Connections and selections: Comparing multivariate predictions and parameter associations from latent variable models of picture naming

References

• Bamber, D. (2018). Statisticians should not tell scientists what to think. In Studies in computational intelligence (Vol. 808, pp. 63–82). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04263-9_5
   Google Scholar
• Batchelder, W. H. (1998). Multinomial processing tree models and psychological assessment. Psychological Assessment, 10(4), 331–344. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.10.4.331
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batchelder, W. H., & Riefer, D. M. (1999). Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modeling. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6(1), 57–86. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210812
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batchelder, W. H., & Riefer, D. M. (2007). Using multinomial processing tree models to measure cognitive deficits in clinical populations. In R. W. J. Neufeld (Ed.), Advances in clinical cognitive science: Formal modeling of processes and symptoms (pp. 19–50). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/11556-001
   Google Scholar
• Belke, E., Brysbaert, M., Meyer, A. S., & Ghyselinck, M. (2005). Age of acquisition effects in picture naming: Evidence for a lexical-semantic competition hypothesis. Cognition, 96(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2004.11.006
   Google Scholar
• Best, W. (1996). When Racquets are baskets but baskets are biscuits, where do the words come from? A single case study of formal paraphasic errors in aphasia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 13(3), 443–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/026432996381971
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozeat, S., Lambon Ralph, M. A., Patterson, K., Garrard, P., & Hodges, J. R. (2000). Non-verbal semantic impairment in semantic dementia. Neuropsychologia, 38(9), 1207–1215. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0028-3932(00)00034-8 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10865096
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., & Biemiller, A. (2017). Test-based age-of-acquisition norms for 44 thousand English word meanings. Behavior Research Methods, 49(4), 1520–1523. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0811-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., & Ellis, A. W. (2016). Aphasia and age of acquisition: Are early-learned words more resilient? Aphasiology, 30(11), 1240–1263. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2015.1106439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Busemeyer, J. R., & Wang, Y.-M. (2000). Model comparisons and model selections based on generalization criterion methodology. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 44(1), 171–189. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmps.1999.1282
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A., & Hillis, A. E. (1990). Where do semantic errors come from? Cortex, 26(1), 95–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(13)80077-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardillo, G.. (2010). MyFisher: The definitive function for the Fisher’s exact and conditional test for any RxC matrix.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Q., & Mirman, D. (2012). Competition and cooperation among similar representations: Toward a unified account of facilitative and inhibitory effects of lexical neighbors. Psychological Review, 119(2), 417–430. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027175
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuetos, F., Aguado, G., Izura, C., & Ellis, A. W. (2002). Aphasic naming in Spanish: Predictors and errors. Brain and Language, 82(3), 344–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00038-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuetos, F., Barbón, A., Urrutia, M., & Domínguez, A. (2009). Determining the time course of lexical frequency and age of acquisition using ERP. Clinical Neurophysiology, 120(2), 285–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2008.11.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dabul, B. (2000). Apraxia Battery for Adults. Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• DeLeon, J., Gottesman, R. F., Kleinman, J. T., Newhart, M., Davis, C., Heidler-Gary, J., Lee, A., & Hillis, A. E. (2007). Neural regions essential for distinct cognitive processes underlying picture naming. Brain, 130(5), 1408–1422. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awm011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93(3), 283–321. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.283 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3749399
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S., Chang, F., & Griffin, Z. M. (1999). Connectionist models of language production: Lexical access and grammatical encoding. Cognitive Science, 23(4), 517–542. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2304_6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S., Lawler, E. N., Harris, H. D., & Gordon, J. K. (2004). Models of errors of omission in aphasic naming. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21(2–4), 125–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290342000320
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S., Martin, N., & Schwartz, M. F. (2007). A case-series test of the interactive two-step model of lexical access: Predicting word repetition from picture naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 56(4), 490–520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.05.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Saffran, E. M., & Gagnon, D. A. (1997). Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. Psychological Review, 104(4), 801–838. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.104.4.801 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9337631
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1997). PPVT-III: Peabody picture vocabulary test. American Guidance Service.
   Google Scholar
• Erdfelder, E., Auer, T.-S., Hilbig, B. E., Aßfalg, A., Moshagen, M., & Nadarevic, L. (2009). Multinomial processing tree models. Zeitschrift Für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology, 217(3), 108–124. https://doi.org/10.1027/0044-3409.217.3.108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foygel, D., & Dell, G. S. (2000). Models of impaired lexical access in speech production. Journal of Memory and Language, 43(2), 182–216. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fromkin, V. A. (1971). The non-anomalous nature of anomalous utterances. Language, 47(1), 27–52. https://doi.org/10.2307/412187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gagnon, D. A., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Dell, G. S., & Saffran, E. M. (1997). The origins of formal paraphasias in aphasics’ picture naming. Brain and Language, 59(3), 450–472. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1997.1792
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, M. (1980). Levels of processing in sentence production. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production Vol. 1: Speech and talk (pp. 177–220). London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldrick, M. (2011). Theory selection and evaluation in case series research. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 28(7), 451–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2012.675319
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldrick, M., & Rapp, B. (2002). A restricted interaction account (RIA) of spoken word production: The best of both worlds. Aphasiology. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687040143000203
   Google Scholar
• Goldrick, M., & Rapp, B. (2007). Lexical and post-lexical phonological representations in spoken production. Cognition, 102(2), 219–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2005.12.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, D., & Patterson, K. (1992). The pyramids and palm trees test: A test of semantic access from words and pictures. Thames Valley Test Company.
   Google Scholar
• Hulme, C., Roodenrys, S., Brown, G. D. A., Schweickert, R., Martin, S., & Stuart, G. (1997). Word-frequency effects on short-term memory tasks: Evidence for a redintegration process in immediate serial recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 23(5), 1217–1232. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.23.5.1217
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kertesz, A. (1982). The Western aphasia battery. Grune & Stratton, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kittredge, A. K., Dell, G. S., Verkuilen, J., & Schwartz, M. F. (2008). Where is the effect of frequency in word production? Insights from aphasic picture-naming errors. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 25(4), 463–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290701674851
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(1), 1–75. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99001776
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, N., & Dell, G. S. (2019). Maintenance versus transmission deficits: The effect of delay on naming performance in aphasia. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 13, 406. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2019.00406
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, N., Gagnon, D. A., Schwartz, M. F., Dell, G. S., & Saffran, E. M. (1996). Phonological facilitation of semantic errors in normal and aphasic speakers. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11(3), 257–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/016909696387187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, N., Schwartz, M. F., & Kohen, F. P. (2007). Assessment of the ability to process semantic and phonological aspects of words in aphasia: A multi-measurement approach. Aphasiology, 20(2-4), 154–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030500472520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. C., Shelton, J. R., & Yaffee, L. S. (1994). Language processing and working memory: Neuropsychological evidence for separate phonological and semantic capacities. Journal of Memory and Language, 33(1), 83–111. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1994.1005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirman, D., Strauss, T. J., Brecher, A. R., Walker, G. M., Sobel, P., Dell, G. S., & Schwartz, M. F. (2011). A large, searchable, web-based database of aphasic performance on picture naming and other tests of cognitive function. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 27(6), 495–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2011.574112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neufeld, R. W. J. (2015). Mathematical and computational modeling in clinical psychology. In J. R. Busemeyer (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of computational and mathematical psychology (pp. 341–362). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nickels, L., & Howard, D. (1994). A frequent occurrence? Factors affecting the production of semantic errors in aphasic naming. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 11(3), 289–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643299408251977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickels, L., & Howard, D. (1995). Aphasic naming: What matters? Neuropsychologia, 33(10), 1281–1303. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(95)00102-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickels, L., & Howard, D. (2004). Dissociating effects of number of phonemes, number of syllables, and syllabic complexity on word production in aphasia: It’s the number of phonemes that counts. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 21(1), 57–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290342000122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nozari, N., Kittredge, A. K., Dell, G. S., & Schwartz, M. F. (2010). Naming and repetition in aphasia: Steps, routes, and frequency effects. Journal of Memory and Language, 63(4), 541–559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2010.08.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, B., & Goldrick, M. (2000). Discreteness and interactivity in spoken word production. Psychological Review, 107(3), 460–499. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.107.3.460
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riefer, D. M., & Batchelder, W. H. (1988). Multinomial modeling and the measurement of cognitive processes. Psychological Review, 95(3), 318–339. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.95.3.318
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roach, A., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Grewal, R. S., & Brecher, A. R. (1996). The Philadelphia naming test: Scoring and Rationale. Clinical Aphasiology, 24, 121–133. http://eprints-prod-05.library.pitt.edu/215/1/24-09.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A. (1992). A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking. Cognition, 42(1–3), 107–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(92)90041-F
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A. (1997). The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production. Cognition, 64(3), 249–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(97)00027-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A. (2000). WEAVER++ and other computational models of lemma retrieval and word-form encoding. In L. Wheeldon (Ed.), Aspects of Language Production (pp. 71–114). East Sussex: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A. (2004). Error biases in spoken word planning and monitoring by aphasic and nonaphasic speakers: Comment on Rapp and Goldrick (2000). Psychological Review, 111(2), 561–572. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.2.561
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, M. F., Dell, G. S., Martin, N., Gahl, S., & Sobel, P. (2006). A case-series test of the interactive two-step model of lexical access: Evidence from picture naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 54(2), 228–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tochadse, M., Halai, A. D., Lambon Ralph, M. A., & Abel, S. (2018). Unification of behavioural, computational and neural accounts of word production errors in post-stroke aphasia. NeuroImage: Clinical, 18, 952–962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2018.03.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ueno, T., Saito, S., Rogers, T. T., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2011). Lichtheim 2: Synthesizing aphasia and the neural basis of language in a neurocomputational model of the dual dorsal-ventral language pathways. Neuron, 72(2), 385–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2011.09.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, G. M. (2016). Computational modeling of speech production and aphasia. University of California, Irvine. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/1cp5g22d#supplemental
   Google Scholar
• Walker, G. M., & Hickok, G. (2016). Bridging computational approaches to speech production: The semantic–lexical–auditory–motor model (SLAM). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(2), 339–352. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0903-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, G. M., Hickok, G., & Fridriksson, J. (2018). A cognitive psychometric model for assessment of picture naming abilities in aphasia. Psychological Assessment, 30(6), 809–826. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0000529
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, G. (1996). Moby part-of-speech II. https://archive.org/details/mobypartofspeech03203gut
   Google Scholar
• Yarkoni, T., & Westfall, J. (2017). Choosing prediction over explanation in psychology: Lessons from machine learning. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 1100–1122. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617693393
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, W. (2002). Psycholinguistic and motor theories of apraxia of speech. Seminars in Speech and Language, 23(4), 231–244. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2002-35798
   PubMedGoogle Scholar