How the level of personalization affects the effectiveness of personalized ad messages: the moderating role of narcissism

References

• Ahn, S.J., and J.N. Bailenson. 2011. Self-endorsing versus other-endorsing in virtual environments. Journal of Advertising 40, no. 2: 93–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahn, S.J.G., J. Phua, and Y. Shan. 2017. Self-endorsing in digital advertisements: Using virtual selves to persuade physical selves. Computers in Human Behavior 71: 110–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. 2013. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Washington DC: American Psychiatric Association Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Baek, T.H., C.Y. Yoo, and S. Yoon. 2018. Augment yourself through virtual mirror: The impact of self-viewing and narcissism on consumer responses. International Journal of Advertising 37, no. 3: 396–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bang, H., and B.W. Wojdynski. 2016. Tracking users' visual attention and responses to personalized advertising based on task cognitive demand. Computers in Human Behavior 55: 867–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bang, H.J., and W.N. Lee. 2016. Consumer response to Ads in social network sites: An exploration into the role of Ad location and path. Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising 37, no. 1: 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Barnard, L., M.L. Comello, and J. Edwards. 2015. The cost of creepiness: How online behavioral advertising affects consumer purchase intention. Paper presented at the 65th Annual International Communication Association (ICA) Conference, May, in San Juan, Puerto Rico.
   Google Scholar
• Bartsch, A., and A. Kloß. 2018. Personalized charity advertising. Can personalized prosocial messages promote empathy, attitude change, and helping intentions toward stigmatized social groups? International Journal of Advertising 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benway, J.P. 1998. Banner blindness: The irony of attention grabbing on the World Wide Web. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 42, no. 5: 463–67.
   Google Scholar
• Boerman, S.C., E.A. Van Reijmersdal, and P.C. Neijens. 2015. Using eye tracking to understand the effects of brand placement disclosure types in television programs. Journal of Advertising 44, no. 3: 196–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burnkrant, R.E., and H.R. Unnava. 1989. Self-referencing: A strategy for increasing processing of message content. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 15, no. 4: 628–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buss, A.H. 1995. Personality: Temperament. Social behavior, and the self. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Cai, H., V.S. Kwan, and C. Sedikides. 2012. A sociocultural approach to narcissism: The case of modern China. European Journal of Personality 26, no. 5: 529–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, W.K., A.M. Bonacci, J. Shelton, J.J. Exline, and B.J. Bushman. 2004. Psychological entitlement: Interpersonal consequences and validation of a self-report measure. Journal of Personality Assessment 83, no. 1: 29–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, W.K., A.B. Brunell, and E.J. Finkel. 2006. Narcissism, interpersonal self-regulation, and romantic relationships: An agency model approach. In Self and Relationships: Connecting intrapersonal and interpersonal processes, ed. E.J. Finkel & K.D. Vohs, 57–83. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, W.K., and J.D. Foster. 2007. The narcissistic self: Background, an extended agency model, and ongoing controversies. In The self ed. J.D. Brown, 115–38. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, W.K., C.A. Foster, and E.J. Finkel. 2002. Does self-love lead to love for others? A story of narcissistic game playing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 83, no. 2: 340–54.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, W.K., E.A. Rudich, and C. Sedikides. 2002. Narcissism, self-esteem, and the positivity of self-views: Two portraits of self-love. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 28, no. 3: 358–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, L. 1989. A comparative study of narcissism, gender, and sex-role orientation among bodybuilders, athletes, and psychology students. Psychological Reports 64, no. 3: 999–1006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cisek, S.Z., C. Sedikides, C.M. Hart, H.J. Godwin, V. Benson, and S.P. Liversedge. 2014. Narcissism and consumer behaviour: A review and preliminary findings. Frontiers in Psychology 5: 232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davenport, S.W., S.M. Bergman, J.Z. Bergman, and M.E. Fearrington. 2014. Twitter versus Facebook: Exploring the role of narcissism in the motives and usage of different social media platforms. Computers in Human Behavior 32: 212–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Bellis, E., D.E. Sprott, A. Herrmann, H.W. Bierhoff, and E. Rohmann. 2016. The influence of trait and state narcissism on the uniqueness of mass-customized products. Journal of Retailing 92, no. 2: 162–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debevec, K., and J.B. Romeo. 1992. Self-referent processing in perceptions of verbal and visual commercial information. Journal of Consumer Psychology 1, no. 1: 83–102.
   Google Scholar
• De Keyzer, F., N. Dens, and P. De Pelsmacker. 2015. Is this for me? How consumers respond to personalized advertising on social network sites. Journal of Interactive Advertising 15, no. 2: 124–34.
   Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, A. 2014. The persuasive effects of personalization through: Name mentioning in a smoking cessation message. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 24, no. 5: 393–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkstra, A., and K. Ballast. 2012. Personalization and perceived personal relevance in computer‐tailored persuasion in smoking cessation. British Journal of Health Psychology 17, no. 1: 60–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emmons, R.A. 1984. Factor analysis and construct validity of the narcissistic personality inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment 48, no. 3: 291–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evergage. 2018. 2018 Trends in Personalization Survey Report. https://www.evergage.com/resources/ebooks/trends-in-personalization-survey-report/
   Google Scholar
• Fastoso, F., B. Bartikowski, and S. Wang. 2018. The “little emperor” and the luxury brand: How overt and covert narcissism affect brand loyalty and proneness to buy counterfeits. Psychology & Marketing 35, no. 7: 522–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fornell, C., and D.F. Larcker. 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research 18, no. 1: 39–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, J.D., and W.K. Campbell. 2007. Are there such things as “narcissists” in social psychology? A taxometric analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory. Personality and Individual Differences 43, no. 6: 1321–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentile, B., J.D. Miller, B.J. Hoffman, D.E. Reidy, A. Zeichner, and W.K. Campbell. 2013. A test of two brief measures of grandiose narcissism: The Narcissistic Personality Inventory-13 and the Narcissistic Personality Inventory-16. Psychological Assessment 25, no. 4: 1120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ham, C.D. 2017. Exploring how consumers cope with online behavioral advertising. International Journal of Advertising 36, no. 4: 632–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harman, D. 1967. A single factor test of common method variance. Journal of Psychology 35, no. 1967: 359–78.
   Google Scholar
• Hayes, A.F. 2017. Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hong, J.W., and G.M. Zinkhan. 1995. Self‐concept and advertising effectiveness: The influence of congruency, conspicuousness, and response mode. Psychology & Marketing, 12, no. 1: 53–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, D.J., and R.A. Kerin. 2004. The effects of personalized product recommendations on advertisement response rates: The “try this. It works!” technique. Journal of Consumer Psychology 14, no. 3: 271–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, D.J., and R.A. Kerin. 2011. The effects of name similarity on message processing and persuasion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 47, no. 1: 63–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, P.O., and J. Neyman. 1936. Tests of certain linear hypotheses and their application to some educational problems. Statistical Research Memoirs. 1: 57–93.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, L.L., and A.B. Brunell. 2014. Clever and crude but not kind: Narcissism, self-esteem, and the self-reference effect. Memory 22, no. 4: 307–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ketelaar, P.E., S.F. Bernritter, J. van't Riet, A.E. Hühn, T.J. van Woudenberg, B.C. Müller, and L. Janssen. 2017. Disentangling location-based advertising: The effects of location congruency and medium type on consumers' ad attention and brand choice. International Journal of Advertising 36, no. 2: 356–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., D. Choi, & H. Kim. 2019. Advertising nativeness as a function of content and design congruence. International Journal of Advertising, 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Lambert, A., and J. Desmond. 2013. Loyal now, but not forever! A study of narcissism and male consumer–brand relationships. Psychology & Marketing, 30, no. 8: 690–706.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, A. 2006. Using the limited capacity model of motivated mediated message processing to design effective cancer communication messages. Journal of Communication 56: 57–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, A.Y., and J.L. Aaker. 2004. Bringing the frame into focus: The influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 86, no. 2: 205–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C.K.C., N. Fernandez, and B.A. Martin. 2002. Using self-referencing to explain the effectiveness of ethnic minority models in advertising. International Journal of Advertising 21, no. 3: 367–79.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, S.Y., A.P. Gregg, and S.H. Park. 2013. The person in the purchase: Narcissistic consumers prefer products that positively distinguish them. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 105, no. 2: 335–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, C., and S. Kalyanaraman. 2013. “I, me, mine” or “us, we, ours?”: The influence of cultural psychology on web-based customization. Media Psychology 16, no. 3: 272–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, C., S. Kalyanaraman, and Y.R. Du. 2011. Moderating effects of collectivism on customized communication: A test with tailored and targeted messages. Asian Journal of Communication 21, no. 6: 575–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, S.B., and R.J. Lutz. 1989. An empirical examination of the structural antecedents of attitude toward the ad in an advertising pretesting context. The Journal of Marketing 48–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malheiros, M., C. Jennett, S. Patel, S. Brostoff, and M.A. Sasse. 2012. Too close for comfort: A study of the effectiveness and acceptability of rich-media personalized advertising. Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 53, no. 2: 579–88. ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Maslowska, E., E.G. Smit, and B. van den Putte. 2013. Assessing the cross-cultural applicability of tailored advertising: A comparative study between the Netherlands and Poland. International Journal of Advertising 32, no. 4: 487–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maslowska, E., E.G. Smit, and B. van den Putte. 2016. It is all in the name: A study of consumers' responses to personalized communication. Journal of Interactive Advertising 16, no. 1: 74–85.
   Google Scholar
• McGuire, W.J., C.V. McGuire, and W. Winton. 1979. Effects of household sex composition on the salience of one's gender in the spontaneous self-concept. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 15, no. 1: 77–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moon, J.H., E. Lee, J.A. Lee, T.R. Choi, and Y. Sung. 2016. The role of narcissism in self-promotion on Instagram. Personality and Individual Differences 101: 22–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, K. 2016. The rise of personalized marketing. Adweek, http://www.adweek.com/digital/the-rise-of-personalized-marketing-infographic/
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen Norman Group 2016. Customization vs. Personalization in the User Experience. https://www.nngroup.com/articles/customization-personalization/
   Google Scholar
• Noar, S.M., C.N. Benac, and M.S. Harris. 2007. Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychological Bulletin 133, no. 4: 673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nowak, G.J., S. Shamp, B. Hollander, and G.T. Cameron. 1999. Interactive media: A means for more meaningful advertising. In Advertising and the world wide web, ed. D.W. Schumann and E. Thorson, 197–215. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Pavlou, P.A., and D.W. Stewart. 2000. Measuring the effects and effectiveness of interactive advertising: A research agenda. Journal of Interactive Advertising 1, no. 1: 61–77.
   Google Scholar
• Perez, D., and Y. Steinhart. 2014. Not so personal: The benefits of social identity ad appeals with activation in advertising. Social Influence 9, no. 3: 224–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raskin, R., & H. Terry. 1988. A principal-components analysis of the Narcissistic Personality Inventory and further evidence of its construct validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54, no. 5: 890–902.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riketta, M. 2008. The causal relation between job attitudes and performance: A meta-analysis of panel studies. Journal of Applied Psychology 93, no. 2: 472–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robins, R.W., and O.P. John. 1997. Effects of visual perspective and narcissism on self-perception: Is seeing believing? Psychological Science 8, no. 1: 37–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, T.B., N.A. Kuiper, and W.S. Kirker. 1977. Self-reference and the encoding of personal information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 35, no. 9: 677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, P. 2007. Mediators of the association between narcissism and compulsive buying: The roles of materialism and impulse control. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors 21, no. 4: 576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawyer, J. 2017. Segmentation vs personalization: They’re not the same. Kickdynamic. https://www.kickdynamic.com/email-segmentation-email-personalization/
   Google Scholar
• Sedikides, C., S. Cisek, and C.M. Hart. 2011. Narcissism and brand name consumerism. In The handbook of narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder: Theoretical approaches, empirical findings, and treatments, ed. W.K. Campbell, 382–92. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Sedikides, C., A.P. Gregg, S. Cisek, and C.M. Hart. 2007. The I that buys: Narcissists as consumers. Journal of Consumer Psychology 17, no. 4: 254–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sedikides, C., E.A. Rudich, A.P. Gregg, M. Kumashiro, and C. Rusbult. 2004. Are normal narcissists psychologically healthy?: Self-esteem matters. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 87, no 3: 400–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sohl, S.J., and A. Moyer. 2007. Tailored interventions to promote mammography screening: A meta-analytic review. Preventive Medicine 45, no. 4: 252–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiller, S.A., G.J. Fitzsimons, J.G. Lynch Jr., and G.H. McClelland. 2013. Spotlights, floodlights, and the magic number zero: Simple effects tests in moderated regression. Journal of Marketing Research 50, no. 2: 277–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sung, Y., J.A. Lee, E. Kim, and S.M. Choi. 2016. Why we post selfies: Understanding motivations for posting pictures of oneself. Personality and Individual Differences 97: 260–5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tam, K.Y., and S.Y. Ho. 2005. Web personalization as a persuasion strategy: An elaboration likelihood model perspective. Information Systems Research 16, no. 3: 271–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The EcoTech Report. 2016. How to win the hearts, minds and wallets of adult Millennials with technology that flatters the ego and indulges the cult of the self. https://syzygy-net.s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/uploads/media/580e3408a0cb1/syzygy-us-egotech-report-oct2016-3-ar-gn.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Tsang, M.M., S.C. Ho, and T.P. Liang. 2004. Consumer attitudes toward mobile advertising: An empirical study. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 8, no. 3: 65–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, N.S. 2014. Bisexual politics: Theories, queries, and visions. Binghamton, NY: Harrington Park Press.
   Google Scholar
• Twenge, J.M., and W.K. Campbell. 2009. The narcissism epidemic: Living in the age of entitlement. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Twenge, J.M., and J.D. Foster. 2010. Birth cohort increases in narcissistic personality traits among American college students, 1982–2009. Social Psychological and Personality Science 1, no. 1: 99–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Broeck, E., K. Poels, and M. Walrave. 2015. Older and wiser? Facebook use, privacy concern, and privacy protection in the life stages of emerging, young, and middle adulthood. Social Media + Society 1, no. 2: 1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Reijmersdal, E.A., E. Rozendaal, N. Smink, G. van Noort, and M. Buijzen. 2017. Processes and effects of targeted online advertising among children. International Journal of Advertising 36, no. 3: 396–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, H.M., and R.F. Baumeister. 2002. The performance of narcissists rises and falls with perceived opportunity for glory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 82, no. 5: 819–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, T.B., D.L. Zahay, H. Thorbj⊘rnsen, and S. Shavitt. 2008. Getting too personal: Reactance to highly personalized email solicitations. Marketing Letters 19, no. 1: 39–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolin, L., and P. Korgaonkar. 2005. Web advertising: Gender differences in beliefs, attitudes, and behavior. Journal of Interactive Advertising 6: 125–36.
   Google Scholar
• Wottrick, V.M., P.W.J. Verlegh, and E.G. Smit. 2017. The role of customization, brand trust, and privacy concerns in advergaming. International Journal of Advertising 36, no. 1: 60–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarouali, B., K. Poels, M. Walrave, and K. Ponnet. 2018. The impact of regulatory focus on adolescents’ evaluation of targeted advertising on social networking sites. International Journal of Advertising 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar