Productivity and impact in advertising research since the millennium: a profiling and investigation of drivers of impact

References

• Ayres, I., and F.E. Vars. 2000. Determinants of citations to articles in elite law reviews. The Journal of Legal Studies 29, no. 1: 427–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baldi, S. 1998. Normative versus social constructivist processes in the allocation of citations: A network-analytic model. American Sociological Review 63, no. 6, 829–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, T.E. 1990. Publication productivity in the three leading US advertising journals: Inaugural issues through 1988. Journal of Advertising 19, no. 1: 52–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyer, J.M., R.G. Chanove, and W.B. Fox. 1995. The review process and the fates of manuscripts submitted to AMJ. Academy of Management Journal 38, no. 5: 1219–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20, no. 1: 37–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, J.R., and S. Cole. 1973. Social stratification in science. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Faber, R.J. 2015. Peeking under the curtain and over the horizon: The reflections of another former editor. Journal of Advertising 44, no. 3: 289–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, J.B., and A. Merchant 2008. A ten-year retrospective of advertising research productivity, 1997–2006. Journal of Advertising 37, no. 3: 69–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geuna, A., and B.R. Martin. 2003. University research evaluation and funding: An international comparison. Minerva 41, no. 4: 277–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, G.N. 1977. Referencing as persuasion. Social Studies of Science, 7, no. 1: 113–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harzing, A.W., and R. Van Der Wal. 2009. A Google scholar H‐index for journals: An alternative metric to measure journal impact in economics and business. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60, no. 1: 41–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henthorne, T. L., M.S. LaTour, and T. Loraas. 1998. Publication productivity in the three leading US advertising journals: 1989 through 1996. Journal of Advertising 27, no. 2: 53–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hult, G.T.M., W.T. Neese, and R.E. Bashaw. 1997. Faculty perceptions of marketing journals. Journal of Marketing Education 19, no. 1: 37–52.
   Google Scholar
• Judge, T.A., D. M. Cable, A.E. Colbert, and S.L. Rynes. 2007. What causes a management article to be cited – article, author, or journal? Academy of Management Journal 50, no. 3: 491–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K., J.L. Hayes, J.A. Avant, and L.N. Reid. 2014. Trends in advertising research: A longitudinal analysis of leading advertising, marketing, and communication journals, 1980 to 2010. Journal of Advertising 43, no. 3: 296–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaBand, D.N., and M.J. Piette. 1994. A citation analysis of the impact of blinded peer review. Journal of the American Medical Association 272, no. 2: 147–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis, J.R., and G.G. Koch. 1977. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, no. 1: 159–74.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maslowska, E., E.G. Smit, and B. van den Putte. 2013. Assessing the cross-cultural applicability of tailored advertising: A comparative study between the Netherlands and Poland. International Journal of Advertising 32, no. 4: 487–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muncy, J.A. 1991. The Journal of Advertising: A twenty year appraisal. Journal of Advertising 20, no. 4: 1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasadeos, Y. 1985. A bibliometric study of advertising citations. Journal of Advertising 14, no. 4, 52–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasadeos, Y., J. Phelps, and B.H. Kim. 1998. Disciplinary impact of advertising scholars: Temporal comparisons of influential authors, works and research networks. Journal of Advertising 27, no. 4: 53–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, H.P.F., and A.R.J. van Raan. 1994. On determinants of citation scores: A case study in chemical engineering. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 45, no. 1: 39–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitt, L.F., P. Berthon, A. Caruana, and J.P. Berthon. 2005. The state of theory in three premier advertising journals: A research note. International Journal of Advertising 24, no. 2: 241–9.
   Google Scholar
• Polonsky, M., and L. Carlson. 2009. Is there global inclusion of authors in the five leading advertising journals? A regional comparison 1998–2007. International Journal of Advertising 28, no. 4: 691–714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, W.J., and K. Riddle. 2007. A content analysis of the media effects literature. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 84, no. 1: 90–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajabi, M., N. Dens, and P. De Pelsmacker. 2015. Advertising adaptation versus standardization effectiveness in open and closed markets. In Advances in advertising research, eds. I.B Banks, P. De Pelsmaker, and S. Okazaki, Vol. 5, 177–90, Fachmedien Wiesbaden: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, L.N. 2014. Green grass, high cotton: Reflections on the evolution of the journal of advertising. Journal of Advertising 43, no. 4: 410–6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, J.T., and C.H. Martin. 1976. Sources of scholarly publications in marketing, advertising, and public relations. Journal of Advertising 5, no. 3: 29–34.
   Google Scholar
• Siemens, J.C., S. Burton, T. Jensen, and N.A. Mendoza. 2005. An examination of the relationship between research productivity in prestigious business journals and popular press business school rankings. Journal of Business Research 58, no. 4: 467–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soley, L.C., and L.N. Reid. 1983. Advertising article productivity of the US academic community. Journalism Quarterly 60, no. 3: 464–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soley, L.C., and L.N. Reid. 1988. Advertising article productivity updated. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 65, no. 1: 157–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stremersch, S., I. Verniers, and P.C. Verhoef. 2007. The quest for citations: Drivers of article impact. Journal of Marketing 71, no. 3: 171–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C.R. 2005. Moving international advertising research forward: A new research agenda. Journal of Advertising 34, no. 1: 7–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theoharakis, V., and A. Hirst. 2002. Perceptual differences of marketing journals: A worldwide perspective. Marketing Letters 13, no. 4: 389–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dalen, H., and K. Henkens. 2001. What makes a scientific article influential? The case of demographers. Scientometrics 50, no. 3: 455–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, D. 2007. Directions in marketing communications research: An analysis of the International Journal of Advertising. International Journal of Advertising 26, no. 4: 543–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yale, L., and M.C. Gilly. 1988. Trends in advertising research: A look at the content of marketing-oriented journals from 1976 to 1985. Journal of Advertising 17, no. 1: 12–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zinkhan, G. M., and T.W. Leigh. 1999. Assessing the quality ranking of the journal of advertising, 1986–1997. Journal of Advertising 28, no. 2: 51–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou, S. 2005. Contributions to international advertising research: An assessment of the literature between 1990 and 2002. Journal of Advertising 34, no. 1: 99–110.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar