Why mothers with midwifery-led vaginal births recommend that mode of birth: a qualitative study

References

• Aannestad, M., Herstad, M., & Severinsson, E. (2020). A meta‐ethnographic synthesis of qualitative research on women’s experience of midwifery care. Nursing & Health Sciences, 22(2), 171–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.12714
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbaspoor, Z., Moghaddam-Banaem, L., Ahmadi, F., & Kazemnejad, A. (2014). Iranian mothers’ selection of a birth method in the context of perceived norms: A content analysis study. Midwifery, 30(7), 804–809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2013.06.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akgün, Ö., & Aktaş, S. (2023). Birth and midwifery (chapter). Basic midwifery from a to Z. In S. Aktaş, A. Derya, & E. Toker Eds., Doğum ve Ebelik. A’dan Z’ye Temel Ebelik (Vol. 1, pp. 792–802). İstanbul Tıp Kitabevi. 1st press, Plusone press. ISBN: 978-625-6820-17-3.
   Google Scholar
• Aktaş, S., & Aydın, R. (2019). The analysis of negative birth experiences of mothers: A qualitative study. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 37(2), 176–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2018.1540863
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aktaş, S., & Pasinlioğlu, T. (2017). The effect of empathy training given to midwives upon meeting mothers’ expectations and level of perceiving labor and midwives during postpartum period. Journal of Gynecologic Obstetric and Neonatology, 14(2), 60–65.
   Google Scholar
• Aktaş, S., & Pasinlioğlu, T. (2021). The effect of empathy training given to midwives on the empathic communication skills of midwives and the birth satisfaction of mothers giving birth with the help of these midwives: A quasi‐experimental study. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 27(4), 858–867. https://doi.org/10.1111/jep.13523
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aktaş, S., & Yılar Erkek, Z. (2018). The examination of the reasons why mothers preference, tvaginal birth: An example of qualitative study. Gümüşhane University Journal of Health Science, 7(1), 111–124.
   Google Scholar
• Amanak, K. (2022). About pregnant women views of cesarean and vaginal delivery: A qualitative. Sakarya Üniversitesi Holistik Sağlık Dergisi, 5(2), 122–140. https://doi.org/10.54803/sauhsd.1037774
   Google Scholar
• Anatolian Midwives Association. (2020). Anadolu Ebeler Derneği, 2020. Retrieved December 1, 2023, from https://anadoluebelerdernegi.org//proje-kategori/bilimsel-faaliyetler/
   Google Scholar
• Bahar, S. (2021). Obstetric Outcomes of Mother-Friendly and Non-Mother-Friendly Hospital Practices/Anne Dostu Hastane Olan Ve Olmayan Hastanelerin Obstetrik Sınuçları [ Master Thesis] Thesis No: 726216. Karadeniz Technical University, İnstitute of Health Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtari, F., Nadrian, H., Matlabi, H., Sarbakhsh, P., & Bidar, M. (2019). Personal, interpersonal, and organizational predictors of the mode of delivery among urban women: A prospective study with socio-ecological approach. Clinical Nursing Research, 28(3), 280–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/1054773817740530
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barimani, M., Vikström, A., Rosander, M., Forslund Frykedal, K., & Berlin, A. (2017). Facilitating and inhibiting factors in transition to parenthood – ways in which health professionals can support parents. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 31(3), 537–546. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boz, I., Teskereci, G., & Akman, G. (2016). How did you choose a mode of birth? Experiences of nulliparous women from Turkey. Women & Birth, 29(4), 359–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2016.01.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buckley, S. J. (2015, January). Hormonal physiology of childbearing: Evidence and implications for women, babies, and maternity care. Childbirth Connection Programs, National Partnership for Women & Families. Retrieved Nowember 23, 2023, from https://nationalpartnership.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/hormonal-physiology-of-childbearing.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Çalım, S. İ., & Saruhan, A. (2019). The effect of interpersonal communication training given according to the travelbee theory on midwives’ communication skills and mothers’ birth satisfaction. Life Sciences, 14(4), 104–121. https://doi.org/10.12739/NWSA.2019.14.4.4B0030
   Google Scholar
• Chabbert, M., Panagiotou, D., & Wendland, J. (2021). Predictive factors of women’s subjective perception of childbirth experience: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 39(1), 43–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2020.1748582
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2014). Thematic analysis encyclopedia of critical psychology. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Coates, D., Donnolley, N., Foureur, M., Thirukumar, P., & Henry, A. (2021). Factors associated with women’s birth beliefs and experiences of decision-making in the context of planned birth: A survey study. Midwifery, 96, 102944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2021.102944
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coates, D., Thirukumar, P., Spear, V., Brown, G., & Henry, A. (2020). What are women’s mode of birth preferences and why? A systematic scoping review. Women & Birth, 33(4), 323–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2019.09.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dogra, P., & Sharma, R. (2017). Preferences of pregnant women regarding mode of delivery: A questionnaire based study. International Journal of Scientific Reports, 3(11), 292–5. https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2454-2156.IntJSciRep20174870
   Google Scholar
• Duman, F. N., & Gölbaşı, Z. (2023). The Effects of increasing cesarean birth rate on mother-infant health and strategies for reducing cesarean births/Artan sezaryen doğum oranının Anne-Bebek sağlığı üzerine etkileri ve sezaryen doğumların azaltılmasına yönelik stratejiler. Turkish Journal of Family Medicine & Primary Care, 17(1), 188–194. https://doi.org/10.21763/tjfmpc.1188235
   Google Scholar
• Eri, T. S., Berg, M., Dahl, B., Gottfreðsdóttir, H., Sommerseth, E., & Prinds, C. (2020). Models for midwifery care: A mapping review. European Journal of Midwifery, 4(30). https://doi.org/10.18332/ejm/124110
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gökçe İsbir, G., Serçekuş, P., Yenal, K., Okumuş, H., Durgun Ozan, Y., Karabulut, Ö., Abbasoğlu, D., Gönenç, M. I., Sarı, E., Aktaş, S., & Erdoğan, S. (2024). The prevalence and associated factors of fear of childbirth among Turkish pregnant women. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 42(1), 62–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2022.2057938
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, H., Fooladi, E., Kloester, J., Ulnang, A., Sinni, S., White, C., Yeganeh, L., & Yeganeh, L. (2022). Factors that promote a positive childbearing experience: A qualitative study. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 68(1), 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13402
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hildingsson, I., Johannsson, M., Karlström, A., & Fenwick, J. (2013). Factors associated with a positive birth experience: An exploration of Swedish women’s experiences. International Journal of Childbirth, 3(3), 153–164. https://doi.org/10.1891/2156-5287.3.3.153
   Google Scholar
• Kahramanoglu, I., Baktiroglu, M., Hamzaoglu, K., Kahramanoglu, O., Verit, F. F., & Yucel, O. (2017). The impact of mode of delivery on the sexual function of primiparous women: A prospective study. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 295(4), 907–916. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-017-4299-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keag, O. E., Norman, J. E., Stock, S. J., & Myers, J. E. (2018). Long-term risks and benefits associated with cesarean delivery for mother, baby, and subsequent pregnancies: Systematic review and meta-analysis. PloS Medicine, 15(1), e1002494. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002494
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagrew, D. C., Low, L. K., Brennan, R., Corry, M. P., Edmonds, J. K., Gilpin, B. G., & Jaffer, S. (2018). National partnership for maternal safety: Consensus bundle on safe reduction of primary cesarean births—supporting intended vaginal births. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing, 47(2), 214–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogn.2018.01.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latifnejad Roudsari, R., Zakerihamidi, M., Merghati-Khoei, E., & Kazemnejad, A. (2014). Cultural perceptions and preferences of Iranian women regarding cesarean delivery. Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research, 19(7 Suppl1), S28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leinweber, J., Fontein‐Kuipers, Y., Karlsdottir, S. I., Ekström‐Bergström, A., Nilsson, C., Stramrood, C., & Thomson, G. (2023). Developing a woman‐centered, inclusive definition of positive childbirth experiences: A discussion paper. Birth, 50(2), 362–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12666
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, M., Gu, W., Li, X., & Wang, X. (2018). The reasons and strategies of high cesarean section rate from Chinese obstetricians and midwives perspective in the public hospitals: An ınterpretative phenomenologic analysis. J Fam Med Dis Prev, 4, 087. https://doi.org/10.23937/2469-5793/1510087
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8
   Google Scholar
• Lundgren, I., Begley, C., Gross, M. M., & Bondas, T. (2012). ‘Groping through the fog’: A metasynthesis of women’s experiences on VBAC (vaginal birth after Caesarean section). BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 12(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-12-85
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lupu, V. V., Miron, I. C., Raileanu, A. A., Starcea, I. M., Lupu, A., Tarca, E., Mocanu, A., Buga, A. M. L., Lupu, V., & Fotea, S. (2023). Difficulties in adaptation of the mother and newborn via cesarean section versus natural birth—A narrative review. Life, 13(2), 300. https://doi.org/10.3390/life13020300
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Maternal Fetal Medicine and Perinatology Society of Turkey. (2014). Maternal ve Fetal Tıpve Pernatoloji Derneği Türkiye, 2014. Retrieved June 15, 2023, from https://www.tmftp.org/tr/sayfa/bolge-toplantilari
   Google Scholar
• Mazzoni, A., Althabe, F., Gutierrez, L., Gibbons, L., Liu, N. H., Bonotti, A. M., Izbizky, G. H., Ferrary, M., Viergue, N., Vigil, S. I., Zalazar Denett, G., & Belizán, J. M. (2016). Women’s preferences and mode of delivery in public and private hospitals: A prospective cohort study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 16(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-0824-0
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Migliorini, L., Setola, N., Naldi, E., Rompianesi, M. C., Iannuzzi, L., & Cardinali, P. (2023). Exploring the role of birth environment on Italian mothers’ emotional experience during childbirth. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(15), 6529. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20156529
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Miller, Y. D., & Danoy-Monet, M. (2021). Reproducing fear: The effect of birth stories on nulligravid women’s birth preferences. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 21, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-021-03944-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirghafourvand, M., Meedya, S., Mohammadi, E., Mohammad Alizadeh-Charandabi, S., Jafarabadi, M. A., & Ghanbari-Homaie, S. (2022). Iranian women’s perception on the determinants of birth experience: A qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 22(1), 751. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-05078-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2023), Health at a glance 2023: OECD indicators. OECD Publishing. Retrieved January 17, 2024, from https://doi.org/10.1787/7a7afb35-en
   Google Scholar
• Oladapo, O. T., Tunçalp, Ö., Bonet, M., Lawrie, T. A., Portela, A., Downe, S., & Gülmezoglu, A. M. (2018). WHO model of intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience: Transforming care of women and babies for improved health and wellbeing. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 125(8), 918–922. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olza, I., Leahy-Warren, P., Benyamini, Y., Kazmierczak, M., Karlsdottir, S. I., Spyridou, A., Crespo-Mirasol, E., Takács, L., Hall, P. J., Murphy, M., Jonsdottir, S. S., Downe, S., & Nieuwenhuijze, M. J. (2018). Women’s psychological experiences of physiological childbirth: A meta-synthesis. BMJ Open, 8(10), e020347. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020347
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Özbay, F. (1992). Status of Women and Fertility. The Phenomenon of Women in Türkiye/Kadının Statüsü ve Doğurganlık. Türkiye’de Kadın Olgusu (in Turkish). Say Publisher. ss.147-165. Retrieved Nowember 24, 2023, from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Ferhunde-Ozbay/publication/270272249_Kadinin_Statusu_ve_Dogurganlik/links/54a3e7950cf267bdb905d22c/Kadinin-Statuesue-ve-Dogurganlik.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Paksoy, E. N. (2021). Mother-friendly hospital programme of Turkey: National intervention to improve the quality of maternity services. Eastern Mediterranean Health Journal, 27(2), 202–210. https://doi.org/10.26719/emhj.20.138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preis, H., Lobel, M., & Benyamini, Y. (2019). Between expectancy and experience: Testing a model of childbirth satisfaction. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 43(1), 105–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684318779
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richard, F., Zongo, S., & Ouattara, F. (2014). Fear, guilt, and debt: An exploration of women’s experience and perception of cesarean birth in Burkina Faso, West Africa. International Journal of Women’s Health, 469–478. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S54742
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rizk, D. E., ElZubeir, M. A., Al Dhaheri, A. M., Al Mansouri, F. R., & Al Jenaibi, H. S. (2005). Determinants of women’s choice of their obstetrician and gynecologist provider in the UAE. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 84(1), 48–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00705.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandall, J., Devane, D., Soltani, H., Hatem, M., & Gates, S. (2010). Improving quality and safety in maternity care: The contribution of midwife-led care. Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health, 55(3), 255–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmwh.2010.02.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandall, J., Tribe, R. M., Avery, L., Mola, G., Visser, G. H., Homer, C. S., Gibbons, D., Kelly, N. M., Kennedy, H. P., Kidanto, H., Taylor, P., & Temmerman, M. (2018). Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children. The Lancet, 392(10155), 1349–1357. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31930-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarker, B. K., Rahman, M., Rahman, T., Hossain, J., Reichenbach, L., Mitra, D. K., & Leone, T. (2016). Reasons for preference of home delivery with traditional birth attendants (TBAs) in rural Bangladesh: A qualitative exploration. Public Library of Science One, 11(1), e0146161. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146161
   Google Scholar
• Serçekuş, P., Cetisli, N. E., & İnci, F. H. (2015). Birth preferences by nulliparous women and their partners in Turkey. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare, 6(3), 182–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2015.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman, D. (2013). Doing qualitative research: A practical hand book. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Somsap, Y. (2022). Caring for women for a positive childbirth experience. Songklanagarind Journal of Nursing, 42(2), 178–186.
   Google Scholar
• Striebich, S., & Ayerle, G. M. (2020). Fear of childbirth (FOC): Pregnant women’s perceptions towards the impending hospital birth and coping resources–a reconstructive study. Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & Gynecology, 41(3), 231–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/0167482X.2019.1657822
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TR Ministry of Health –Turkish Gynecology and Obstetrics Association joint action plan for reducing cesarean rates. (2013). Sağlık Bakanlığı – Türk Jinekoloji ve Obstetri Derneği sezaryen oranlarını azaltma ortak eylem planı. Türk Jinekoloji ve Obstetri Derneği. Retrieved November 20, 2023, from http://www.tjod.org/saglik-bakanligi-tjod-sezaryen-oranlarini-azaltma-ortak-eylem-plani/
   Google Scholar
• TR Ministry of Health, Birth and Cesarean Management Guide. (2010). General Directorate of Mother and Child, and Family Planning./TC Sağlık Bakanlığı Ana Çocuk, ve Aile Planlaması Genel Müdürlüğü. Doğum ve sezaryen eylemi yönetim rehberi. Retrieved October 10, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• TR Ministry of Health, Directive on Performance and Quality in Health. (2010). T.C. Sağlık Bakanlığı Sağlıkta Performans ve Kalite Yönergesi. Retrieved Nowember 24, 2023, from http://www.saglik.gov.tr/TR/belge/1-11554/saglikta-performans-ve-kaliteyonergesi.html
   Google Scholar
• TR Ministry of Health, Health Regulation. (2014). 18 Jan 2014, Number : 28886, Sağlık Bakanlığı, Kanun Hükmünde Kararrname, Sağlık Bakanlığı ve bağlı kuruluşlarının teşkilat ve görevleri hakkında kanun hükmünde kararname ile bazı kanunlarda değişiklik yapılmasına dair kanun, Sayı: 28886, Date.18 Ocak 2014. Retrieved December 1, 2023, from https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2014/01/20140118-1.htm
   Google Scholar
• TR Ministry of Health, Mother-Friendly Hospital Programme. (2018, November 23). Circular Number: 57536863/10.06.02, Year/No: 2018/17, Sağlık Bakanlığı, Anne Dostu Hastane, Ankara, Türkiye. Genelge No: 57536863/10.06.02, Yıl/No: 2018/17. https://dosyamerkez.saglik.gov.tr/Eklenti/33217/0/anne-dostu-hastaneek8ff310b4-cfa1-42dc-94a3-868c16378e79—kopyapdf.pdf
   Google Scholar
• TR Ministry of Health, TR Ministry of Health, Circular on Pregnancy School. (2020). Sağlık Bakanlığı Gebe Okulu, Gebe Bilgilendirme Sınıfı, Doğuma Hazırlık ve Danışmanlık Merkezleri Hakkında Genelge (2020). Retrieved October 24, 2023, from https://sbm.saglik.gov.tr/TR,49222/gebe-okulu-gebebilgilendirme-sinifi–doguma-hazirlik-vedanismanlik-merkezlerihakkinda-genelge.html
   Google Scholar
• TR Ministry of Health, Turkish Health Statistics Yearbook. (2022). Sağlık Bakanlığı, Sağlık İstatistikleri Yıllığı 2022, Ankara, Türkiye. Retrieved Nowember 24, 2023, from https://sbsgm.saglik.gov.tr/Eklenti/46511/0/haber-bulteni-2022-v7pdf.pdf?_tag1=3F123016BE50268AF4A10917870BF5962AC79ECF
   Google Scholar
• Turan, Z., Suveren, Y., & Vural, G. (2022). A qualitative study on the expectations and experiences of mothers during the childbirth process in Western Anatolia, Turkey. Women & Health, 62(5), 444–453. https://doi.org/10.1080/03630242.2022.2084211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkish Midwives Association. (2017). Türk Ebeler Derneği, 2017. Retrieved Nowember 23, 2023, from https://www.turkebelerdernegi.org/category/kutuphane/
   Google Scholar
• Viirman, F., Engström, A. H., Sjömark, J., Hesselman, S., Poromaa, I. S., Ljungman, L., Skoog Svanberg, A., & Wikman, A. (2023). Negative childbirth experience in relation to mode of birth and events during labour: A mixed methods study. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 282, 146–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.01.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walburg, V., Friederich, F., & Callahan, S. (2014). Embarrassment and modesty feelings during pregnancy, childbirth and follow-up care: A qualitative approach.Journal of. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 32(2), 126–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2013.860518
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WHO. (2018). WHO recommendations on intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. World Health Organization. Retrieved Nowember 24, 2023, from https://iris.who.int/bitstream/handle/10665/260178/9789241550215-eng.pdf?sequence=1Available:
   Google Scholar