Translation and validation of Vietnamese version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R)

References

• Arafat, S. Y., Chowdhury, H. R., Qusar, M. M. A. S., & Hafez, M. A. (2016). Cross cultural adaptation and psychometric validation of research instruments: A Methodological review. Journal of Behavioral Health, 5(3), 129–136. https://doi.org/10.5455/jbh.20160615121755
   Google Scholar
• Barbosa-Leiker, C., Fleming, S., Hollins Martin, C. J., & Martin, C. R. (2015). Psychometric properties of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R) for US mothers. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 33(5), 504–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2015.1024211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, A. F., & Andersson, E. (2016). The birth experience and women’s postnatal depression: A systematic review. Midwifery, 39, 112–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2016.04.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohren, M. A., Berger, B. O., Munthe-Kaas, H., & Tuncalp, O. (2019). Perceptions and experiences of labour companionship: A qualitative evidence synthesis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2019(7), CD012449. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012449.pub2
   Google Scholar
• Bohren, M. A., Vogel, J. P., Hunter, E. C., Lutsiv, O., Makh, S. K., Souza, J. P., Aguiar, C., Saraiva Coneglian, F., Diniz, A. L. A., Tunçalp, Ö., Javadi, D., Oladapo, O. T., Khosla, R., Hindin, M. J., & Gülmezoglu, A. M. (2015). The mistreatment of women during childbirth in health facilities globally: A mixed-methods systematic review. PloS Medicine, 12(6), e1001847. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001847
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond, R., & Smith, P. B. (1996). Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch’s (1952b, 1956) line judgment task. Psychological Bulletin, 119(1), 111–137. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychological Assessment, 7(3), 309–319. https://doi.org/10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02310555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmens, B., Hollins Martin, C. J., & Martin, C. R. (2023). Translation and validation of the Dutch version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R). Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 41(2), 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2021.1979200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossmann, I., & Santos, H. C. (2016). Individualistic Cultures. In V. Zeigler-Hill & T. Shackelford (Eds.), Encyclopedia of personality and individual differences. Springer (pp 2238–2241).
   Google Scholar
• Grundstrom, H., Hollins Martin, C. J., Malmquist, A., Nieminen, K., & Martin, C. R. (2023). Translation and validation of the Swedish version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R). Midwifery, 124, 103745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2023.103745
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hochman, N., Galper, A., Stanger, V., Levin, G., Herzog, K., Cahan, T., Bookstein Peretz, S., & Meyer, R. (2023). Risk factors for a negative birth experience using the birth satisfaction scale-revised. International Journal of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 163(3), 904–910. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.14884
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollins Martin, C. J., & Martin, C. R. (2014). Development and psychometric properties of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R). Midwifery, 30(6), 610–619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2013.10.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30(2), 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Childbirth Initiative (ICI). (2023). https://icichildbirth.org/
   Google Scholar
• The International Consortium for Health Outcome Measurement. (2017). Pregnancy and childbirth standard set and reference guide, Version 1.0.3. http://www.ichom.org/medical-conditions/pregnancy-and-childbirth/
   Google Scholar
• International Consortium for Health Outcome Measurement (ICHOM). (2016). Pregnancy and childbirth sandard set and reference guide. https://connect.ichom.org/patient-centered-outcome-measures/pregnancy-and-childbirth/
   Google Scholar
• Jefford, E., Hollins Martin, C. J., & Martin, C. R. (2018). Development and validation of the Australian version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R). Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 36(1), 42–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2017.1396302
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jolivet, R. R., Gausman, J., Kapoor, N., Langer, A., Sharma, J., & Semrau, K. E. (2021). Operationalizing respectful maternity care at the healthcare provider level: A systematic scoping review. Reproductive Health, 18(1), 194. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-021-01241-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlstrom, A., Nystedt, A., & Hildingsson, I. (2015). The meaning of a very positive birth experience: Focus groups discussions with women. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 15(1), 251. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-015-0683-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, P. (1994). An easy guide to factor analysis. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kline, P. (2000). A psychometrics primer. Free Association Books.
   Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, S., Hanada, N., Matsuzaki, M., Takehara, K., Ota, E., & Sasaki, H. (2017). Assessment and support during early labour for improving birth outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2017(8), CD011516. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011516.pub2
   Google Scholar
• Mahalanobis, P. C. (1936). On the generalised distance in statistics. Proceedings of the National Institute of Sciences of India, 2(1), 49–55.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, C. R., Hollins Martin, C. J., Burduli, E., Barbosa-Leiker, C., Donovan Batson, C., & Fleming, S. E. (2018). The Birth Satisfaction Scale – Revised (BSS-R): Should the subscale scores or the total score be used? Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 36(5), 530–535. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2018.1490498
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreira, H., Hollins Martin, C. J., & Martin, C. (2023). Factor structure and psychometric properties of the birth satisfaction scale–revised in Portuguese postpartum women. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2023.2176473
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakić Radoš, S., Matijaš, M., Brekalo, M., Hollins Martin, C. J., & Martin, C. R. (2022). Further validation of the birth satisfaction scale-revised: Factor structure, validity, and reliability. Current Psychology, 42(16), 13693–13702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-02688-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nespoli, A., Colciago, E., Fumagalli, S., Locatelli, A., Hollins Martin, C. J., & Martin, C. R. (2020). Validation and factor structure of the Italian version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R). Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 39(5), 516–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2020.1836333
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quynh, L. H. C. (2021). The influences of collectivism on vietnamese communication style. International Journal of Research in Engineering, Science and Management, 4(7), 10–14. https://journal.ijresm.com/index.php/ijresm/article/view/930
   Google Scholar
• Ratislavova, K., Hendrych Lorenzova, E., Hollins Martin, C. J., & Martin, C. R. (2022). Translation and validation of the Czech Republic version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R). Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 42(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2022.2067837
   Google Scholar
• Revelle, W. (2022). Psych: Procedures for psychological, psychometric, and personality research (Version R package version 2.2.9). Northwestern University. Retrieved from https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych.
   Google Scholar
• Romero-Gonzalez, B., Peralta-Ramirez, M. I., Caparros-Gonzalez, R. A., Cambil-Ledesma, A., Hollins Martin, C. J., & Martin, C. R. (2019). Spanish validation and factor structure of the Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R). Midwifery, 70, 31–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2018.12.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shuman, H. L., Grupp, A. M., Robb, L. A., Akers, K. G., Bedi, G., Shah, M. A., Caldart, C. G., Gupta, U., Vaghasia, J. K., Panneerselvam, A., Kazeem, A. O., Amutah-Onukagha, N. N., Levine, D. L., & Janis, A. (2023). Approaches and geographical locations of respectful maternity care research: A scoping review. Public Library of Science ONE, 18(8), e0290434. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290434
   Google Scholar
• Skodova, Z., Nepelova, Z., Grendar, M., & Baskova, M. (2019). Psychometric properties of the Slovak version of the Birth Satisfaction Scale (BSS) and Birth Satisfaction Scale-Revised (BSS-R). Midwifery, 79, 102550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.midw.2019.102550
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skvirsky, V., Taubman–Ben-Ari, O., Hollins Martin, C. J., & Martin, C. R. (2020). Validation of the hebrew Birth Satisfaction Scale – Revised (BSS-R) and its relationship to perceived traumatic labour. Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 38(2), 214–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2019.1600666
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiger, J. H., & Lind, J. (1980). Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the Annual Spring Meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Takegata, M., Smith, C., Nguyen, H. A. T., Thi, H. H., Thi Minh, T. N., Day, L. T., Kitamura, T., Toizumi, M., Dang, D. A., & Yoshida, L. M. (2020). Reasons for increased caesarean section rate in Vietnam: A qualitative study among Vietnamese mothers and health care professionals. Healthcare, 8(1), 41). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare8010041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tezuka, A., Hiroyama, N., Suzuki, M., Matsuoka, M., Martin, C. J. H., & Martin, C. R. (2023). Translation and validation of the Japanese version of the birth satisfaction scale‐revised. Japan Journal of Nursing Science, 21(1), e12569. https://doi.org/10.1111/jjns.12569
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiwari, S. K., Murry, L., Joshi, P., Tallanao, T., Zined, R., Hollins Martin, C. J., & Martin, C. R. (2023). Translation and validation of the Hindi-Indian version of the birth satisfaction scale-revised. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research, 49(3), 938–945. https://doi.org/10.1111/jog.15520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vu, D. H., Ta, B. T., Aasen, I. L., Le, D. Q., Mathisen, R., Becker, G. E., Phan, H. T., Bui, C. M., Nguyen, T. T. K., Hoang, S. T. T., & Cashin, J. (2023, September). Promoting respectful maternity care by reducing unnecessary episiotomies: Experiences from centers of excellence for breastfeeding in Vietnam. Healthcare, 11(18), 2520). MDPI. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11182520
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2012). Translation and linguistic evaluation protocoal and supporting material. who.int/mediacentre/data
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2016). International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems 10th Revision. https://icd.who.int/browse10/2016/en
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. (2018). Recommendations: Intrapartum care for apositive childbirth experience. who.int.iris.bitstream
   Google Scholar
• Zinbarg, R. E., Revelle, W., Yovel, I., & Li, W. (2005). Cronbach’s α, Revelle’s β, and McDonald’s ωh: Their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika, 70(1), 123–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11336-003-0974-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar