Phonological impairments in Hindi aphasics: Error analyses and cross-linguistic comparisons

References

• Alderete, J., & Tupper, P. (2018). Phonological regularity, perceptual biases, and the role of phonotactics in speech error analysis. WIRESs Cognitive Science, 9(5), e1466. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altvater-Mackensen, N., & Fikkert, P. (2010). The acquisition of the stop-fricative contrast in perception and production. Lingua, 120, 1898–1909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, J., & Ewen, C. (1987). Principles of dependency phonology. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arsenault, P. E. (2012). Retroflex consonant harmony in South Asia [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Toronto.
   Google Scholar
• Ash, S., McMillan, C., Gunawardena, D., Avants, B., Morgan, B., Khan, A., Moore, P., Gee, J., & Grossman, M. (2010). Speech errors in progressive non-fluent aphasia. Brain and Language, 113(1), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2009.12.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auzou, P., Özsancak, C., Morris, R. J., Jan, M., Eustache, F., & Hannequin, D. (2000). Voice onset time in aphasia, apraxia of speech and dysarthria: A review. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 14(2), 131–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/026992000298878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, J. P., Hardie, A., McEnery, A. M., Cunningham, H., & Gaizauskas, R. (2002). EMILLE, a 67-million word corpus of Indic languages: Data collection, mark-up and harmonisation. In M. González Rodríguez & C. Paz Suarez Araujo (Eds.), Proceedings of 3rd Language Resources and Evaluation Conference (LREC). European Language Resources Association (ELRA).
   Google Scholar
• Bastiaanse, R., Gilbers, D. G., & Van der Linde, K. (1994). Sonority substitutions in Broca’s and conduction aphasia. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 8(4), 247–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckman, J. (1997). Positional faithfulness, positional neutralization, and Shona vowel harmony. Phonology, 14(1), 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675797003308
   Google Scholar
• Beland, R., Caplan, D., & Nespoulous, J.-L. (1990). The role of abstract phonological representations in word production: Evidence from phonemic paraphasias. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 5(2/3), 125–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/0911-6044(90)90009-N
   Google Scholar
• Beland, R., Paradis, C., & Bois, M. (1993). Constraints and repairs in aphasic speech: A group study. Canadian Journal of Linguistics, 38(2), 279–302. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000841310001478X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beveridge, M. E. L., & Bak, T. H. (2011). The languages of aphasia research: Bias and diversity. Aphasiology, 25(12), 1451–1468. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2011.624165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhatnagar, S. C., Jain, S. K., Bihari, M., Bansal, N. K., Pauranik, A., Jain, D. C., Bhatnagar, M. K., Meheshwari, M., Gupta, M., & Padma, M. (2002). Aphasia type and aging in Hindi-speaking stroke patients. Brain and Language, 83(2), 353–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00039-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blumstein, S. E. (1973a). Some phonological implications of aphasic speech. In H. Goodglass & S. Blumstein (Eds.), Psycholinguistics and aphasia (pp. 123–236). Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blumstein, S. E. (1973b). A phonological investigation of aphasic speech. Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Blumstein, S. E. (1978). Segment structure and the syllable in aphasia. In A. Bell & J. B. Hooper (Eds.), Syllables and segments (pp. 189–200). North-Holland.
   Google Scholar
• Blumstein, S. E. (2001). Deficits of speech and speech perception in aphasia. In R. S. Berndt (Ed.), Handbook of neuropsychology (2nd ed., Vol. 3, pp. 95–113). Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Bohra, V., Khwaja, G. A., Jain, S., Duggal, A., Ghuge, V. V., & Srivastava, A. (2015). Clinicoanatomical correlation in stroke related aphasia. Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology, 18(4), 424–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boomer, D. S., & Laver, J. D. M. (1968). Slips of the tongue. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 3(1), 2–12. https://doi.org/10.3109/13682826809011435
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Browman, C. P., & Goldstein, L. M. (1992). “Targetless” schwa: An articulatory analysis. In G. Docherty & D. R. Ladd (Eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology II: Gesture, segment, prosody (pp. 26–67). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buchwald, A. (2009). Minimizing and optimizing structure in phonology: Evidence from aphasia. Lingua. International Review of General Linguistics. Revue Internationale De Linguistique Generale, 119(10), 1380–1395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.11.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchwald, A., & Miozzo, M. (2012). Phonological and motor errors in individuals with acquired sound production impairment. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 55(5), S1573–S1586. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0200)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchwald, A., & Rapp, B. (2006). Consonants and vowels in orthographic representations. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23(2), 308–337. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290442000527
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchwald, A. B., Rapp, B., & Stone, M. (2007). Insertion of discrete phonological units: An articulatory and acoustic investigation of aphasic speech. Language and Cognitive Processes, 22(6), 910–948. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960701273532
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckingham, H., & Kertesz, A. (1974). A linguistic analysis of fluent aphasia. Brain and Language, 1(1), 43–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(74)90025-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckingham, H. W. (1986). The scan-copier mechanisms and the positional level of language production: Evidence from phonemic paraphasia. Cognitive Science, 10, 195–217.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckingham, H. W. (1990). Abstruse neologisms, retrieval deficits and the random generator. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 5(2–3), 215–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/0911-6044(90)90012-N
   Google Scholar
• Butterworth, B., & Whittaker, S. (1980). Peggy Babcock’s relatives. Advances in Psychology, 1, 647–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61976-7
   Google Scholar
• Cairns, C., & Feinstein, M. (1982). Markedness and the theory of syllable structure. Linguistic Inquiry, 13, 193–226.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canter, G. J., Trost, J. E., & Burns, M. S. (1985). Contrasting speech patterns in apraxia of speech and phonemic paraphasia. Brain and Language, 24(2), 204–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(85)90131-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A., Chialant, D., Capasso, R., & Miceli, G. (2000). Separable processing of consonants and vowels. Nature, 403(6768), 428–430. https://doi.org/10.1038/35000206
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardona, G., & Jain, D. K. (2003). The Indo-Aryan languages. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cera, M. L., & Ortiz, K. Z. (2010). Phonological analysis of substitution errors of patients with apraxia of speech. Dementia and Neuropsychologia, 4(1), 58–62. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-57642010DN40100010
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chang, C., Cathcart, C., Hall, D., & Garrett, A. (2015). Ancestry-constrained phylogenetic analysis supports the Indo-European steppe hypothesis. Language, 91(1), 194–244. https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2015.0005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christman, S. S. (1992). Uncovering phonological regularity in neologisms: Contributions of sonority theory. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 6(3), 219–247. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699209208985532
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christman, S. S. (1994). Target-related neologism formation in jargonaphasia. Brain and Language, 46(1), 109–128. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1994.1007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clements, G. N. (1990). The role of the sonority cycle in core syllabification. In J. Kingston & M. Beckman (Eds.), Papers in laboratory phonology I: Between the grammar and physics of speech (pp. 282–333). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clements, G. N., & Keyser, S. J. (1983). CV phonology (Linguistic Inquiries Monograph Series, No.9). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cuetos, F., Aguado, G., Izura, C., & Ellis, A. W. (2002). Aphasic naming in Spanish: Predictors and errors. Brain and Language, 82(3), 344–365. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00038-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler, A. (1982). The reliability of speech error data. In A. Cutler (Ed.), Slips of the tongue and language production (pp. 7–28). Walter de Gruyter/Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Darley, F. L., Aronson, A. E., & Brown, J. R. (1975). Motor speech disorders. W. B. Sauders Company.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, L. (2005). Addressing phonological questions with ultrasound. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 19(6/7), 619–633. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699200500114077
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, L., Jusczyk, P., & Smolensky, P. (2003). The initial and final states: Theoretical implications and explorations of richness of the base. In R. Kager, W. Zonnevelf, & J. Pater (Eds.), Fixing priorities: Constraints in phonological acquisition (pp. 321–368). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Deger, K., & Ziegler, W. (2002). Speech motor programming in apraxia of speech. Journal of Phonetics, 30(3), 321–335. https://doi.org/10.1006/jpho.2001.0163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Lacy, P. (2006). Markedness: Reduction and preservation in phonology. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S., Juliano, C., & Govindjee, A. (1993). Structure and content in language production: A theory of frame constraints in phonological speech errors. Cognitive Science, 17(2), 149–195. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1702_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Den Ouden, D., & Bastiaanse, R. (2003). Syllable structure at different levels in the speech production process: Evidence from aphasia. In J. van de Weijer, V. J. van Heuven, & H. van der Hulst (Eds.), The phonological spectrum volume II: Suprasegmental structure (pp. 81–110). John Benjamins Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Den Ouden, D.-B. (2002). Segmental vs syllable markedness: Deletion errors in the paraphasias of fluent and non-fluent aphasics. In E. Fava (Ed.), Current issues in linguistic theory (Vol. 227, pp. 23–45). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.227.05oud
   Google Scholar
• Dronkers, N. E. (1996). A new brain region for coordinating speech articulation. Nature, 384(6605), 159–161. https://doi.org/10.1038/384159a0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupoux, E., Kakehi, K., Hirose, Y., Pallier, C., & Mehler, J. (1999). Epenthetic vowels in Japanese: A perceptual illusion? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25(6), 1568–1578. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.25.6.1568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faber, F., & Best, C. T. (1994). The perceptual infrastructure of early phonological development. In S. D. Lima, R. L. Corrigan, & G. K. Iverson (Eds.), The reality of linguistic rules (pp. 261–280). Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Feyereisen, P., Van der Borght, F., & Seron, X. (1988). The operativity effect in naming: A reanalysis. Neuropsychologia, 26(3), 401–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(88)90094-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischler, I. (2000). Attention, resource allocation, and language. In S. E. Nadeau, B. A. Crosson, & L. Gonzalez-Rothi (Eds.), Aphasia and language: Theory to practice (pp. 348–371). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fossett, T. R. D., & McNeil, M. R. (2007). Effects of speech rate on phonological sequencing errors in aphasia. Brain and Language, 103(1–2), 118–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2007.07.073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fromkin, V. (1973). Introduction. In V. Fromkin (Ed.), Speech errors as linguistic evidence (pp. 13). Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Fromkin, V. A. (1971). The non-anomalous nature of anomalous utterances. Language, 47(1), 27–52. https://doi.org/10.2307/412187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galluzzi, C., Bureca, I., Guariglia, C., & Romani, C. (2015). Phonological simplifications, apraxia of speech and the interaction between phonological and phonetic processing. Neuropsychologia, 71, 64–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.03.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrett, M. F. (1980). Levels of processing in sentence production. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production (pp. 177–220). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Giang, T. (2007). Cross-linguistic analysis of Vietnamese and English with implications for Vietnamese language acquisition and maintenance in the United States. Journal of Southeast Asian American Education and Advancement, 2(1), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.7771/2153-8999.1085
   Google Scholar
• Godbold, C., Robson, H., & Bose, A. (2013). Patterns of phonological overlap between non-word and target in jargon aphasia. Procedia – Social and Behavioural Sciences, 94, 28–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.011
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, E., & Obler, L. K. (1997). Affixational morphology in jargon aphasia. Academy of Aphasia.
   Google Scholar
• Goldrick, M. (2004). Phonological features and phonotactic constraints in speech production. Journal of Memory and Language, 51(4), 586–603.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldrick, M., & Rapp, B. (2007). Lexical and post-lexical phonological representations in spoken production. Cognition, 102(2), 219–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2005.12.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldsmith, J. (1990). Autosegmental and metrical phonology. Basil Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J. H. (1978). Some generalizations concerning initial and final consonant clusters. In J. H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of human language. Volume 2: Phonology (pp. 243–279). Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, J. H. (2005). Language universals: With special reference to feature hierarchies. Mouton de Gruyter. (Original work published 1966).
   Google Scholar
• Hamann, S. R. (2003). The phonetics and phonology of retroflexes [Doctoral dissertation]. Utrecht University.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, B. (1989). Compensatory lengthening in moraic phonology. Linguistic Inquiry, 20, 253–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillis, A. E., Work, M., Barker, P. B., Jacobs, M. A., Breese, E. L., & Maurer, K. (2004). Re-examining the brain regions crucial for orchestrating speech articulation. Brain, 127(7), 1479–1487. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awh172
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger, J. J. (1992). “Not by the chair of my hinny hin hin”: Some general properties of slips of the tongue in young children. Journal of Child Language, 19(2), 335–366. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900011442
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabak, B., & Idsardi, W. J. (2007). Perceptual distortions in the adaptation of English consonant clusters: Syllable structure or consonantal contact constraints? Language and Speech, 50(1), 23–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309070500010201
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kachru, Y. (2006). Hindi. John Benjamins B. V.
   Google Scholar
• Kasturi, V. J., & Goswami, S. P. (2020). Man with machine or man versus machine? Insights from technology-based rehabilitation in persons with aphasia. In S. K. Gupta (Ed.), Telerehabilitation in communication disorders and mental health (pp. 183–202). Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kaur, H., Bajpai, S., Pershad, D., Sreenivas, V., & Nehra, A. (2017). Development and standardization of Indian aphasia battery. Journal of Mental Health and Human Behaviour, 22(2), 116–122.
   Google Scholar
• Kaur, H., Chopra, S., Pandey, R. M., Bhatia, R., & Nehra, A. (2017). Translation and adaptation of stroke aphasia depression questionnaire-10 to Hindi. Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology, 20(2), 153–155. https://doi.org/10.4103/aian.AIAN_456_16
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaye, J., & Lowenstamm, J. (1981). Syllable structure and markedness theory. In A. Belletti, L. Brandi, & L. Rizzi (Eds.), Theory of markedness in generative grammar (pp. 287–315). Pacini Editore.
   Google Scholar
• Kenstowicz, M. (1994). Phonology in generative grammar. Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Klich, R. J., Ireland, J. V., & Weidner, W. E. (1979). Articulatory and phonological aspects of consonant substitutions in apraxia of speech. Cortex, 15(3), 451–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(79)80070-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohn, S. E. (1984). The nature of the phonological disorder in conduction aphasia. Brain and Language, 23(1), 97–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(84)90009-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar, S., & Goswami, S. P. (2013). Development of syntax comprehension test in Hindi language for persons with aphasia. Language in India, 13(8), 346–360.
   Google Scholar
• Ladefoged, P., & Bhaskararao, P. (1983). Non-quantal aspects of consonant production: A study of retroflex consonants. Journal of Phonetics, 11(3), 291–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0095-4470(19)30828-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladefoged, P., & Maddieson, I. (1996). The sounds of the world’s languages. Blackwell Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J. M., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 1–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locke, J. L. (1983). Phonological acquisition and change. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lombardi, L. (2002). Coronal epenthesis and markedness. Phonology, 19(2), 219–251. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675702004323
   Google Scholar
• MacKay, D. (1970). Spoonerisms: The structure of errors in the serial order of speech. Neuropsychologia, 8, 325–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maddieson, I. (1984). Patterns of sounds. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marquardt, T. P., Reinhart, J. B., & Peterson, H. A. (1979). Markedness analysis of phonemic substitution errors in apraxia of speech. Journal of Communication Disorders, 12(6), 481–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9924(79)90011-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, N., Saffran, E. M., & Dell, G. S. (1996). Recovery in deep dysphasia: Evidence for a relation between auditory verbal STM and lexical errors in repetition. Brain and Language, 52(1), 83–113. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1996.0005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masica, C. P. (1991). The Indo-Aryan languages. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Menn, L. (1983). Development of articulatory, phonetic and phonological capabilities. In B. Butterworth (Ed.), Language production (pp. 168–214). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, A. S. (1992). Investigation of phonological encoding through speech error analyses: Achievements, limitations, and alternatives. Cognition, 42(1–3), 181–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277(92)90043-H
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, H. E., & Guenther, F. H. (2021). Modelling speech motor programming and apraxia of speech in the DIVA/GODIVA neurocomputational framework. Aphasiology, 35(4), 424–441. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2020.1765307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitra, I. H., & Krishnan, G. (2015). Adaptation and validation of stroke-aphasia quality of life (SAQOL-39) scale to Hindi. Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology, 18(1), 29–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nespoulous, J., Joannette, Y., Beland, R., Caplan, D., & Lecours, A. R. (1984). Phonological disturbances in Aphasia: Is there a Markedness effect?. In F. C. Rose (Ed.), Advances in neurology vol. 42: Progress in aphasiology (pp. 203–214). Raven Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nespoulous, J. L., Joanette, Y., Ska, B., Caplan, D., & Lecours, A. R. (1987). Production deficits in Broca’s and conduction aphasia: Repetition versus reading. In E. Keller & M. Gopnik (Eds.), Motor sensory processes of language (pp. 53–81). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Odell, K., McNeil, M., Rosenbek, J. C., & Hunter, L. (1990). Perceptual characteristics of consonant production by apraxic speakers. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 55(2), 345–359. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshd.5502.345
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ohala, M. (1999). Hindi. In Handbook of the international phonetic association (pp. 100–103). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paradis, C., & Prunet, J. (1991). The special status of coronals: Internal and external evidence. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peach, R., & Tonkovich, J. (2004). Phonemic characteristics of apraxia of speech resulting from subcortical hemorrhage. Journal of Communication Disorders, 37(1), 77–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2003.08.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Platt, L. J., Andrews, G., & Howie, P. M. (1980). Dysarthria of adult cerebral palsy. II. Phonemic analysis of articulatory errors. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 23, 41–55.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Prince, A., & Smolensky, P. (1993). Optimality theory: Constraint interaction in generative grammar (Technical Report #2 of the Rutgers Centre for Cognitive Science). Rutgers University.
   Google Scholar
• Prince, T. (2016). On the Jakobson’s postulate: The notion of markedness. A case study of French phonology of aphasia and acquisition. AISV, 1, 235–254. https://doi.org/10.17469/O21011AISV000015
   Google Scholar
• Ramoo, D., Olson, A., & Romani, C. (2021a). Repeated attempts, phonetic errors, and syllabifications in a case study: Evidence of impaired transfer from phonology to articulatory planning. Aphasiology, 35(4), 485–517. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2021.1881349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramoo, D., Romani, C., & Olson, A. (2021b). Lexeme and speech syllables in English and Hindi: A case for syllable structure. In J. Lowe & G. Sharma (Eds.), Trends in south Asian linguistics (pp. 415–462). Mouton De Gruyter. http://doi.org/10.1515/9783110753066-016
   Google Scholar
• Red, D. (1995). Learning to read Hindi. In V. Gambhir (Ed.), The teaching and acquisition of South Asian languages (pp. 97–107). University of Philadelphia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, K. (1999). Featural markedness in phonology: Variation. Part I. GLOT, 4(7), 3–6.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, K. (2017). Dependencies in phonology: Hierarchies and variation. In N. J. Enfield (Ed.), Dependencies in language (pp. 159–171). Language Science Press. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.573786
   Google Scholar
• Romani, C., & Calabrese, A. (1998). Syllabic constraints in the phonological errors of an aphasic patient. Brain and Language, 64(1), 83–121. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1998.1958
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romani, C., & Galluzzi, C. (2005). Effects of syllabic complexity in predicting accuracy of repetition and direction of errors in patients with articulatory and phonological difficulties. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(7), 817–850. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290442000365
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romani, C., Galluzzi, C., Bureca, I., & Olson, A. (2011). Effects of syllable structure in aphasic errors: Implications for a new model of speech production. Cognitive Psychology, 62(2), 151–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.08.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romani, C., Galluzzi, C., & Olson, A. (2011). Phonological lexical activation: A lexical component or an output buffer? Evidence from aphasic errors. Cortex, 47(2), 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2009.11.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romani, C., Galuzzi, C., Guariglia, C., & Goslin, J. (2017). Comparing phoneme frequency, age of acquisition, and loss in aphasia: Implications for phonological universals. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 34(7–8), 449–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2017.1369942
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romani, C., Grana’, A., & Semenza, C. (1996). More errors on vowels than on consonants: An unusual case of conduction aphasia. Brain and Language, 55, 144–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romani, C., Olson, A., Semenza, C., & Granà, A. (2002). Patterns of phonological errors as a function of a phonological versus an articulatory locus of impairment. Cortex, 38(4), 541–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70022-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romani, C., Silverstein, P., Ramoo, D., & Olson, A. (2022). Effects of delay, length, and frequency on onset RTs and word durations: Articulatory planning uses flexible units but cannot be prepared. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 39(3-4), 170–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2022.2070425
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, M. C. (1989). A primer in modern standard Hindi. Motilal Banarsidass.
   Google Scholar
• Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (1983). Sublexical units and suprasegmental structure in speech production planning. In P. MacNeilage (Ed.), The production of speech (pp. 109–136). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (1986). The representation of phonological information during speech production planning: Evidence from vowel errors in spontaneous speech. Phonology Yearbook, 3, 117–149. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675700000609
   Google Scholar
• Shattuck-Hufnagel, S. (1987). The role of word onset consonants in speech production planning: New evidence from speech error patterns. In E. Keller & M. Gopnik (Eds.), Motor and sensory processing in language (pp. 17–51). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Shewan, C. M., Leeper, H. A., Jr., & Booth, J. C. (1984). An analysis of voice onset time (VOT) in aphasic and normal subjects. In J. C. Rosenbek, M. R. McNeil, & A. E. Aronson (Eds.), Apraxia of speech: Physiology, acoustics, linguistics, management (pp. 197–220). College-Hill Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sidiropoulos, K., de Bleser, R., Ackermann, H., & Preilowski, B. (2008). Pre-lexical disorders in repetition conduction aphasia. Neuropsychologia, 46(14), 3225–3238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.07.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stemberger, J. P. (1985b). The reliability and replicability of speech error data: A comparison with experimentally induced errors (Progress Report No. 11). Indiana University, Research on Speech Perception.
   Google Scholar
• Stemberger, J. P. (1989). Speech errors in early child language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 28(2), 164–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(89)90042-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steriade, D. (2001). Directional asymmetries in place assimilation: A perceptual account. In E. Hume & K. Johnson (Eds.), The role of speech perception in phonology (pp. 219–250). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vaid, J., & Pandit, R. (1991). Sentence interpretation in normal and aphasic Hindi speakers. Brain and Language, 41(2), 250–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(91)90155-T
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venkatesh, M., Edwards, S., & Saddy, J. D. (2012). Production and comprehension of English and Hindi in multilingual transcortical aphasia. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 25(6), 615–629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2011.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verma, A., Sikarwar, V., Yadav, H., Jaganathan, R., & Kumar, P. (2022). Shabd: A psycholinguistic database for Hindi. Behavioral Research, 54(2), 830–844. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01625-2
   Google Scholar
• Vousden, J. I., Brown, G. D. A., & Harley, T. A. (2000). Serial control of phonology in speech production: A hierarchical model. Cognitive Psychology, 41(2), 101–175. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.2000.0739
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, J., & Romani, C. (2000). Consonant–vowel encoding and ortho-syllables in a case of acquired dysgraphia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17(7), 641–663. https://doi.org/10.1080/026432900750002208
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren, H. (1986). Slips of the tongue in very young children. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 15(4), 309–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067677
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wijnen, F. (1992). Incidental word and sound errors in young speakers. Journal of Memory and Language, 31(6), 734–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(92)90037-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilshire, C. (2002). Where do aphasic phonological errors come from? Evidence from phoneme movement errors in picture naming. Aphasiology, 16(1–2), 169–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687040143000528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, C. (2001). Consonant cluster neutralization and targeted constraints. Phonology, 18(1), 147–197. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0952675701004043
   Google Scholar
• Wolk, L. (1986). Markedness analysis of consonant error production in apraxia of speech. Journal of Communication Disorders, 19(2), 133–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/0021-9924(86)90016-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Data. (2023). Hindi speaking countries. Retrieved November 12, 2023, from https://www.worlddata.info/languages/hindi.php
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler, W., Aichert, I., & Staiger, A. (2012). Apraxia of speech: Concepts and controversies. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55(S1), 485–501.
   Google Scholar