References
- Benzies , K.M. , Premji , S. , Hayden , K.A. and Serrett , K. 2006 . State-of-the-evidence reviews: Advantages and challenges of including grey literature . Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing , 3 ( 2 ) : 55 – 61 .
- Brealey , S.D. , Hewitt , C. , Green , J.M. , Morrell , J. and Gilbody , S. 2010 . Screening for postnatal depression: Is it acceptable to women and healthcare professionals? A systematic review and meta-synthesis . Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology , 28 : 328 – 344 .
- Cochrane , A.L. 1989 . “ Foreword ” . In Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth , Edited by: Chalmers , I. , Enkin , M. and Keirse , M.J.N.C. Oxford : Oxford University Press .
- Harden , A. and Thomas , J. 2005 . Methodological issues in combining diverse study types in systematic reviews . International Journal of Social Research Methodology , 8 : 257 – 271 .
- Harris , J.M. , Franck , L. and Michie , S. 2012 . Assessing the psychological effects of prenatal screening tests for maternal and foetal conditions: A systematic review . Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology , 30 : 222 – 246 .
- Higgins, J.P.T., & Altman, D.G. (2011). Assessing risk of bias in included studies. Chapter 8 in J.P.T. Higgins & S. Green (Eds.), Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, Available: http://www.cochrane-handbook.org/ [accessed 6 November 2012].
- Higgins, J.P.T., & Green, S. (eds.) (2011). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
- Liberati , A. , Altman , D.G. , Tetzlaff , J. , Mulrow , C. , Gøtzsche , P.C. Ioannidis , J.P.A. 2009 . The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration . British Medical Journal , 339 : b2700
- Moher , D. , Cook , D.J. , Eastwood , S. , Olkin , I. Rennie , D. 1999 . Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: The QUOROM statement. Quality of reporting of meta-analyses . Lancet , 354 : 1896 – 1900 .
- Moher , D. , Tetzlaff , J. , Tricco , A.C. , Sampson , M. and Altman , D.G. 2007 . Epidemiology and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews . PLoS Med , 4 ( 3 ) : e78
- Savoie , I. , Helmer , D. , Green , C.J. and Kazanjian , A. 2003 . Beyond Medline: Reducing bias through extended systematic review search . International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , 19 ( 1 ) : 168 – 178 .