Brand placement repetition in a fictional text

References

• Alter, A. 2012. Your e-book is reading you. The Wall Street Journal, July 19, http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052702304870304577490950051438304
   Google Scholar
• Alter, A. 2014. E-Book mingles love and product placement. The New York Times, November 2, http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/03/business/media/e-book-mingles-love-and-product-placement.html?_r=0
   Google Scholar
• Altmann, U., I. Bohrn, O. Lubrich, W. Menninghaus, and A. Jacobs. 2012. Fact vs fiction – how paratextual information shapes our reading processes. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience 9, no. 1: 22–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appel, M., and T. Richter. 2010. Transportation and need for affect in narrative persuasion: A mediated moderation model. Media Psychology 13, no. 2: 101–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, J. 1988. A twist in the tale. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Arnold, M. 2001. Making books: Placed products and their cost. The New York Times, September 13, http://www.nytimes.com/2001/09/13/books/making-books-placed-products-and-their-cost.html
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, C. 2003. Merger of advertising and content worries consumers. Advertising Age, January 6, http://adage.com/article/media/merger-advertising-content-worries-consumers/36541/
   Google Scholar
• Author Earnings. 2015. September 2015 Author Earnings Report. http://authorearnings.com/report/september-2015-author-earnings-report/
   Google Scholar
• Bhatnagar, N., L. Aksoy, and S. A. Malkoc. 2004. Embedding brands within media content: The impact of message, media, and consumer characteristics on placement efficacy. In The psychology of media entertainment: Blurring the lines between entertainment and persuasion, ed. L.J. Shrum, 99–116. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatnagar, N., and F. Wan. 2011. Is self-character similarity always beneficial? Journal of Advertising 40, no. 2: 39–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, I. 2008. Brand placement in novels: A test of the generation effect. International Journal of Advertising 27, no. 4: 495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan, I., and D. McCalman. 2011. Word-of-author advertising in textbooks: The role of brand familiarity and placement repetition on recall and recognition. Academy of Marketing Studies Journal 15, no. 1: 125–137.
   Google Scholar
• Britton, B., and A. Tesser. 1982. Effects of prior knowledge on use of cognitive capacity in three complex cognitive tasks. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 21, no. 4: 421–436.
   Google Scholar
• Busselle, R., and H. Bilandzic. 2009. Measuring narrative engagement. Media Psychology 12, no. 4: 321–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J., and R. Petty. 1979. Effects of message repetition and position on cognitive response, recall, and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37, no. 1: 97–109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J., and R. Petty. 1982. The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 42, no. 1: 116–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J., R. Petty, J. Feinstein, and W. Jarvis. 1996. Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin 119, no. 2: 197–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calder, B., and B. Sternthal. 1980. Television commercial wearout: An information processing view. Journal of Marketing Research 17, no. 2: 173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, M., and K. Keller. 2003. Brand familiarity and advertising repetition effects. Journal of Consumer Research 30, no. 2: 292–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cauberghe, V., and P. De Pelsmacker. 2010. Advergames: The impact of brand prominence and game repetition on brand responses. Journal of Advertising 39, no. 1: 5–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christenson, P., D. F. Roberts, and N. Bjork. 2012. Booze, drugs, and pop music: Trends in substance portrayals in the Billboard top 100—1968–2008. Substance Use and Misuse 47: 121–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, A., and E. Loftus. 1975. A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review 82, no. 6: 407–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cranwell, J., R. Murray, S. Lewis, J. Leonardi-Bee, M. Dockrell, and J. Britton. 2015. Adolescents’ exposure to tobacco and alcohol content in YouTube music videos. Addiction 110, no. 4: 703–711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dal Cin, S., B. Gibson, M. Zanna, R. Shumate, and G. Fong. 2007. Smoking in movies, implicit associations of smoking with the self, and intentions to smoke. Psychological Science 18, no. 7: 559–563.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dens, N., and P. De Pelsmacker. 2010. Advertising for extensions: moderating effects of extension type, advertising strategy, and product category involvement on extension evaluation. Marketing Letters 21, no. 2: 175–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dens, N., P. De Pelsmacker, M. Wouters, and N. Purnawirawan. 2012. Do you like what you recognize? The effects of brand placement prominence and movie plot connection on brand attitude as mediated by recognition. Journal of Advertising 41, no.3: 35–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finn, B., and H. Roediger III. 2013. Interfering effects of retrieval in learning new information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 39, no. 6: 1665–1681.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishbein, M., and I. Ajzen. 1974. Attitudes towards objects as predictors of single and multiple behavioral criteria. Psychological Review 81, no. 1: 59–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzhugh, B. 2000. To sell out takes a lot of bottle. The Guardian, November 6, http://www.theguardian.com/media/2000/nov/06/books.pressandpublishing
   Google Scholar
• Fleischhauser, M., S. Enge, B. Brocke, J. Ullrich, and A. Strobel. 2010. Same or different? Clarifying the relationship of need for cognition to personality and intelligence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 36, no. 1: 82–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flood, A. 2014. The car's the star: William Boyd gets into Land Rover tie-in deal. The Guardian, November 13, http://www.theguardian.com/books/2014/nov/13/william-boyd-land-rover-product-placement
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. 1985. The changing language of a consumer society: Brand name usage in popular American novels in the postwar era. Journal of Consumer Research 11, no. 4: 927.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friestad, M., and P. Wright. 1994. The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research 21, no. 1: 1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaughran, D. 2012. Writers, James Bond, and the perils of product placement. Huffington Post, April 19, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/18/product-placement-books-james-bond_n_1435824.html
   Google Scholar
• Green, M. C., J. Garst, and T.C. Brock. 2004. The power of fiction: Determinants and boundaries. In The psychology of entertainment media: Blurring the lines between entertainment and persuasion, ed. L. J. Shrum, 161–76. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Green, M., and T. Brock. 2000. The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 79, no. 5: 701–721.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, M. C., and T.C. Brock. 2002. In the mind's eye: Transportation-imagery model of narrative persuasion. In Narrative impact: Social and cognitive foundation, ed. M. C. Green, J. J. Strange, and T. C. Brock, 315–342. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Green, M., S. Kass, J. Carrey, B. Herzig, R. Feeney, and J. Sabini. 2008. Transportation across media: Repeated exposure to print and film. Media Psychology 11, no. 4: 512–539.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, P. B., and S. J. Gould. 1997. Consumers' perceptions of the ethics and acceptability of product placements in movies: Product category and individual differences. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 19, no. 1: 37–50.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta P. B., S. J. Gould, and S. Grabner-Kräuter. 2000. Product placements in movies: A cross-cultural analysis of Austrian, French and American consumers’ attitudes towards this emerging, international promotional medium. Journal of Advertising 29, no. 4: 41–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, P., and K. Lord. 1998. Product placement in movies: The effect of prominence and mode on audience recall. Journal of Current Issues & Research In Advertising 20, no. 1: 47–59.
   Google Scholar
• Ham, C.D., M.R. Nelson, and S. Das. 2015. How to measure persuasion knowledge. International Journal of Advertising 34, no 1: 17–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hakemulder, F. 2011. Ways to engage readers: Relevance in the scientific study of literature. Scientific Study of Literature 1, no. 1: 144–152.
   Google Scholar
• Haugtvedt, C., R. Petty, and J. Cacioppo. 1992. Need for cognition and advertising: Understanding the role of personality variables in consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology 1, no. 3: 239–260.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. 2012. PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Homer, P. M. 2009. Product placements: The impact of placement type and repetition on attitude. Journal of Advertising 38, no 3: 21–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, E. 2012. Hard sellers. Financial Times, May 18, http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/85ce1ede-9aae-11e1-9c98-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3SrQlmy8C
   Google Scholar
• Kamleitner, B., and A. K. Jyote. 2013. How using versus showing interaction between characters and products boosts product placement effectiveness. International Journal of Advertising 32, no. 4: 633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karrh, J. 1998. Brand placement: A review. Journal of Current Issues & Research In Advertising 20, no. 2: 31–49.
   Google Scholar
• Karrh, J. A., K. B. McKee, and C. J. Pardun. 2003. Practitioners’ evolving views on product placement effectiveness. Journal of Advertising Research, 43, no. 2: 138–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, K. 1993. Conceptualizing, measuring, and managing customer-based brand equity. Journal of Marketing 57, no. 1: 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, B., B. Lang, and S. Wong. 2003. Conclusion explicitness in advertising: The moderating role of need for cognition (NFC) and argument quality (AQ) on persuasion. Journal of Advertising 32, no. 4: 57–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthes, J., and B. Naderer 2015. Product placement disclosures: Exploring the moderating effect of placement frequency on brand responses via persuasion knowledge. International Journal of Advertising 35, no. 2: 185–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthes, J., C. Schemer, and W. Wirth. 2007. More than meets the eye: Investigating the hidden impact of brand placements in television magazines. International Journal of Advertising 26, no. 4: 477–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthes, J., W. Wirth, C. Schemer, and A. Kissling. 2011. I see what you don't see. Journal of Advertising 40, no. 4: 85–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzocco, P., M. Green, J. Sasota, and N. Jones. 2010. This story is not for everyone: Transportability and narrative persuasion. Social Psychological and Personality Science 1, no. 4: 361–368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mau, G., G. Silberer, and C. Constien. 2008. Communicating brands playfully: Effects of in-game advertising for familiar and unfamiliar brands, International Journal of Advertising, 27, no. 5: 827–851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCracken, G. 1989. Who is the celebrity endorser? Cultural foundations of the endorsement process. Journal of Consumer Research 16, no. 3: 310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, S. T., L. B. Frank, M. B. Moran, and P. Patnoe-Woodley. 2011. Involved, transported, or emotional? Exploring the determinants of change in knowledge, attitudes, and behavior in entertainment-education. Journal of Communication 61, no. 3: 407–431.
   Google Scholar
• Nordhielm, C. L. 2002. The influence of level of processing on advertising repetition effects. Journal of Consumer Research 29, no. 3: 371–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, L., and E. Lanseng. 2012. Brands in texts: Attitudinal effects of brand placements in narrative fiction. Journal of Brand Management 19, no. 8: 702–711.
   Google Scholar
• Orden, E. 2011. This book brought to you by… The Wall Street Journal, April 26, http://www.wsj.com/articles/SB10001424052748704132204576285372092660548
   Google Scholar
• Owen, B., and M. Riggs. 2012. Transportation, need for cognition, and affective disposition as factors in enjoyment of film narratives. Scientific Study of Literature 2, no. 1: 128–149.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., P. Briñol, C. Loersch, and M.J. McCaslin. 2009. The need for cognition. In Handbook of individual differences in social behavior, ed. M. R. Leary and R. H. Hoyle, 318–329. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R., K. DeMarree, P. Briñol, J. Horcajo, and A. Strathman. 2008. Need for cognition can magnify or attenuate priming effects in social judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 34, no. 7: 900–912.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prentice, D., R. Gerrig, and D. Bailis. 1997. What readers bring to the processing of fictional texts. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 4, no. 3: 416–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Primack, B. A., A. C. McClure, Z. Li, and J. D. Sargent. 2014. Receptivity to and recall of alcohol brand appearances in U.S. popular music and alcohol-related behaviors. Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research 38, no. 6: 1737–1744.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redker, C., B. Gibson, and I. Zimmerman. 2013. The effects of background product placement and movie genre on implicit brand attitudes. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 35, 249–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rentfrow, P. J., L. R., Goldberg, and R. Zilca. 2011. Listening, watching, and reading: The structure and correlates of entertainment preferences. Journal of Personality 79, no. 2: 223–257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, C. 2002. Investigating the effectiveness of product placements in television shows: The role of modality and plot connection congruence on brand memory and attitude. Journal of Consumer Research 29, no. 3: 306–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, C., V. Regnier-Denois, B. Chapoton, and D. Buhrau. 2015. Substance messages in music videos and youths’ substance-related views and consumption: The role of connectedness. (Working paper).
   Google Scholar
• Russell, C. A., and D. W. Russell. 2009. Alcohol messages in prime-time television series. Journal of Consumer Affairs 43, no. 1: 108–128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, C., and B. Stern. 2006. Consumers, characters, and products: A balance model of sitcom product placement effects. Journal of Advertising 35, no. 1: 7–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadowski, C. J., and H. E. Cogburn. 1997. Need for cognition in the Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Psychology 131, no 3: 307–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schemer, C., J. Matthes, W. Wirth, and S. Textor. 2008. Does “passing the Courvoisier” always pay off? Positive and negative evaluative conditioning effects of brand placements in music videos. Psychology and Marketing 25, no. 10: 923–943.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, D., and J. Kim. 2011. Alcohol product placements and the third-person effect. Television & New Media 12, no. 5: 412–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shiv, B., J. Edell, and J. Payne. 1997. Factors affecting the impact of negatively and positively framed ad messages. Journal of Consumer Research 24, no. 3: 285–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slater, M., and D. Rouner. 2002. Entertainment-education and elaboration likelihood: Understanding the processing of narrative persuasion. Communication Theory 12, no. 2: 173–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spears, N., and S. N. Singh. 2004. Measuring attitude toward the brand and purchase intentions. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising 26, no. 2: 53–66.
   Google Scholar
• Spiller, S., G. Fitzsimons, J. Lynch, and G. McClelland. 2013. Spotlights, floodlights, and the magic number zero: Simple effects tests in moderated regression. Journal of Marketing Research 50, no. 2: 277–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sujan, M. 1985. Consumer knowledge: Effects on evaluation strategies mediating consumer judgments. Journal of Consumer Research 12, no. 1: 31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sung, Y., F. de Gregorio, and J. Jung. 2009. Non-student consumer attitudes towards product placement. International Journal of Advertising 28, no. 2: 257–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tal-Or, N., and J. Cohen. 2010. Understanding audience involvement: Conceptualizing and manipulating identification and transportation. Poetics 38, no. 4: 402–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, R., and G. Haddock. 2012. Sometimes stories sell: When are narrative appeals most likely to work? Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 42, no. 1: 92–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tukachinsky, R. 2012. Processing mode and actor-character congruency as moderators of narratives’ effects on viewers’ attitudes. PhD diss., Univ. Arizona.
   Google Scholar
• Tukachinsky, R. 2014. Experimental manipulation of psychological involvement with media. Communication Methods and Measures 8, no. 1: 1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Van Laer, T., K. de Ruyter, L. Visconti, and M. Wetzels. 2014. The extended transportation-imagery model: A meta-analysis of the antecedents and consequences of consumers’ narrative transportation. Journal of Consumer Research 40, no. 5: 797–817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Reijmersdal, E. 2009. Brand placement prominence: Good for memory! Bad for attitudes? Journal of Advertising Research 49, no. 2: 151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Vaerenbergh, Y., D. Van de Sompel, N. Van Loock, and I. Vermeir. 2011. The impact of brand name placement in song lyrics on brand attitudes: Does the attitude toward the artist matter? In Advances in advertising research : Breaking new grounds in theory and practice, ed. Shintaro Okazaki, Vol. 2: 21–33. Gabler Verlag, Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden GmbH.
   Google Scholar
• Verhellen, Y., N. Dens, and P. De Pelsmacker. 2015. Do I know you? How brand familiarity and perceived fit affect consumers attitudes towards brands placed in movies. Marketing Letters. doi:10.1007/s11002-015-9347–0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, M., E. Fischer, and K. Main. 2008. An examination of the effects of activating persuasion knowledge on consumer response to brands engaging in covert marketing. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 27, no. 1: 34–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weldon, F. 2001. The Bulgari connection. London: Atlantic Press.
   Google Scholar
• West, S., L. Aiken, and J. Krull. 1996. Experimental personality designs: Analyzing categorical by continuous variable interactions. Journal of Personality 64, no. 1: 1–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheeler, C., M. Green, and T. Brock. 1999. Fictional narratives change beliefs: Replications of Prentice, Gerrig, and Bailis (1997) with mixed corroboration. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 6, no. 1: 136–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witkin, H. 1950. Individual differences in ease of perception of embedded figures. Journal of personality 19, no. 1: 1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R. 1994. Effect of genre expectations on text comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 20, no. 4: 920–933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwarun, L., and A. Hall. 2012. Narrative persuasion, transportation, and the role of need for cognition in online viewing of fantastical films. Media Psychology 15, no. 3: 327–355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar