The impact of antenatal imaging on parent experience and prenatal attachment: a systematic review

References

• Baumgartner, C., Kamnitsas, K., Matthew, J., Fletcher, T. P., Smith, S., Koch, L. M., & Rueckert, D. (2018). SonoNET: Real-time detection and localisation of fetal standard scan planes in freehand ultrasound. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 36(11), 2204–2215. https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2017.2712367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borg Cunen, N., Jomeen, J., Borg Xuereb, R., & Poat, A. (2017). A narrative review of interventions addressing the parental–fetal relationship. Women and Birth, 30(4), e141–e151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2016.11.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boukydis, C. F. Z., Treadwell, M. C., Delaney-Black, V., Boyes, K., King, M., Robinson, T., & Sokol, R. (2006). Women’s responses to ultrasound examinations during routine screens in an obstetric clinic. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 25(6), 721–728. https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2006.25.6.721
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment and loss: Retrospect and prospect. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 52(4), 664–678. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1939-0025.1982.tb01456.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boztepe, H., Ay, A., Kerimoğlu Yıldız, G., & Çınar, S. (2016). Does the visibility of a congenital anomaly affect maternal-infant attachment levels?. Journal for Specialists in Pediatric Nursing, 21, 200–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/jspn.12157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brisch, K. H., Munz, D., Bemmerer-Mayer, K., Kächele, H., Terinde, R., & Kreienberg, R. (2002). Ultrasound scanning for diagnosis of foetal abnormality and maternal anxieties in a longitudinal perspective. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 20(4), 223–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/0264683021000033156
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Businelli, C., Bembich, S., Vecchiet, C., Cortivo, C., Norcio, A., Risso, M. F., & Stampalija, T. (2021). The psychological burden of routine prenatal ultrasound on women’s state anxiety across the three trimesters of pregnancy. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecololgy & Reproductive Biology, 256, 281–286. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2020.11.065
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cadogan, J., Marsh, C., & Winter, R. (2009). Parents’ views of 4D ultrasound scans following diagnosis of cleft condition. British Journal of Midwifery, 17(6), 374–380. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjom.2009.17.6.42607
   Google Scholar
• Chudleigh, T. (1999). Scanning for pleasure. Ultrasound in Obstetestrics & Gynecology, 14(6), 369–371. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0705.1999.14060369.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Condon, J. (1993). The assessment of antenatal emotional attachment: Development of a questionnaire instrument. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 66(2), 167–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8341.1993.tb01739.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coté, J. J., Badura-Brack, A. S., Walters, R. W., Dubay, N. G., & Bredehoeft, M. R. (2020). Randomized controlled trial of the effects of 3D-printed models and 3D ultrasonography on maternal–fetal attachment. JOGNN – Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing, 49(2), 190–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogn.2020.01.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cristofalo, E. A., DiPietro, J. A., Costigan, K. A., Nelson, P., & Crino, J. (2006). Women’s response to fetal choroid plexus cysts detected by prenatal ultrasound. Journal of Perinatololgy, 26(4), 215–223. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211489
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jong-Pleij, E. A. P., Ribbert, L. S. M., Pistorius, L. R., Tromp, E., Mulder, E. J. H., & Bilardo, C. M. (2013). Three-dimensional ultrasound and maternal bonding, a third trimester study and a review. Prenatal Diagnosis, 33(1), 81–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/pd.4013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Della Vedova, A. M., & Burro, R. (2017). Surveying prenatal attachment in fathers: The Italian adaptation of the Paternal antenatal attachment scale (PAAS-IT). Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 35(5), 493–508. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2017.1371284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drukker, L., Noble, J. A., & Papageorghiou, A. T. (2020). Introduction to artificial intelligence in ultrasound imaging in obstetrics and gynecology. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecololgy, 56(4), 498–505. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.22122
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dykes, K., & Stjernqvist, K. (2001). The importance of ultrasound to first-time mothers’ thoughts about their unborn child. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 19(2), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646830123343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edwards, M. M., Wang, F., Tejura, T., Patel, A., Majewski, S., & Donnenfeld, A. E. (2010). Maternal reactions to two-dimensional compared to three-dimensional foetal ultrasonography. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecololgy, 31(2), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.3109/01674821003793038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekelin, M., Crang-Svalenius, E., & Dykes, A. K. (2004). A qualitative study of mothers’ and fathers’ experiences of routine ultrasound examination in Sweden. Midwifery, 20(4), 335–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2004.02.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekelin, M., Crang-Svalenius, E., Nordström, B., & Dykes, A. K. (2008). Parents’ experiences, reactions and needs regarding a nonviable fetus diagnosed at a second trimester routine ultrasound. JOGNN – Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing, 37(4), 446–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1552-6909.2008.00258.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenwick, J., Bayes, S., & Johansson, M. (2012). A qualitative investigation into the pregnancy experiences and childbirth expectations of Australian fathers-to-be. Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare, 3(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2011.11.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firth, E. R., Mlay, P., Walker, R., & Sill, P. R. (2011). Pregnant women’s beliefs, expectations and experiences of antenatal ultrasound in Northern Tanzania. African Journal of Reproductive Health, 15(2), 91–107 https://journals.co.za/doi/abs/10.10520/EJC135765.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Flanagan, P., Dowling, M., & Gethin, G. (2020). Barriers and facilitators to seasonal influenza vaccination uptake among nurses: A mixed methods study. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 76(7), 1746–1764. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14360
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, A. (2000). The influences of ultrasound stimulated paternal fetal bonding and gender identification. Journal of Diagnostic Medical Sonography, 16(6), 237–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/875647930001600604
   Google Scholar
• Glover, V. (2014). Maternal depression, anxiety and stress during pregnancy and child outcome; What needs to be done. Best Practice & Research. Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 28(1), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2013.08.017
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Göbel, A., Stuhrmann, L. Y., Harder, S., Schulte-Markwort, M., & Mudra, S. (2018). The association between maternal-fetal bonding and prenatal anxiety: An explanatory analysis and systematic review. Journal of Affective Disorders, 239, 313–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2018.07.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonçalves, L. F., Lee, W., Espinoza, J., & Romero, R. (2005). Three- and 4-dimensional ultrasound in obstetric practice does it help? Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 24(12), 1599–1624. https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2005.24.12.1599
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harpel, T. S., & Barras, K. G. (2018). The impact of ultrasound on prenatal attachment among disembodied and embodied knowers. Journal of Family Issues, 39(6), 1523–1544. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X17710774
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, R. E., Grove, A. L., & Clarke, A. (2019). Pillar Integration Process: A joint display technique to integrate data in mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(3), 301–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689817743108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan, K. S., Kunz, R., Kleijnen, J., & Antes, G. (2003). Five steps to conducting a systematic review. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 96(3), 118–121. https://doi.org/10.1258/jrsm.96.3.118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lalor, J. G., & Devane, D. (2007). Information, knowledge and expectations of the routine ultrasound scan. Midwifery, 23(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2006.02.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lalor, J., Ayers, S., Calleja Agius, J., Downe, S., Gouni, O., Hartmann, K., & Horsch, A. (2021). Balancing restrictions and access to maternity care for women and birthing partners during the COVID-19 pandemic: A commentary. https://doi.org/10.22541/au.161689510.05966705/v1
   Google Scholar
• Lapaire, O., Alder, J., Peukert, R., Holzgreve, W., & Tercanli, S. (2007). Two- versus three-dimensional ultrasound in the second and third trimester of pregnancy: Impact on recognition and maternal-fetal bonding. A prospective pilot study. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 276(5), 475–479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-007-0368-7
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leung, K. Y., Ngai, C. S. W., Lee, A., Chan, H. Y., Leung, W. C., Lee, C. P., & Tang, M. H. Y. (2006). The effects on maternal anxiety of two-dimensional versus two-plus three-/four-dimensional ultrasound in pregnancies at risk of fetal abnormalities: A randomized study. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 28(3), 249–254. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.284411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lie, M., Graham, R., Robson, S. C., & Griffiths, P. D. (2019). “He looks gorgeous” – IuMR images and the transforming of foetal and parental identities. Sociology of Health & Illness, 41(2), 360–377. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12831
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindgren, K. (2001). Relationships among maternal-fetal attachment, prenatal depression, and health practices in pregnancy. Research in Nursing & Health, 24(3), 203–217. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.1023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lockwood, C., Munn, Z., & Porritt, K. (2015). Qualitative research synthesis: Methodological guidance for systematic reviewers utilizing meta-aggregation. International Journal of Evidence Based Healthcare, 13(3), 179–187. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masroor, I., Ahmed, H., & Ajmal, F. (2008). Impact of prenatal ultrasound consultation on maternal anxiety. Journal of the Dow University of Health Sciences, 2(1), 16–20. https://mail.jduhs.com/index.php/jduhs/article/view/720.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, L. M. (2004). Women’s experiences of unexpected ultrasound findings. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 49(3), 228–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmwh.2003.11.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moola, S., Munn, Z., Tufanaru, C., Aromataris, E., Sears, K., Sfetcu, R., & Mu, P. F. (2020) Explanation of analytical cross sectional studies critical appraisal. JBI Manual for Evididence Synthesis, 1–5. https://joannabriggs.org/critical_appraisal_tools (Accessed 11 August 2021)
   Google Scholar
• Moon, M. D. (2019). Triangulation: A method to increase validity, reliability, and legitimation in clinical research. Journal of Emergency Nursing, 45(1), 103–105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2018.11.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murakami, K., Tsujino, K., Sase, M., Nakata, M., Ito, M., & Kutsunugi, S. (2012). Japanese women’s attitudes towards routine ultrasound screening during pregnancy. Nursing & Health Sciences, 14(1), 95–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-2018.2011.00670.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2019) Overview: Antenatal care for uncomplicated pregnancies [CG62]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg62 (Accessed: 11 August 2021)
   Google Scholar
• Øyen, L., & Aune, I. (2016). Viewing the unborn child - pregnant women’s expectations, attitudes and experiences regarding fetal ultrasound examination. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare, 7, 8–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2015.10.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, M., McKenzie, J., Bossuyt, P., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T., Mulrow, C. et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. British Medical Journal, 372, 8284 . https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
   Google Scholar
• Pedreira, M., & Leal, I. (2015). What is my baby like? Representations concerning the baby in the third trimester of pregnancy. Psychology, Community & Health, 4(3), 156–170. https://doi.org/10.5964/pch.v4i3.141
   Google Scholar
• Polizzi, C., Perricone, G., Duca, V., Carollo, A., Marceca, M., & Fontana, V. (2017). A study on maternal-fetal attachment in pregnant women undergoing fetal echocardiography. Journal of Pediatric & Neonatal Individualized Medicine, 6(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.7363/060137
   Google Scholar
• Pulliainen, H., Niela-Vilén, H., Ekholm, E., & Ahlqvist-Björkroth, S. (2019). Experiences of interactive ultrasound examination among women at risk of preterm birth: A qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 19(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2493-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ranji, A., Dykes, A. K., & Ny, P. (2012). Routine ultrasound investigations in the second trimester of pregnancy: The experiences of immigrant parents in Sweden. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 30(3), 312–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2012.717266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed, K., Kochetkova, I., & Whitby, E. (2016). Visualising uncertainty: Examining women’s views on the role of Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in late pregnancy. Social Science & Medicine, 164, 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.07.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Righetti, P. L., Dell’Avanzo, M., Grigio, M., & Nicolini, U. (2005). Maternal/paternal antenatal attachment and fourth-dimensional ultrasound technique: A preliminary report. British Journal of Psychology, 96(1), 129–137. https://doi.org/10.1348/000712604X15518
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robak-Chołubek, D., Chołubek, G., & Piróg, E. (2015). Determining fetal sex in pregnancy with reference to pregnant women behavior in late pregnancy. Polish Journal of Public Health, 125(2), 87–89. https://doi.org/10.1515/pjph-2015-0030
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, J. (2012). “Wakey wakey baby”: Narrating four-dimensional (4D) bonding scans. Sociology of Health & Illness, 34(2), 299–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2011.01345.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothman, B. (1987). The Tentative pregnancy: Prenatal diagnosis and the future of motherhood. (Penguin Books, New York, USA
   Google Scholar
• Rowe, H., Fisher, J., & Quinlivan, J. (2009). Women who are well informed about prenatal genetic screening delay emotional attachment to their fetus. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology, 30(1), 34–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/01674820802292130
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruschel, P., Zielinsky, P., Grings, C., Pimentel, J., Azevedo, L., Paniagua, R., & Nicoloso, L. H. (2014). Maternal-fetal attachment and prenatal diagnosis of heart disease. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecololgy & Reproductive Biology, 174(1), 70–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2013.11.02961
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rustico, M. A., Mastromatteo, C., Grigio, M., Maggioni, C., Gregori, D., & Nicolini, U. (2005). Two-dimensional vs. two- plus four-dimensional ultrasound in pregnancy and the effect on maternal emotional status: A randomized study. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 25(5), 468–472. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.1894
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandelowski, M., Voils, C. I., & Barroso, J. (2006). Defining and designing mixed research synthesis studies. Research in the Schools: A Nationally Refereed Journal Sponsored by the Mid-South Educational Research Association and the University of Alamaba, 13(1), 29. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2809982/.
   Google Scholar
• Sedgmen, B., McMahon, C., Cairns, D., Benzie, R. J., & Woodfield, R. L. (2006). The impact of two-dimensional versus three-dimensional ultrasound exposure on maternal-fetal attachment and maternal health behavior in pregnancy. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 27(3), 245–251. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.2703
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidi, M., & Josheu, N. (2019). The role of ultrasound in enhancing maternal–fetal bonding in Kaduna Metropolis, Nigeria. Dutse Journal of Pure & Applied Sciences, 5(2), 169–179. https://fud.edu.ng/journals/dujopas/2019_DEC_Vol_5_No_2b/Page%20169-179%2041.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, M., Baumgartner, C., Matthew, J., Bai, W., Martinez, J. C., Li, Y., & King, A. P. (2018) Human-level performance on automatic head biometrics in fetal ultrasound using fully convolutional neural networks. International conference IEEE Engineering in medicine & biology society, 714–717. https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC.2018.8512278
   Google Scholar
• Skelton, E., Malamateniou, C., Rutherford, M., & Ayers, S. (2020) The impact of antenatal imaging on parent-fetal bonding: A systematic review. PROSPERO 2020 CRD42020197259. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42020197259 (Accessed 29 April 2022)
   Google Scholar
• Sreejith, V. P., Arun, V., Devarajan, A. P., Gopinath, A., & Sunil, M. (2018). Psychological effect of prenatal diagnosis of cleft lip and palate: A systematic review. Contemporary Clinical Dentistry, 9(2), 304–308. https://doi.org/10.4103/ccd.ccd_673_17
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson, N., McLeod, K., & Mills, C. (2016). Ambiguous encounters, uncertain foetuses: Women’s experiences of obstetric ultrasound. Feminist Review, 113(1), 17–33. https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.2016.6
   Google Scholar
• Stern, C., Lizarondo, L., Carrier, J., Godfrey, C., Rieger, K., Salmond, S., & Loveday, H. (2020). Methodological guidance for the conduct of mixed methods systematic reviews. JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis, 18(10), 2108–2118. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-D-19-00169
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thomas, J., Brunton, J., & Graziosi, S. (2010) EPPI-Reviewer 4: software for research synthesis. EPPI-Centre Software. Social Science Research Unit, UCL Institute of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, G. M., Roberts, J., & Griffiths, F. E. (2017). Ultrasound as a technology of reassurance? How pregnant women and health care professionals articulate ultrasound reassurance and its limitations. Sociolology of Health & Illness, 39(6), 893–907. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.12554
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trombetta, T., Giordana, M., Santoniccolo, F., Vismara, L., Della Vedova, A. M., & Rollè, L. (2021). Pre-natal attachment and parent-to-infant attachment: A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.620942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tufanaru, C., Munn, Z., Aromataris, E., Campbell, J., & Hopp, L. (2020). In Aromataris E. & Munn Z. (Eds.), 3. Systematic reviews of effectiveness JBI Manual for Evidence Synthesis. https://doi.org/10.46658/JBIMES-20-04.
   Google Scholar
• van den Bergh, B., & Simons, A. (2009). A review of scales to measure the mother-foetus relationship. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 27(2), 114–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646830802007480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Zalm, J. E., & Byrne, P. J. (2006). Seeing baby: Women’s experience of prenatal ultrasound examination and unexpected fetal diagnosis. Journal of Perinatololgy, 26(7), 403–408. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.jp.7211540
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wadephul, F., Jomeen, J., & Glover, L. (2015). Women’s experiences of commercial three -dimensional ultrasound scans. MIDIRS Midwifery Digest, 25(4), 433–438 https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/151157181.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, J. (2010). Definitions matter: If maternal-fetal relationships are not attachment, what are they? Archive of Women’s Mental Health, 13(5), 449–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-010-0152-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, T. B., Tolman, R. M., Singh, V., Davis, M. M., & Davis, R. N. (2017). Expectant fathers’ presence at prenatal ultrasounds: An opportunity for engagement. Social Work Research, 41(3), 181–185. https://doi.org/10.1093/swr/svx014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, T. B. (2020). Your baby is so happy, active, uncooperative: How prenatal care providers contribute to parents’ mental representations of the baby. Midwifery, 83, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2020.102630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner, H., Lopes, J., Tonni, G., & Araujo Júnior, E. (2016). Maternal-fetal attachment in blind women using physical model from three-dimensional ultrasound and magnetic resonance scan data: Six serious cases. Journal of Maternal & Neonatal Medicine, 29(14), 2229–2232. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2015.1085015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westerneng, M., Diepeveen, M., Witteveen, A. B., Westerman, M. J., Van Der Horst, H. E., Van Baar, A. L., & De Jonge, A. (2019). Experiences of pregnant women with a third trimester routine ultrasound - A qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 19(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-019-2470-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whynes, D. K. (2002). Receipt of information and women’s attitudes towards ultrasound scanning during pregnancy. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 19(1), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00517.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaqub, M., Cook, K., Cocks, K., Chen, Z., Chikkanna, B., Sleep, N., & Papageorghiou, A. T. (2019). Auditing the quality of ultrasound images using an AI solution: ScanNav® for fetal second trimester ultrasound scans. Ultrasound in Obstetetrics & Gynecololgy, 54(S1), 87. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.20656
   PubMedGoogle Scholar