We wanted to choose us: how embryo donors choose recipients for their surplus embryos

References

• Advisory Committee on Assisted Reproductive Technology (ACART). (2008). Guidelines on embryo donation for reproductive purposes. Retrieved from www.acart.health.govt.nz/publications-and-resources/guidelines-and-advice-issued-ecart/guidelines-embryo-donation
   Google Scholar
• Advisory Committee on Assisted Reproductive Technology (ACART). (2016). Annual Report 2014/15. Retrieved from www.acart.health.govt.nz/annual-report-2014-15
   Google Scholar
• Advisory Committee on Assisted Reproductive Technology (ACART). (2017). Proposed donation guidelines: For family gamete donation, embryo donation, use of donated eggs with donated sperm and surrogacy. Retrieved from https://acart.health.govt.nz/consultations
   Google Scholar
• Allan, S. (2010). Submission to the senate committee inquiry into donor conception, access to genetic information and donor identification. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30034784
   Google Scholar
• American Society for Reproductive Medicine (ASRM). (2013). Recommendations for gamete and embryo donation: A committee opinion. Fertility and Sterility, 99, 47–63. Retrieved from https://doi-org.ezproxy.aut.ac.nz/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.09.037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appleby, J., Blake, L., & Freeman, T. (2012). Is disclosure in the best interests of children conceived by donation? In M. Richards, G. Pennings, & J. B. Appleby (Eds.), Reproductive donation: Practice, policy and bioethics (pp. 231–249). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139026390
   Google Scholar
• Blyth, E. (2012). Genes r us? Making sense of genetic and non-genetic kinship relationships following anonymous sperm donation. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 24(7), 719–726. Retrieved from https://doi-org.ezproxy.aut.ac.nz/10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.02.01010.1016/j.rbmo.2012.02.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blyth, E., Frith, L., Paul, M., & Berger, R. (2011). Embryo relinquishment for family building: How should it be conceptualised? Internal Journal of Law and the Family, 25(2), 260–285. Retrieved from https://doi-org.ezproxy.aut.ac.nz/10.1093/lawfam/ebr00310.1093/lawfam/ebr003
   Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Collard, C., & Kashmeri, S. (2011). Embryo adoption: Emergent forms of siblingship among Snowflakes® families. Amercian Ethnologist, 38(2), 307–322. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1425.2011.01308.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawshaw, M., Adams, D., Allan, S., Blyth, E., Bourne, K., Brugge, C., … Zweifel, J. (2017). Disclosure and donor-conceived children. Human Reproduction, 32(7), 1535–1536.10.1093/humrep/dex107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawshaw, M., Gunter, C., Tidy, C., & Atherton, F. (2013). Working with previously anonymous gamete donors and donor-conceived adults: Recent practice experiences of running the DNA-based voluntary information exchange and contact register, UKDonorLink. Human Fertility, 16(1), 26–30. doi:10.3109/14647273.2012.731714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels, K. (2004). New Zealand: From secrecy and shame to openness and acceptance. In E. Blyth & R. Landau (Eds.), Third party assisted conception across cultures: Social, legal and ethical perspectives (pp. 148–167). London, England: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Daniels, K., Grace, V., & Gillett, W. (2011). Factors associated with parents’ decisions to tell their adult offspring about the offspring’s donor conception. Human Reproduction, 26(10), 2783–2790. Retrieved from https://doi-org.ezproxy.aut.ac.nz/10.1093/humrep/der24710.1093/humrep/der247
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daniels, K., Kramer, W., & Perez-y-Perez, M. (2012). Semen donors who are open to contact with their offspring: Issues and implications for them and their families. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 25(7), 670–677. Retrieved from https://doi-org.ezproxy.aut.ac.nz/10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.09.00910.1016/j.rbmo.2012.09.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Lacey, S. (2007). Decisions for the fate of frozen embryos: Fresh insights into patients’ thinking and their rationales for donating or discarding embryos. Human Reproduction, 22(6), 1751–1758. doi:10.1093/humrep/dem05610.1093/humrep/dem056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Lacey, S., Peterson, K., & McMillan, J. (2015). Child interests in assisted reproductive technology: How is the welfare principle applied in practice? Human Reproduction, 30(3), 616–624. doi:10.1093/humrep/deu343
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Lacey, S., Rogers, W., & Richards, B. (2010). Directed embryo donation: Free choice or discrimination? Journal of Law and Medicne, 18, 169–177.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Frith, L., & Blyth, E. (2013). They can't have my embryo: The ethics of conditional embryo donation. Bioethics, 27(6), 317–324. doi:10.1111/bioe.12034
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frith, L., Blyth, E., & Lui, S. (2017). Family building using embryo adoption: Relationships and contact arrangements between provider and recipient families – a mixed-methods study. Human Reproduction, 32(5), 1092–1099. Retrieved from https://doi-org.ezproxy.aut.ac.nz/10.1093/humrep/dex04810.1093/humrep/dex048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frith, L., Blyth, E., Paul, M., & Berger, R. (2011). Conditional embryo relinquishment: Choosing to relinquish embryos for family-building through a Christian embryo 'adoption' programme. Human Reproduction, 26(12), 3327–3338. doi:10.1093/humrep/der313
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuscaldo, G., Russell, S., & Gillam, L. (2007). How to facilitate decisions about surplus embryos: Patients' views. Human Reproduction, 22(12), 3129–3138. doi:10.1093/humrep/dem325
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Ruiz, Y., & Guerra-Diaz, D. (2012). Gamete and embryo donation: A legal view from Spain. In M. Richards, G. Pennings, & J. Appleby (Eds.), Reproductive donation: Practice, policy and bioethics (pp. 112–129). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139026390
   Google Scholar
• Gibbs, A., & Scherman, R. (2013). Pathways to parenting in New Zealand: Issues in law, policy and practice. Kōtuitui: NZ J Soc Sci Online, 8, 13–26. doi:10.1080/1177083X.2013.821077
   Google Scholar
• Goedeke, S. (2014). Understandings and experiences of embryo donation in the New Zealand context ( Unpublished PhD thesis). AUT University, Auckland.
   Google Scholar
• Goedeke, S., & Daniels, K. (2017). Embryo donation or embryo adoption? Practice and policy in the New Zealand context. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 31(1), 1–19. doi:10.1093/lawfam/ebw015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goedeke, S., Daniels, K., & Thorpe, M. (2016). Embryo donation and counselling for the welfare of donors, recipients, their families and children. Human Reproduction, 31, 4-12–4-17. doi:10.1093/humrep/dev304 ( Impact factor 4.569)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goedeke, S., Daniels, K., Thorpe, M., & Du Preez. (2015). Building extended families through embryo donation: The experiences of donors and recipients. Human Reproduction, 30(10), 2340–2350. doi:10.1093/humrep/dev189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammarberg, K., Johnson, L., & Petrillo, T. (2011). Gamete and embryo donation and surrogacy in Australia: The social context and regulatory framework. Internal Journal of Fertility and Sterility, 4, 176–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Human Assisted Reproductive Technology Act. 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Jadva, V., Freeman, T., Kramer, W., & Golombok, S. (2011). Sperm and oocyte donors’ experiences of anonymous donation and subsequent contact with their donor offspring. Human Reproduction, 26(3), 638–645.doi:10.1093/humrep/deq364
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karnein, A. (2012). Parenthood – whose right is it anyway? In M. Richards, G. Pennings, & J. B. Appleby (Eds.), Reproductive donation: Practice, policy and bioethics (pp. 51–69). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139026390
   Google Scholar
• MacCallum, F., Golombok, S., & Brinsden, P. R. (2007). Parenting and child development in families with a child conceived through embryo donation. Journal of Family Psychology, 21(2), 278–287. doi:10.1037/0893-3200.21.2.278
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCallum, F., & Keeley, S. (2008). Embryo donation families: A follow-up in middle childhood. Journal of Family Psychology, 22(6), 799–808. doi:10.1037/a0013197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacCallum, F., & Keeley, S. (2012). Disclosure patterns of embryo donation mothers compared with adoption and IVF. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 24(7), 745–748. doi:10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.01.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahon, C., & Saunders, D. (2007). Attitudes of couples with stored frozen embryos toward conditional embryo donation. Fertility & Sterility, 91, 140–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• New Zealand Law Commission. (2005). New issues in legal parenthood. Wellington, NZ. Retrieved from http://www.lawcom.govt.nz/our-projects/status-parenthood?id=867
   Google Scholar
• New Zealand Ministry of Justice. (2006). Government response to Law Commission report on new issues in legal parenthood. Retrieved from https://www.parliament.nz/en/pb/papers-presented/current-papers/document/48DBHOH_PAP13253_1/government-response-to-law-commission-report-on-new-issues
   Google Scholar
• O’Halloran, K. (2015). The polictics of adoption: International perspectives on law, policy and practice (3rd ed.). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Palacios, J., & Brodzinsky, D. M. (2010). Review: Adoption research. Trends, topics, outcomes. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 34(3), 270–284. doi:10.1177/0165025410362837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, M., Berger, R., Blyth, E., & Frith, L. (2010). Relinquishing frozen embryos for conception by infertile couples. Families, Systems & Health, 28(3), 258–273. Retrieved from http://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a002000210.1037/a0020002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennings, G. (2017). Disclosure of donor conception, age of disclousre and the well-beoing of donor offspring. Human Reproduction, 32(5), 969–973.doi:10.1093/humrep/dex056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richards, M., Pennings, G., & Appleby, J. (2012). Introduction. In M. Richards, G. Pennings, & J. Appleby (Eds.), Reproductive donation: Practice, policy and bioethics (pp. 1–11). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139026390
   Google Scholar
• Riggs, D., & Scholz, B. (2011). The value and meaning attached to genetic relatedness among Australian sperm donors. New Genet Soc, 30(1), 41–58. doi:10.1080/14636778.2011.552299
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorpe, R., Croy, S., Petersen, K., & Pitts, M. (2012). In the best interests of the child? Regulating assisted reproductive technologies and the well-being of offspring in three Australian states. Internal Journal of Law & the Family, 26(3), 259–277.doi:10.1093/lawfam/ebs012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanggren, K., Prag, F., & Skoog Svanberg, A. (2013). Attitudes towards embryo donation in Swedish women and men of reproductive age. Upsala Journal of Medical Sciences, 118(3), 187–195. doi:10.3109/03009734.2013.808294
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willig, C. (2013). Introdcuing qualitative research in psychology (3rd ed.). England: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar