concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Noppeney, U., & Price, C. J. (2004). Retrieval of abstract semantics. Neuroimage, 22(1), 164–170. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.12.010
  • Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  • Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue Canadienne de Psychologie, 45(3), 255–287. doi: 10.1037/h0084295
  • Potter, M. C. (1976). Short-term conceptual memory for pictures. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 2(5), 509–522. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.2.5.509
  • Pulvermüller, F. (2013). How neurons make meaning: Brain mechanisms for embodied and abstract-symbolic semantics. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17(9), 458–470. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.06.004
  • Pulvermüller, F. (2018). Neural reuse of action perception circuits for language, concepts and communication. Progress in Neurobiology, 160, 1–44. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2017.07.001
  • Rogers, T. T., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Garrard, P., Bozeat, S., McClelland, J. L., Hodges, J. R., & Patterson, K. (2004). Structure and deterioration of semantic memory: A neuropsychological and computational investigation. Psychological Review, 111(1), 205–235. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.1.205
  • Rugg, M. D., Vilberg, K. L., Mattson, J. T., Sarah, S. Y., Johnson, J. D., & Suzuki, M. (2012). Item memory, context memory, and the hippocampus: fMRI evidence. Neuropsychologia, 50(13), 3070–3079. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.06.004
  • Rumelhart, D. E., & Ortony, A. (1977). The representation of knowledge in memory. In R. C. Anderson, R. J. Spiro, & W. E. Montague (Eds.), Schooling and the acquisition of knowledge (pp. 99–135). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Schwanenflugel, P. J. (1991). Why are abstract concepts hard to understand? In P. J. Schwanenflugel (Ed.), The psychology of word meanings (pp. 223–250). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Schwanenflugel, P. J., Akin, C., & Luh, W. M. (1992). Context availability and the recall of abstract and concrete words. Memory & Cognition, 20(1), 96–104. doi: 10.3758/BF03208259
  • Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Shoben, E. J. (1983). Differential context effects in the comprehension of abstract and concrete verbal materials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 9(1), 82–102. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.9.1.82
  • Snefjella, B., & Kuperman, V. (2015). Concreteness and psychological distance in natural language use. Psychological Science, 26(9), 1449–1460. doi: 10.1177/0956797615591771
  • Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2003). Neuroimaging studies of semantic memory: Inferring “how” from “where”. Neuropsychologia, 41, 280–292. doi: 10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00161-6
  • Thompson-Schill, S. L., D’Esposito, M., Aguirre, G. K., & Farah, M. J. (1997). Role of left inferior prefrontal cortex in retrieval of semantic knowledge: A reevaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 94(26), 14792–14797. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.26.14792
  • Thompson-Schill, S. L., Swick, D., Farah, M. J., D’Esposito, M., Kan, I. P., & Knight, R. T. (1998). Verb generation in patients with focal frontal lesions: A neuropsychological test of neuroimaging findings. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95(26), 15855–15860. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.26.15855
  • Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440–463. doi: 10.1037/a0018963
  • Tulving, E. (1983). Ecphoric processes in episodic memory. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 302(1110), 361–371. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1983.0060
  • van Kesteren, M. T. R., Beul, S. F., Takashima, A., Henson, R. N., Ruiter, D. J., & Fernández, G. (2013). Differential roles for medial prefrontal and medial temporal cortices in schema-dependent encoding: From congruent to incongruent. Neuropsychologia, 51(12), 2352–2359. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.05.027
  • van Kesteren, M. T. R., Ruiter, D. J., Fernández, G., & Henson, R. N. (2012). How schema and novelty augment memory formation. Trends in Neurosciences, 35(4), 211–219. doi: 10.1016/j.tins.2012.02.001
  • Wagner, A. D., Paré-Blagoev, E. J., Clark, J., & Poldrack, R. A. (2001). Recovering meaning: Left prefrontal cortex guides controlled semantic retrieval. Neuron, 31(2), 329–338. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00359-2
  • Wang, J., Conder, J. A., Blitzer, D. N., & Shinkareva, S. V. (2010). Neural representation of abstract and concrete concepts: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Human Brain Mapping, 31(10), 1459–1468. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20950
  • Wilson-Mendenhall, C. D., Simmons, W. K., Martin, A., & Barsalou, L. W. (2013). Contextual processing of abstract concepts reveals neural representations of nonlinguistic semantic content. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 25(6), 920–935. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00361
  • Wittgenstein, L. (1953/2010). Philosophical investigations. Oxford, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Yee, E., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2016). Putting concepts into context. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(4), 1015–1027. doi: 10.3758/s13423-015-0948-7

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.