Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the PEER-U scale

References

• Alhusen, J. L. (2008). A literature update on maternal–fetal attachment. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, & Neonatal Nursing, 37(3), 315–328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alpar, R. (2016). Applied statistics and validity-reliability (4th ed., pp. 502–621). Ankara: Detay Yayıncılık.
   Google Scholar
• Antonovsky, A. (1983). The sense of coherence: Development of a research instrument. Newsletter and Research Reports, 1, 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Antonovsky, A. (1993). The structure and properties of the sense of coherence scale. Social Science & Medicine, 36(6), 725–733.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonovsky, H., & Sagy, S. (1986). The development of a sense of coherence and its impact on responses to stress situations. Journal of Social Psychology, 126(2), 213–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartlett, M. S. (1950). Tests of significance in factor analysis. British Journal of Statistical Psychology, 3(2), 77–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bricker, L., Garcia, J., Henderson, J., Mugford, M., Neilson, J., Roberts, T., & Martin, M. A. (2000). Ultrasound screening in pregnancy: A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and women’s views. Health Technology Assessment, 4(16), 1–193.
   Google Scholar
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2002). Factor analysis: Main concepts and their use in developing scales. Education Management in Theory and Practice, 32, 470–483.
   Google Scholar
• Çapık, C. (2014). Use of confirmatory factor analysis in validity and reliability studies. Anadolu Nursing and Health Sciences Journal, 17(3), 196–205.
   Google Scholar
• Çelik, H. E., & Yılmaz, V. (2016). Structural equality modelling. (3. Baskı) (pp. 23–51). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, L. L. (1992). Instrument review: Getting the most from a panel of experts. Applied Nursing Research, 5(4), 194–197.
   Google Scholar
• Dheensa, S., Metcalfe, A., & Williams, R. A. (2013). Men’s experiences of antenatal screening: A metasynthesis of the qualitative research. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 50(1), 121–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekelin, M., Crang Svalenius, E., & Dykes, A. K. (2004). A qualitative study of mothers’ and fathers’ experiences of routine ultrasound examination in Sweden. Midwifery, 20(4), 335–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekelin, M., Crang Svalenius, E., Larsson, A. K., Nyberg, P., Maršál, K., & Dykes, A. K. (2009). Parental expectations, experiences and reactions, sense of coherence and grade of anxiety related to routine ultrasound examination with normal findings during pregnancy. Prenatal Diagnosis, 29(10), 952–959.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekelin, M., Svalenius, E. C., & Dykes, A. K. (2008). Developing the PEER-U scale to measure parents’ expectations, experiences and reactions to routine ultrasound examinations during pregnancy. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 26(3), 211–228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, A. (2000). Discovering statistics using SPSS for windows: Advanced techniques for the beginner. Thousand Oaks- New Delhi: Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsson, A. K., Crang Svalenius, E., Maršál, K., Ekelin, M., Nyberg, P., & Dykes, A. K. (2009). Parents’ worried state of mind when fetal ultrasound shows an unexpected finding. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 28(12), 1663–1670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molander, E., Alehagen, S., & Bertero, C. (2010). Routine ultrasound examination during pregnancy: A world of possibilities. Midwifery, 26(1), 18–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öner, N., & Le Compte, A. (1983). Hand book of state-trait anxiety inventory (1st ed.). İstanbul: Boğaziçi Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scherler, R. H., & Lajunen, T. A. (1997, 6–11 July) Comparison of Finnish and Turkish university students on the short form of the sense of coherence scale. Fifth Congress of European Psychology, Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Sönmez, Y. (2007). Prenatal health care services. Journal of Medical Education, 16(1), 9–12.
   Google Scholar
• Spielberger, C. D., Goursuch, R. L., & Lusahane, R. E. (1970). Manual for the State–Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Palo Alto: California: Consulting Psychologists Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taşkın, L. (2016). Labor and women’s health nursing (13th ed., pp. 1–154). Ankara: Akademisyen Tıp Kitabevi.
   Google Scholar
• Tavşancıl, E. (2014). Measuring attitudes and data analysis with SPSS (5th ed., pp. 3–58). Ankara: Nobel Kitabevi.
   Google Scholar
• Turkish Population and Health Research (TNSA) (2008) Hacettepe University population studies institute. Retrieved from http://www.hips.hacettepe.edu.tr/TNSA2008-AnaRapor.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Turkish Population and Health Research (TNSA) (2013). Hacettepe University population studies institute. Retrieved from http://www.hips.hacettepe.edu.tr/tnsa2013/rapor/TNSA_2013_ana_rapor.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, T. B., Tolman, R. M., Davis, R. N., et al. (2014). Moving up the” magic moment”: Fathers’ experience of prenatal ultrasound. Fathering, 12(1), 18–37.
   Google Scholar
• Waltz, C. F., Strcikland, O. L., & Lenz, E. R. (2010). Measurement in nursing and health research (pp. 176–178). New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J., & Wang, X. (2012). Structural equation modeling: Applications using mplus: Methods and applications (pp. 5–9). West Susex: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Yurdagül, H. (2005, 28–30 September) Use of scope validity indices for scope validity in scale development studies. XIV. National Educational Sciences Congress, Denizli: Pamukkale University Education Faculty.
   Google Scholar