Factor structure and psychometric properties of the Birth Satisfaction Scale–Revised in Portuguese postpartum women

References

• Aggarwal, R., & Ranganathan, P. (2016). Common pitfalls in statistical analysis: The use of correlation techniques. Perspectives in Clinical Research, 7(4), 187–190. https://doi.org/10.4103/2229-3485.192046
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alfaro Blazquez, R., Corchon, S., & Ferrer Ferrandiz, E. (2017). Validity of instruments for measuring the satisfaction of a woman and her partner with care received during labour and childbirth: Systematic review. Midwifery, 55, 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2017.09.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Areias, M. E., Kumar, R., Barros, H., & Figueiredo, E. (1996). Comparative incidence of depression in women and men, during pregnancy and after childbirth. Validation of the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale in Portuguese mothers. British Journal of Psychiatry, 169(1), 30–35. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.169.1.30
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbosa Leiker, C., Fleming, S., Hollins Martin, C. J., & Martin, C. R. (2015). Psychometric properties of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R) for US mothers. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 33(5), 504–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2015.1024211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonifay, W. E., Reise, S. P., Scheines, R., & Meijer, R. R. (2015). When are multidimensional data unidimensional enough for structural equation modeling? An evaluation of the DETECT multidimensionality index. Structural Equation Modeling, 22(4), 504–516. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.938596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burduli, E., Barbosa Leiker, C., Fleming, S., Hollins Martin, C. J., & Martin, C. R. (2017). Cross-cultural invariance of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R): Comparing UK and US samples. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 35(3), 248–260. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2017.1310374
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, B. M. (2010). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications and Programming (2nd ed.). Routledge/Taylor and Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, F. F., West, S. G., & Sousa, K. H. (2006). A comparison of bifactor and second-order models of quality of life. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41(2), 189–225. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr4102_5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 309–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, J. L., Holden, J. M., & Sagovsky, R. (1987). Detection of postnatal depression. Development of the 10-item Edinburgh postnatal depression scale. British Journal of Psychiatry, 150, 782–786. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.150.6.782
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diedenhofen, B., & Musch, J. (2016). Cocron: A web interface and R package for the statistical comparison of Cronbach’s alpha coefficients. International Journal of Internet Science, 11(1), 51–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diedenhofen, B., Musch, J., & Olivier, J. (2015). Cocor: A comprehensive solution for the statistical comparison of correlations. PLoS One, 10(4), e0121945. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121945
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmens, B., Hollins Martin, C. J., & Martin, C. R. (2021). Translation and validation of the Dutch version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R). Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2021.1979200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrari, R. B., Martin, C., Hollins Martin, C., de Souza, F. G., Clini, J. V., Onofre, L. B. O., & Diniz Zanetti, M. R. (2022). Translation of the UK-Birth-Satisfaction-Scale-Revised (BSS-R) into Brazilian (Portuguese) and description of initial measurement properties. Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine, 35(25), 6373–6379. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2021.1913579
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Göncü Serhatlioglu, S., Karahan, N., Hollins Martin, C. J., & Martin, C. R. (2018). Construct and content validity of the Turkish Birth Satisfaction Scale - Revised (T-BSS-R). Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 36(3), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2018.1443322
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock, G. R., & Mueller, R. O. (2001). Rethinking construct reliability within latent variable systems. In R. Cudeck, S. du Toit, & D. Soerbom (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Present and future. A festschrift in honor of Karl Jöreskog (pp. 195–216). Scientific Software International.
   Google Scholar
• Hollins Martin, C., & Fleming, V. (2011). The birth satisfaction scale. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 24(2), 124–135. https://doi.org/10.1108/09526861111105086
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hollins Martin, C. J., & Martin, C. R. (2014). Development and psychometric properties of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R). Midwifery, 30(6), 610–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2013.10.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jefford, E., Hollins Martin, C. J., & Martin, C. R. (2018). Development and validation of the Australian version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R). Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 36(1), 42–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2017.1396302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, P. (2000). A Psychometrics Primer. Free Association Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lyubenova, A., Neupane, D., Levis, B., Wu, Y., Sun, Y., He, C., Krishnan, A., Bhandari, P. M., Negeri, Z., Imran, M., Rice, D. B., Azar, M., Chiovitti, M. J., Saadat, N., Riehm, K. E., Boruff, J. T., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Cuijpers, P., and Thombs, B. D. (2021). Depression prevalence based on the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale compared to structured clinical interview for DSM disorders classification: Systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 30(1), e1860. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpr.1860
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, C. R., Hollins Martin, C. J., Burduli, E., Barbosa Leiker, C., Donovan Batson, C., & Fleming, S. E. (2017). Measurement and structural invariance of the US version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R) in a large sample. Women and Birth, 30(4), e172–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2016.11.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, C. R., Hollins Martin, C. J., Burduli, E., Barbosa Leiker, C., Donovan Batson, C., & Fleming, S. E. (2018). The Birth Satisfaction Scale - Revised (BSS-R): Should the subscale scores or the total score be used? Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 36(5), 530–535. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2018.1490498
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified approach. Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Mortazavi, F., Mehrabadi, M., Hollins Martin, C. J., & Martin, C. R. (2021). Psychometric properties of the birth satisfaction scale-revised (BSS-R) in a sample of postpartum Iranian women. Health Care for Women International, 42(4–6), 836–851. https://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2020.1802464
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nespoli, A., Colciago, E., Fumagalli, S., Locatelli, A., Hollins Martin, C. J., & Martin, C. R. (2021). Validation and factor structure of the Italian version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R). Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 39(5), 516–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2020.1836333
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reise, S. P. (2012). The rediscovery of bifactor measurement models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47, 667–696. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2012.715555
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reise, S. P., Bonifay, W. E., & Haviland, M. G. (2013). Scoring and modeling psychological measures in the presence of multidimensionality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95(2), 129–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2012.725437
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reise, S. P., Moore, T. M., & Haviland, M. G. (2010). Bifactor models and rotations: Exploring the extent to which multidimensional data yield univocal scale scores. Journal of Personality Assessment, 92(6), 544–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2010.496477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reise, S. P., Scheines, R., Widaman, K. F., & Haviland, M. G. (2013). Multidimensionality and structural coefficient bias in structural equation modeling: A bifactor perspective. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(1), 5–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164412449831
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, A., Reise, S. P., & Haviland, M. G. (2016a). Applying bifactor statistical indices in the evaluation of psychological measures. Journal of Personality Assessment, 98(3), 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2015.1089249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, A., Reise, S. P., & Haviland, M. G. (2016b). Evaluating bifactor models: Calculating and interpreting statistical indices. Psychological Methods, 21(2), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000045/
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, A., Reise, S. P., & Haviland, M. G. (2016c). Evaluating bifactor models: Calculating and interpreting statistical indices. Psychological Methods, 21(2), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero-Gonzalez, B., Peralta-Ramirez, M. I., Caparros-Gonzalez, R. A., Cambil Ledesma, A., Hollins Martin, C. J., & Martin, C. R. (2019). Spanish validation and factor structure of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R). Midwifery, 70, 31–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2018.12.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosseland, L. A., Reme, S. E., Simonsen, T. B., Thoresen, M., Nielsen, C. S., & Eberhard-Gran, M. (2020). Are labor pain and birth experience associated with persistent pain and postpartum depression? A prospective cohort study. Scandinavian Journal of Pain, 20(3), 591–602. https://doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2020-0025
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sijtsma, K. (2009). On the use, the misuse, and the very limited usefulness of Cronbach’s alpha. Psychometrika, 74(1), 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-008-9101-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skvirsky, V., Taubman-Ben-Ari, O., Hollins Martin, C. J., & Martin, C. R. (2020). Validation of the Hebrew Birth Satisfaction Scale - Revised (BSS-R) and its relationship to perceived traumatic labour. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 38(2), 214–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2019.1600666
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiger, J. H., & Lind, J. (1980). Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors Annual Spring Meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Stucky, B. D., & Edelen, M. O. (2015). Using hierarchical IRT models to create unidimensional measures from multidimensional data. In S. P. Reise & D. A. Revicki (Eds.), Handbook of item response theory modeling: Applications to typical performance assessment (pp. 183–206). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• The International Consortium for Health Outcome Measurement. (2016). Pregnancy and Childbirth Standard Set and Reference Guide. http://www.ichom.org/medical-conditions/pregnancy-and-childbirth/
   Google Scholar
• Ten Berge, J. M. F., & Sočan, G. (2004). The greatest lower bound to the reliability of a test and the hypothesis of unidimensionality. Psychometrika, 69(4), 613–625. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02289858
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vardavaki, Z., Hollins Martin, C. J., & Martin, C. R. (2015). Construct and content validity of the Greek version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale (G-BSS). Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 33(5), 488–503. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2015.1035235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinbarg, R. E., Revelle, W., Yovel, I., & Li, W. (2005). Cronbach’s α, Revelle’s β, and Mcdonald’s ωH: Their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika, 70(1), 123–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-003-0974-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar