488
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Time-course of phonetic (motor speech) encoding in utterance production

ORCID Icon
Pages 287-297 | Received 15 Jan 2023, Accepted 31 Oct 2023, Published online: 09 Nov 2023

References

  • Alario, F., & Ferrand, L. (1999). A set of 400 pictures standardized for French: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, visual complexity, image variability, and age of acquisition. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 31(3), 531–552. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200732
  • Ala-Salomäki, H., Kujala, J., Liljeström, M., & Salmelin, R. (2021). Picture naming yields highly consistent cortical activation patterns: Test–retest reliability of magnetoencephalography recordings. NeuroImage, 227, 117651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117651
  • Alderete, J., Baese-Berk, M., Leung, K., & Goldrick, M. (2021). Cascading activation in phonological planning and articulation: Evidence from spontaneous speech errors. Cognition, 210, 104577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104577
  • Atanasova, T., Fargier, R., Zesiger, P., & Laganaro, M. (2020). Dynamics of word production in the transition from adolescence toAdulthood. Neurobiology of Language, 2(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1162/nol_a_00024
  • Bohland, J. W., & Guenther, F. H. (2006). An fMRI investigation of syllable sequence production. NeuroImage, 32(2), 821–841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.04.173
  • Bonin, P., Peereman, R., Malardier, N., Méot, A., & Chalard, M. (2003). A new set of 299 pictures for psycholinguistic studies: French norms for name agreement, image agreement, conceptual familiarity, visual complexity, image variability, age of acquisition, and naming latencies. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35(1), 158–167. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195507
  • Brendel, B., Hertrich, I., Erb, M., Lindner, A., Riecker, A., Grodd, W., & Ackermann, H. (2010). The contribution of mesiofrontal cortex to the preparation and execution of repetitive syllable productions: An fMRI study. Neuroimage, 50(3), 1219–1230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.039
  • Brunet, D., Murray, M. M., & Michel, C. M. (2011). Spatiotemporal analysis of multichannel EEG: CARTOOL. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2011.
  • Bürki, A., Pellet, P., & Laganaro, M. (2015). Do speakers have access to a mental syllabary? ERP comparison of high frequency and novel syllable production. Brain and Language, 150, 90–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2015.08.006
  • Bürki, A., Viebahn, M., & Gafos, A. (2020). Plasticity and transfer in the sound system: exposure to syllables in production or perception changes their subsequent production. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 35(10), 1371–1393. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2020.1782445
  • Chang, S.-E., Kenney, M. K., Loucks, T. M. J., Poletto, C. J., & Ludlow, C. L. (2009). Common neural substrates support speech and non-speech vocal tract gestures. NeuroImage, 47(1), 314–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.03.032
  • Conner, C. R., Kadipasaoglu, C. M., Shouval, H. Z., Hickok, G., & Tandon, N. (2019). Network dynamics of Broca’s area during word selection. PLoS One, 14(12), e0225756. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225756
  • Dell, G. S. (1985). Positive feedback in hierarchical connectionistmodels: Application to language production. Cognitive Science, 9, 3–23.
  • Dell, G. S. (1986). A spreading-activation theory of retrieval in sentence production. Psychological Review, 93(3), 283–321. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.283
  • de Zubicaray, G. I., & Piai, V. (2019). Investigating the spatial and temporal components of speech production. In The Oxford handbook of neurolinguistics (pp. 471–497). Oxford University Press.
  • Dubarry, A. S., Llorens, A., Trébuchon, A., Carron, R., Liégeois-Chauvel, C., Bénar, C. G., & Alario, F. X. (2017). Estimating parallel processing in a language task using single-trial intracerebral electroencephalography. Psychological Science, 28(4), 414–426. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616681296
  • Fairs, A., Michelas, A., Dufour, S., & Strijkers, K. (2021). The same ultra-rapid parallel brain dynamics underpin the production and perception of speech. Cerebral Cortex Communications, 2(3), tgab040. https://doi.org/10.1093/texcom/tgab040
  • Fargier, R., & Laganaro, M. (2017). Spatio-temporal dynamics of referential and inferential naming: Different brain and cognitive operations to lexical selection. Brain Topography, 30(2), 182–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-016-0504-4
  • Frossard, J., & Renaud, O. (2021). Permutation tests for regression, ANOVA, and comparison of signals: the permuco package. Journal of Statistical Software, 99(15), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v099.i15
  • Frossard, J., & Renaud, O. (2022). The cluster depth tests: Toward point-wise strong control of the family-wise error rate in massively univariate tests with application to M/EEG. NeuroImage, 247, 118824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118824
  • Goldrick, M., Baker, H. R., Murphy, A., & Baese-Berk, M. (2011). Interaction and representational integration: Evidence from speech errors. Cognition, 121(1), 58–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.05.006
  • Guenther, F. H. (2002). Neural control of speech movements. In A. Meyer, & N. Schiller (Eds.), Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production: Differences and similarities (pp. 209–240). Mouton de Gruyter.
  • Guenther, F. H. (2016). Neural control of speech. Mit Press.
  • Guenther, F. H., Ghosh, S. S., & Tourville, J. A. (2006). Neural modeling and imaging of the cortical interactions underlying syllable production. Brain and Language, 96(3), 280–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2005.06.001
  • Hassan, M., Benquet, P., Biraben, A., Berrou, C., Dufor, O., & Wendling, F. (2015). Dynamic reorganization of functional brain networks during picture naming. Cortex, 73, 276–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.08.019
  • Herman, A. B., Houde, J. F., Vinogradov, S., & Nagarajan, S. S. (2013). Parsing the phonological loop: Activation timing in the dorsal speech stream determines accuracy in speech reproduction. The Journal of Neuroscience, 33(13), 5439–5453. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1472-12.2013
  • Hickok, G. (2012). Computational neuroanatomy of speech production. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 13(2), 135–145. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3158
  • Indefrey, P. (2011). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components: A critical update. Language Sciences, 2, 255. http://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00255
  • Indefrey, P., & Levelt, W. J. M. (2004). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition, 92(1-2), 101–144. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2002.06.001
  • Jescheniak, J. D., & Levelt, W. J. (1994). Word frequency effects in speech production: Retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological form. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20(4), 824–843. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.20.4.824
  • Kawamoto, A. H., Liu, Q., Mura, K., & Sanchez, A. (2008). Articulatory preparation in the delayed naming task. Journal of Memory and Language, 58(2), 347–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2007.06.002
  • Kemmerer, D. (2019). From blueprints to brain maps: The status of the Lemma Model in cognitive neuroscience. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(9), 1085–1116. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2018.1537498
  • Laganaro, M., & Alario, F. X. (2006). On the locus of the syllable frequency effect in speech production. Journal of Memory and Language, 55(2), 178–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2006.05.001
  • Laganaro, M., & Perret, C. (2011). Comparing electrophysiological correlates of word production in immediate and delayed naming through the analysis of word age of acquisition effects. Brain Topography, 24(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-010-0162-x
  • Laganaro, M., Python, G., & Toepel, U. (2013). Dynamics of phonological-phonetic encoding in word production: Evidence from diverging ERPs between stroke patients and controls. Brain and Language, 126(2), 123–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2013.03.004
  • Levelt, W. (1989). Speaking: From intention to articulation. MIT Press.
  • Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1–75.
  • Liljeström, M., Kujala, J., Stevenson, C., & Salmelin, R. (2015). Dynamic reconfiguration of the language network preceding onset of speech in picture naming. Human Brain Mapping, 36(3), 1202–1216. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.22697
  • Maris, E., & Oostenveld, R. (2007). Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 164(1), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.03.024
  • Michel, C. M., & Koenig, T. (2018). EEG microstates as a tool for studying the temporal dynamics of whole-brain neuronal networks: A review. Neuroimage, 180, 577–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.11.062
  • Miozzo, M., Pulvermuller, F., & Hauk, O. (2015). Early parallel activation of semantics and phonology in picture naming: Evidence from a multiple linear regression MEG study. Cerebral Cortex, 25(10), 3343–3355. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhu137
  • Möller, J., Jansma, B. M., Rodriguez-Fornells, A., & Münte, T. F. (2007). What the brain does before the tongue slips. Cerebral Cortex, 17(5), 1173–1178. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhl028
  • Monaco, E., Pellet, P., & Laganaro, M. (2017). Facilitation and interference of phoneme repetition and phoneme similarity in speech production. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 32(5), 650–660. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2016.1257730
  • Munding, D., Dubarry, A.-S., & Alario, F.-X. (2016). On the cortical dynamics of word production: A review of the MEG evidence. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 31(4), 441–462. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2015.1071857
  • New, B., Pallier, C., Brysbaert, M., & Ferrand, L. (2004). Lexique 2 : A new French lexical database. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(3), 516–524. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195598
  • Nozari, N., & Pinet, S. (2020). A critical review of the behavioral, neuroimaging, and electrophysiological studies of co-activation of representations during word production. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 53, 100875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2019.100875
  • Parrell, B., Lammert, A. C., Ciccarelli, G., & Quatieri, T. F. (2019). Current models of speech motor control: A control-theoretic overview of architectures and properties. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 145(3), 1456–1481. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5092807
  • Pernet, C., Garrido, M. I., Gramfort, A., Maurits, N., Michel, C. M., Pang, E., … Puce, A. (2020). Issues and recommendations from the OHBM COBIDAS MEEG committee for reproducible EEG and MEG research. Nature Neuroscience, 23(12), 1473–1483. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-020-00709-0
  • Perret, C., & Bonin, P. (2019). Which variables should be controlled for to investigate picture naming in adults? A Bayesian meta-analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 51(6), 2533–2545. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-018-1100-1
  • Perrin, F., Pernier, J., Bertnard, O., Giard, M.-H., & Echallier, J. (1987). Mapping of scalp potentials by surface spline interpolation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 66(1), 75–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(87)90141-6
  • Savage, G. R., Bradley, D. C., & Forster, K. I. (1990). Word frequency and the pronunciation task: The contribution of articulatory fluency. Language and Cognitive Processes, 5(3), 203–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969008402105
  • Silva, A. B., Liu, J. R., Zhao, L., Levy, D. F., Scott, T. L., & Chang, E. F. (2022). A neurosurgical functional dissection of the middle precentral gyrus during speech production. The Journal of Neuroscience, 42(45), 8416–8426. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1614-22.2022
  • Strijkers, K., & Costa, A. (2011). Riding the lexical speedway: A critical review on the time course of lexical selection in speech production. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 356.
  • Strijkers, K., Costa, A., & Pulvermüller, F. (2017). The cortical dynamics of speaking: Lexical and phonological knowledge simultaneously recruit the frontal and temporal cortex within 200 ms. NeuroImage, 163, 206–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.09.041
  • Strijkers, K., Costa, A., & Thierry, G. (2010). Tracking lexical access in speech production: electrophysiological correlates of word frequency and cognate effects. Cerebral Cortex, 20(4), 912–928. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhp153
  • Tilsen, S., Spincemaille, P., Xu, B., Doerschuk, P., Luh, W.-M., Feldman, E., & Wang, Y. (2016). Anticipatory posturing of the vocal tract reveals dissociation of speech movement plans from linguistic units. PLoS One, 11(1), e0146813. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146813
  • Valente, A., Bürki, A., & Laganaro, M. (2014). ERP correlates of word production predictors in picture naming: A trial by trial multiple regression analysis from stimulus onset to response. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 8, 390. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2014.00390
  • Van der Merwe, A. (2008). A theoretical framework for the characterization of pathological speech sensorimotor control. In M. R. McNeil (Ed.), Clinical management of sensorimotor speech disorders ( 2nd ed., pp. 407–409). Thieme Medical Publishers.