Effects of delay, length, and frequency on onset RTs and word durations: Articulatory planning uses flexible units but cannot be prepared

References

• Agresti, A. (2013). Categorical data analysis (3rd ed). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, J E. (2016). Explicit and emergent mechanisms of information status. Topics in Cognitive Science, 8, 737–760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R., Piepenbrock, R., & Rijn, H. (1993). The CELEX lexical data base.
   Google Scholar
• Bachoud-Lévi, A.-C., Dupoux, E., Cohen, L., & Mehler, J. (1998). Where is the length effect? A cross-linguistic study of speech production. Journal of Memory and Language, 39(3), 331–346. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1998.2572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (2019). The phonological loop as a buffer store: An update. Cortex, 112, 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2018.05.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (1985). The locus of word-frequency effects in the pronunciation task: Lexical access and/or production? Journal of Memory and Language, 24(1), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(85)90017-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Sergent-Marshall, S. D., Spieler, D. H., & Yap, M. J. (2004). Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(2), 283–316. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, J. J. S., Hanif, H. M., Björnström, L. E., & Hills, C. (2014). The word-length effect in reading: A review. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 31(5–6), 378–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2014.895314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boersma, P. (2001). Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 5(9), 341–345.
   Google Scholar
• Browman, C. P., & Goldstein, L. (1992). Articulatory phonology: An overview. Phonetica, 49(3–4), 155–180. https://doi.org/10.1159/000261913
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buxo-Lugo, A., Jacobs, C. L., & Watson, D. G. (2020). The world is not enough to explain lengthening of phonological competitors. Journal of Memory and Language, 110, 104066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2019.104066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buz, E., & Jaeger, T. F. (2016). The (in)dependence of articulation and lexical planning during isolated word production. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(3), 404–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2015.1105984
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Code, C. (1998). Models, theories and heuristics in apraxia of speech. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 12(1), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699209808985212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coltheart, M. (1981). The MRC psycholinguistic database. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 33(4), 497–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640748108400805
   Google Scholar
• Cortese, M. J., Yates, M., Schock, J., & Vilks, L. (2018). Examining word processing via a megastudy of conditional reading aloud. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 71(11), 2295–2313. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021817741269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croot, K., Lalas, G., Biedermann, B., Rastle, K., Jones, K., & Cholin, J. (2017). Syllable frequency effects in immediate but not delayed syllable naming in English. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32(9), 1119–1132. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2017.1284340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damian, M. F. (2003). Articulatory duration in single-word speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(3), 416–431. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.29.3.416
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damian, M. F., Bowers, J. S., Stadthagen-Gonzalez, H., & Spalek, K. (2010). Does word length affect speech onset latencies when producing single words? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(4), 892–905. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deger, K., & Ziegler, W. (2002). Speech motor programming in apraxia of speech. Journal of Phonetics, 30(3), 321–335. https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.2001.0163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Groot, A. (n.d.). Representational aspects of word imageability and word frequency as assessed through word association. https://oce.ovid.com/article/00004786-198909000-00006/HTML
   Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S., Juliano, C., & Govindjee, A. (1993). Structure and content in language production: A theory of frame constraints in phonological speech errors. Cognitive Science, 17(2), 149–195. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1702_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, A. W., & Monaghan, J. (2002). Reply to Strain, Patterson, and Seidenberg (2002). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(1), 215–220. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.28.1.215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fink, A., Oppenheim, G. M., & Goldrick, M. (2018). Interactions between lexical access and articulation. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 33(1), 12–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2017.1348529
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gahl, S. (2008). Time and thyme are not homophones: The effect of lemma frequency on word durations in spontaneous speech. Language, 84(3), 474–496. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.0.0035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gahl, S., Yao, Y., & Johnson, K. (2012). Why reduce? Phonological neighborhood density and phonetic reduction in spontaneous speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 66(4), 789–806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2011.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galluzzi, C., Bureca, I., Guariglia, C., & Romani, C. (2015). Phonological simplifications, apraxia of speech and the interaction between phonological and phonetic processing. Neuropsychologia, 71, 64–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.03.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldrick, M., McClain, R., Cibelli, E., Adi, Y, Gustafson, E., Moers, C., & Keshet, J. (2019). The influence of lexical selection disruptions on articulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45(6), 1107–1141. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000633
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldrick, M., & Rapp, B. (2007). Lexical and post-lexical phonological representations in spoken production. Cognition, 102(2), 219–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2005.12.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickok, G. (2012). Computational neuroanatomy of speech production. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 13(2), 135–145. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3158
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbrook, B. B., Kawamoto, A. H., & Liu, Q. (2019). Task demands and segment priming effects in the naming task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45(5), 807–821. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000631
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, C. L., Yiu, L. K., Watson, D. G., & Dell, G. S. (2015). Why are repeated words produced with reduced durations? Evidence from inner speech and homophone production. Journal of Memory and Language, 84, 37–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2015.05.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, M. I. (1990). Motor learning and the degrees of freedom problem. (By M. Jeannerod; pp. 796–836). LEA.
   Google Scholar
• Kahn, J. M., & Arnold, J. E. (2015). Articulatory and lexical repetition effects on durational reduction: Speaker experience vs. common ground. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30(1–2), 103–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2013.848989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawamoto, A. H., Kello, C. T., Higareda, I., & Vu, J. V. Q. (1999). Parallel processing and initial phoneme criterion in naming words: Evidence from frequency effects on onset and rime duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(2), 362–381. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.25.2.362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawamoto, A. H., Liu, Q., Lee, R. J., & Grebe, P. R. (2014). The segment as the minimal planning unit in speech production: Evidence based on absolute response latencies. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(12), 2340–2359. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.927892
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawamoto, A. H., Liu, Q., Mura, K., & Sanchez, A. (2008). Articulatory preparation in the delayed naming task. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(2), 347–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kello, C. T. (2004). Control over the time course of cognition in the tempo-naming task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30(5), 942–955. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.30.5.942
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kello, C. T., & Plaut, D. C. (2000). Strategic control in word reading: Evidence from speeded responding in the tempo-naming task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(3), 719–750. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.26.3.719
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kello, C. T., Plaut, D. C., & MacWhinney, B. (2000). The task dependence of staged versus cascaded processing: An empirical and computational study of Stroop interference in speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129(3), 340–360. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.129.3.340
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klapp, S. T. (1995). Motor response programming during simple choice reaction time: The role of practice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21(5), 1015–1027. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.21.5.1015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klapp, S. T. (2003). Reaction time analysis of two types of motor preparation for speech articulation: Action as a sequence of chunks. Journal of Motor Behavior, 35(2), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222890309602129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klapp, S. T., Anderson, W. G., & Berrian, R. W. (1973). Implicit speech in reading: Reconsidered. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 100(2), 368–374. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0035471
   Google Scholar
• Kohn, S. E. (1984). The nature of the phonological disorder in conduction aphasia. Brain and Language, 23(1), 97–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(84)90009-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohn, S E. (1989). The nature of the phonemic string deficit in conduction aphasia. Aphasiology, 3, 209–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krause, P. A., & Kawamoto, A. H. (2020). On the timing and coordination of articulatory movements: Historical perspectives and current theoretical challenges. Language and Linguistics Compass, 14(6), https://doi.org/10.1111/lnc3.12373
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laganaro, M., & Alario, F.-X. (2006). On the locus of the syllable frequency effect in speech production. Journal of Memory and Language, 55(2), 178–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, T. Q., & Watson, D. G. (2010). Repetition is easy: Why repeated referents have reduced prominence. Memory & Cognition, 38(8), 1137–1146. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.38.8.1137
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, T. Q., & Watson, D. G. (2014). Repetition reduction: Lexical repetition in the absence of referent repetition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 40(3), 829–843. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035780
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(1), 1–38; discussion 38–75. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525×99001776
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M., & Wheeldon, L. (1994). Do speakers have access to a mental syllabary? Cognition, 50(1–3), 239–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(94)90030-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohmann, A. (2018). Time and thyme are NOT homophones: A closer look at Gahl’s work on the lemma-frequency effect, including a reanalysis. Language, 94(2), e180–e190. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2018.0032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas, E., & Mailend, M.-L. (2012). Speech planning happens before speech execution: Online reaction time methods in the study of apraxia of speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55(5), 1523–1534. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0311)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas, E., Robin, D. A., Wright, D. L., & Ballard, K. J. (2008). Motor programming in apraxia of speech. Brain and Language, 106(2), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2008.03.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKay, I. R. A. (1987). Phonetics: The science of speech production (2nd ed). Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Marinelli, C. V., Romani, C., Burani, C., McGowan, V. A., & Zoccolotti, P. (2016). Costs and benefits of orthographic inconsistency in reading: Evidence from a cross-linguistic comparison. PLoS ONE, 11(6), e0157457. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157457
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, M. (1978). From print to sound in mature readers as a function of reader ability and two forms of orthographic regularity. Memory & Cognition, 6(5), 568–581. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198246
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, A. S., Belke, E., Häcker, C., & Mortensen, L. (2007). Use of word length information in utterance planning. Journal of Memory and Language, 57(2), 210–231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, A. S., Roelofs, A., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2003). Word length effects in object naming: The role of a response criterion. Journal of Memory and Language, 48(1), 131–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-596X(02)00509-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, A. S, & Schriefers, H. (1991). Phonological facilitation in picture-word interference experiments: Effects of stimulus onset asynchrony and types of interfering stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17(6), 1146–1160. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.17.6.1146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, H. E., & Guenther, F. H. (2021). Modelling speech motor programming and apraxia of speech in the DIVA/GODIVA neurocomputational framework. Aphasiology, 35(4), 424–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2020.1765307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mooshammer, C., Goldstein, L., Nam, H., McClure, S., Saltzman, E., & Tiede, M. (2012). Bridging planning and execution: Temporal planning of syllables. Journal of Phonetics, 40(3), 374–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2012.02.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mooshammer, C. R., Goldstein, L., Tiede, M., Kulshreshtha, M., McClure, S., & Katsika, A. (2009). Planning time effects of phonological competition: Articulatory and acoustic data. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125(4), 2657–2657. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4784180
   Google Scholar
• Munson, B. (2007). Lexical access lexical representation and vowel production. Laboratory Phonology. 9, 201–228.
   Google Scholar
• Perret, C., & Bonin, P. (2019). Which variables should be controlled for to investigate picture naming in adults? A Bayesian meta-analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 51(6), 2533–2545. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1100-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierrehumbert, J. (2002). Word-specific phonetics. In C. Gussenhoven & N. Warner (Eds.), Laboratory Phonology 7. De Gruyter Mouton. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110197105.1.101
   Google Scholar
• Postma, A. (2000). Detection of errors during speech production: A review of speech monitoring models. Cognition, 77(2), 97–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00090-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramoo, D., Olson, A., & Romani, C. (2021). Repeated attempts, phonetic errors, and syllabifications in a case study:Evidence of impaired transfer from phonology to articulatory planning. Aphasiology, 35(4), 485–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2021.1881349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A. (1996). Serial order in planning the production of successive morphemes of a word. Journal of Memory and Language, 35(6), 854–876. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1996.0044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A. (1997). The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production. Cognition, 64(3), 249–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(97)00027-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A. (2002a). Spoken language planning and the initiation of articulation. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology – Human Experimental Psychology, 55(2), 465–483. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980143000488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A. (2002b). Syllable structure effects turn out to be word length effects: Comment on Santiago et al. (2000). Language and Cognitive Processes, 17(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960042000139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A. (2004). Comprehension-based versus production-internal feedback in planning spoken words: A rejoinder to Rapp and Goldrick (2004). Psychological Review, 111(2), 579–580. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.111.2.579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, M. A., & Storkel, H. L. (1999). Planning speech one syllable at a time: The reduced buffer capacity hypothesis in apraxia of speech. Aphasiology, 13(9–11), 793–805. https://doi.org/10.1080/026870399401885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romani, C., & Galluzzi, C. (2005). Effects of syllabic complexity in predicting accuracy of repetition and direction of errors in patients with articulatory and phonological difficulties. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(7), 817–850. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290442000365
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romani, C., Galluzzi, C., Bureca, I., & Olson, A. (2011). Effects of syllable structure in aphasic errors: Implications for a new model of speech production. Cognitive Psychology, 62(2), 151–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.08.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romani, C., Galuzzi, C., Guariglia, C., & Goslin, J. (2017). Comparing phoneme frequency, age of acquisition, and loss in aphasia: Implications for phonological universals. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 34(7–8), 449–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2017.1369942
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santiago, J., MacKay, D. G., & Palma, A. (2002). Length effects turn out to be syllable structure effects: Response to Roelofs (2002). Language and Cognitive Processes, 17(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960042000148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santiago, J., MacKay, D. G., Palma, A., & Rho, C. (2000). Sequential activation processes in producing words and syllables: Evidence from picture naming. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/016909600386101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82(4), 225–260. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076770
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, R. A., Lee, T. D., Winstein, C. J., Wulf, G., & Zelaznik, H. N. (2019). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis (6th ed.). Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Schriefers, H., & Teruel, E. (1999). Phonological facilitation in the production of two-word utterances. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 11(1), 17–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/713752301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Stowe, R. W. (1989). Context availability and the processing of abstract and concrete words in sentences. Reading Research Quarterly, 24(1), 114. https://doi.org/10.2307/748013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shields, L. W., & Balota, D. A. (1991). Repetition and associative context effects in speech production. Language and Speech, 34(1), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/002383099103400103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinelli, D., De Luca, M., Di Filippo, G., Mancini, M., Martelli, M., & Zoccolotti, P. (2005). Length effect in word naming in reading: Role of reading experience and reading deficit in Italian readers. Developmental Neuropsychology, 27(2), 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326942dn2702_2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sternberg, S., Monsell, S., Knoll, R. L., & Wright, C. E. (1978). The latency and duration of rapid movement sequences: Comparisons of speech and typewriting. In G. E. Stelmach (Ed.), Information processing in motor control and learning (pp. 117–152). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tilsen, S. (2013). A dynamical model of hierarchical selection and coordination in speech planning. Plos One, 8(4), e62800. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062800
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilsen, S. (2016). Selection and coordination: The articulatory basis for the emergence of phonological structure. Journal of Phonetics, 55, 53–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2015.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Merwe, A. (2009). A theoretical framework for the characterization of pathological speech sensorimotor control. In M. R. McNeil (Ed.), Clinical management of sensorimotor speech disorders (2nd ed, pp. 3–18). Thieme Medical Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Van Der Merwe, A. (2021). New perspectives on speech motor planning and programming in the context of the four- level model and its implications for understanding the pathophysiology underlying apraxia of speech and other motor speech disorders. Aphasiology, 35(4), 397–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2020.1765306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varley, R., & Whiteside, S. P. (2001). What is the underlying impairment in acquired apraxia of speech? Aphasiology, 15(1), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687040042000115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varley, R. A., Whiteside, S. P., & Luff, H. (1999). Apraxia of speech as a disruption of word-level schemata: Some durational evidence. Journal of Medical Speech and Language Pathology, 7, 127–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weekes, B. S. (1997). Differential effects of number of letters on word and nonword naming latency. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 50(2), 439–456. https://doi.org/10.1080/713755710
   Google Scholar
• Wheeldon, L., & Lahiri, A. (1997). Prosodic units in speech production. Journal of Memory and Language, 37(3), 356–381. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1997.2517
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yap, M. J., & Balota, D. A. (2009). Visual word recognition of multisyllabic words. Journal of Memory and Language, 60(4), 502–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2009.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar