http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9464-1110
References
- Annas, G. J. (1979). Artificial insemination: beyond the best interests of the donor. Hastings Center Report, 9(4), 14–15.
- Bossema, E. R., Janssens, P. M., Treucker, R. G., Landwehr, F., van Duinen, K., Nap, A. W., & Geenen, R. (2014). An inventory of reasons for sperm donation in formal versus informal settings. Human Fertility, 17(1), 21–27.
- Cook, R., & Golombok, S. (1995). Ethics and society: A survey of semen donation: Phase II—The view of the donors. Human Reproduction, 10(4), 951–959.
- Daniels, K. R. (1989). Semen donors: Their motivations and attitudes to their offspring. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 7(2), 121–127.
- Daniels, K. R. (1998). The semen providers. In K. R. Daniels & E. Haimes (Eds.), Donor Insemination: International Social Science Perspectives (pp. 76–104). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Daniels, K. R., Curson, R., & Lewis, G. M. (1996). Semen donor recruitment: A study of donors in two clinics. Human Reproduction, 11(4), 746–751.
- Freeman, T., Jadva, V., Tranfield, E., & Golombok, S. (2016). Online sperm donation: A survey of the demographic characteristics, motivations, preferences and experiences of sperm donors on a connection website. Human Reproduction, 31, 2082–2089.
- Harper, J., Jackson, E., Spoelstra-Witjens, L., & Reisel, D. (2017). Using an introduction website to start a family: Implications for users and health practitioners. Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online, 4, 13–17.
- Jadva, V., Freeman, T., Tranfield, E., & Golombok, S. (2018). Why search for a sperm donor online? the experiences of women searching for and contacting sperm donors on the internet. Human Fertility, 21(2), 112–119.
- Janssens, P. M., Simons, A. H., van Kooij, R. J., Blokzijl, E., & Dunselman, G. A. (2006). A new Dutch Law regulating provision of identifying information of donors to off spring: Background, content and impact. Human Reproduction, 21, 852–856.
- Kirkman, M. (2004). Saviours and satyrs: Ambivalence in narrative meanings of sperm provision. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 6(4), 319–334.
- Riggs, D. W., & Russell, L. (2010). Characteristics of men willing to act as sperm donors in the context of identity-release legislation. Human Reproduction, 26, 266–272.
- Ripper, M. (2008). Australian sperm donors: Public image and private motives of gay, bisexual and heterosexual donors. Health Sociology Review, 17(3), 313–325.
- Saucier, G. (1994). Mini-Markers: A brief version of Goldberg’s unipolar Big-Five markers. Journal of Personality Assessment, 63(3), 506–516.
- Van Den Broeck, U., Vandermeeren, M., Vanderschueren, D., Enzlin, P., Demyttenaere, K., & D’Hooghe, T. (2012). A systematic review of sperm donors: Demographic characteristics, attitudes, motives and experiences of the process of sperm donation. Human Reproduction Update, 19, 37–51.
- Whyte, S., Savage, D. A., & Torgler, B. (2017). Online sperm donors: The impact of family, friends, personality and risk attitudes on behaviour. Reproductive Biomedicine & Society Online., 35(6), 723–732.
- Whyte, S., & Torgler, B. (2015). Selection criteria in the search for a sperm donor: Behavioural traits versus physical appearance. Journal of Bioeconomics, 17(2), 151–171.
- Whyte, S., & Torgler, B. (2016). Determinants of online sperm donor success: How women choose. Applied Economics Letters, 23(8), 592–596.
- Whyte, S., & Torgler, B. (2017). Things change with age: Educational assortment in online dating. Personality and Individual Differences, 109, 5–11.
- Woestenburg, N. O., Winter, H. B., & Janssens, P. M. (2016). What motivates men to offer sperm donation via the internet?. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 21(4), 424–430.
- Yee, S. (2009). ‘Gift without a price tag’: Altruism in anonymous semen donation. Human Reproduction, 24(1), 3–13.