Complementing the mainstream: an exploration of partnership work between complementary alternative provisions and mainstream schools

References

• Apple, M. W. (2006). Educating the ‘right’ way: Markets, standards, god and inequality (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Araújo, M. (2005). Disrupt ive or disrupt ed ? A qualitative study on the construction of indiscipline. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 9, 241–268.10.1080/09596410500059730
   Google Scholar
• Barker, J., Alldred, P., Watts, M., & Dodman, H. (2010). Pupils or prisoners? Institutional geographies and internal exclusion in UK sexondary schools. Area, 42, 378–386.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blyth, E., & Milner, J. (1993). Exclusion from school: A first step in exclusion from society. Children & Society, 7, 255–268.
   Google Scholar
• Cable, K. E., Plucker, J. A., & Spradlin, T. E. (2009). Alternative schools: What’s in a name? Centre for Evaluation and Education Policy, 7(4), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, P. (2008). Nurturing attachment to school: Contemporary perspectives on social, emotional and behavioural difficulties. Pastoral Care in Education, 26, 13–22.10.1080/02643940701848570
   Google Scholar
• DfE. (2013). Alternative provision statutory guidance for local authorities. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Glennerster, H. (1991). Quasi-markets for education? The Economic Journal, 101, 1268–1276.10.2307/2234442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, B., Vincent, K., Thomson, P., & Toalster, R. (2006). Does every child know they matter? Pupils’ views of one alternative to exclusion. Pastoral Care in Education, 24, 28–38.
   Google Scholar
• Heinrich, R. S. (2005). Expansion of an alternative school typology. The Journal of At-Risk Issues, 11, 25–37.
   Google Scholar
• McGregor, G., & Mills, M. (2012). Alternative education sites and marginalised young people: ‘I wish there were more schools like this one’. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 16, 843–862.10.1080/13603116.2010.529467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McInerney, P. (2009). Toward a critical pedagogy of engagement for alienated youth: Insights from Freire and school-based research. Critical Studies in Education, 50, 23–35.10.1080/17508480802526637
   Google Scholar
• Menzies, L., & Baars, S. (2015). The alternative should not be inferior: What now for pushed out learners?. LKMco.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, M., Riddell, S., & Hjörne, E. (2015). After exclusion what? International Journal of Inclusive Education, 19, 561–567.10.1080/13603116.2014.961674
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ofsted. (2014). Alternative provision: A report on the findings from the first year of a three-year survey. London: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, C. (2005). School exclusion: The will to punish. British Journal of Educational Studies, 53, 187–211.10.1111/j.1467-8527.2005.00290.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennacchia, J., Thomson, P., Mills, M., & McGregor, G. (2016). Alternative programmes, alternative schools and social justice. Critical Studies in Education, 57(1), 1–5.10.1080/17508487.2015.1132972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pink, W. T. (2012). Reforming schools for marginalized youth: Rethinking both theory and practice. In W. T. Pink (Ed.), Schools for marginalized youth: An international perspective (pp. 3–28). New York, NY: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reay, D. (2012). What would a socially just education system look like?: Saving the minnows from the pike. Journal of Education Policy, 27, 587–599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaughnessy, J. (2012). The challenge for English schools in responding to current debates on behaviour and violence. Pastoral Care in Education, 30, 87–97.10.1080/02643944.2012.679954
   Google Scholar
• Slee, R. (2011). The irregular school: Exclusion, schooling and inclusive education. Oxon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. (2012). Improving alternative provision. London: Department for Education.
   Google Scholar
• te Riele, K. (2012). Negotiating risk and hope: A case study of alternative education for marginalized youth. In W. T. Pink (Ed.), Schools for marginalized youth: An international perspective (pp. 31–79). New York, NY: Hampton Press.
   Google Scholar
• The Children’s Society. (2014). The 2014 report on children’s well-being. Nottingham: Author.
   Google Scholar
• The Institute of Education & National Foundation for Educational Research (IoE&NFER). (2014). School exclusion trial evaluation. London: Department for Education.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, P. (2014). Literature review: ‘What’s the alternative? Effective support for young people disengaging from the mainstream’. London: The Prince’s Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, P., McQuade, V., & Rochford, K. (2005). ‘My little special house’: Re-forming the risky geographies of middle school girls at Clifftop College. In G. Lloyd (Ed.), Problem girls: Working with troubled and troublesome young women (pp. 172–189). London: Routledge Falmer.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, P., & Pennacchia, J. (2014). Final report: What’s the alternative? Effective support for young people disengaging from mainstream education. London: The Prince’s Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, P., & Pennacchia, J. (2015). Hugs and behaviour points: Alternative education and the regulation of ‘excluded’ youth. International Journal of Inclusive Education. doi:10.1080/13603116.2015.1102340
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, P., & Russell, L. (2007). Mapping the alternatives to permanent exclusion. Joseph Rowntree Foundation. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, S. (2013). Pupil vulnerability and school exclusion: Developing responsive pastoral policies and practices in secondary education in the UK. Pastoral Care in Education, 31, 279–291.10.1080/02643944.2013.842312
   Google Scholar