Processes and effects of targeted online advertising among children

References

• Aguirre, E., D. Mahr, D. Grewal, K. de Ruyter, and M. Wetzels. 2014. Unraveling the personalization paradox: The effect of information collection and trust-building strategies on online advertisement effectiveness. Journal of Retailing 91, no. 1: 34–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambani, S.S. 2006. U.S. patent No. 7,117,173. Washington, DC: U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.
   Google Scholar
• Antheunis, M.L., and G. Van Noort. 2012. Personalized advertising campaigns in social network sites: Are there potential hazards or opportunities? Paper Presented at the international conference on Research in Advertising ICORIA, June, in Stockholm, Sweden.
   Google Scholar
• Baek, T.H., and M. Morimoto. 2012. Stay away from me. Journal of Advertising 41, no. 1: 59–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergkvist, L., and J.R. Rossiter. 2007. The predictive value of multiple-item versus single-item measures of the same constructs. Journal of Marketing Research 44: 175–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bleier, A., and M. Eisenbeiss. 2015. The importance of trust for personalized online advertising. Journal of Retailing 91, no. 3: 390–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgers, N., E. De Leeuw, and J. Hox. 2000. Children as respondents in survey research: Cognitive development and response quality. Bulletin De Méthodologie Sociologique 66: 60–75.
   Google Scholar
• Borgers, N., J. Hox, and D. Sikkel. 2004. Response effects in surveys on children and adolescents: The effect of number of response options, negative wording, and neutral mid-point. Quality and Quantity 38: 17–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boush, D.M., M. Friestad, and G. Rose. 1994. Adolescent scepticism toward TV advertising and knowledge of advertiser tactics. Journal of Consumer Research 21, no. 1: 165–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brehm, S.S., and J.W. Brehm. 1981. Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, I., and L.A. Babin. 2004. Brand placement recognition: The influence of presentation mode and brand familiarity. Journal of Promotion Management 10, no. 1/2: 185–202.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S.P., and D.M. Stayman. 1992. Antecedents and consequences of attitude toward the ad: A meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Research 19(June): 34--51.
   Google Scholar
• Buijzen, M., E.A. Van Reijmersdal, and L.H. Owen. 2010. Introducing the PCMC model: An investigative framework for young people's processing of commercialized media content. Communication Theory 20, no. 4: 427–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, B.M. 2013. Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Oxford, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Calvert, S.L. 2008. Children as consumers: Advertising and marketing. The Future of Children 18, no. 1: 205–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaiken, S. 1980. Heuristic versus systematic information processing in the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39: 752–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chartrand, T.L. 2005. The role of conscious awareness in consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology 15, no. 3: 203–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cho, C. 2003. Factors influencing clicking of banner ads on the www. Cyberpsychology and Behaviour 6, no. 2: 201–15.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cho, C., and H.J. Cheon. 2004. Why do people avoid advertising on the internet? Journal of Advertising 33, no. 4: 89–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'Alessio, M., Laghi, F. and Baiocco. R. 2009. Attitudes toward TV advertising: A measure for children. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 30, no. 4: 409–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Keyzer, F., N. Dens, and P. De Pelsmacker. 2015. Is this for me? How consumers respond to personalized advertising on social network sites. Journal of Interactive Advertising 15, no. 2: 124–34.
   Google Scholar
• Derbaix, C., and C. Pecheux. 2003. A new scale to assess children's attitude toward TV advertising. Journal of Advertising Research 43, no. 4: 390–9.
   Google Scholar
• Duimel, M. 2010. Hyves. In Contact! children and new media, ed. J. De Haan and R. Pijpers, 121–38. Houten: Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum.
   Google Scholar
• Facebook. 2012. Facebook ads: What are facebook ads? www.facebook.com/help/?page=856 ( accessed October 18, 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Friestad, M., and P. Wright. 1994. The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts. Journal of Consumer Research 22, no. 1: 1–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gollety, M., and N. Guichard. 2011. The dilemma of flavor and color in the choice of packaging by children. Young Consumers 12, no. 1: 82–90.
   Google Scholar
• Greig, A.D., J. Taylor, and T. MacKay. 2007. Doing research with children. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A.F. 2013. Introduction to mediation, moderation and conditional process analyses. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heath, R. 2000. Low involvement processing – a new model of brands and advertising. International Journal of Advertising 19, no. 3: 287–98.
   Google Scholar
• Henseler, J., Ch.M. Ringle, and M. Sarstedt. 2015. A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 43, no. 1: 115–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoekstra, J.C., and J. Van Doorn. 2013. Customization of online offers: The role of intrusiveness. Marketing Letters 24, no. 4: 339–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John, D.R. 1999. Consumer socialization of children: A retrospective look at twenty-five years of research. Journal of Consumer Research 26, no. 3: 183–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., Jeen-Su Lim, and Bhargava. M. 1998. The role of affect in attitude formation: A classical conditioning approach. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 26, no. 2: 143–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R.B. 2005. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Köster, M., M. Rüth, K.C. Hamborg, and K. Kaspar. 2015. Effects of personalized banner ads on visual attention and recognition memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology 29, no. 2: 181–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kreuter, M.W., and R.J. Wray. 2003. Tailored and targeted health communication: Strategies for enhancing information relevance. American Journal of Health Behavior 27: 227–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingstone, S. 2009. Debating children's susceptibility to persuasion – where does fairness come in? International Journal of Advertising 28, no. 1: 170–4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, S.B., R.J. Lutz, and G.E. Belch. 1986. The role of attitude toward the ad as a mediator of advertising effectiveness: A test of competing explanations. Journal of Marketing Research 23, no. 2: 130–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahr, D., K. De Ruyter, M. Wetzels, and D. Grewal. 2012. The impact of vulnerability during covert personalization: A regulatory mode approach. Paper presented at the annual conference of the European Marketing Academy, June, in Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Maslowska, E., S.J. H.M. Van den Putte, and E.G. Smit. 2011. The effectiveness of personalized E-mail newsletters and the role of personal characteristics. Cyberpsychology, Behavior & Social Networking 14, no. 12: 765–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, A.A., and Olsen. J.C. 1981. Are product attribute beliefs the only mediator of advertising effects on brand attitude? Journal of Marketing Research 18, no. 3: 318–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, E.S. 2004. Children and the changing world of advertising. Journal of Business Ethics 52, no. 2: 161–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, E.S., and V.J. Rideout. 2007. The online marketing of food to children: Is it just fun and games? Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 26, no. 2: 202–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nairn, A., and C. Fine. 2008. Who's messing with my mind? The implications of dual-process models for the ethics of advertising to children. International Journal of Advertising 27, no. 3: 447–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ofcom. 2014. Children and parents: Media use and attitudes report. London: Ofcom.
   Google Scholar
• Owen, L.H., C. Lewis, S. Auty, and M. Buijzen. 2013. Is children's understanding of non-traditional advertising comparable to their understanding of television advertising? Journal of Public Policy & Marketing 32, no. 2: 195–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R.E., and J.T. Cacioppo. 1986. Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R.E., and J.T. Cacioppo. 1996. Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R.E., and J.R. Priester. 1994. Mass media attitude change: Implications of the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In Media effects: Advances in theory and research, ed. J. Bryant and D. Zillmann, 91–122. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Phelps, J.E., and M.G. Hoy. 1996. The aad-ab-pi relationship in children: The impact of brand familiarity and measurement timing. Psychology & Marketing 13, no. 1: 77–105.
   Google Scholar
• Rideout, V.J., U.G. Foehr, and D.F. Roberts. 2010. Generation M²: Media in the lives of 8- to 18-year-olds. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Rozendaal, E., M. Buijzen, and P.M. Valkenburg. 2009. Do children's cognitive advertising defenses reduce their desire for advertised products? Communications 34, no. 3: 287–303.
   Google Scholar
• Rozendaal, E., M.A. Lapierre, E.A. Van Reijmersdal, and M. Buijzen. 2011. Reconsidering advertising literacy as a defense against advertising effects. Media Psychology 14, no. 3: 333–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozendaal, E., N. Slot, E.A. Van Reijmersdal, and M. Buijzen. 2013. Children's responses to advertising in social games. Journal of Advertising 42, no. 2–3: 142–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SanJosé-Cabezudo, R., A.M. Gutiérrez-Arranz, and J. Gutiérrez-Cillán. 2009. The combined influence of central and peripheral routes in the online persuasion process. Cyberpsychology and Behaviour 12, no. 3: 299–308.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shimp, T.A., R.F. Dyer, and S.F. Divita. 1976. An experimental test of the harmful effects of premium-oriented commercials on children. Journal of Consumer Research 3, no. 1: 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shin, W., J. Huh, and R.J. Faber. 2012. Developmental antecedents to children's responses to online advertising. International Journal of Advertising 31, no. 4: 719–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tam, K.Y., and S.Y. Ho. 2006. Understanding the impact of web personalization on user information processing and decision outcomes. MIS Quarterly 30, no. 4: 865–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C.R. 2013. Customised communications. International Journal of Advertising 32, no. 4: 483–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, C.E. 2014. Social networks, personalized advertising, and privacy controls. Journal of Marketing Research 51, no. 5: 546–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turow, J., J. King, C.J. Hoofnagle, A. Bleakley, and M. Hennessy. 2009. Contrary to what marketers say, Americans reject tailored advertising and three activities that enable it. Working paper, Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Valkenburg, P.M. 2004. Children's responses to the screen: A media psychological approach. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Valkenburg, P.M., and J. Cantor. 2001. The development of a child into a consumer. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 22, no. 1: 61–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Reijmersdal, E.A., J. Jansz, O. Peters, and G. Van Noort. 2010. The effects of interactive brand placements in online games on children's cognitive, affective, and conative brand responses. Computers in Human Behavior 26, no. 6: 1787–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Reijmersdal, E.A., E. Rozendaal, and M. Buijzen. 2012. Effects of prominence, involvement, and persuasion knowledge on children's cognitive and affective responses to advergames. Journal of Interactive Marketing 26, no. 1: 33–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Reijmersdal, E.A., Smit E.G., and Neijens. P.C. 2010. How media factors affect audience responses to brand placement. International Journal of Advertising 29, no. 2: 279–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vesanen, J. 2007. What is personalization? A conceptual framework. European Journal of Marketing 41, no. 5/6: 409–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villiard, H., and M.A. Moreno. 2012. Fitness on Facebook: Advertisements generated in response to profile content. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 15, no. 10: 1–5. doi:10.1089/cyber.2011.0642
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waiguny, M.K., and R. Terlutter. 2011. Differences in children's processing of advergames and TV commercials. In Advances in advertising research, vol. 2, 35–51. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• White, T.B., D.L. Zahay, H. Thorbjørnsen, and T. Shavitt. 2008. Getting too personal: Reactance to highly personalized email solicitations. Marketing Letters 19, no. 1: 39–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, M., and D.R. Roskos-Ewoldsen. 2007. The effectiveness of brand placements in the movies: Levels of placements, explicit and implicit memory, and brand choice behavior. Journal of Communication 57, no. 3: 469–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Youn, S. 2009. Determinants of online privacy concern and its influence on privacy protection behaviors among young adolescents. Journal of Consumer Affairs 43, no. 3: 389–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar